mmoojjee

17 posts

mmoojjee banner
mmoojjee

mmoojjee

@moonjedi

Katılım Mayıs 2021
453 Takip Edilen86 Takipçiler
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@George275523842 @BobLoukas Over ~$1 trillion of user wealth is stored in btc. How much have the users paid for AI access/services so far? $10s of billions?
English
0
0
0
48
Bob Loukas 🗽
Bob Loukas 🗽@BobLoukas·
AI was all the buzz in 2025. But it feels like in the just last 2 weeks that’s up 10x in engagement/discussion.
English
37
10
442
49.5K
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@TheRealPlanC @boomer_btc @DJ69_Port @stephanlivera Unlike other commodities, Btc production cost is more dynamic. If it trades under production cost, hashers might stop operating, which could lead to difficulty adjustments and potentially lower production costs.
English
1
0
0
22
Plan C
Plan C@TheRealPlanC·
@boomer_btc @DJ69_Port @stephanlivera Thanks for your response, Bob. You must be below the average though, correct? What would you say the estimated global average cost of production would be if you had to guess? Does $67,000 seem high or low?
English
2
0
0
274
Plan C
Plan C@TheRealPlanC·
Important: One of the most significant Bitcoin charts you have most likely never seen! Notice how many times Bitcoin has found support at this estimated cost of production red line. The line currently sits at $67,000. This is not just on-chain data—this is a cost of production model for Bitcoin, which is a commodity, and commodities almost never trade below their cost of production. Shout out to (@)paulewaulpaul for creating this chart. Make sure you give him a follow; he does unique and great work.
Plan C tweet media
English
90
235
1.3K
175.2K
Archie
Archie@ArchieX__·
2025 was a bear market. Change my mind.
English
4
0
11
3.5K
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@_Checkmatey_ @IIICapital Yes, it’s a Saylorism :) When it comes to the difference, he argues Bitcoin is “the most pristine capital” or the best base asset to build on.
English
0
0
2
83
Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBA@IIICapital·
Digital Credit can be issued to acquire bitcoin (high mNAV) or acquire shares (low mNAV). Both can generate a positive BTC Yield. Interestingly, the further a stock trades from 1x mNAV (above or below), the greater the potential for accretive transactions.
Dylan LeClair@DylanLeClair

Leverage capacity enables future optionality. BTC Yield — Δ(BTC / share) — can be increased through varied expressions of non-dilutive leverage, with proceeds allocated toward either: ↑ Numerator ↓ Denominator

English
11
12
119
21K
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@adam3us @cguida6 @LibreHans Bitcoin is censorship-resistant, not censorship-proof. So why do people dismiss filters as 'not working' instead of recognizing they’re spam-resistant, not spam-proof?
English
0
0
0
18
Adam Back
Adam Back@adam3us·
@cguida6 @LibreHans network schelling points change, viz sub 1s/vb summer. so "it always worked before" until it didn't. filters only work if there is no organized incentive by users, and miners won't mine it anyway.
English
2
0
5
974
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@_Checkmatey_ @CcMyfeelings @BitPaine I get the “incentive → accept out-of-band Tx” logic. But how does increasing OP_RETURN help? Isn’t it “incentive → use witness discount” then?
English
1
0
0
368
_Checkmate 🟠🔑⚡☢️🛢️
It's the same logic presented by Core mate. The filters are measurably ineffective, Bitcoin is literally designed to prevent censorship when only a small minority relay. There are an infinite number of ways they will hide data, consuming the scarcest resource which is qualified developer time. If I was a nation state actor, I'd force ossification and distraction with something like this too. Finally, the filters only make it more likely out of band payments to miners become the norm. Miners will accept it because they like money. You can't stop this once it's developed. UTXO set bloat is a problem, and op return is the least harmful 'spam' vector since it's a) more expensive and b) can be pruned from the UTXO set. To come to a conclusion that filters and knots are the solution, is frankly falling for what appears to be an ocean mining advertisement scam. It is devoid of evidence and reasoning, and relies on folks being fired up by narrative, and not technical reasoning.
English
10
13
106
30.4K
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
the sublime fucking irony is this: I am inundated by spam in my email. I am inundated by spam on my phone. I am inundated by spam in my texts. I am inundated by spam in my snail mail. I am inundated by spam in my tweets. the one and only fucking place that I remain COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY UNAFFECTED BY SPAM is when I use Bitcoin. my node runs just fine on the $25 raspberry pi and 1TB SDD I bought five goddamn years ago. I can send a transaction in the next block for $0.15. literally, and uniquely, not even one time have I been materially affected by spam in my use of Bitcoin. probably because it was designed to be a fucking spam filter and despite what you retarded lunatics imagine, it works really fucking well to just put a price on spam. better than any possible filter you could devise.
Udi Wertheimer@udiWertheimer

