The Provost / سيدة الفتنة

100.4K posts

The Provost / سيدة الفتنة banner
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة

The Provost / سيدة الفتنة

@MsEntropy

Your Lady of Chaos (Theory) | Cassandra of Geopolitics | MENA - Nazis - ISIS - political violence - etc. | [email protected] | @MsEntropy everywhere

الله أعلم. Katılım Aralık 2010
1.1K Takip Edilen23K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
The government is very aware of who I am and what I do; they should be - I’ve worked on counterterrorism issues for the UN, State, DOS, DHS, and more under the Obama, Trump I, and Biden administrations. ISIS, Army of God, and all the run of the mill Neo-Nazi organizations are, too — see above as per why. So feel free to keep harassing away, and add me to all the lists you’d like. I’m afraid you’re a bit late to the game, but your time is valuable, so just doing my best to help you out here. This has been a PSA.
English
16
14
164
33.1K
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
@ShabanaMir1 Truly appreciate that you see this as well; the contentiousness of the “debate” (and its detachment from ethics-based arguments, by and large) makes me feel like I’ve lost my mind!
English
1
0
1
175
Shabana Mir
Shabana Mir@ShabanaMir1·
👇🏾“how should we ethically respond to a suggestion that a Nazi who left the SS one year ago now (and still maintained and publicly referenced “friends” in his former unit) be entrusted with relief efforts for the same Jewish population *while the Holocaust ACTIVELY CONTINUED*?!”
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة@MsEntropy

Thank YOU for caring! I also just had an in-depth conversation about this whole thing with a former Neo-Nazi I know extremely well, as I wanted his perspective (and I think the debate reflects just how dehumanized Palestinians are — so I feel a comparative case cuts to the heart of the matter more clearly). He left the movement when I was still in high school (2001), and didn’t enter an activist capacity of his life until 2015. After I filled him in on the Shaeil / Adam Project story (note the parallel concerns below), his first response was: “Seriously? Imagine Jeff [a fake former and grifter who pretended to be out — after an arrest, mind you — and not just immediately began a ‘derad expert’ grift, but also literally flushed his phone down the toilet to prevent police from obtaining his contacts for the Charlottesville civil suit] having control over anyone’s data?! HELL NO. The audacity!” I think this former Nazi’s reaction is CRUCIAL for folks to consider, namely because there are paradigms of harm surrounding relative victim populations — Palestinian life is not treated as equally valuable, and even this debate about “helping” them not just reveals that differential, but makes it stunningly, depressingly clear. Here’s a stark example of what I mean by that: NO ONE ON EARTH would be comfortable with an ex-Nazi “vetting” Jews and controlling their data NOW, regardless of how long that Nazi had “been out of the SS. Now let’s apply the same temporal parameters that apply to the Holocaust - how should we ethically respond to a suggestion that a Nazi who left the SS one year ago now (and still maintained and publicly referenced “friends” in his former unit) be entrusted with relief efforts for the same Jewish population *while the Holocaust ACTIVELY CONTINUED*?! Point being: if we say “it’s a genocide,” and MEAN “it’s a genocide,” we treat the at-risk population LIKE IT IS A GENOCIDE. Finally, I told the former Neo-Nazi I spoke with that despite how close we are, how long we’ve known each other, and how long he’s been out — I would NEVER be comfortable with him in a public or private-facing data collection / vetting role for any at-risk community (not even those experiencing genocide). I’ll close with his response to that, as it’s even more telling about what sincere reform, authentic self-work, and ethics in actions looks like: “You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. I’ve been out 25 years, and not only would it never occur to me to propose something like that, but no matter who asked me or how many times, there’s no way in hell I would even consider it. That’s not my place.” Says it all, really.

