
NativeOK
1.6K posts





For ten months the TPUSA/Erika Kirk camp has responded to @RealCandaceO not by addressing her specific claims point by point, but by criticizing her personally. They call her evil, demonic, a grifter and much much worse. And they criticize you as being a blind sycophant and lickspittle of this evil spirit. Yet the substance of their public response remains remarkably consistent, viz. an unqualified blind acceptance of the official narrative. A preposterous narrative that has nothing to do with reality. Or the evidence at hand. Rather than presenting a detailed counter-analysis, they dismiss her conclusions without offering a comprehensive alternative examination of the evidence. The debate has become less about competing factual narratives and more about attacking the messenger instead of systematically answering the message. They have no Candace. How could they?








Before anyone calls me crazy, or an antisemite for the statements I've made this week... recall, Charlie himself said them first.. before he was shot dead inside a 🕎 at the potential behest of Ben Shapiro



























