Origen-chan 🇻🇦

70 posts

Origen-chan 🇻🇦 banner
Origen-chan 🇻🇦

Origen-chan 🇻🇦

@ModernOrigen

Chudmaxxed Catholicel. High Marshal of the Race War. The last of my kind.

California Katılım Mart 2026
106 Takip Edilen32 Takipçiler
猫パンダ
猫パンダ@pika_nekopanda·
海外ニキに質問です。 日本語ってどんなふうに聞こえてるの?
日本語
1.6K
137
3.2K
628K
Darth Powell
Darth Powell@VladTheInflator·
Boomers ruin everything Seems like that ocean was promised to him 3000 years ago or something
English
255
179
4.7K
312.1K
Origen-chan 🇻🇦 retweetledi
Shinju
Shinju@Shinju_47·
True? 🧐
English
20
328
2.2K
13.2M
Leofwine
Leofwine@papaavalon·
The way certain Thomists treat St. Thomas Aquinas borders on idolatry (and often crosses it). Let the reader understand
English
7
2
14
5.3K
Yitu 🇻🇪
Yitu 🇻🇪@YituVZ·
Si fomentamos la caza de chavistas y legalizamos el canibalismo podríamos alimentar a nuestros 6 millones de viejitos para que no se mueran de hambre una vez que les quitemos las pensiones 🤔 (Papista dixit)
Español
9
8
58
1K
Konrad von Marburg
Konrad von Marburg@JustinusRomanus·
Uh, youtube, I don't think JonTron belongs here...but I appreciate the thought.
Konrad von Marburg tweet media
English
1
0
0
102
Origen-chan 🇻🇦 retweetledi
Fluff 🇺🇸🇭🇷
Fluff 🇺🇸🇭🇷@JJELLYDAYZ·
How it feels to be a grotesque chud interacting with foids
English
7
92
733
9K
Origen-chan 🇻🇦 retweetledi
Kayak
Kayak@irumyuui1·
St Thomas: "So, there are these things called natural rights, that are distinct from the rights that are determined by legislators, but they are on the basis of nature." Muh based tradcath: "So true!" Neothomist Jacques Maritain helping draft the UN Declaration on Human Rights: "So there are these things called human rights, that are distinct from the rights that are determined by legislators, but they are on the basis of human nature." Muh based tradcath: "That is modernism, because the word "human" is used instead of "natural." Heil Israel and death to the U.N.
Apex Imperialist@ApexImperialist

Do you believe in human rights?

English
3
6
30
422
Origen-chan 🇻🇦
Origen-chan 🇻🇦@ModernOrigen·
Finally ... I am a registered Democrat. Now I can pull the "I'm just like you guys" card when I spout my racist talking points without being profiled as some dumb Republicoon.
English
1
0
3
64
Untold Fortune
Untold Fortune@UntoldFortune·
@namae282 Omg what’s this?! Nostra Aetate rejects limited atonement’s Augustinianism?! BASED
Untold Fortune tweet media
English
2
1
10
444
𝔑𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔢🌸
Worth noting that John Paul II noted in 1987 that the irrevocable Covenant in question that was not revoked was specifically the Covenant with Abraham, which rests on the promise of God / grace, and is prior to the Mosaic Law christianunity.va/content/unitac…
𝔑𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔢🌸 tweet media
Rev. Fr. Emmanuel Lemelson@Lemelson

