Monty Merlin Bryant 🧙✨

🌱 Powering Regenerative Local Economies with Web3 How can local communities use blockchain tools to strengthen local economies? From local funding rounds, to ecological regeneration, to new ways of organizing and circulating value. Together, Ethereum Localism and Regen Coordination offer a compelling vision for a future of blockchain and peer-to-peer technologies. 🔷 What's up with @Ethereum? 🔷 Over the last decade, Ethereum has grown from a scrappy experiment into the second largest cryptocurrency in the world, with a vast ecosystem of apps, developers, and capital flowing through it. But after years of rapid growth and market hype, Ethereum is now at a crossroads. Amidst market volatility, geopolitical shifts, and increasing centralization in tech, the community is asking a critical question: 👉 Will this infrastructure continue to serve primarily as a vehicle for financial speculation — or can it power real-world, community-driven impact? In this new piece, I explore Ethereum Localism — a growing movement that reimagines Ethereum not as financial infrastructure for the few, but as a coordination layer for local economies and regenerative communities. I also share how @ReFiDAOist & @RegenCoordinate are putting this vision into practice. This is about more than just blockchain. With failing global systems, we need to rethink how we fund, govern, and regenerate — from the ground up. Full post below 👇 x.com/owocki/status/… @RegenCoordinate @ReFiDAOist @greenpillnet @CeloPublicGoods @BioFiProject @maearthmedia @OurBloomNetwork @agroforestDAO @Gitcoin @karmahq_ @SilviProtocol @hypercerts @OSObserver @Atlantis_p2p @metricsgarden @CommonApproach @Celo @OctantApp 💚

@regenavocado @turinglabsorg @higrowfi @EthicHub let me share my research doc on ethichub with you, sending a dm x

@MontyMerlin @turinglabsorg @higrowfi @EthicHub What is crowd collateral?

First feedback is always "What happens if the loan defaults"? Setting up a collective treasury that acts as a form of insurance and incentive is the way to grow. We are having too much in the token factory and yield farms @turinglabsorg What will we cook up next @higrowfi ?

Applications are open for Ma Earth Funding Round 3. $500k in matching grants for 100 grassroots nature projects worldwide. Apply through Ma Earth's new collective funding platform, purpose built for community-led regeneration. Learn more at maearth.com

I just donated on @Giveth! Check out the projects I supported 💜 qf.giveth.io/user/0x59DDA36…

Six years ago today, Celo mainnet launched on Earth Day! 🥳 The @Ethereum Layer 2 built for the real world has processed 1.27B+ transactions, bringing fast, low-cost stablecoin txs to 600K+ global users every day What does this look like in practice? Here's a better look ↓

@gen_ukraine @SilviProtocol 🙌

How we digitized tree planting — and earned a bit of crypto 🌱 We’ve reached a point where we can not only talk about impact, but actually record it in digital form. It’s not a final system yet, but already on @SilviProtocol you can see around 1,100 verified and digitized trees across more than ten of our locations. One detail stands out: most of these plantings are happening in frontline regions. If you look at the map, it becomes obvious. In reality, we planted closer to 2,500 trees. And this highlights a core issue — the gap between physical work and Web3 accounting. In the field, things don’t follow a script. Geolocation can shift by tens of kilometers due to security constraints. Phones fail to capture points. People work with their hands — not with apps. To fully operate in this system, we would actually need to upgrade devices across the network — phones, laptops — otherwise the digital layer simply can’t keep up with real-world activity. Still, even with these limitations, the results are tangible: — ~2,500 trees planted — 1,100 digitized and verified — 12 projects created on the platform — 480 USDC already paid directly to local wallets This is what an emerging horizontal economy looks like. The model is simple: Each verified tree brings $1.20 USDC upfront $0.80 USDC after one year if the tree survives This is not “income” in the traditional sense. It’s a tool: — to support local initiatives — to create incentives for impact verification — to onboard communities into Web3 (wallets, transactions, validation) In practice, it’s a preparation layer for more complex systems — carbon credits and biodiversity markets. What matters is accessibility. The onboarding is simple, the mechanics are clear, support is responsive, and payments are relatively fast. This allowed us to test everything not in theory, but in real conditions. At this stage, we can confidently recommend this approach to others: permaculture groups, foresters, volunteers — anyone involved in tree planting. Because this is one of the few tools where a physical action — planting a tree — already has a digital trace and a basic economic layer around it. Special thanks to @DjimoSerodio for continuous support and fast responses to all our “field-level” challenges. Without that, this experiment likely wouldn’t have worked. #ecovillage #treeplanting #ReFi #Web3platform #tokenizing

Shout out to @MontyMerlin for pre-purchasing 2 liters of olive oil and supporting @RifaiSicilia Another success story for @ReFiDAOist and model for local nodes to follow.

