Alex Strasser

16.4K posts

Alex Strasser banner
Alex Strasser

Alex Strasser

@AStrasser116

Physics, Philosophy, Religion | PhD student in Materials Science | Blog: https://t.co/YrQOqpyr0k Substack: https://t.co/t53m9Q37Zg

Katılım Mart 2019
881 Takip Edilen5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
I finally created a substack (PsiPhiPi) and wrote an intro talking about my favorite things (link below). So, subscribe or whatever
Alex Strasser tweet media
English
15
6
104
22.6K
Ralph Stefan Weir
Ralph Stefan Weir@RalphStefanWeir·
Great to be in Lugano and to catch up with @ChristophAlin whose book on mind-body interaction will come out soon
Ralph Stefan Weir tweet mediaRalph Stefan Weir tweet mediaRalph Stefan Weir tweet mediaRalph Stefan Weir tweet media
English
0
0
6
351
Opie
Opie@PalaeoPhilo·
Where best to learn python?
English
5
0
4
404
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@matt_olma That's a good way to put it, the atheist starter pack haha
English
1
0
2
153
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@CharacterGap If I include my parents that skews it a bit and makes AI only average +0.11 more than human rating haha
Alex Strasser tweet media
English
0
0
0
135
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@CharacterGap I asked it after a Twitter trend of doing so regarding my moral virtues and it rated me like 95-99 percentile lol. Actually I asked a couple friends to rate me on 7 intellectual virtues and then chatgpt to do the same, and the results mixed over and under, average AI+0.64
Alex Strasser tweet media
English
1
0
0
254
Christian Miller
Christian Miller@CharacterGap·
Question: Have you used AI for honest feedback you don't think you would get (or get easily) from people in your life?
English
25
2
15
4.6K
Cas (Stephen Casper)
Cas (Stephen Casper)@StephenLCasper·
I recently finished preparing a 90-minute crash course presentation on [technical] AI governance, where we're at in 2026, and the different ways that things might change in the next few years. Let me know if you want me to give it sometime or share slides.
English
33
3
107
5.1K
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@AndyMasley My 2006 Mazda was like $7-8k when I bought it in 2013 and it's still going strong! It's all I need (Although it may be time for an update)
English
0
0
1
132
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@A_Philosopher Which is something we equally expect to find if the brain and mind closely causally interact, and even more so if the mind emerges from the brain. What we don't find in the brain are things that have alethic or intentional properties, and we find geometric properties not thoughts
English
1
0
0
33
Michael Perilstein
Michael Perilstein@A_Philosopher·
@AStrasser116 • We know the location of consciousness, in the brain, and can change what is perceived by stimulating these areas via surgery, electricity, magnetism, drugs, etc. thereby inducing artificial perceptions, We’ve found the things we’d expect exist to explain consciousness. •
English
1
0
0
24
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
Does the question of the soul ever play a role in people's deconversion stories? I feel like the soul was something of a purely religious concept that I was never given evidence for in a religious context (then I discovered the philosophy of mind)
English
12
1
31
2.9K
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@A_Philosopher But generally you ask "what would I expect to find if this thing exists" - if you find those things good, if not then do you find the things that you would expect if it does not exist? That's not looking good for its existence
English
1
0
0
21
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@A_Philosopher I would consider candidate support an argument. Maybe it's a bad argument, but whatever. By showing evidence that appears inconsistent with that thing, that's it's properties aren't found in reality, are incoherent, or whatever.
English
1
0
0
19
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@matt_olma if most people think something has a credence of <10% and I think it has a 50% chance of something, and it is interesting and fundamental to how we think of ourselves as humans or some other part of reality, I'd definitely be arguing for it!
English
0
0
2
66
Matt Olma
Matt Olma@matt_olma·
What even is the credence threshold to get into belief territory? Like, ~60%? It’s just odd to me that one would argue for p if they didn’t think it at least 60% probable.
English
2
0
5
239
Matt Olma
Matt Olma@matt_olma·
Implicit in arguing/defending that p is that you might sway others into ascending to p. If you don’t actually think that p is true - you don’t believe - it seems almost immoral to play a role in convincing others to believe it.
English
4
0
6
569
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@matt_olma If somebody's credence distribution is panpsychism 40% physicalism 30% dualism 20% idealism 10% 1) it seems reasonable to defend the view 2) since the average credence in panpsychism is more like <1%, you're likely to get someone closer to the "correct" credence
English
1
0
1
164
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
@A_Philosopher A series of statements that support a claim is an argument By exist, I mean something that is real, ie it is in reality. I wouldn't want to presuppose a particular metaphysical view of reality in defining the meaning of the term exist. But I can accept your def for a mind
English
1
0
0
13
Michael Perilstein
Michael Perilstein@A_Philosopher·
@AStrasser116 • A claim is not an argument. Let’s start with the fundamentals: When I use the word ‘exist,’ I mean that the thing in question is located somewhere in time and space and it’s made of something. What does that word mean when you use it? •
English
1
0
0
14
░▒▓▒░▒▓▒░▒▓▒░
@AStrasser116 i'm not sure why you would have a problem with them specifically, they seem like a package deal with the entire rest of the spiritual world that you're supposed to believe in, god, angels, demons, etc
English
1
0
2
42
William O’Brien
William O’Brien@No5mallf3at·
@AStrasser116 And even though companies are responsible there is no legal accountability in terms of prosecutions. Best that families can hope for is money. Capitalism at its finest, “yes negligence killed them, but it’s a massive corporation that did it…”
English
1
0
1
81
Alex Strasser
Alex Strasser@AStrasser116·
Wild and sad that this is a real Wikipedia page
Alex Strasser tweet media
English
2
3
25
1.1K
christian
christian@cxgonzalez·
modal anti-realists are just squeamish. if you expand your ontology nothing bad actually happens. watch me do it right now ready. see? i’m fine! cowards
English
5
0
9
1.4K