NB

3.1K posts

NB banner
NB

NB

@NBartholdus

International Security, investment and politics. Army officer.

Katılım Şubat 2021
294 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@PolymarketIntel I wonder if this includes products from #palantir.. if so good lucking selling Palantir software anywhere else than the US.
English
0
0
0
188
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@Jennifer_Ruth74 @sentdefender Congrats. The US is no longer the leader of the free world. You will stand alone against China. Good luck.
English
0
0
0
6
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
According to White House Officials who spoke to CBS News, following the argument in the Oval Office between U.S. President Donald J. Trump, Vice-President JD Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky; the Ukrainian delegation retreated into a nearby room, where they were then told they had to leave the White House by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz.
OSINTdefender tweet media
English
739
1.5K
10.4K
961.1K
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@BillMeyer_1 @sentdefender We will. The US is no longer the leader of the free world. You (The US) will end up fighting China alone. Congrats.
English
0
0
2
28
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@USAperegrino @sentdefender We see you. And we laught at you. The US is no longer the Leader of the free World. Only result of this, is that the US will face China alone. Good luck.
English
0
0
1
14
migolito
migolito@UsMigolito·
@sentdefender So proud right now! Thank you POTUS, thank you VPOTUS, thank you Marco Rubio!!! The rest of the world was watching, and now they hear.
English
73
2
124
14.9K
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@gunnarisholm @JonasHerby @KarstenKrogh14 Eller også er hun påvirket af det, fordi det, ligesom for os andre, går op for hende at USA er 100 procent på Ruslands side. Og uanset hvad Ukraine havde gjort/gør, så vil det ende med at Rusland tager alt for store dele af Ukraine.
Dansk
0
0
1
7
Gunnar Isholm
Gunnar Isholm@gunnarisholm·
@JonasHerby @KarstenKrogh14 Zelenskyj kaldte JD Vance en “bitch” for åben mikrofon på ukrainsk i Det Hvide Hus. Hans attitude sagde det hele. Hans mimik, hans krydsede arme, og hans modvilje mod fred. Den ukrainske ambassadør tog sig til hovedet, og hun virkede flov. Det var ikke en statsmand værdigt.
Dansk
1
0
1
23
Karsten Krogh
Karsten Krogh@KarstenKrogh14·
Det er værd lige at læse det her igennem.
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania

I watched the entire press conference with Zelensky. There was 40 minutes of discussion up to the argument. Most people saw at most the last ten minutes. The whole video gives the proper context. When I first watched the argument without the proper context, I thought it was possible that Trump and Vance ambushed Zelensky or were even trying to humiliate him. That's not what happened. You had 40 minutes of calm conversation. Vance made a point that didn't attack Zelensky and wasn't even addressed to him, and Zelensky clearly started the argument. In the first 40 minutes, Zelensky kept trying to go beyond what was negotiated in the deal. When Trump was asked a question, it was always "we'll see." Zelensky made blanket assertions that there would be no negotiating with Putin, and that Russia would pay for the war. When Trump said that it was a tragedy that people on both sides were dying, Zelensky interjected that the Russians were the invaders. For his part, Trump made clear that the US would continue delivering military aid. All Zelensky had to do was remain calm for a few more minutes and they would've signed a deal. The argument started when Trump pointed out that it would be hard to make a deal if you talk about Putin the way Zelensky does. Vance interjects to make the reasonable point that Biden called Putin names and that didn't get us anywhere. The Zelensky/Trump dynamic was calm and stable. It was when Vance spoke that Zelensky started to interrogate him. Throughout the press conference to that point, everyone was making their arguments directly to the audience. Zelensky decided to challenge Vance and ask him hostile questions. He went back to his point that Putin never sticks to ceasefires, once again implying that negotiations are pointless. Why on earth would you do this? Then came the fight we all saw. Zelensky was minutes away from being home free, and he would have had the deal and new commitments from the Trump administration. The point Vance made was directed against Biden and the media, taking them to task for speaking in moralistic terms. This offended Zelensky, and that began the argument. I've been a fan of Zelensky up to this point, but this showed so much incompetence, if not emotional instability, that I don't see how he recovers from this. The relationship with the administration is broken. Ukraine should probably go with new leadership at this point.

