Jason Spencer

2.9K posts

Jason Spencer banner
Jason Spencer

Jason Spencer

@NoStressTech

Executive Director of Innovation & Technology - CUSD200

Wheaton Katılım Mayıs 2013
1K Takip Edilen815 Takipçiler
Jason Spencer retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
This is a 12-year-old study that has failed replication three times. And the underlying claim is still probably right. The paper is Mueller and Oppenheimer, 2014. 67 students at Princeton. Longhand note-takers scored higher on conceptual questions. Became the most cited paper in every “ban laptops” argument on Earth. Then three separate labs tried to reproduce the result. Urry et al. at Tufts in 2021, 145 students. No effect. Morehead et al. in 2019, two experiments. No effect. A meta-analysis pooling eight similar studies. No effect. So why am I saying it’s still right? Because a 2023 Norwegian EEG study with 256 channels found something the behavioral research couldn’t measure. Handwriting produces theta and alpha connectivity patterns between parietal and central brain regions that typing does not produce. Those specific frequencies are the ones your hippocampus relies on for memory formation. Your brain treats handwriting as a motor-spatial problem. Five brain regions fire in coordination: premotor cortex, parietal cortex, cerebellum, fusiform gyrus, sensorimotor cortex. Typing activates a fraction of that network. The original study measured the right outcome with the wrong methodology. The real finding lives at the neural level: handwriting rewires the encoding process itself.
Brandon Luu, MD@BrandonLuuMD

Students who took notes by hand scored ~28% higher on conceptual questions than laptop note-takers. Writing forces your brain to process and compress ideas instead of copying them.

