MrGolf

1.1K posts

MrGolf banner
MrGolf

MrGolf

@MoysEP

Back Stronger

London/Leeds Katılım Mayıs 2011
305 Takip Edilen155 Takipçiler
MrGolf retweetledi
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
Final holiday giveaway! Tickets to ANY Pgatour event. Players, WM Phx open, Pebble, you name it, I’ll get you 4 tickets to the event. You can even caddie for me in the pro am IF you want. Comment which event you might want to go to (not final), repost, like to enter.
English
6.2K
4.9K
8.6K
854.6K
MrGolf retweetledi
Iona Stephen
Iona Stephen@Iona_Stephen·
If you retweet this post, you could win a chance to go to the 154th Open Championship!! (Plus some merch) youtu.be/2YsQkKMNvS0
YouTube video
YouTube
English
44
1.8K
914
392.7K
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
Final US Open giveaway. You get this duffle bag, my US open credentials, a pair of my Footjoy premier shoes that I’ll sign (worn during my titleist shoot) Winner is first person to guess my locker number this week. 1-200 No cheating! Some of you asked insiders to look my locker number up 😂
Michael S. Kim tweet media
English
14.7K
128
4.1K
1.4M
Kyle Porter
Kyle Porter@KylePorterNS·
Happy U.S. Open week. I'm giving away a @Garmin Approach S70 watch to whoever gets closest to guessing my total (Monday-Sunday) step count this week at Oakmont. Eligibility = Drop a guess in the comments below and be subscribed to our newsletter (link in bio) by Sunday night!
Kyle Porter tweet media
English
879
17
337
190.4K
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
First person to guess my locker number this week at Oakmont gets it It’s between 1-200
English
8.2K
25
1.5K
854.2K
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
Not sure if some would be into this but would someone want my tour bag? The one I’ve used since Bay Hill (Clubs not included haha)
Michael S. Kim tweet media
English
8.1K
259
14.5K
2.5M
MrGolf retweetledi
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
Masters Giveaway! Nothing crazy, just a couple golf shirts and some hats from the ANGC pro shop. (I know it’s super late but I’ve been busy 🤷🏻‍♂️) Only 1 winner and I’ll be picking today. I’ll throw in some of my stuff as well like the @Binary_Defense hat and @Titleist prov1X
English
6.3K
6.9K
15.3K
1.1M
Kevin Van Valkenburg
Kevin Van Valkenburg@KVanValkenburg·
[whipsers] Soly and KVV recorded a 3-hour Deep Dive that will be in your podcast feeds (likely) next week. It's about ... the 2000 Major season.
GIF
English
26
8
941
51.8K
MrGolf
MrGolf@MoysEP·
@NoLayingUp There’s no course fit tool for Valhalla on Data Golf and no ‘Every Hole at..’ video from Golf Digest to get a feel for how it’s going to play. What are the best comp courses? Is it bombers only?
English
0
0
0
107
No Laying Up
No Laying Up@NoLayingUp·
PGA Championship preview podcast recording this afternoon, publishing overnight. What questions do you have?
English
135
0
210
139.6K
LukeB
LukeB@LukeBur52834852·
@verasitytech Stop the social mentions bragging & team day outs to Paris 1) Separate the #pov tokens, closed loop with no tradability 2) Get an audit of both tokens 3) Discount fees if client lets you release case studies 4) Onboard new CMO & improve communication 5) Smarten sales team
English
9
5
64
4.8K
PLRL by Verasity
PLRL by Verasity@verasitytech·
We've published our Q1 2024 roadmap recap, exploring our progress in the first quarter of this year and looking closely at some of the events coming up in Q2 2024! Read it here: medium.com/verasity/veras…
English
104
241
998
105.6K
MrGolf
MrGolf@MoysEP·
@Mike_kim714 @jjamladad Absolutely yes! This is exactly what we want (and never get) when watching coverage. Your insights are fascinating
English
0
0
0
175
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
@jjamladad Hmm I feel like everyone knows the course so well tho… would people be interested?
English
43
0
595
37.4K
Michael S. Kim
Michael S. Kim@Mike_kim714·
Here’s a myth I consider wrong at ANGC: “Leave yourself uphill putts because greens are so fast” That can be true at times but from my experience, ur doing all you can to get it to the correct section/platform of the green. Most greens have really distinct sections. For ex, 6 if the pin is back right, ur trying to get it to that right platform and don’t care if you have a 15ft downhill birdie putt. The hole you might consider an uphill putt is maybe 10 since that green is just one big back to front but again, ur more or less aiming for the middle of the green there
English
25
5
503
515.5K
PLRL by Verasity
PLRL by Verasity@verasitytech·
Important notice for UK VeraWallet users 🇬🇧 We have restricted UK users from creating VeraWallet accounts whilst we evaluate our position with new UK crypto travel rules and regulations that recently came into force. We are exploring new KYC flows that will enable us to meet current and future regulations. We will keep our UK users updated during this process. Wallet creation from other jurisdictions remains unaffected☑️
English
78
102
709
80.4K
1980Verdi
1980Verdi@1980Verdi·
If I am @verasitytech team and it is not true that $VRA held in the exchange deposit/withdrawal wallet is exceeding. First of all, I would have shown $VRA holders evidence that he was wrong and lying. After that I would have sued "Timeshare" immediately for the sake of the $VRA holders. This is because the circulation issue is a very serious problem that destroys trust in the project. But if he's right, at least I would have admitted my mistake and moved the excess $VRA to an external wallet. And I would have made a promise to demonstrate transparency and confidence in the shortest possible time for $VRA holders who have trusted me so far. Honestly, I didn't know that the team would hide behind blind people and remain silent. 🤦‍♂️ Plus, since no one can refute my post, Blind People only says strange things that are off topic. Anyone can easily check Etherscan, so anyone can know the truth even if they don’t believe me. Exceeding CS should never be allowed. The only way to save $VRA is to speak with one voice so that the team can make the right choices. 🗣
1980Verdi@1980Verdi