English
1
1
4
483
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
I also want to add this update, which I see as critically important in terms of the stakes here. I just had an in-depth conversation about this whole thing with a former Neo-Nazi I know extremely well, as I wanted his perspective (and I think the debate reflects just how dehumanized Palestinians are — so I feel a comparative case cuts to the heart of the matter more clearly). He left the movement when I was still in high school (2001), and didn’t enter an activist capacity of his life until 2015. After I filled him in on the Shaeil / Adam Project story (note the parallel concerns below), his first response was: “Seriously? Imagine Jeff [a fake former and grifter who pretended to be out — after an arrest, mind you — and not just immediately began a ‘derad expert’ grift, but also literally flushed his phone down the toilet to prevent police from obtaining his contacts for the Charlottesville civil suit] having control over anyone’s data?! HELL NO. The audacity!” I think this former Nazi’s reaction is CRUCIAL for folks to consider, namely because there are paradigms of harm surrounding relative victim populations — Palestinian life is not treated as equally valuable, and even this debate about “helping” them not just reveals that differential, but makes it stunningly, depressingly clear. Here’s a stark example of what I mean by that: NO ONE ON EARTH would be comfortable with an ex-Nazi “vetting” Jews and controlling their data NOW, regardless of how long that Nazi had “been out of the SS. Now let’s apply the same temporal parameters that apply to the Holocaust - how should we ethically respond to a suggestion that a Nazi who left the SS one year ago now (and still maintained and publicly referenced “friends” in his former unit) be entrusted with relief efforts for the same Jewish population *while the Holocaust ACTIVELY CONTINUED*?! Point being: if we say “it’s a genocide,” and MEAN “it’s a genocide,” we treat the at-risk population LIKE IT IS A GENOCIDE. Finally, I told the former Neo-Nazi I spoke with that despite how close we are, how long we’ve known each other, and how long he’s been out — I would NEVER be comfortable with him in a public or private-facing data collection / vetting role for any at-risk community (not even those experiencing genocide). I’ll close with his response to that, as it’s even more telling about what sincere reform, authentic self-work, and ethics in actions looks like: “You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. I’ve been out 25 years, and not only would it never occur to me to propose something like that, but no matter who asked me or how many times, there’s no way in hell I would even consider it. That’s not my place.” Says it all, really.
English
0
0
7
228
Babak
Babak@ChronicBabak·
Provost perfectly articulates the reasons to be skeptical of Shaiel’s supposed “rehabilitation”, first from his past sex pest behavior (which he still lies about 🚩), later from his yrs of Israel advocacy. He understands the social currency of presenting as a Jewish antizionist.
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة@MsEntropy

I had no idea about his background until I saw BM’s posts, and I’m really, really glad I did. As someone who helps white supremacists leave the movement, I know A LOT about how those who have done immense harm and GENUINELY want to atone behave in their sincere quest for accountability and restorative justice. To name just a few huge red flags (now that I’ve read his posts alongside BM’s): - the ridiculously short time between “renouncing” his past beliefs / actions (especially IDF activities). The process of recognizing what you’ve done takes a looooooooooong period of time if it’s authentically motivated. They know damn well “I said sorry” is nowhere near enough, and “I already apologized” is a sign they haven’t even scratched the surface of self-examination yet, because it isn’t a one thing. It’s lifelong. - quick public positioning and self-promotion as an “ally” (there are loads of alleged ex-Nazis that cynically use the “exit” rhetoric / gesture as a grift, and the points I’m talking about here are all what those of us antifascists who believe in the possibility of redemption and help them leave are VEEEERY closely watching for as we vet them). Sincere formers generally experience so much shame and self-flagellation for what they’ve done that they are timid about entering the activist space in any public capacity for quite some time. - defensiveness (especially passive aggressive) to criticism and skepticism, particularly from other formers as well as members of communities they’ve harmed. Actual accountability and restorative justice requires both humility and recognizing no one “owes” you forgiveness, trust, or acceptance. Sincere formers encourage skepticism about their intentions and motivations, because they’ve done enough work to realize why we have every reason to consider them threats. People can change, even those who’ve done immense and irreparable harm (and they can become incredibly powerful allies)— I know this very well. However, it’s rare, particularly because of how much intense and long-term work is required. When it’s sincere and authentic, the “I’m a new person” public announcement / rebirth intro doesn’t come so soon, isn’t accompanied by using tokens from harmed communities as weaponized shields against criticism, characterized by self-promotion, hypersensitivity / defensiveness over critique, and especially through performative “I’ve done so much for you” emotional blackmail. After digging through his background, this feels like a cynical “rebrand” after the sexual abuse allegations (in the most generous of assessments). TL;DR — the best rule of thumb I have for vetting sincere disengagement is: analyze actions (not words or performative gestures) over time. He fails the test (I’m being polite in my language here). (Sorry for the essay)

