AnnMom2021

@rsteade @DerrickEvans4WV 🤡

@AMom2021 @DerrickEvans4WV He has a plan and it's working magnificently. You haven't been told because you're neither important enough nor intelligent enough to know it.

President Trump is making it clear he is not rushing into a deal with Iran just to say one was made. "We have total control of the Strait... They would have opened it up three days ago. They came to us and they said, 'we will agree to open the Strait.' And all my people are happy. Everybody was happy except me." "I said...if we open the Strait, that means they're going to make $500 million a day. I don't want them to make $500 million a day until they settle this thing."

@rttway @SebGorka Wut? 🤔

@SebGorka Devin is the very definition of stud.

Another National Security win.

@rsteade @RCPolitics 🤦🏻‍♀️

@RCPolitics The 25th is just the latest Leftist fantasy.

Dershowitz: I've Visited Trump — 25th Amendment Would Be Unconstitutional Against Him realclearpolitics.com/video/2026/04/…

@MindofMunitions @TheRickWilson Cope

@TheRickWilson Blue states are the worst about gerrymandering and have been for a long time. If you had ever actually been an intellectually honest conservative you would not be saying that.

It didn't have to be this way. Y'all got cute in Texas at Trump's orders. It's blowing up in your faces.

@rsteade @KurtSchlichter Quit being a pussy then. You should have no problem reenlisting.

@KurtSchlichter ASVAB waivered useful idiots numbering in the dozens whose pathetic mewling signifies nothing.

All pieces of shit

@MarkPaoletta @rsteade A poll he doesn’t like: “It’s a rigged poll.” An election he loses: “The election was rigged. It was stolen.” A court ruling: “The entire process was rigged. Judge was unfair to me.” Media coverage: “Fake news. I’ll sue em.” What a weak, pathetic, cowardly way to go thru life

