Colin Clark Anti-Liberals/ Woke idiots. Stay safe.

@its_The_Dr Globalism at a glance: City of London - World Banking Control Vatican - Religious arm Washington DC - Military Enforcement Arm. (until Trump) WEF - Political enlistment, indoctrination and control centre WHO - Health/Medicine Control Centre UN - 'Peace' keepers Questions?

How could we ever forget that look? How? We will never forget you, Iryna.

I urge @elonmusk, @JDVance and the wider American administration to deploy whatever appropriate power they hold to prevent Keir Starmer from banning X in Britain. Free speech must be protected, and such disgusting authoritarianism must be resisted. We need help.

BAN PRO INTIFADA PROTESTS Here @KemiBadenoch is baited by the @BBC into trying to have our march banned. Kemi sees straight through their agenda, so fair play to her for that. We have never glorified terrorism or jihadists. We have never called for violence. We don't sympathise with Hamas. We don't shout 'from the river to the sea'. We don't hate Jews. We love our country and our people. Our Unite The Kingdom events are not comparable, not even slightly. Better luck next time BBC you filthy dirty smear merchants. We call for peace and unity, the pro Palestinian, far left and Islamic revolutionaries call for the exact opposite. We are not the same. See you all in London on the 16th of May. Make your stand. #UniteTheKingdom #UTK

The judge who granted bail to that rapist who again raped a 4 year old girl after coming out of jail and then murdered her should also be charged for encouraging rape and murder. These people can't just walk scott free after sending such monsters back in the society

Someone👇who has clearly never been in policing or ever challenged someone armed with Knife; grabbing someone’s hands? Please tell us Peter your Experience? I tried grabbing a Knifeman’s arms & hey Ho he shoved a Knife deep into my chest; with respect Peter please Fuck Off👇🙄

The Green Party has complained about this cartoon of Zack Polanski by the The Times. They’re deeply unhappy with it. Whatever you do, do not repost!

Convicted terrorist Shahid Butt, who is currently favored to win the race for Birmingham MP in the UK: “Don't take Christians and Jews as your friends; non-believers cannot be trusted. Stick with the Muslims.” And then people wonder what the cause of stabbings are.

This is the most detailed MRI scan of an unborn baby. At just 20 weeks, she is moving, turning her head, kicking—even standing. Her beating heart is also visible. Human life is a miracle.

“Here we go again, Mr Speaker” This would be an apt response to a petulant child, or maybe a friend during a disagreement, @bphillipsonMP But to respond in such a manner to the concerns of women, frightened for the safety of themselves and others is truly despicable. Doesn’t she realise that @RupertLowe10 is voicing the concerns of British people up and down the country? Does she think he is trying to score political points? What does she think Rupert’s motivation for raising this issue is? As a husband and father of three girls (and a boy) I find Phillipson and the rest of @UKLabour utterly disgusting. Shame on you. Shame on all of you. Do people think that at this point, anything this woman says can be taken seriously?

Okay, X trolls, I'm just going to say it… The police officers seen kicking the knifeman in the head were absolutely correct in their actions. I was trained by the police and the British Army as part of my deployment for Operation Temperer a few years ago. Using their hands to keep control of their weapons while using their feet to deal blows to the head and body is completely standard. I also wonder if you’d be so “outraged” and quick to “condemn” those heroes if it were your child that had just been stabbed by that terrorist.

HE WON THE NOBEL PRIZE TWICE. THEN HE SAID VITAMIN C CURES CANCER. THEY DESTROYED HIS REPUTATION OVERNIGHT. Dr. Linus Pauling is the only person in history to win two unshared Nobel Prizes. The first in Chemistry. The second the Nobel Peace Prize. He is considered one of the most brilliant scientists who ever lived. He founded molecular biology. He mapped the structure of proteins. He changed the course of modern science. Then in 1970, he published a book claiming that high-dose vitamin C could prevent and treat cancer. The medical establishment turned on him within weeks. The same institutions that had celebrated him for decades called him a quack. The American Medical Association publicly ridiculed him. Journals that had published his work for 40 years refused to print his research. Funding was cut. Colleagues distanced themselves. The media ran headlines calling him senile. He was 69 years old. He had two Nobel Prizes. And they erased him from credibility because he threatened a trillion-dollar industry with a vitamin that costs pennies. Pauling's research showed that intravenous vitamin C in doses of 10 grams or more per day could selectively kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells untouched. He published clinical trials with Dr. Ewan Cameron showing that terminal cancer patients given high-dose vitamin C lived on average four times longer than those on conventional treatment. The Mayo Clinic ran two studies claiming to "debunk" him. But they used oral vitamin C instead of intravenous. Oral doses cannot achieve the blood plasma concentrations needed to kill cancer cells. They knew this. They designed the studies to fail. Then they published the results as proof that Pauling was wrong. In 2005, the National Institutes of Health finally confirmed what Pauling said 35 years earlier. High-dose intravenous vitamin C is selectively toxic to cancer cells. Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They proved him right. After he was dead. After they had already destroyed his name. A two-time Nobel laureate told the world that a natural molecule could fight cancer. They buried him for it. Then they quietly confirmed his work when no one was paying attention. The cure was never the problem. The price was. Source: 🔗 M-B Technology

