Nora Wheeler

@ZachCostello_ @JohnMappin All of this, followed by the coordinated “Candace is evil” “Candace is demonic” for doing what every good homockde detective would do, start with those closest to the victim, an the spouse is always the first to be investigatesd.

There are three key moments that caused me to take the Candace Owens investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination case seriously, which I initially and admittedly, was skeptical of... 1) When Eric Bolling got caught lying about her on the Patrick Bet David podcast. He said Candace had not been invited to TPUSA events for years, when in fact it was verified she had been less than a year prior to his statement. He also claimed that Charlie Kirk had a "silent break up" with Candace for her "chasing down too many rabbit holes," which Andrew Kolvet himself denied and verified that they remained friends. Eric Bolling then returned to the Patrick Bet David podcast to rescind his statements, since they were false. This however did not stop Dave Rubin from reposting the false claims that Eric Bolling made at the time, stating that based on his own experience, what Eric said was true - so he blatantly lied too. This opened my eyes to the smear campaign being waged against her. Then... 2) After Candace Owens released the now famous text messages of Charlie saying that he had "no choice but to leave the Pro-Israel cause, they accused her of forging them and making them up. These obviously turned out to be very authentic as verified by the source, Andrew Kolvet. Funny, they are now the most important classified documents in American history and whoever leaked them must be hanged for treason. Finally... 3) Candace has identified strange activity that occurred the day of the assassination including the Egyptian plane that dropped military contractors in Provo, Utah the week leading up to September 10th, these contractors did not leave on the same plane the morning of the assassination. An eye witness at Utah Valley University claims to have seen an individual on the Losee Building rooftop the week prior to the assassination. This same flight landed in Wimington, DE under a special foreign dignitary status, which required escort by the FBI field office at One Rodney Square. This, in addition to the fact that there was a decoy (George Zinn) on the ground that day, who said he was paid to do so, vehicles seemingly working with the Dodge Challenger allegedly driven by Tyler Robinson before and after the assassination, along with online group chatter about the assassination beforehand, suggest that something bigger than just the 'lone wolf' Tyler Robinson could have taken place. Further details have emerged about Erika Kirk and members of TPUSA not being truthful about how things played out that day like Mikey McCoy acting like a hero, Terryl Farnsworth not being truthful about why he took the cameras down behind Charlie, Tracy Martin not being truthful about why her daughter didn't show up to work like she was supposed to that day, when different members of TPUSA took their fights to Provo after they had received the news, etc. The inconsistencies, in a word, dishonesty, about these smaller details add fuel to the skepticism fire. It was a terrible thing that happened that day, but the easiest thing to do is be honest. You don't forget reality, that is unless you are trying to distort it. I believe these items serve as the foundation of what Candace Owens, and other who have contributed, have done. I do not believe we are being told the full truth about what happened to Charlie Kirk just like we were not told the full truth about COVID, the lab leak, or the COVID vaccine... I actually think it very naive to just blindly trust what we are being told at this point by those in positions of big power and influence.

@TylerWitwitty @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO We won’t agree. Thanks for being cordial and respectful. I hope you have a good rest of your day.

@NWheeler623 @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO Nobody is discrediting his words besides you. He spoke 1000s of words daily. All day every day.

Narcissistic vengefulness. They view the exposure of that text thread as the beginning of the public recognition that Charlie was betrayed. It was the launch pad for people with common sense asking “why hide the fact that Charlie’s views were changing about Israel, unless it’s somehow relevant to his assassination?” “Why didn’t Turning Point, or Erika back Candace up when she told the truth?” It was the first crack in their narrative. Were they not guilty, they would be tremendously grateful to the people who exposed the truth about Charlie’s final days. As I have said many times, Turning Point execs possess a dangerously low emotional IQ. They don’t know how innocent parties behave. They can’t even imitate innocence. Anger towards Joe Kent makes them look worse. Were I running their PR, I would have had Joe Kent on the Charlie Kirk show. Instead, they send Israeli attack dogs on him.

@TylerWitwitty @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO Thats simply not true. You just want to apply less value or importance to some of his words. When it comes to these text messages, they stand in their own. You are minimizing them or applying your own lense.

@TylerWitwitty @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO You don’t know that, and neither do I.

@Tatiana83196605 @NWheeler623 @RealCandaceO This is factually correct for his personal religious beliefs. Those sre not the same as running a donor funded 501c3.

@Tatiana83196605 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO My point is it’s not that simple, you shouldn’t just discredit his words. They COULD point to something bigger. I would prefer to know the entire truth and why they were lying about these texts.

@NWheeler623 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO He also said many other things in support of Israel AFTER this text message and up until his death. What's your point?

@Tatiana83196605 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO Then you are discrediting the level of influence he had both with voters and Trump. He also spent time at the White House convincing Trump not to go to war with Iran last year. Unfortunately we will never know what he would think today.

@NWheeler623 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO He was anti-war but he supported the President. Did you not see his video saying that? There are plenty of -anti-war people in government or in podcast world that are still alive today.