President Trump’s Truths about this dangerous injunction hit the nail on the head. What is at stake is nothing less than the security of this Great White House and the power of the Presidency. All great Presidents have to deal with courts attempting to usurp their powers, but no President has come close to having to deal with the systematic assault by the courts on his Presidency than President Trump. Big victory Friday with the DC circuit staying the district court’s egregious injunction until the Circuit court decides the issue, sometime after it hears oral argument on June 5th. Until then, the construction project for the Ballroom can proceed. The President should take all lawful measures to overturn this district court judge’s LAWLESS injunction, including seeking an emergency petition to the Supreme Court, if necessary. Judge Neomi Rao’s Superb Dissent from the initial DC Circuit decision upholding the injunction is the roadmap to victory. This outrageous injunction is lawless and cannot continue. First, the plaintiff in this case, National Trust for Historic Preservation of the United States, has NO STANDING in this matter. Courts are limited in jurisdiction to resolve cases or controversies, which require parties to show actual injury. As Judge Rao explains, the National Trust literally has no legal interest in the White House, which is located on property within the National Park system. Pursuant to the Trust’s congressionally-authorized charter, the Trust may acquire real property for preservation purposes but is specifically prohibited from acquiring land in the National Park system. Accordingly, the Trust has no injury whatsoever in anything to do with the Ballroom and the security improvements to the White House complex. The Trust has NO STANDING. Even more absurdly, the Trust had one of its members, Alison Hoagland, who lives in DC and walks by the White House about once a month, file an affidavit claiming “I would suffer both professional and personal injuries, including to my aesthetic, cultural, and historical interests, if a ballroom of the proposed form and scale were constructed on the site of the former East Wing.” (emphasis added). Allison Hoagland also filed a similar ludicrous declaration in the Kennedy Center lawsuit against President Trump. More shocking, the District Court judge used this Hoagland declaration to bring construction on the White House grounds to a screeching halt. This is beyond absurd. As bad as DC Circuit standing precedents are (as Judge Rao notes, they are “sometimes quite capacious”), this district court judge’s allowing the so-called “personal injury” of one person having to LOOK at the new Ballroom is far beyond any existing precedent and shocking. It is a form of standing intended to allow a district court judge to absurdly and dangerously prevent this great project at the instigation of a private citizen who has appointed herself general overseer of the safety and aesthetics of our Nation’s capital. Next, Judge Rao finds that the President is authorized by law to build this ballroom, and specifically pursuant to 3 U.S.C 105, which authorizes the President to use funds to make “improvements” to the White House. The district court judge wrongfully claims the President has no authority, and he misreads the word “improvements” in the statute. As Judge Rao says, this term “improvements” in the context of real property easily encompasses building the ballroom. Judge Rao also concludes the term must mean more than “ordinary maintenance and upkeep” (as the district court tries to argue), because the terms “maintenance” and “repair” are in the same section of the statute and they would be rendered meaningless. The President is 100% authorized to build this Ballroom and the district judge’s opinion severely misinterprets the law. Finally, it is truly disturbing that the district judge’s latest version of his injunction will continue to significantly impair the security of the White House and specifically the President’s security and his life. The judge allows the underground work to continue but prohibits the work on the above ground ballroom. The judge claims the President does not have authority to build but will allow building below ground?? As the government’s briefs make clear, this nonsensical “permission” makes no sense. The President must have authority to build it all now, as any delay represents a significant national security threat. The Ballroom forms a massive, steel-reinforced, impenetrable shield for the remainder of the White House Complex, including the East Room, Residence, and West Wing. It is worth quoting the government’s brief in full on this point. “The Project is required for national security. It will shield the now exposed East Room of the Executive Mansion and provide best in class, modern security to the President and his family, his staff, and visitors. This ‘fixed structure’ - constructed using ‘threat-resistant materials’ include missile-resistant steel columns, military-grade venting, drone-proof ceilings, and bullet, ballistic, and blast proof glass -- will form a fortified structural buffer protecting ‘both the main White House and West Wing.’ Together the ballroom and secure facilities throughout the Project -- including bomb shelters a state-of-the-art hospital and medical facilities military installations and more -- form a single integrated complex unit that is vital for the national security of the United states for example features such as military grade ventilation systems are integrated for the whole project below ground and above making the project ‘a single coherent whole.’ Indeed, without the ballroom the underground portions of the project become significantly less useful and effective.” This injunction, though stayed temporarily, must not be allowed to ever come back in force again, as it is reckless, irresponsible, and dangerous, especially where the district court lacks jurisdiction in the first place, there is full authorization to build this ballroom, and every day of delay constitutes irreparable harm to the President, and more importantly to his safety. This lawless ruling cannot be allowed to stand. This lawsuit should be dismissed on standing grounds first and foremost. If the DC Circuit fails to correct this dangerous ruling, the Supreme Court must step in and wipe away this baseless standing ruling. The Court should end, once and for all, bizarre standing rulings that allow any left-wing activist to file suit to try to stop the duly elected President from implementing his agenda and undermine national security.

@DefiyantlyFree @rsteade It won’t even get to trial. Discovery will sink him.

I hope he bankrupts them.

@is_rufus @MAFairElections @AAGDhillon @TheJusticeDept @CivilRights @MariaBartiromo 💯

@MAFairElections @AAGDhillon @TheJusticeDept @CivilRights @MariaBartiromo Made up.

Here @theJusticeDept, ensuring election integrity is a paramount duty. Many states fail to clean noncitizen & deceased people from their voter rolls, and under my leadership, @CivilRights will continue working to ensure that ONLY eligible American citizens vote in our elections! 🇺🇸

@SuePrager @TonySeruga @J6patriotnews @LouDobbs @DrJohnEastman The guy who wanted fake electors and provided false evidence in his filings? Cope, Susan. Don’t be a disgrace.

Who’s next? Hopefully, @DrJohnEastman, who should be equally and fully vindicated by the Supreme Court of the United States after the CA Supreme Court allowed the California Bar to disbar him for his completely legitimate counsel to and representation of President Trump in attempting to challenge the illegal tactics and practices used by multiple states in the 2020 election. We can’t have lawyers being disbarred because the people running the state bar and sitting on court benches don’t like their politics.