Dansk
19
10
138
20.5K
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@offgriddesigner @CilComLFC You should take a look into who he is. This will lead to nothing, because all the other MP are full aware that this was a trap and Russia would only use a ceasefire to further strengthening their military.
NB tweet media
English
0
0
0
106
Ryan
Ryan@offgriddesigner·
@CilComLFC No need to apologise mate. You’re bang on, and they’re wrong. Keep at it, you’re hurting them 💪
English
4
1
36
4.1K
Cillian
Cillian@CilComLFC·
🇺🇦 BREAKING: Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Dubinsky just called for an Emergency Session of Ukraine’s Parliament to initiate IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against President Zelensky after the Oval Office shouting match. This is HUGE. Zelensky’s Regime is collapsing in real time.
Cillian tweet media
English
7.1K
32.8K
143.1K
10.8M
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@DavidH8822 @pelledragsted Uanset hvad VS havde sagt i aften, så havde DT og JD vendt det til præcis samme resultat. De ønsker ikke at bruge flere penge på Ukraine. Nu får de Ukraine til at fremstå som dem der ikke ønsker fred - og kan stoppe støtten (eller få EU til at betale 100%).
Dansk
0
0
0
7
David Hanson
David Hanson@DavidH8822·
@pelledragsted Det var da Zelensky, der begyndte det. Hvorfor skulle han begynde at sætte spørgsmålstegn og udfordre det Vance sig på åbent TV? Havde han regnet med, at de ikke ville sige noget igen?
Dansk
1
0
1
118
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@pelledragsted Jeg har aldrig rigtig været enig med dig i noget Pelle - men her har du helt ret. Jeg håber dog at du også kan se truslen fra Rusland, som betyder at vi må opruste militært. Samtidig med at vi på alle andre måder frigør os fra USA.
Dansk
1
0
0
35
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@Paulkdougherty @jimsciutto And I’m sure the people of Greenland would rather live as they do now than how people live in Alaska.
English
0
0
0
19
Jim Sciutto
Jim Sciutto@jimsciutto·
A reminder: Denmark, as a fellow member of NATO, is a U.S. treaty ally. It exceeds Trump’s demand to spend 2% of GDP on defense. And it fought alongside US forces in Afghanistan in frontline operations, losing several dozen soldiers.
Kaitlan Collins@kaitlancollins

Asked if he could assure the world that as he tries to take control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, he would not use "military or economic coercion," Trump tells @SangerNYT, "No, I can’t assure you on either of those two." A remarkable moment.

English
217
1.2K
7.2K
491.5K
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@MaMoMVPY A nice way to enable chinas hostile takeover of Taiwan.. Handing over the world’s tier one semiconductor production AND dividing NATO across the Atlantic. I am speechless.
English
0
0
0
67
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@Paulkdougherty @jimsciutto So yeah. Most doctors etc. are Danish and paid by Denmark. Greenland is a huge country with no infrastructure - but with high expectations for the level of service Denmark or US is able to provide them.
English
0
0
0
33
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@Paulkdougherty @jimsciutto If the US takes over, they would then either change the system to the American one. Or pay like Denmark have done, to support what many republicans would call a communist system.. I don’t think that will happen.
English
1
0
0
23
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@Paulkdougherty @jimsciutto The social society in Denmark and Greenland is very different from the US. We pay higher taxes. But get education, healthcare etc. in return. Greenland is not today, able to finance this on their own. Therefor is a large part of their budget financed by Denmark.
English
1
0
0
25
Harry Limey
Harry Limey@harry_limey·
@steven_pifer He probably wants missile bases there and I don’t mean small, harmless kinds of missiles..
English
1
0
0
803
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@santafelife @steven_pifer You already have access to that.. no reason to give China all the reason in the world to take Taiwan this way. This is so stupid that it is almost unreal.
English
0
0
6
248
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@libphil_ @ulrikcrgerahm @twoslicesobread @jimsciutto Yep. And if the US wants to deliver Taiwan to China and after that face them on their own - go ahead and take Greenland by force.. If the US want to maintain NATO as of today - and with a free Taiwan, I would drop this shit RN.
English
0
0
0
37
NB
NB@NBartholdus·
@libphil_ @twoslicesobread @jimsciutto Well. It would not be Denmark stopping it. Again. There have been tenders for mining that no one wanted. If the US wants it now - I’m quite sure that everyone would make an agreement. But the final decision is for the people of Greenland.
English
0
0
2
157