@rjmark_verasity You need to move exceeded 1.64b $VRA from a tradable exchange deposit/withdrawal wallet. ✅️ CS : 10.06b $VRA Even blind people know about $VRA outside of exchange deposit/withdrawal wallets. ▪️Staking tokens : 2.5b ▪️Locked team tokens : 2.16b ▪️Coinspot 1+2 : 2.8b ✅️ 10.06b - 7.46b = 2.6b $VRA This is a fact that no one can deny. 🔷️ Now let’s take a look at the exchange deposit/withdrawal wallets that can be traded. ▪️OKX d/w wallet : 997m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bitumb deposit wallet : 663m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Kucoin deposit wallet : 475m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️For Kucoin deposit wallet supply : 472m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Gateio d/w wallet : 453m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bybit d/w wallet : 356m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bitget d/w wallet : 280m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bitrue d/w wallet : 208m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️MEXC d/w wallet : 130m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bittrex d/w wallet : 53m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bithumb withdrawal wallet : 50m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Uniswap V2 : 38m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Uniswap V3 : 35m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ▪️Bitfinex d/w wallet : 29m $VRA etherscan.io/token/0xf41190… ✅️ 2.6b - 4.24b = -1.64b $VRA If I am wrong with any of the above, I will delete my account today. @block_writer & @verasitytech try it. And Bring a new excuse. ex) Coinspot wallets is actually a PoV marker token storage wallet that has been accumulated since 3 years ago. At least you should not have done such a thing to the people who believed in you and criticized me until the end.

English
54
28
232
37.7K
CD
CD@CryptoDevil_·
$VRA Thoughts Tricky at the moment, so many thoughts on the team and the POV migration ( @block_writer ) 🔸No idea why the team just don't move the POV tokens to a new ETH contract & then move to a new L1 later on, if they want to 🔸Burn unused POV tokens 🔸Get the F away from Kucoin Above has less impact to us all, gets POV tokens out the way and all the issues that have halted PA, ETH is already working for them, no need to search for a new L1 and then have 6 months of looking and testing for one. Hope they bring migration forward and deliver much quicker also. Having 4/5 months in 2023, and then having Q1/Q2 for just Beta testing seems stretched, so great to see that pulled in. I never liked the 2nd consultation round for selecting a L1, literally no point in asking the community, people just shill their own L1 investments. The team know the product best, they should know what's best for a L1 without asking the community. Also like to start seeing: 🔸Some Clients / Show Partners using the tech 🔸Present Case Studies Team have always been good on communications, AMAs, they just need to handle the POV move more urgently - personal thoughts. Regardless - In. H&S failed hard, but stacked the dip. Pattern was working but hard sell off. For a while I've been saying I don't like these constant sell off wicks. Note - Chart is just a zoomed in view 8h, will post a higher frame later, but for now just want to see how the team act with updates and year end reviews. Apols, started as short post and I kept going. I'm sure we have answers to the above, I've just been away all Xmas and New Year.
CD tweet media
CD@CryptoDevil_

@TRIASislove Sorry meant to add on $VRA On the 1d, you could say this is a In H&S on $VRA Reduction of MAC and increase in Stoch, but eyes on those wicks, and chart currently in resistance Hopefully see something like the below, which i might play, but need to see those EMAs beaten