Quoting @59SouthLee: "Nostra Aetate was written by a gay Jew. It's only been downhill since then. Your last Pope said all religions are just different languages speaking to the same god." What a devastatingly accurate summary of the post-conciliar disaster. The man behind much of it was Gregory Baum (born Gerhard Albert Baum, 1923–2017). A man of Jewish descent who converted to Catholicism, became a priest, and rose to become one of the most influential periti at Vatican II. He drafted the first version of Nostra Aetate §4, the declaration that radically reframed the Church’s relationship with Judaism and non-Christian religions. In his later autobiography, Baum openly admitted he was homosexual and had his first same-sex experience while working on the Council documents in Rome. He left the priesthood, entered a relationship with an ex-nun, and became a vocal advocate for homosexual relationships, contraception, women’s ordination, and interfaith indifferentism. From the holy and unchanging perspective of Orthodoxy, the Church Fathers, and the Saints, this is not a footnote but a profound spiritual catastrophe. A man living in unrepented sin helped reshape Catholic teaching away from the patristic understanding of the Church as the true Israel, the fulfillment of the Old Covenant in Christ. Worse still, Baum’s work on Nostra Aetate opened the theological door for the infiltration of Christian Zionist ideas into Catholicism. By strongly affirming an “irrevocable” covenant with the Jewish people apart from explicit fulfillment in Christ, and by softening traditional supersessionist language, the document created space for a new philo-Semitism. This shift contributed to the Vatican’s eventual diplomatic recognition of the State of Israel and the rise of what some now call “Catholic Zionism,” positions that align more closely with Protestant dispensationalist support for modern Israel than with the consensus of the Church Fathers. This tragedy is compounded by the deeper error in Roman Catholic ecclesiology: the consolidation of doctrinal and disciplinary power into the person of the Pope alone. Unlike the ancient conciliar model preserved in Holy Orthodoxy, where bishops gather in Synod under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, with the living voice of the Church including clergy and laity in harmony, the post-Vatican I papal system allows a single man’s decisions (or those of a small circle around him) to rapidly alter the course of the entire Church. When that man, or the experts influencing him, carries personal corruption or modernist ideas, the whole body suffers. Orthodoxy’s synodal structure, rooted in the practice of the Apostles and Fathers, provides safeguards through collective discernment that the papal model tragically lacks. How painfully naive (though meaning well), then, are so many of today’s “new Catholics,” voices like @RealCandaceO and @CarriePrejean1! They thunder against Christian Zionism, liberal ideologies, Epstein’s network of depravity, and moral decay, yet they have enthusiastically joined the very institution whose post-conciliar path, heavily influenced by figures like Baum, has helped mainstream the very errors they decry. They raise their voices loudly, as if the Catholic Church’s ecclesiology, centered on papal supremacy rather than the conciliar consensus of the East, suddenly values the opinion of the laity in matters of doctrine and morals. Yet when the fullness of the Church, Holy Orthodoxy, is humbly presented to them as the unadulterated apostolic faith, they fall mysteriously silent, ignoring its living authority rooted in the Saints and Fathers. This trajectory has normalized ecumenism without conversion, moral relativism regarding sexuality, and the dangerous notion that all religions are different paths to the same God, condemned by the Fathers and by every martyr who refused to compromise the uniqueness of Christ. Holy Orthodoxy alone has preserved the Faith once delivered to the saints without compromise. She calls us not to endless dialogue with error, but to repentance, fidelity to Apostolic Tradition, and the fearless proclamation that Jesus Christ is the only Savior of the world, yesterday, today, and unto the ages of ages. Let us guard our souls with fear of God and holy zeal! Cling to the unchanging Church of the Fathers and the Saints. Both Candace and Carrie are women of evident zeal and courage. May the Lord grant them, and all who seek the ancient Faith, to look East and discover the fullness of the true Church of the Apostles and the Saints, the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church preserved without innovation.

English
1
2
17
861
Origen-chan 🇻🇦
Origen-chan 🇻🇦@ModernOrigen·
@Catholic_Minion Spiritual directors are really only helpful for giving you advice about where the best place to put your effort is, IME. Actually putting in the work in the spiritual life will always fall on you. Unless you're in big spiritual trouble it probably won't be life changing.
English
1
0
0
34
MinionThomist
MinionThomist@Catholic_Minion·
I need a spiritual director but I’m incapable of taking action it seems
English
6
0
25
254
Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒
Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒@WalmartThomist·
(Speaking as a Roman Catholic), I don't think your first point appreciates why Strict Observance Scholasticism actually exists. The reason there is some sort of observance rather than a pure eclecticism among *most* Roman Catholic authors is that the theses of theology or philosophy are not disconnected orbs floating around in the ether...they have a virtal and intimate connection to each other. Conclusions follow upon principles and these principles are united with one another by more fundamental axioms. To try to "take" one and leave another promiscuously in an author who has systematically build from these principles (as the great scholastics did) does not make much sense. As we descend further into particulars, the principles illuminate the conclusions more dimly, hence there are even disputes within the schools. To take an example you brought up...when I study angelology, I have to make fundamental commitments from the start of my stud. I cannot just pick and choose whatever seems to me at first glance to be true from each of the schoolmen. They are working from distinct principles in many cases and an eclectic appreciation of each of their viewpoints into some synthesis would result in a mess of conclusions that do not have a due subordination to principles and actually rely on contrary principles for their elucidation.
English
9
9
119
7.4K