Nick Palmer

@LalitoElGringo @AMom2021 @SuePrager @wideawake_media The problem is types like you don't realise that "The Great Global Warming Swindle" is deceitful propaganda that has been debunked a thousand times.

@AMom2021 @SuePrager @wideawake_media I believed like you, my entire childhood until age 30. I dare you to watch that documentary. The media is lying to you & manipulating you emotions. This is a problem, not carbon.👇🏻

Best-selling author and scientist Gregg Braden: "Climate change is a fact... It's also a fact that humans are not causing it." "Is there more CO₂ in the atmosphere now than there was 10 years, 20, 50, 100 years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. Is it a bad thing? The answer is no." "We're right about 440 parts per million right now. In geologic history... the Jurassic [had] over a thousand parts per million. Triassic, 2,000 parts per million." "The Earth was lush. The Earth was green. Life was abundant during that time." Credit: @GreggBraden @missmayim

@whotnaught @NimbleBard48 @Electroversenet It's actually the vast majority of solar physicists, who've measured that the current global warming is NOT caused by the Sun, who think Soon is a crackpot! Why do you believe the delusional fringe?

@NimbleBard48 @Electroversenet oh so you found a few refuseniks. good job. now you'll tell me The Science™ is settled. lol

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

@inDpendntVoter @NikolovScience Those uses are about 20% of our current total consumption. Even the IPCC acknowledges we will still be needing about 20% of today's fossil fuel consumption in 'Net Zero' 2050.

@NickAPalmer @NikolovScience Oil is used to make everything from plastics to cosmetics to pharmaceuticals. It will never be without value, even if we quit using it for energy, which won’t happen anytime soon.

This is an updated list of peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, video podcasts, and key blog articles explaining various aspect of our new climate-science paradigm currently known as the Nikolov-Zeller (NZ) Climate Concept. This full-fledged, physics-based and data-driven concept will eventually replace the "greenhouse theory" of climate change, which was proposed as a pure conjecture more than 120 years ago, and is now falsified by modern satellite observations from projects such as NASA CERES (ceres.larc.nasa.gov): Peer-reviewed Scientific Papers: - 2014. On the average temperature of airless spherical bodies and the magnitude of Earth’s atmospheric thermal effect: springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.11… - 2017. New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model: omicsonline.org/open-access/Ne… - 2024. Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations: mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/… Video Presentations & Podcasts: - 2021. Demystifying the Atmospheric Thermal Effect. Toward a New Paradigm of Climate Science: vimeo.com/602819278 - 2021. Drivers of Earth's Paleoclimate, a New Paradigm of Understanding: youtube.com/watch?v=DpUkPP… - 2024. Beyond the Greenhouse Theory: youtube.com/watch?v=L1GgmB… - 2025. The ill-defined “Greenhouse Effect” and Greenhouse-Gas "Radiative Forcing" youtube.com/watch?v=tTMEc5… - 2025. What's the Truth? Unpacking Climate Science (Podcast with Dr. Shawn Baker): youtube.com/watch?v=-DhlH6… - 2026. Is the Global Mean Surface Temperature Physically Meaningful? youtube.com/watch?v=WqmxpW… Blog Articles: - 2022. Dispelling the Milankovitch Myth: Why were Ice Ages not caused by Orbital Cycles? tallbloke.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/ned… - 2022. A Surface Solar Radiation Dataset exposes a major manipulation of Global Temperature Records between 1960 and 1980: tallbloke.wordpress.com/2022/07/11/ned… - 2024. Misrepresentation of Critical Satellite Data by the IPCC 6th Assessment Report: tallbloke.wordpress.com/2024/07/26/nik… - 2024. An Open Letter to IPCC discussing omissions & data misrepresentations in AR6: tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/upl… Spread the word about our new climate science, for it has the power to save the World through knowledge from a self-induced destruction caused by collective ignorance!

@freedom_rsrch Plimer B.S.'ing as usual. He wants the suckers who listen to him and his ilk to believe that all these under-ice-sheet volcanoes, that weren't there before, have suddenly fired up to start melting the ice!!! What an ultra-maroon...

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈𝐟 𝐀𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚’𝐬 𝐈𝐜𝐞 𝐈𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞? Prof. Ian Plimer points to a largely overlooked factor: dozens of active volcanoes beneath the Antarctic ice sheet releasing heat from below.

@NikolovScience Well, at least it's good to see you beating up CLINTEL!!!

The CLINTEL Group appears unable to advance beyond the lame message "There is no climate crisis". In March of this year, I proposed to them the following modified message: "There is no climate crisis and no evidence for anthropogenic forcing of global warming in recent decades." They did not accept it, because CLINTEL's leadership and most of its members believe that human carbon emissions can in principle warm the Earth. This belief lacks physical understanding on their part and also contradicts NASA CERES data as shown in this 2024 paper: mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/… CLINTEL is not interested in new climate science, although publicly they claim otherwise. Beware of make-believe (false) skeptics!