English
14
12
88
29.2K
MrGolf
MrGolf@MoysEP·
@block_writer @WitFinance @verasitytech Elliot, a lot of the issues and concerns would be resolved if transparency was provided around the process to separate the POV tokens, at the very minimum, together with a timeline. I'm a long-term holder, but am seriously considering selling all my $VRA this week
English
0
0
1
188
Elliot Hill
Elliot Hill@block_writer·
Thanks Wit, I know you have $VRA's best interests at heart. The timeline is not delayed, we will provide more details on the process and how it will develop shortly. That said, with Q1 2024 already underway, I felt it was appropriate to publish the roadmap. We already provided a detailed breakdown of our requirements, and shared that we were in discussions with several chains. The next step will be to enter active testing with these chains. This is regarded as alpha testing, where tests are carried out internally (no 'real' users). Beta testing is when a small cohort of real end users test a solution. This admittedly was an oversight on my part having been in tech for a number of years, I thought the wording of beta testing would be more clearly interpreted. I will clarify this in further communications. I do disagree that all the community cares about is PoV, or at least I would hope this isn't the case, because we have clearly begun the process required to move PoV tokens; and there are many more critical components outlined in our roadmap this year that are crucial for our commercial goals. As @rjmark_verasity has outlined, there are many mission-critical components coming onboard this year which will enhance our offering to publishers. We will also deep dive into these and why they're important to our success in 2024. I very much value your opinion in the community and I will take your feedback onboard. This week we also have the Q4 2023 review, our annual report, and other announcements which we are putting a great deal of effort into. After this, I will plan some Q&A sessions regarding the PoV migration process.
English
140
89
525
68K
Wit
Wit@WitFinance·
Let me start by saying that the @VerasityTech's roadmap release was poorly executed. • In public relations, controlling the narrative is the key, and $VRA missed an opportunity to do so regarding the POV tokens. •Their lackluster explanation allowed the narrative to slip out of their hands, which is never good. This is my attempt to help the team. Please allow me to explain before attacks come: • I personally do not care about the delay but the roadmap announcement was suboptimal at the best, mostly due to the lack of follow up: 1⃣ The roadmap was published, but it was not complemented with sufficient details. 2⃣ This could have been saved if a detailed article accompanied the roadmap, explaining the reasons for the delay and what was overlooked. 3⃣ This article needed to outline how the situation will unfold in the coming months, providing much needed clarity on the beta testing process. 4⃣ Clarification on what the beta phase entails was necessary, including whether it would involve testing on more than one blockchain. 5⃣ Naming the chains under consideration for the beta and explaining the current status in the process of selecting these chains. • We all know, and team is well aware of this, that the only thing community cared about was the bullet point about the “POV Marker tokens”. This is how I would have done it to keep effective, transparent communication while maintaining control of the narrative around POV marker token migration: 1⃣Posting the roadmap. 2⃣Following up with an in depth article explaining: ‣ The rationale behind the delay. ‣ Specifics of what aspects were overlooked. ‣ A detailed plan for the next few months. ‣ A clear explanation of the beta testing phase, its scope, and implications. ‣ Will the beta involve multiple blockchains, and if so, naming these chains. ‣ Current progress in the chain selection process, giving a community clear view of the roadmap's practical implementation. ‣ Why can’t testing be done by feeding the system with test data in a controlled testing environment, where they can push the limits of these blockchains? This comprehensive approach would have helped Verasity maintain a positive and controlled narrative. Just by making sure everyone remained informed and engaged we could have avoided months of FUD that the community, and my self included, needs to deal with now. There are a lot of positive things about the new 2024 Verasity road map that I will talk more in the coming days, but sadly it wont matter much in terms of community building because this issue I explained here will take up all the attention.
Wit tweet media
English
69
78
575
74.9K
MrGolf retweetledi
Iona Stephen
Iona Stephen@Iona_Stephen·
Re tweet if you fancy a game at the home of golf in 2024 😍🤞🏼
English
286
3.2K
4.1K
855.1K
FPL Meerkat
FPL Meerkat@FPLMeerkat·
The top score in the world this gameweek has Doku as his captain every single gameweek and this one he happened to triple captain him Team name is Count Doku as well Honestly fair play 🤣👏
FPL Meerkat tweet media
English
38
79
1.5K
206.4K
Cryp2Fan
Cryp2Fan@Crypt2Fan·
The reason price is not going up is the fault of @rjmark_verasity & @block_writer for being arrogant and not listening what community is asking. 1. Get rid of that 90% supply even it’s in closed loop. It’s scaring new investors away. 2. Burn the War Chest tokens. Really.. using them in the future will do more harm than good. No one is waiting for 10b tokens to get dumped on them even if they buy another company with this. It’s still with the money of the investors. I call it a scam aka rugpull if it ever take place and thats not legal in any way. Ask Do Kwon. 3. Start making announcements of partnerships. …. $VRA has one of the best products in crypto and also patented. But these 3 points i just mentioned is killing the chart.
English
22
11
73
6.3K
MrGolf
MrGolf@MoysEP·
@block_writer Is there a way to track the buy back and burn from revenue generated? Has the buy back and burn commenced? Will it be announced by the team to gain publicity?
English
0
0
0
60
Elliot Hill
Elliot Hill@block_writer·
I'll go live on Twitter Spaces @ 3PM UTC on Monday (6th) to talk about today's news, case studies, 1st publishers on our platform, & what it all means for $VRA #VeraViews & #Verasity. Not an AMA, just a 20/30 minute chat about our progress. If you have Q's, drop them below 👇
English
68
162
704
106.3K