@binder89paul @EricLDaugh fed gov has no say in convention of states it was designed to be a final check on bureaucracy for the states to restrain the Federal overreach click their website read more????
English
NH Nancy84
875 posts
NH Nancy84
@NhNancy84
Bible Believer, Jesus is Lord Article V of Constitution https://t.co/UWqpteE3Od
Katılım Mayıs 2023
63 Takip Edilen20 Takipçiler
@NhNancy84 @EricLDaugh it is HIGHLY unlikely there will ever be another constitutional convention there in no one in government that wants to see the commerce clause stripped of all it nonsense.... it would remove MUCH of the feds power, and the first thing that would be addressed is that over reach
English
🚨 NOW: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis goes full in favor of TERM LIMITS for members of Congress
"If you would have had term limits, Nancy Pelosi would have been retired in the 1980s. I mean, how amazing would that have been?!" 🔥
"If some of the Founders looked at how Congress operates today, you see the same NONSENSE over and over again. I think they'd be very much in favor of term limits."
English
@KyleSeraphin this guy reminds me of ur Naval (belly button) Academy dig you did. make the thing that bothers you not bother you anymore. we need more of this everywhere.
English
Most Canceled Man in Comedy Defending Racist Jokes rumble.com/v79wabw-the-mo…
English
The GOP base is not losing to Democrats.
The GOP base is losing to a segment of the GOP standing in the way of the platform.
The particular legislation in question is, first, not necessary and was likely developed based on a Democrat political warfare operation in which a physician pursued malicious compliance to manufacture a victim narrative. This victim narrative then formed the crack in the GOP armor that allowed a badly (or very cleverly) written all-Democrat bill to be approved by the Senate GOP.
The actual language of the bill introduces a conflict in current law by affirmatively allowing surgeries to be undertaken by election of a minor (thereby likely nullifying parental consent requirements when viewed by an activist Leftwing judiciary, or alternatively getting the whole statute enjoined for internal contradictions). It then awkwardly inserts broadening language that could be reasonably interpreted to allow any "symptom" of a child diagnosed for which breast surgery might be contemplated to be elected by that minor - this naturally includes the pseudoscience of "gender dysphoria" for which activist physicians will prescribe breast surgery for "symptoms" of dysphoria.
The entire bill is unnecessary in the first place, as the existing law allows such surgeries for breast reductions where clinically enlarged breasts with symptoms are present. Again, this was almost certainly a political warfare effort undertaken by Democrats and their NGOs/lobbyists in malicious noncompliance and manufacturing a victim narrative as an emotional hook in order to move forward a bill that tears a mile-wide hole through recent legislation to outlaw gender medicine pseudoscience.
This isn't exactly novel, either. Their network of NGOs is a repository of political warfare knowledge and praxis and they open discuss such malicious noncompliance and narrative manufacturing in their strategy sessions. You can find countless examples of this posted by rightwing activists. We need to harden ourselves against jumping on these victim narratives and hold the line against encroachments that roll back good laws we've passed.
Victoria Sullivan@victoria4nh
Ok, let's geek on legislation. The breast reduction bill in NO way repeals the ban on transgender surgery. It in NO way repels parental consent on surgeries on minors. it in NO way allows breasts to be "cut off." It would be awesome if Republicans learned to have conversations instead of running to social media to go on the attack. Let's focus on the Dems for a change. This is the current law on the transgender surgery for minors ban: 329:53 Prohibitions and Enforcement. – I. Pursuant to this subdivision and RSA 332-M, no physician shall perform transgender chest surgery on a person under 18 years of age. II. No physician shall perform breast surgery on a person under 18 years of age unless one or more of the following conditions are met: (a) The procedure is subsequent to a diagnosis of cancer which necessitates such a procedure as part of a treatment plan; (b) The procedure is needed to remove malignant tissue and an appropriate margin, and lymph nodes as indicated; (c) Reconstruction of breast tissue to restore the breasts after injury or infection which requires the removal of breast tissue to restore the physical health of the person; (d) The procedure is needed to correct gynecomastia and symptomatic macromastia; or (e) Treatment of congenital deformities of the breast and/or chest wall. This is the bill in question: "Amend RSA 329:53, II(f) as inserted by section 1 of the bill by replacing it with the following: (f) At the election of the minor in consultation with her primary care physician when the primary reason for the breast reduction surgery is, but not limited to, musculoskeletal pain, postural changes, or physical discomfort of the individual that restricts exercise and activity." The "not limited to" language is to protect a girl with a condition not mentioned. NOTHING in that language repeals this language: "329:53 Prohibitions and Enforcement. – I. Pursuant to this subdivision and RSA 332-M, no physician shall perform transgender chest surgery on a person under 18 years of age." Nor does it repeal parental consent. If the House found those 4 words too generalized, we could address it in committee of conference. Republicans attacking Republicans is why we lose.
English
WATCH: @GovRonDeSantis is doubling down on his call for Congressional term limits, arguing that the Founding Fathers would be "very much in favor" of the move today.
"If you would have had term limits, Nancy Pelosi would have been retired in the 1980s. I mean, how amazing would that have been?"
English
Hey Nancy! A new sheriff is coming to town.
If you or me were caught insider trading, we’d be thrown in prison.
But when members of Congress like Nancy Pelosi insider trade, they get a massive payout.
As your next U.S. Senator from Alabama, I will lead the charge to ban congressional stock trading.
The gig is up.
English
@ThomasWelsh0131 @RealCandaceO @IanCarrollShow @Leonardaisfunny @IanMalcolm84 @Iwendtster @BasedSamParker @HarrisonHSmith @jakeshieldsajj @DanBilzerian @Truthtellerftm That’s like saying I can’t imagine how disturbing it must be. Do not be able to find evidence on Nancy Pelosi. Your logic is because our corrupt government hasn’t prosecuted somebody that there’s no evidence cool story, bro.
English
I think I just connected, Jeffrey Epstein, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Donald Trump to AI data centers.
RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅@Ryanmatta
The Great El Salvadorian Comeback - God, Bukele, & Bitcoin. Ryan Matta Documentary. May 26th, 2025
English
@EricLDaugh conventionofstates.com we need 14 more states talk to ur state senators and reps to join the article V movement
English
@EricLDaugh @Victoriaokane He needs to lead a Convention of States for these Constitutional Amendments!
Congress will never heal itself.
Add population-only-based districts, fixing SCOTUS at 9, and maybe balanced budget amendments.
English
@EricLDaugh Congress is full of dictators, just like the 3rd world authoritarian dictators who've been in power without term limits for decades.
English
@EricLDaugh Yeah, and Mitch McConnell began his congressional career January 3, 1985.
English
@EricLDaugh well golly had we not allowed women to run for office she would never been elected in the first place in fact I am all for banning ANY democrat OR republican from being allowed to run for office...
English
@EricLDaugh I HOPE that that would eliminate the dinosaurs already there
English