@colbsdoug @epaleezeldin 2/2 propagandists were confusing people by pointing to cold snaps to fool the scientifically illiterate

@colbsdoug @epaleezeldin 1/2 B.S. The IPCC was formed in 1988. Try remembering what the acronym means! Intergovernmental Panel on CLIMATE CHANGE... Look at the IPCC reports of theti9me and subsequently. Global warming is what, and still is, causing climate change. It was probably because denialist

The ultimate authority on all questions involving life on earth, Al Gore, is now declaring that global warming is out, and global freezing is in. Safe bet that he found a whole new angle to line his pockets off the climate grift.

@Gen_Vortex @Electroversenet I dunno. The trend in the Arctic looks rather downwards for 45 years... youtube.com/watch?v=NphVG5…

@NickAPalmer @Electroversenet Parce qu'on les observe de près maintenant. L'Arctique et l'Antarctique ont cessé de fondre depuis des années, avec quelques exceptions, que tout le monde regarde maintenant.

West Antarctica sits on top of a volcanic rift. Thwaites and Pine Island, Antarctica's two fastest thinning glaciers, sit directly above strong geothermal anomalies. The glaciers are being melted from below, not above, and atmospheric data backs this up. A recent study shows central/west Antarctica has cooled around 1C per decade over the past 20 years. Bird Station, the only long-running record on the ice sheet, shows the trend. The surface is cooling, the base is heating, and melt is concentrated where the crust is hottest. Public messaging insists CO2 is melting Antarctica, but the air is cooling, with the only real melt restricted to the west, to regions sitting atop a hot volcanic rift.

@freedom_rsrch 2/2 but the MWP was never a global period of greater warmth than today. That assertion is a denialist fiction. Despite controversy, the central conclusion—that recent warming is unprecedented in the last 1,000+ years—has been confirmed by numerous subsequent studies,

@freedom_rsrch 1/2 Happer is deluded or deceitful. The FIRST ever reconstruction of temperatures over that period (Mann et al 1998) did not 'erase the MWP'. It's right there within the error bars. Subsequent reconstructions (there have been over 20 by others) with better resolution showed it up

𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐀𝐠𝐨? 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐒𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐘𝐞𝐬 Prof. William Happer argues that the well-known “hockey stick” climate graph erased the very real Medieval Warm Period, when temperatures in parts of the world were warmer than today.

@Electroversenet Christ, you tossers are deceitful!

A new study shows the North Atlantic is at its coldest point in 9,000 years. Researchers used a finely layered Chinese stalagmite (a natural rain recording climate tape) to track North Atlantic temperatures. When the ocean cools and sea ice grows, the Asian monsoon weakens and the stalagmite's chemistry shifts. It's a direct proxy. The results show a nine millennia cooling trend, with the coldest values in the last 200 years. The record captures the big cold events of the past, all driven by orbital cycles, sea ice feedbacks and internal ocean variability, say the researchers - not CO2. The slight warming observed since the 1800s didn't start from normal. It started from the coldest North Atlantic baseline in 9,000 years.

@iluminatibot Plimer is a deceitful crackpot whose pseudo-science has been debunked a thousand times

Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, demolishes the man-made global warming scam, in just over a minute

@BJul1989 @iluminatibot @jemmm85517813 @Piers_Corbyn Corbin is a grade A crackpot. Even the fossil fuel corporations accept climate science is legit! Check out their websites and company reports.

@iluminatibot @jemmm85517813 @Piers_Corbyn: "The pro-global warming movements do not produce arguments; they make claims. These claims are not backed up by science. They make the claim scientists believe or know XYZ." youtube.com/watch?v=XVsIVc… weatheraction.com/resource/data/…

@KnucklesNp26684 You are STILL turning a blind eye to the fact that giant Petro-states like Saudi Arabia accept the science - and they have their own scientists who would be motivated to tell their Nation's governments that climate science was false - if it was. But they don't, because they can't

@NickAPalmer Having money doesn't make you immune from government oppression. The UK, for example, imposed ridiculously high "windfall taxes" on oil extraction in the north sea. At the drop of a hat, governments can fuck you over and ruin you. You either bend the knee, or they fuck you.

I think we're all agreed that the UK can't take 4 more years of this 👇 Agreed?

@KnucklesNp26684 4/4 Oman etc - hardly "climate alarmists governments"!!! If you truly think that trillion dollar Big Oil corporations are running scared from governments, then you are just another conspiracy theorist with a shaky grip on reality...

@KnucklesNp26684 3/4 the voting public that the science was wrong & they could go on using as much fossil fuels into the future as they wanted. Your ignorant views turn a blind eye to the fact that amongst those 196 Nations are giant fossil fuel producers like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait,

@KnucklesNp26684 Christ, you're thick. Why don't you check out what the giant fossil fuel corporations think about climate science these days? That they fully accept it is easily checkable by anyone who looks at their company reports and corporate websites. Go on! I dare you!

@NickAPalmer A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.