@BitPaine not only is the spam affecting no one, it literally doesn’t exist there’s no spam there are no transactions whatsoever in fact lmao

English
48
24
364
62.7K
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@SteveSimple Thanks so much for the kind reply, Steve!🙏 I think this is a really interesting point—and congrats on building such a unique tool! 🤯👏
English
1
0
5
26
Simple Steve 🌌
Simple Steve 🌌@SteveSimple·
@moonjedi For example the $100 usd cluster is likely to have 10x the density of the $1k usd cluster And every other consistent relationship I can find Once you can identify which cluster is which round amount, you have a price No bootstrap
English
1
0
0
44
Simple Steve 🌌
Simple Steve 🌌@SteveSimple·
Why are you watching the off-chain price when you could be watching the on-chain price Live at utxo.pro Added perk: Hop in the chat and fight off the scammers with me!
English
3
1
16
664
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@LynAldenContact Soon, emptying reused addresses when fees are low could become a common practice like UTXO consolidation. Wallets with user friendly multisig implementation can also become more widespread.
English
1
0
1
93
mmoojjee
mmoojjee@moonjedi·
@_Checkmatey_ Great work as always🙏I'm slightly confused. BTC isn't CPI inflation hedge. Hedge against monetary debasement. But,CPI is a result of M2 increase. Part of BTC utility/value is fixed supply. Is it fair to deduct it? Price to be interpreted as is, no?
English
2
0
1
325
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
M2 now positive with rates at 5.5%. And rate cuts/QE/YCC are just a matter of time
zerohedge tweet media
English
79
496
2.6K
976.8K
mmoojjee retweetledi
Babylon
Babylon@babylonlabs_io·
🚀 Milestone Alert! 🌟 🛡️A total of 60 validators have joined Babylon's Bitcoin Staking Protocol Testnet - propelling towards a more resilient, secure, and decentralized economy! 🎯 Our mission is to enable a Bitcoin-secured Proof-of-Stake economy, tapping into Bitcoin's vast $1 trillion idle capital to secure PoS systems and generate yield. #StakingBitcoin #BitcoinDeFi #Babylon
GIF
English
1.9K
133.6K
139.8K
1.2M
mmoojjee retweetledi
Babylon
Babylon@babylonlabs_io·
🚀 Countdown to Babylon's Bitcoin Staking Protocol Testnet Public Launch Begins! 🔒 Trustless Staking ⚡ Fast Unbonding 🧩 Modular Design 📈 Scalable Restaking (coming soon) Read more: medium.com/babylonchain-i… 👀 Ready to witness a new era in Bitcoin staking? #StakingBitcoin #BitcoinDeFi #Babylon
GIF
English
3.3K
134.5K
140.4K
2.5M
mmoojjee retweetledi
TEN (🔟/🔟)
TEN (🔟/🔟)@tenprotocol·
Earn on Ten Testnet by helping us battle-harden the only encrypted Layer 2 for Ethereum! Shape the future of Web3 in collaboration with @CoinList. This is a chance for Users, Developers, and Node Runners to earn from a pool of 22,500,000 $TEN Join now - coinlist.co/ten-testnet?ut…
English
725
47.1K
50.1K
416.7K