Mohseni Ejei, the regime’s head of gallows, just invited Iranians abroad to “come back” and I am directly quoting him here: “Who have we killed? Who have we beaten? Whose rights have we taken?” Beautiful. A man sitting on top of execution files, torture chambers, stolen property, forced confessions, and broken families is asking who they have killed. The lack of self awareness is almost artistic. Then came the real offer, and again, this is the direct meaning of his threat: Come back, or else. We will confiscate your property. And if anything happens to your families, that is on you. So the terrorist Islamic Regime occupying Iran is basically saying: Return to the prison voluntarily, or we punish the hostages we still have. That is not a legal system. That is a mafia boss reading a hostage note on state TV. They do not want Iranians abroad to return. They want silence. They want fear. They want every Iranian outside the country to remember that the regime still has hands around the throats of families inside Iran. And then these clowns wonder why millions of Iranians call them exactly what they are: terrorist occupiers.

Remember the 80 Yazidi grandmothers who were buried alive by ISIS for being considered too old to be sex slaves. There was not a single protest for them!

🇫🇷 A 12-year-old girl in France woke up covered in blood after being gang raped by two adult men in an Airbnb. A judge just released them without a restraining order, without supervised contact restrictions... nothing. At the hearing, the child collapsed in her lawyer's office upon hearing the men were to be set free. It is getting very tiring reading so many stories like this, where horrible people face zero consequences. SICK! Source: @zerohedge

Little girls get arrested as child prostitutes after being abused by grooming gangs. Meanwhile, when an illegal migrant rapes a 14 year old girl… they get ZERO JAIL TIME and are instead told to take “consent classes.” This is why girls feel unsafe in Britain. Because we are.

🚨BREAKING: The IDF found another huge underground tunnel built by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, around 2 km long, and only 10 kilometers from Israel's border. A massive amount of weapons was found. Share this. The mainstream media won't.

Remember Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, the 24-year-old Danish woman, and Maren Ueland, the 28-year-old Norwegian. While on vacation in Morocco, they were camping one night when four Muslims attacked them. They were kidnapped and raped. What happened next was filmed by the Islamists themselves in a video — pure horror and hatred. ⚠️ [Sensitive content — if you’re easily upset, stop reading now] ⚠️ It’s night. The two girls are outdoors, their bodies lit only by the glow of mobile phones. Louisa is lying face down, pants pulled down. Two Moroccans stand over her, speaking Arabic. One of them starts slicing her throat from the back of the neck. She cries, calling out “MOOOR”, Danish for “Mom”, desperately calling for her mother. He doesn’t stop. He keeps cutting until she loses consciousness, then fully decapitates her and throws her head to the ground. One of them spits on it. The next morning a shepherd found both bodies, decapitated. Louisa and Maren were tortured, raped, and murdered for a single “crime”: being white Europeans. The killers are currently serving 20-year sentences in a Moroccan prison. For these two innocent souls, there was barely any outrage, just a brief news story that quickly disappeared from the headlines. Their suffering was allowed to fade in silence, because they were killed by North Africans.