English
1
1
10
566
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
Thank YOU for caring! I also just had an in-depth conversation about this whole thing with a former Neo-Nazi I know extremely well, as I wanted his perspective (and I think the debate reflects just how dehumanized Palestinians are — so I feel a comparative case cuts to the heart of the matter more clearly). He left the movement when I was still in high school (2001), and didn’t enter an activist capacity of his life until 2015. After I filled him in on the Shaeil / Adam Project story (note the parallel concerns below), his first response was: “Seriously? Imagine Jeff [a fake former and grifter who pretended to be out — after an arrest, mind you — and not just immediately began a ‘derad expert’ grift, but also literally flushed his phone down the toilet to prevent police from obtaining his contacts for the Charlottesville civil suit] having control over anyone’s data?! HELL NO. The audacity!” I think this former Nazi’s reaction is CRUCIAL for folks to consider, namely because there are paradigms of harm surrounding relative victim populations — Palestinian life is not treated as equally valuable, and even this debate about “helping” them not just reveals that differential, but makes it stunningly, depressingly clear. Here’s a stark example of what I mean by that: NO ONE ON EARTH would be comfortable with an ex-Nazi “vetting” Jews and controlling their data NOW, regardless of how long that Nazi had “been out of the SS. Now let’s apply the same temporal parameters that apply to the Holocaust - how should we ethically respond to a suggestion that a Nazi who left the SS one year ago now (and still maintained and publicly referenced “friends” in his former unit) be entrusted with relief efforts for the same Jewish population *while the Holocaust ACTIVELY CONTINUED*?! Point being: if we say “it’s a genocide,” and MEAN “it’s a genocide,” we treat the at-risk population LIKE IT IS A GENOCIDE. Finally, I told the former Neo-Nazi I spoke with that despite how close we are, how long we’ve known each other, and how long he’s been out — I would NEVER be comfortable with him in a public or private-facing data collection / vetting role for any at-risk community (not even those experiencing genocide). I’ll close with his response to that, as it’s even more telling about what sincere reform, authentic self-work, and ethics in actions looks like: “You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. I’ve been out 25 years, and not only would it never occur to me to propose something like that, but no matter who asked me or how many times, there’s no way in hell I would even consider it. That’s not my place.” Says it all, really.
English
1
0
5
694
Shabana Mir
Shabana Mir@ShabanaMir1·
Some people feel like investigating and exposing Shaiel ben Ephraim is a distraction, but I am glad people have learned the facts about him. I've been warning people to block SBE for a while now. Every red flag🚩 As The Provost says, SBE *suddenly* became an Israel critic,
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة@MsEntropy

I had no idea about his background until I saw BM’s posts, and I’m really, really glad I did. As someone who helps white supremacists leave the movement, I know A LOT about how those who have done immense harm and GENUINELY want to atone behave in their sincere quest for accountability and restorative justice. To name just a few huge red flags (now that I’ve read his posts alongside BM’s): - the ridiculously short time between “renouncing” his past beliefs / actions (especially IDF activities). The process of recognizing what you’ve done takes a looooooooooong period of time if it’s authentically motivated. They know damn well “I said sorry” is nowhere near enough, and “I already apologized” is a sign they haven’t even scratched the surface of self-examination yet, because it isn’t a one thing. It’s lifelong. - quick public positioning and self-promotion as an “ally” (there are loads of alleged ex-Nazis that cynically use the “exit” rhetoric / gesture as a grift, and the points I’m talking about here are all what those of us antifascists who believe in the possibility of redemption and help them leave are VEEEERY closely watching for as we vet them). Sincere formers generally experience so much shame and self-flagellation for what they’ve done that they are timid about entering the activist space in any public capacity for quite some time. - defensiveness (especially passive aggressive) to criticism and skepticism, particularly from other formers as well as members of communities they’ve harmed. Actual accountability and restorative justice requires both humility and recognizing no one “owes” you forgiveness, trust, or acceptance. Sincere formers encourage skepticism about their intentions and motivations, because they’ve done enough work to realize why we have every reason to consider them threats. People can change, even those who’ve done immense and irreparable harm (and they can become incredibly powerful allies)— I know this very well. However, it’s rare, particularly because of how much intense and long-term work is required. When it’s sincere and authentic, the “I’m a new person” public announcement / rebirth intro doesn’t come so soon, isn’t accompanied by using tokens from harmed communities as weaponized shields against criticism, characterized by self-promotion, hypersensitivity / defensiveness over critique, and especially through performative “I’ve done so much for you” emotional blackmail. After digging through his background, this feels like a cynical “rebrand” after the sexual abuse allegations (in the most generous of assessments). TL;DR — the best rule of thumb I have for vetting sincere disengagement is: analyze actions (not words or performative gestures) over time. He fails the test (I’m being polite in my language here). (Sorry for the essay)