@Tatiana83196605 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO His words said it. You would have to prove that he didn’t.

@NWheeler623 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO Yes, we can agree that Charlie had influence. What you can’t prove is that he adopted a new position to abandon Israel. People say things out of frustration all the time. And there’s no evidence that Israel or Erika had anything to do with his death.

@Tatiana83196605 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO He was anti war with Iran. You don’t have to pick one, you could pick neither.

@NWheeler623 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO Charlie was never going to go from supporting Israel to supporting Hamas. He knew very well those were the choices. Charlie died a Zionist.

@TylerWitwitty @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO In simplistic form, yes. In this case, his influence carried much bigger implications than a shoe contract. It had the ability to affect voter sentiment. Can we agree on that?

@NWheeler623 @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO Yes as sponsors do. Sponsors all the time pressure the people or orgz they sponsor to not implement a competing brand. Tucker was a competing brand, the sponsor justifiably pulled his sponsor. It would be like Michael Jordan wearing Reebok shoes. Nike would pull out.

@TylerWitwitty @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO Listen, you can interpret it this way if you’d like. This was much more than losing a sponsor. He was being pressured and much more. He spoke about this. Except this shift had big implications for many. I choose to believe his actual words, not someone’s interpretation of them.

@NWheeler623 @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO Nora what do you think a 501c3 is?

@TylerWitwitty @Tatiana83196605 @RealCandaceO

No. It literal proves nothing about his views on Israel. It's like a sponsorship. When you lose a sponsorship you stop promoting the product. Charlie lost his donations so he stopped promoting the product. It is truly that simple. It is business. Charlie made an error with having Tucker on and it cost him his sponsorship.

@AndrewKolvet Nah, this is the wrong answer. You SHOULD want every angle thoroughly investigated. As Charlie’s “friends” you should be outraged Kash Patel shut it down.

Shortly after Robinson’s arrest, the prosecutors released a probable cause affidavit detailing the evidence gathered immediately after Charlie’s assassination. The evidence presented at that time was overwhelming. In the months that have followed, we know the investigation has continued. More details will come out in May, when the assassin has a probable cause hearing and we are certain there will be even more evidence demonstrating why the State believes Tyler Robinson is the assassin. But now we have a government official, Joe Kent, who has reportedly indicated he is willing to testify on behalf of the defense, to get Robinson off the hook for an evil he committed. Joe Kent just crossed a red line, and it's a massive betrayal of Charlie, his wife, his kids, and the entire TPUSA family. Just because HE didnt get let into the investigation doesnt mean it wasn't investigated.

@Tatiana83196605 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO It proves nothing?? Or it proves what everyone was denying, that his views were changing. His actual WORDS prove the latter.

@NWheeler623 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO It proves nothing but frustration with donors. So what?!?

@Tatiana83196605 @TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO Or, believe his actual words that his views were changing without injecting your own narrative

@TylerWitwitty @RealCandaceO You’re 100% right, @TylerWitwitty. I don’t think his views were changing—he was just frustrated, the same way people get frustrated with the American government. Trying to link that to his death is a huge stretch evil. Her hatred of Jews is what’s driving all of this.

@deyni_zavala @dom_lucre She stand a fact, which you did not disprove,you called her a compulsive liar. I hope YOU find peace.

@NWheeler623 @dom_lucre Are you willfully dumb? She tried to downplay her relationship to Dom because he is spilling the beans. Hope you find peace.

Dear Candace Owens, I was never your employee, I have no idea why they would say that but I am your former State Director of Tennessee that you personally awarded as leader of the year in 2021 just 4 months after. I joined Blexit due me making the Tennessee chapter one of your top 3 chapters in just 3 months, outpacing every other state in America except a Texas and Florida. We went from 36th chapter to number 3 under my leadership. You’re a master of wording, a volunteer can never be considered an employee I did everything for free out my love for America, my community and my trust and admiration for you. You made this appear as if I’m some crazy negro talking out the side of my neck and that attacks my credibility which I am now forced to defend. Now here are your receipts for your purchase.

@deyni_zavala @dom_lucre Are you willfully obtuse? What she posted is 100% true. End of story.

Pay attention. He was a volunteer, not an employee. He never claimed he was an employee. Someone else who posted about it did. So she used that to discredit him from being connected to her. That is what people are calling her out for. Acting as if they didn't work together. She even said "this person" as if she didn't know his name. You can play the shell game all you want but it's irrelevant because he proved that in fact they know each other really well.

@deyni_zavala @dom_lucre lol he confirmed he was never employed by her. Again, where is the lie?

@NWheeler623 @dom_lucre Lol you and I both know she is trying to discredit him as someone who wasn't connected to her. So he proved her wrong. He knows her very well and odds are everything he is saying about her is true.

@deyni_zavala @dom_lucre Where is the lie?

@dom_lucre She truly is a compulsive liar.

@BuzzPatterson And we got neither

I didn’t vote for a “nice” president. I voted for an “effective” president.

@RapidResponse47 So easy, why isn’t it done?