Panth

4.4K posts

Panth banner
Panth

Panth

@NaturalismPanth

Amherst College '22, studied psychology/cog neuro & philreligion https://t.co/5vSaRJtoK4 https://t.co/jmmDJs5BAU

Katılım Kasım 2012
455 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
Is there a God? What can neuroscience tell us about consciousness and perception? Are we morally responsible in spite of determinism? All these questions will be answered on the new Naturalism Next substack! Please subscribe and spread the word naturalismnext.substack.com/p/welcome-to-n…
English
2
3
26
9.9K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@WoosterJeeves2 @SpeedWatkins The difference is that the idea behind OP’s argument is that it’s problematic because we lack moral responsibility. In the other case we have it, so the way one argued for the problem looks different to me
English
1
0
0
30
Wooster Jeeves
Wooster Jeeves@WoosterJeeves2·
@NaturalismPanth @SpeedWatkins idk i think its quite closely related. it is still showing ~C through similar questions "why did god make us with desires that would lead to us going to hell" is the same as "why did god endow us with a character that would lead to us going to hell"
English
1
0
0
26
Benjamin Blake Speed Watkins 🇺🇸🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
Benjamin Blake Speed Watkins 🇺🇸🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️@SpeedWatkins·
My latest brief on why a perfectly good God could not justly withhold salvation. This reasoning, if sound, rebuts any objection that justice demands God withhold salvation from some because of the choices they have made.
Benjamin Blake Speed Watkins 🇺🇸🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ tweet media
Benjamin Blake Speed Watkins 🇺🇸🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️@SpeedWatkins

If God is perfectly good, He would desire to save everyone. If He is all-powerful, He would be able to do so. If both are true, everyone would be saved. Since not everyone is saved, either God lacks power, lacks goodness, or does not exist. Choose wisely.

English
38
5
44
12.3K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@darwintojesus I love the 15-30 range in this statement
English
1
0
4
52
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
This is a myth. Doing science requires blind faith in 15-30 totally unproven assumptions. Why is it that people who say they love science know basically nothing about it?
Juan Aguilar@juan1984

English
296
32
553
28.3K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@WoosterJeeves2 @SpeedWatkins I think you could say that but it'd be a different kind of argument (why did got create people who'd have the sort of desires that would lead them to hell)
English
1
0
0
23
Wooster Jeeves
Wooster Jeeves@WoosterJeeves2·
@NaturalismPanth @SpeedWatkins idt even thats right. bc even on compatibilism your choices are in some sense determined so we can ask why god didnt set up the beginning differently. even if im free in the sense that im acting on my desires, on theism god determined those desires and couldve given me other ones
English
1
0
0
31
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
We must admit that the hysteria around the trans issue from the right was incredibly effective at mentally booming an entire generation of men into adopting a completely deranged view of reality and uncritically accepting getting economically shafted over who goes into a bathroom
Panth tweet media
English
3
0
9
281
Panth retweetledi
James Martell
James Martell@James_Martell_·
rightwingers: we need to protect Western culture! profs: ok let us then have mandatory philosophy, literature, & art courses from junior high through college, together with mandatory fluency on 3 Western languages instruction by the time you graduate rightwingers: not like that
English
890
1.6K
14.3K
945.7K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@waldenpod If the majority say that majority opinions aren’t evidentially significant that would create a cool paradox
English
0
0
3
99
Emerson Green
Emerson Green@waldenpod·
I’m gonna take a poll about the philpapers survey to determine what I should think about the evidential significance of the results of the philpapers survey
English
5
0
34
1.5K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@ShaambaBaashdi @waldenpod I'm very pro meditation, super good practice - unfortunate that Harris is essentially braindead outside of a scant few issues
English
0
0
3
63
Emerson Green
Emerson Green@waldenpod·
This video was designed in a lab to make me go clinically insane
Emerson Green tweet media
English
8
0
59
7.2K
Paul Hoy
Paul Hoy@Covenant_Eagle·
@waldenpod You guys make videos that say mormonism is dumb, and laugh. Then when they make a video abkut yall, yall freak out and complain. Typical silly behavior.
English
3
0
1
276
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
Here are 100 basic philosophical facts, which go underappreciated in light of the focus on controversial topics
Alex Strasser tweet mediaAlex Strasser tweet mediaAlex Strasser tweet mediaAlex Strasser tweet media
English
25
114
791
43.9K
Panth retweetledi
God
God@PostsOfGod·
God tweet media
ZXX
81
7.2K
157.6K
1.8M
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@waldenpod Rare John Marco allegro reference GOATed
English
0
0
1
80
Emerson Green
Emerson Green@waldenpod·
Why is everyone so mad at me all the time
Emerson Green tweet media
English
6
1
22
1.4K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@TheosophicalW @analyticatheism Not sure it does for a few complex reasons but I don't think it matters to this discussion so let's just say yes - see what I said below
English
1
0
1
81
Ghost of the Australian Realists
Ghost of the Australian Realists@analyticatheism·
Just visited the atomic bomb museum in Hiroshima and it’s one of the few times I’ve been so vividly confronted by the reality of the problem of evil divorced from a theoretical context. I’m honestly relieved I don’t have the burden to explain/justify such evil as Theism does.
English
32
2
43
3.9K
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@TheosophicalW @analyticatheism analogy: if bob will be at the party, he will be drunk. If Alice will, she may or may not be. Observing someone drunk = clearly evidence for Bob over Alice, even if there's other evidence that Alice was way more likely to be at the party
English
0
0
0
61
Panth
Panth@NaturalismPanth·
@TheosophicalW @analyticatheism not that it matters, because if FT did imply E only on N but not T, then observing E would clearly be evidence for N over T, even if FT is more likely on T than N
English
2
0
1
110

Keşfet

@CapturingChrist @WoosterJeeves2 @SpeedWatkins @darwintojesus @waldenpod @ShaambaBaashdi @Covenant_Eagle @elonmusk