English
3
4
49
1.5K
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
Thank YOU for caring! I also just had an in-depth conversation about this whole thing with a former Neo-Nazi I know extremely well, as I wanted his perspective (and I think the debate reflects just how dehumanized Palestinians are — so I feel a comparative case cuts to the heart of the matter more clearly). He left the movement when I was still in high school (2001), and didn’t enter an activist capacity of his life until 2015. After I filled him in on the Shaeil / Adam Project story (note the parallel concerns below), his first response was: “Seriously? Imagine Jeff [a fake former and grifter who pretended to be out — after an arrest, mind you — and not just immediately began a ‘derad expert’ grift, but also literally flushed his phone down the toilet to prevent police from obtaining his contacts for the Charlottesville civil suit] having control over anyone’s data?! HELL NO. The audacity!” I think this former Nazi’s reaction is CRUCIAL for folks to consider, namely because there are paradigms of harm surrounding relative victim populations — Palestinian life is not treated as equally valuable, and even this debate about “helping” them not just reveals that differential, but makes it stunningly, depressingly clear. Here’s a stark example of what I mean by that: NO ONE ON EARTH would be comfortable with an ex-Nazi “vetting” Jews and controlling their data NOW, regardless of how long that Nazi had “been out of the SS. Now let’s apply the same temporal parameters that apply to the Holocaust - how should we ethically respond to a suggestion that a Nazi who left the SS one year ago now (and still maintained and publicly referenced “friends” in his former unit) be entrusted with relief efforts for the same Jewish population *while the Holocaust ACTIVELY CONTINUED*?! Point being: if we say “it’s a genocide,” and MEAN “it’s a genocide,” we treat the at-risk population LIKE IT IS A GENOCIDE. Finally, I told the former Neo-Nazi I spoke with that despite how close we are, how long we’ve known each other, and how long he’s been out — I would NEVER be comfortable with him in a public or private-facing data collection / vetting role for any at-risk community (not even those experiencing genocide). I’ll close with his response to that, as it’s even more telling about what sincere reform, authentic self-work, and ethics in actions looks like: “You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. I’ve been out 25 years, and not only would it never occur to me to propose something like that, but no matter who asked me or how many times, there’s no way in hell I would even consider it. That’s not my place.” Says it all, really.
English
0
0
3
70
Shabana Mir
Shabana Mir@ShabanaMir1·
BM's work is brilliant in how he exposes Israeli horrors. I am concerned that Shaiel & co. are trying to hurt BM. We know there is no red line for Israel. I find it very disturbing the way Shaiel is trying to dig up information on BM's identity, location, and activities.
B.M.@ireallyhateyou

So now Shaiel wants to doxx me. To do that, he's collaborating with a gang of psychopathic scum who's been after me, after @RadioWatermelon, and after people in Gaza for a while now. Well, go ahead Shaiel. Unlike you, my past is not the past of a terrorist Zionist and abuser.

English
9
26
117
3.6K
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
Today is my birthday, and tomorrow will mark two years since my mother was killed. This year, I want to see more than a landscape of horror and instead, inshallah, the air that gave her wings. RIP. I’m grateful you’re finally free now, no matter how it happened.
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة tweet mediaThe Provost / سيدة الفتنة tweet media
English
17
9
198
6K
Hend Amry
Hend Amry@LibyaLiberty·
Libyans still have the dna of the Roman Empire. Libya is still a mix of ethnicities. I’m of Amazigh heritage and so was emperor Septimus Severus. I could be emperor of Rome today, according to you. Or at least a citizen.
Dan Naturman@DanNaturman

@LibyaLiberty “Used to be part of our colonial empire” is not the same as “is the indigenous land of our ancestors”.

