
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
100.4K posts

The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
@MsEntropy
Your Lady of Chaos (Theory) | Cassandra of Geopolitics | MENA - Nazis - ISIS - political violence - etc. | [email protected] | @MsEntropy everywhere










So now Shaiel wants to doxx me. To do that, he's collaborating with a gang of psychopathic scum who's been after me, after @RadioWatermelon, and after people in Gaza for a while now. Well, go ahead Shaiel. Unlike you, my past is not the past of a terrorist Zionist and abuser.

Today is my birthday, and tomorrow will mark two years since my mother was killed. This year, I want to see more than a landscape of horror and instead, inshallah, the air that gave her wings. RIP. I’m grateful you’re finally free now, no matter how it happened.


@LibyaLiberty “Used to be part of our colonial empire” is not the same as “is the indigenous land of our ancestors”.












I had no idea about his background until I saw BM’s posts, and I’m really, really glad I did. As someone who helps white supremacists leave the movement, I know A LOT about how those who have done immense harm and GENUINELY want to atone behave in their sincere quest for accountability and restorative justice. To name just a few huge red flags (now that I’ve read his posts alongside BM’s): - the ridiculously short time between “renouncing” his past beliefs / actions (especially IDF activities). The process of recognizing what you’ve done takes a looooooooooong period of time if it’s authentically motivated. They know damn well “I said sorry” is nowhere near enough, and “I already apologized” is a sign they haven’t even scratched the surface of self-examination yet, because it isn’t a one thing. It’s lifelong. - quick public positioning and self-promotion as an “ally” (there are loads of alleged ex-Nazis that cynically use the “exit” rhetoric / gesture as a grift, and the points I’m talking about here are all what those of us antifascists who believe in the possibility of redemption and help them leave are VEEEERY closely watching for as we vet them). Sincere formers generally experience so much shame and self-flagellation for what they’ve done that they are timid about entering the activist space in any public capacity for quite some time. - defensiveness (especially passive aggressive) to criticism and skepticism, particularly from other formers as well as members of communities they’ve harmed. Actual accountability and restorative justice requires both humility and recognizing no one “owes” you forgiveness, trust, or acceptance. Sincere formers encourage skepticism about their intentions and motivations, because they’ve done enough work to realize why we have every reason to consider them threats. People can change, even those who’ve done immense and irreparable harm (and they can become incredibly powerful allies)— I know this very well. However, it’s rare, particularly because of how much intense and long-term work is required. When it’s sincere and authentic, the “I’m a new person” public announcement / rebirth intro doesn’t come so soon, isn’t accompanied by using tokens from harmed communities as weaponized shields against criticism, characterized by self-promotion, hypersensitivity / defensiveness over critique, and especially through performative “I’ve done so much for you” emotional blackmail. After digging through his background, this feels like a cynical “rebrand” after the sexual abuse allegations (in the most generous of assessments). TL;DR — the best rule of thumb I have for vetting sincere disengagement is: analyze actions (not words or performative gestures) over time. He fails the test (I’m being polite in my language here). (Sorry for the essay)