The Man Advising Starmer on National Security. Has He Been Vetted? Peter Mandelson failed his developed vetting. That failure, and the override that followed, has consumed British politics for weeks. One question has received almost no attention in comparison. Has Jonathan Powell, the Prime Minister's National Security Adviser, passed his? Powell is not a civil servant. He is a political appointee, the first ever to hold the National Security Adviser role. As a special adviser he cannot formally direct MI5, MI6 or GCHQ. The constitutional ambiguity of his position has been noted but never resolved. What has not been established publicly is whether he has undergone the same developed vetting process that Mandelson failed, and whose failure triggered the most serious national security scandal of the modern era. @GuidoFawkes, which has a track record of breaking stories the mainstream press subsequently confirms, has published what it describes as Powell's full China dossier and the contents are extraordinary. Before his government appointment Powell met Lt. General Chen Xiaogong, the former head of PLA intelligence, on multiple occasions. He met Cui Tiankai, the former Vice Foreign Minister, repeatedly. He met Shen Xin, Secretary General of the CPAFFC, described by the US Congress as the public face of China's United Front Work Department, Beijing's primary foreign influence operation. These meetings took place through Inter Mediate, the private charity Powell founded and continues to run alongside his government role. Thirteen days after being appointed as the Prime Minister's Special Envoy for the Chagos negotiations in September 2024, Powell was in Beijing chairing a strategic security dialogue with Chinese experts, some with direct PLA connections. Since becoming National Security Adviser in December 2024 he has met Wang Yi, the Politburo member and director of China's Central Commission for Foreign Affairs, four times. July 2025. November 2025. January 2026. March 2026. Every parliamentary question about Powell's interests, his vetting arrangements and what was discussed in those meetings has been blocked. The government's responses use language identical to that deployed to block questions about Mandelson. Established mechanisms are in place. The government does not comment on individual cases. Such meetings are sensitive in nature. Luke de Pulford of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China told Guido that Powell's links to Beijing have a Mandelson-like odour and that if he oversaw the decision to collapse the China espionage trial to avoid upsetting Beijing, his position as National Security Adviser is not tenable. That observation connects two threads that have run through this series separately but belong together. The China spy trial collapsed because the government refused to describe China as a national security threat in court. Powell, as National Security Adviser, would have been central to that decision. The same man who maintained extensive relationships with PLA-connected Chinese officials through his private charity was advising the Prime Minister on whether to name China as a threat in a national security prosecution. The prosecution died. Beijing was not named. Powell remains in post. One further question has not been answered. Has British taxpayer money funded Inter Mediate's China engagement? The government has refused to say. If Powell's private charity received government funding while maintaining deep relationships with Chinese officials of the kind Guido has documented, the conflict of interest exceeds anything yet established in the Mandelson affair. Mandelson failed developed vetting and was appointed anyway. Powell's vetting arrangements have never been disclosed. The government blocks every question. The pattern points toward China. The question is whether the man now responsible for Britain's national security has been assessed against the standard that disqualified his predecessor.

When the Lies Were Exposed, Hermer's Instinct Was to Attack the Soldiers. On 19 April 2014, a document emerged at the Al-Sweady Inquiry that ended the case. A personnel list, written in Arabic, identified nine of Richard Hermer's Iraqi clients as members of the Office of the Martyr al-Sadr, another name for the Mahdi Army, the Iran-backed militia that had ambushed British soldiers at the Battle of Danny Boy a decade earlier. The clients had claimed to be innocent farmers and labourers caught in crossfire. The document proved they were armed insurgents. The inquiry, which had already cost thirty-one million pounds, was heading toward its inevitable conclusion. The following day, Hermer wrote an email. He was not writing to the soldiers who had spent years under false accusation. He was not writing to Lance Corporal Brian Wood, who had won a Military Cross fighting the same insurgents his clients represented and who had been falsely branded a war criminal for his trouble. He was writing to comfort a junior solicitor at Leigh Day who had failed to recognise the significance of the document that had just destroyed their case. He told her she was making an extraordinary contribution to securing justice for torture victims in Iraq. He told her her work had made a real difference to people's lives. Then he added that this was not something the lead counsel for the British soldiers, or his clients, could ever say. The lead counsel for the British soldiers was Sir Neil Garnham, now a High Court judge. His clients were the men Hermer had spent years pursuing on false charges. At the moment those charges were collapsing under the weight of documentary evidence, Hermer's verdict was that the lawyers pursuing them had contributed more to society than the soldiers they had falsely accused. Documents obtained by the Daily Telegraph show Hermer also described legitimate criticism from a former SAS officer and a Conservative MP as the military establishment venting after years of facing scrutiny over Iraq. Decorated soldiers and their advocates raising concerns about a case built on lies were, in Hermer's private assessment, simply letting off steam. A further email shows him acknowledging it was inevitable that some of the Iraqi cases were going to collapse. He was not troubled by what that collapse revealed about the claims he had been advancing. He was concerned about its effect on the remaining civil cases and the likelihood of future settlements. Then there is the Shiner question. In 2015, with Phil Shiner already under investigation by the solicitors' watchdog, Hermer described him publicly as having brought extraordinarily important cases and exposed systemic use of torture by the British Army. In a private email from the same period he called Shiner an arse. In 2019, after Shiner was struck off, Hermer described his conduct as an unforgivable act of dishonesty. Shiner was later convicted of fraud. The public position shifted with the political weather. The private view had always been different. Hermer is now Attorney General. One of his primary functions is to advise on the legality of military operations. The man who decides whether British soldiers can lawfully act is the same man who, at the moment his false case against them collapsed, wrote that they had made less of a difference to people's lives than the lawyers pursuing them. Brian Wood has called him clearly unfit to remain in post. A former head of the Army says his position is untenable. The Bar Standards Board has been asked to investigate. A leading Labour peer has called him an arrogant progressive fool. Starmer has said nothing. The machine keeps running. "A personnel list, written in Arabic, identified nine of Richard Hermer's Iraqi clients as members of the Office of the Martyr al-Sadr, another name for the Mahdi Army"

Relieved to learn that President Trump, the First Lady and Vice President are safe and unharmed following the recent security incident at a Washington DC hotel. I extend my best wishes for their continued safety and well-being. Violence has no place in a democracy and must be unequivocally condemned. @realDonaldTrump @POTUS