English
5
23
121
6.4K
Anonymous
Anonymous@YourAnonNews·
We’re all going to let them inject bleach and take ivermectin this time, right?
English
483
723
8.1K
88.2K
Madelaine Hanson
Madelaine Hanson@MadelaineLucyH·
I love very, very stupid men. More specifically, very stupid men who believe they are extremely intelligent and wander confidently between my teeth
English
9
4
67
5K
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
I also think it’s crucial to recognize that political position sorting isn’t a factor here with what I’m talking about (at least in the usual sense of that terminology). Many formers are Republicans and Centrists (as well as going more left); they’ll often be quite clear about articulating what they’re working through / out of as hate and harm ideology. Some take that to be general “extremism” (a la “both sides”) and some instead identify, for example, the right as more receptive to their previous beliefs. It’s more accurate to say “no one sees themself as a bad person” vs “political sorting” — because the more important and relevant blindspot is Manichean moral certainty about one’s own actions and motivations. And, again, that’s a question of “doing the work” required, by which I hope it’s clearer now that I mean “self-reflection” in the therapeutic sense (I think I specified that), and absolutely not in some Maoist struggle session sense — those are entirely different things.
English
0
0
1
43
David
David@Foreman1David·
@MsEntropy @missyerem @oliveegirl Activist spaces are by definition propagandist. Success requires persuasion of sincerity as well as right argument, so deducing actors’ motivation from within them is uncertain. Typically, good and bad people don’t sort by any political position, hence also moral injury risk.
English
2
0
0
15
Theresa ♿
Theresa ♿@TheatreSpoonie·
@MsEntropy You deserve peace and happiness all year. I'm grateful for your wisdom.
English
1
0
1
7
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
Yes, but again, since I’m speaking from personal experience with a very specific group, I’ll clarify more explicitly: the former Neo-Nazis and white supremacist extremists that I help leave do not approach me because they intend to become activists; rather, they are trying to find ways of processing doubts and disillusionment at first, and in turn, trying to understand both what they’ve believed and done as well as tentatively explore the process, implications, and stakes of disengagement. None of them are trying to become activists; those that express such an intention at the beginning are highly suspect — those are either in denial about the long road ahead or, more worryingly, have ulterior motives. The group I’m specifically focusing on are those who reach out, determined to disentangle their souls from the hate and harm they’re immersed in. Most never have any desire to become “activists” the way you’re interpreting it here — those that enter “change-making spaces” (shall we say) eventually feel compelled to speak out from their experiences in the interest of harm reduction and/or restorative justice (much of the latter doesn’t involve public-facing work beyond community initiatives). Your point about “propagandistic” activism spaces actually underscores my points, because the desire for rapid entry to those is, itself, a signal that one has not done enough therapeutic self-work, and/or is driven by motivations that necessitate scrutiny (such intentions, at best, can mean someone is seeking validation to assuage guilt for the past — again, not having done enough reflection yet for deep change internally — or, at worst, cynical factors like grifting / celebrity status and/or bad actor motivations like infiltration). I’m not generalizing here, but speaking to long term experience with a specific population and specific processes of disengagement, accountability, and restorative justice — as opposed to the issue of moral injury’s multivaried psychological and behavioral manifestations.
English
0
0
1
22
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
Appreciate that, and I probably will - I just went through his profile and screenshotted so many examples of those red flags (and others). I’ve written a lot about these issues with former Neo-Nazis, but definitely should apply that to a deeper analysis here / on substack. Thanks for the suggestion!
English
0
0
0
31
Pathocracy Info
Pathocracy Info@Narcopath_UK·
@MsEntropy Thanks for the thread. You should write more about it. It's just me. 😊
English
1
0
0
29
Pathocracy Info
Pathocracy Info@Narcopath_UK·
I usually skip long threads, but this one has some genuinely good insight - especially on forgiveness and inner housekeeping. Glad to see other people picking up on his patterns too.
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة@MsEntropy