I think data verification gets treated as a technical problem when it's largely a political one. Data doesn't run the world... The claims we make upon that data do. Claims are data with a ▶️ button. Who gets to say what data / outcomes are real and meaningful? In order to steer our systems to regenerate rather than consume the planet, it's actually claims all the way down. In the 6+ years I've spent working in digital sovereignty and environmental protocol design, data verification is the hot mess at the center of most projects. Through a new studio called River Computer, I've been prototyping what I'd call a next generation impact oracle for creating and validating claims around interactions between humans (people), machines (agents everywhere), and the environment (big wet ball we live on). The working name is Waka — the Māori word for canoe, or vessel, because I began designing this system with Māori collaborators. To my knowledge, it's the first cross-protocol claims engine to exist. What that means: it wraps a claims engine (more on what those are in the future) within a versatile credential system and a protocol-agnostic anchoring layer — so impact data can be verified using a range of existing frameworks and then anchored to @ethereum , @regen_network , @hypercerts , or @IPFS , depending on what the work requires. Build a certificate, a credit, an insurance claim across a range of sovereign tech stacks. Its the versatile substrate to build Ecological Institutions. I see this project as a humble attempt to create something like a packet protocol for climate reporting and accounting frameworks that empower rather than exclude the communities generating the impact. It's an essential infrastructure for digital sovereignty. Full stop This kind of tech has to be built in direct collaboration with grassroots, local, and indigenous groups. So this project is being prototyped with Ahipara and Ngāpuhi Māori Iwis in the Northland Aotearoa — (shoutout Anna Brown, Reuben Porter Taipari, Hone Hariwara) and with the brilliant Abdul Semakula and co in Uganda for Kiwaatule 2030, working within his Obuntu Resets framework. It's being supported by @ethereumfndn and @Celo through the "SDG for the World" Grant. Thanks to @LuukDAO , @MontyMerlin , and @DjimoSerodio for orchestrating it. Over the next month I'll be sharing technical and conceptual details on what this all means in practice. Stay tuned. (All artifacts and resources in images are from Kiwaatule 2030 and are testaments to their incredible work!)

How things are going at House of Games Focused Deep Work Nature Friends Chats about AI And everything Non-AI What else do we need? 🤔

The future belongs to those willing to create it. Parallel Society brought together communities and creators working to rebuild civil society upon freedom, trust, and shared imagination. Here’s to the pioneers: @abovephone, @agartha_one, @Andentech, @AquariOfficial, @CCIdotCity, @PortoCoda, @aboutcircles, COOP Studio, @CryptoCanal, @DarkFiSquad, @dEduSchool, @deltay_xyz, Fabrica Moderna, @FundingCommons, Geogram, @HavenXHV, @humntech, @NewEconomyInst, @InstituteCrypto, @internetarchive, @Keycard_, @Kleros_io, @LayerXlab, @Liberland_org, Manja, @MoneroKon, @NovaSBE @nym, @protocollabs, @psy_dao, Rádio Quântica, @rare_effect, SAD, @SealandGov, @ShutterNetwork, SitWith, @SpritzChat, @ethstatus, @StatusL2, @ethswarm, @taikainetwork, @torproject, @unrulyvc, @AskVenice, @web3privacy, @winprivacy, @zano_project, @_zanzalu, @zuAfrique, @zugramadotorg

🌱 BioFi Pathfinders Round, Gitcoin Grants 22: we funded 14 bioregional teams around the world through quadratic funding: → $55K matching pool → 1,096 contributions → $8,813 in direct donations But there was an issue: most participants had never used a crypto wallet before. Some, especially in the Global South, struggled with unreliable internet access and electricity. Few had the social media presence to mobilize donors at the breadth that quadratic funding rewards. Even fewer had a network that could readily donate in crypto. We integrated PayPal to make it work. 🤝 And we learned: onchain funding assumes participants can transact onchain, but bioregional teams coordinate through place-based trust for a reason. So, what does onchain funding infrastructure look like for communities who aren’t on crypto twitter?

The most powerful coordination mechanism humanity has invented? Finance. The almighty “invisible hand of market forces” we are taught in neoliberal economics. But even across mainstream institutions, foundations, investors and policymakers… a quiet consensus is emerging: The old system is broken. I’m starting a new project exploring how we might bridge worlds — connecting the emerging ReFi / Web3 ecosystem with mainstream nature finance. More soon 🌱 @circbioalliance @UniofOxford @LeverhulmeTrust @KateRaworth @UNEP

☀️ SolarpunkOS ☀️ at Parallel Society 🇵🇹

imagine bioregional - capital allocation - ai swarms - knowledge commons bottoms up by & for the people

Have you explored our Open Conversations video library yet? 🌐📽️ It’s a collection of short conversations with people shaping public goods infrastructure—from digital rights and open source funding to climate data, governance, AI, and the future of the commons. Here’s a snapshot of some of the voices featured so far, focused on digital rights, governance, and public goods funding: Digital rights, governance and the commons 🏛️ - @alsmith, @torproject - Isabela Fernandes, @torproject - @whanamura, @GETDWeb & @internetarchive - @audreyt, @PluralityInst - @glenweyl, @PluralityInst & @RadxChange - @mbauwens, @P2P_Foundation - @navroopsahdev, @econ_digital Public goods and coordination infrastructure 💸 - @owocki, @gitcoin - @art_tem_, @OctantApp - @MontyMerlin, @ReFiDAOist - @kensuzuki, @smartnews - @MelynMcKay, @coalapay - @notscottmoore, @publicworksfm - @david1casey, @FundingCommons If you’re curious to explore the full library, the link is in the comments. 👇

@0xj4an @Celo

Help me upgrade this list. If you are somehow related to @Celo #Celo pls leave a comment and I will add you to the list. Feel free also to follow list 🤗 x.com/i/lists/162821…

@xdamman @regenavocado @akosmicfool @IrthuSuresh @revnets A network of bioregional endowment funds? 👀

@regenavocado @akosmicfool @IrthuSuresh @revnets @MontyMerlin Great idea but it has to be done locally. If you do it at a global level, then you run into the issue of capital allocation and having to measure impact. Keep it decentralize. Stake your assets for your local community / bioregion. Then you can see for yourself the impact.

The over focus on the tech is because the cultural layer is more challenging