Munya Shonhai

There is a significant difference between constitutionalism and constitutionality. Yes, there is a significant difference between constitutionalism and constitutionality. Constitutionalism is the ideology of limited government, emphasizing that government power should be restricted by a higher law (a constitution) to protect individual rights. Constitutionality refers to whether a specific law, action, or policy actually conforms to that constitution. In short, constitutionalism is the guiding philosophy, while constitutionality is the legal judgment of conformity to the rules of that philosophy.

@EnergyCrl @Panozipa I will read it later

@Panozipa @NelsonShonhai A country’s credit rating is significant. Zimbabwe’s rating remains weak due to debt challenges and a history of repayment difficulties, which increases borrowing costs. Claims such as 1% interest should be assessed cautiously. Recommend read this book Bro

@Marcie4LOC come here

@ValarieNdlovu47 I invited you to come as cohost so you can take control of the space as you please

@ValarieNdlovu47 I hear you but be prepared for what you don’t want to hear

@LynneStactia At the end of the tunnel there is a slight 😊

When you see this dance 💃🏽 just know that there is no done deal anywhere!!!

@zulukingggg @matinyarare in my view I think Rutendo has been blinded by the gift offer to the extent of throwing caution to the wind.

@advocatemahere This time around I agree with you 💯 @advocatemahere we need new leaders pronto

🔸Maiziva ka? We need new leaders.🇿🇼

@MacBelts There will be no referendum, Mnangagwa will be removed this year very soon. The young guys in the army are standing with the people.

Very interesting insight from cde Opah Muchingiri

@NewsDay_Zim I have no context to understand what it’s about

Sengezo Tshabangu has given Zanu PF until midnight Tuesday to reach a political agreement or face the collapse of CAB 3 in the Senate. His caucus meets Wednesday to decide its final vote. #CAB3 newsday.co.zw/local-news/art…

@zulukingggg @Marcie4LOC thank you for making it clear for what Biti went to do at Chatham House

@ProfJNMoyo The professor is on steroids full throttle. No one will ever take the professor serious even the once he is backing are now afraid of the professor. They don’t know what he is up to, and no body knows what the professor is up to.

WHEN NUMBERS HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL IT LIKE IT IS: No rocket science is required to explain why roughly 99 percent of the physical written submissions to Parliament on the Constitution (Amendment No. 3) H.B. 1 Bill, 2026, overwhelmingly backed the Bill. It is plain common sense: Zanu PF simply did what any serious political organisation does; it mobilised its physical grassroots structures, and those structures responded in massive, disciplined numbers. By sharp contrast, Nelson Chamisa—the very politician opposition media have spent years branding as Zimbabwe’s most popular leader—chose not to mobilise his supporters at all. Instead, he actively dissuaded and demobilised them by declaring that Zimbabwe had “no constitution to talk about.” His elitist allies, meanwhile, relied on precisely the wrong tools: viral posts from big social-media accounts of celebrated influencers that racked up hundreds of thousands of views but never translated into a single physical written submission; outdated technology of emails; headline-chasing press conferences; and divisive pastoral letters. All of these generated noise, but zero ground presence at Parliament. So, those who are now pretending shock or clumsily alleging that the figures were “cooked”; should answer an unavoidable and simple question: exactly where did they imagine the mountain of opposing physical written submissions was supposed to come from? Social-media impressions do not walk into Parliament. Old-fashioned emails do not queue at the clerks’ offices. Hashtags do not sign written forms. Politics is not a popularity contest judged by headlines, social media views or retweets; it is a contest of structures and ground organisation. Zanu PF has plentiful of those structures and used them with clinical effectiveness; as the numbers now prove beyond rational dispute. Everything else is mere psychodrama. Numbers, after all, do not lie!