I had no idea about his background until I saw BM’s posts, and I’m really, really glad I did. As someone who helps white supremacists leave the movement, I know A LOT about how those who have done immense harm and GENUINELY want to atone behave in their sincere quest for accountability and restorative justice. To name just a few huge red flags (now that I’ve read his posts alongside BM’s): - the ridiculously short time between “renouncing” his past beliefs / actions (especially IDF activities). The process of recognizing what you’ve done takes a looooooooooong period of time if it’s authentically motivated. They know damn well “I said sorry” is nowhere near enough, and “I already apologized” is a sign they haven’t even scratched the surface of self-examination yet, because it isn’t a one thing. It’s lifelong. - quick public positioning and self-promotion as an “ally” (there are loads of alleged ex-Nazis that cynically use the “exit” rhetoric / gesture as a grift, and the points I’m talking about here are all what those of us antifascists who believe in the possibility of redemption and help them leave are VEEEERY closely watching for as we vet them). Sincere formers generally experience so much shame and self-flagellation for what they’ve done that they are timid about entering the activist space in any public capacity for quite some time. - defensiveness (especially passive aggressive) to criticism and skepticism, particularly from other formers as well as members of communities they’ve harmed. Actual accountability and restorative justice requires both humility and recognizing no one “owes” you forgiveness, trust, or acceptance. Sincere formers encourage skepticism about their intentions and motivations, because they’ve done enough work to realize why we have every reason to consider them threats. People can change, even those who’ve done immense and irreparable harm (and they can become incredibly powerful allies)— I know this very well. However, it’s rare, particularly because of how much intense and long-term work is required. When it’s sincere and authentic, the “I’m a new person” public announcement / rebirth intro doesn’t come so soon, isn’t accompanied by using tokens from harmed communities as weaponized shields against criticism, characterized by self-promotion, hypersensitivity / defensiveness over critique, and especially through performative “I’ve done so much for you” emotional blackmail. After digging through his background, this feels like a cynical “rebrand” after the sexual abuse allegations (in the most generous of assessments). TL;DR — the best rule of thumb I have for vetting sincere disengagement is: analyze actions (not words or performative gestures) over time. He fails the test (I’m being polite in my language here). (Sorry for the essay)

English
1
4
6
628
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
Yes, I’m aware. I’m focusing here not on its manifestations because that’s a more general subject than the specific group of people who enter activist spaces motivated by, in their articulation, the desire to do restorative justice work for and with the populations they see as harmed by their actions.
English
1
0
0
26
David
David@Foreman1David·
@MsEntropy @missyerem @oliveegirl A feature of moral injury is that once injured, people may no longer experience the moral weighting of morally divergent actions. While it can lead to subjective distress & withdrawal it can also lead to surprising changes in expressed views attitudes & behaviour.
English
1
0
0
27
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة
@WarFrontIntel @MrMosis True, but, there are absolutely clear red flags to help, and from my experience — he’s showing the most important ones at every turn.
The Provost / سيدة الفتنة@MsEntropy

I had no idea about his background until I saw BM’s posts, and I’m really, really glad I did. As someone who helps white supremacists leave the movement, I know A LOT about how those who have done immense harm and GENUINELY want to atone behave in their sincere quest for accountability and restorative justice. To name just a few huge red flags (now that I’ve read his posts alongside BM’s): - the ridiculously short time between “renouncing” his past beliefs / actions (especially IDF activities). The process of recognizing what you’ve done takes a looooooooooong period of time if it’s authentically motivated. They know damn well “I said sorry” is nowhere near enough, and “I already apologized” is a sign they haven’t even scratched the surface of self-examination yet, because it isn’t a one thing. It’s lifelong. - quick public positioning and self-promotion as an “ally” (there are loads of alleged ex-Nazis that cynically use the “exit” rhetoric / gesture as a grift, and the points I’m talking about here are all what those of us antifascists who believe in the possibility of redemption and help them leave are VEEEERY closely watching for as we vet them). Sincere formers generally experience so much shame and self-flagellation for what they’ve done that they are timid about entering the activist space in any public capacity for quite some time. - defensiveness (especially passive aggressive) to criticism and skepticism, particularly from other formers as well as members of communities they’ve harmed. Actual accountability and restorative justice requires both humility and recognizing no one “owes” you forgiveness, trust, or acceptance. Sincere formers encourage skepticism about their intentions and motivations, because they’ve done enough work to realize why we have every reason to consider them threats. People can change, even those who’ve done immense and irreparable harm (and they can become incredibly powerful allies)— I know this very well. However, it’s rare, particularly because of how much intense and long-term work is required. When it’s sincere and authentic, the “I’m a new person” public announcement / rebirth intro doesn’t come so soon, isn’t accompanied by using tokens from harmed communities as weaponized shields against criticism, characterized by self-promotion, hypersensitivity / defensiveness over critique, and especially through performative “I’ve done so much for you” emotional blackmail. After digging through his background, this feels like a cynical “rebrand” after the sexual abuse allegations (in the most generous of assessments). TL;DR — the best rule of thumb I have for vetting sincere disengagement is: analyze actions (not words or performative gestures) over time. He fails the test (I’m being polite in my language here). (Sorry for the essay)

English
0
0
1
47