🚨 SIDNEY POWELL VINDICATED: Texas Appeals Court Just Torched the Bar’s 3-Year Witch Hunt in a 24-Page Masterclass of Legal Reality First off, I sure miss my friend @LouDobbs 😢 After three brutal years of lawfare, the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas delivered a unanimous, airtight ruling on April 17, 2024: the Texas State Bar’s Commission for Lawyer Discipline miserably failed to prove Sidney Katherine Powell engaged in “dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation” in the four landmark lawsuits she filed challenging the 2020 election results. The court didn’t just dismiss the case. It eviscerated the Bar’s evidence. Straight from the opinion: “By its own admission, the Bar misidentified or failed to include multiple exhibits it claims to have relied on in its Second Amended Response.” “The deficiencies go far beyond mislabeling exhibits.” “The Bar not only failed to cite to or argue about any additional documents — the documents are not mentioned at all.” They called the Bar’s entire approach “scattershot.” The prosecutors couldn’t even keep their own paperwork straight. The very body accusing Powell of sloppiness got caught red-handed with a sloppy, incompetent case. Irony so thick you could file it as Exhibit A. This wasn’t just a win for one attorney. It was a historic defense of the right to zealously represent a client — even when that client is a sitting President of the United States fighting for election integrity. For the first time, the legal establishment tried to ruin lawyers (Powell, Giuliani, Eastman) simply for daring to question the “most secure election in history.” Texas just said: Not on our watch. And it doesn’t stop there. In January 2025, the Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals also rejected compulsory discipline tied to Powell’s Georgia plea — ruling those misdemeanors didn’t qualify as a “serious crime” under Texas rules. Cleared on all fronts. Sidney Powell stood tall when the system tried to break her. The courts just proved she was right to fight. The message to every patriotic lawyer left in America? Zealous advocacy is not a crime. Challenging power is not professional suicide. The lawfare machine just got served papers — by the truth. Who’s next? #SidneyPowellVindicated #LawfareExposed #TexasCourtOfAppeals #DefendTheConstitution #ZealousAdvocacy #ElectionIntegrity #BarFail #JusticeServed #StopTheWitchHunt #VindicationNation

@rsteade @_InfoGram_ Echo?

@AMom2021 @_InfoGram_ It's amusing to see you become so unhinged that you forget to use real words as you whine into the void because no one is paying any attention to you. There are easier ways to say you are a pathetic loser craving attention.

🔴This will go down as Trump's FLAGSHIP LIE.🔥 🇺🇸Trump: I met 92 yrs old Mr. Toyoda in Japan🇯🇵. I said, What do you have to do with Toyota? He said, “I own it.” He then agreed to invest $10 billion in the U.S. Fact: Real owner already died in 2023 and the current CEO is just 65 year old. This Guy is SERIAL LIER 😭

@BigWagWag Not even close, pussy

Cute...the vast majority of America supports Trump. Get over it.

@rsteade @TheRickWilson

@AMom2021 @TheRickWilson Your duncery is becoming boring. Be smarter or be silent.

America hates Donald Trump.

@rsteade @_InfoGram_ Dumb MAGAt chuds will believe anything their pedo rapist leader lies to them about 🤡

@_InfoGram_ Have you tried whining??? Because no one believes anything that you post.

@rsteade @TheRickWilson

@TheRickWilson Your obvious duncery aside, Democrats hate Trump and there's some question if they are really Americans.

@rsteade @BrittanyinTexas Yet here you are. Dumbfuck writes his own punchlines without even knowing it. 😂

@AMom2021 @BrittanyinTexas

The media moved on like nothing happened. A sitting congressman, Ted Lieu, said on the record the Epstein files are being blocked because they show Trump raped and threatened to kill children. Keep sharing this so it doesn’t get buried.

@rsteade @RyanAFournier

@AMom2021 @RyanAFournier That operation exists only in your fairy tale world.

HUGE: Iran has officially agreed to let the U.S. collect and remove their leftover uranium. As President Trump said, we’re bringing it right back here to the United States. This was the missing piece to the whole puzzle. Trump is getting it done while everyone else said it was impossible. Promises Made, Promises Kept! 🇺🇸

@rsteade @BrittanyinTexas

@BrittanyinTexas This is a lie that can only be told because the hacks in the Pravda media will never push back.

@rsteade @RyanAFournier Operation Epstein Fury is still going according to plan, sir! 🫡

@AMom2021 @RyanAFournier Ignoring facts don't make them go away, it merely exposes the lengths you are willing to go to remain deliberately stupid.

@prageru @XAVIAERD It’s okay to be whoever you want and to have a family or not. Be yourself.

Do you agree? | @XAVIAERD