English
50
325
1.4K
128.1K
Jess 🌱
Jess 🌱@thattallguy·
I think folks on this app are greatly underestimating how much the general public hates AI. Like, haaaaaaates it.
English
622
430
7.1K
188.1K
Jason Spencer retweetledi
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
AI really can help education: Randomized controlled experiment on high school students found a GPT-4o powered tutor that personalized problems for students raised final test scores by .15 SD, "equivalent to as much as six to nine months of additional schooling by some estimates"
Ethan Mollick tweet mediaEthan Mollick tweet media
English
54
186
1.1K
144.3K
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@tomfgoodwin This premise is flawed. This would assume if these outputs are amazing then all these things can be automated without a human because we've implicitly said we trust the outputs to be amazing.
English
0
0
0
57
Tom Goodwin
Tom Goodwin@tomfgoodwin·
Let's say a generation of kids can produce amazing essays , white papers or research, with almost no undertstanding of the content, the process or the thinking, where does that leave us. Lots of people seem to be stoked at the productivity gains from this
English
65
54
439
40.2K
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@CallahanLuke Correct that's why I'm saying better lesson design is the answer not tech to block things. Handwriting though isn't better lesson design, it's avoiding the problem.
English
1
0
1
18
Luke Callahan, Ed.D.
Luke Callahan, Ed.D.@CallahanLuke·
@NoStressTech It would do us all good to take a step back. When there aren't enough tech tools to keep up, we can either keep chasing our tails or adjust practice. Ss can type in rows in a lab, use Google Forms (locked mode), or use paper/pencil. We can't add a 56th extension/tool to the kit.
English
1
0
0
13
Luke Callahan, Ed.D.
Luke Callahan, Ed.D.@CallahanLuke·
If students are bypassing Google's Originality reports and the Revision History extension, it makes sense to step back & focus on in-class writing (pencil/paper) or having Ss write in a structured digital environment (lab) where teachers can observe writing in real time.
English
1
0
0
28
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@HedgieMarkets I think the problem with this is there's not a lot of work in higherED on how to leverage AI or discuss good assignment design.
English
0
0
0
18
Hedgie
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets·
🦔 The Guardian talked to a dozen humanities professors about teaching in the age of AI. Most described the experience in despairing terms. One said generative AI is the bane of her existence. Another said she wishes she could push ChatGPT off a cliff. 92% of students now report using AI for schoolwork. Some professors have resorted to oral exams, handwritten notebooks, and requiring students to submit photos of their notes. One injects random words like "broccoli" into assignments to catch students who paste prompts directly into AI without reading them. My Take The thing that stuck with me is the professor who assigned students to visit a museum, look at a painting for ten minutes, and write a few paragraphs about the experience. A student showed up on a Monday when the museum was closed, then turned in an AI-generated reflection anyway. The assignment was designed to be impossible to fake because it was supposed to be personal. It didn't matter. I don't know what the answer is here. The professors are trying everything they can think of and none of it scales. You can require handwritten work and oral exams but that means smaller classes and more staff, which means more money, which isn't coming. Meanwhile universities are partnering with OpenAI and announcing AI-fluent curriculums while faculty figure it out alone. The worry isn't just cheating. It's that we're running an experiment on an entire generation's ability to think, and nobody's sure what comes out the other side. Hedgie🤗
Hedgie tweet media
English
63
193
652
39K
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@ModestTeacher he means artificial intelligence as a tool....you do the same thing every month when you pay your ISP
English
0
0
0
22
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
It's because of this
Jason Spencer tweet media
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Sam Altman said people saying “please” and “thank you” to ChatGPT costs OpenAI tens of millions of dollars a year in compute. 67% of Americans do it anyway. Run the math on why. A 2024 Waseda University study tested LLM responses across politeness levels in English, Chinese, and Japanese. Impolite prompts produced measurably worse outputs: more bias, more errors, more refusals. Moderate politeness consistently beat both extremes. The mechanism makes sense once you see it. Polite prompts pattern-match to higher-quality training data. When you write “Could you help me structure this analysis?”, the model pulls from professional, well-reasoned text. When you write “give me the answer,” it pulls from Reddit. Google DeepMind’s Murray Shanahan explained it simply: the model is role-playing a smart intern. Treat the intern like a colleague, you get colleague-quality work. Bark orders, you get minimum-viable compliance. Now look at the cost side. OpenAI handles over a billion queries daily. Each GPT-4 query uses roughly 2.9 watt-hours, ten times a Google search. But OpenAI just raised $40 billion at a $300 billion valuation. Tens of millions in politeness tokens is a rounding error on a rounding error. 67% of users do it anyway, and 55% of them say it’s because it’s “the right thing to do.” They’re maintaining a behavioral habit that governs every other interaction in their life. The parent who teaches their kid to say please to Alexa isn’t doing it for Alexa. They’re doing it because the alternative is raising someone who learns that being rude gets faster results. Telling 900 million people to stop saying thank you so OpenAI can save 0.01% of operating costs is the most engineer-brained optimization take on the internet. You’re training yourself to treat every interaction as a transaction. And that habit doesn’t stay in the chat window.

English
0
0
0
16
Jason Spencer retweetledi
Lisa Nielsen
Lisa Nielsen@InnovativeEdu·
Some educators are banning laptops and returning to pen & paper to improve learning. But easier classroom management ≠ better learning. The real issue isn’t the devices. It’s the learning model we built around them. My latest in Tech & Learning: techlearning.com/learning/edtec…
English
0
2
1
112
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@BeckyLTuch Most in my feed that fall on your side of the 46% have writer, editor, English Prof., etc. in their bios. It stands to reason that you'd prefer human writing. The other 54% aren't probably voracious readers and just want simple and to the point. Style isn't a hangup for them.
English
1
0
0
64
Becky Tuch
Becky Tuch@BeckyLTuch·
I took the NYT quiz. It was easy to spot which was the human writing. & I preferred it every time. AI writing sucks, and is littered with tells.
Becky Tuch tweet media
English
11
4
79
2.7K
The Modest Teacher
The Modest Teacher@ModestTeacher·
@AgentScully64 Well, I can’t prove a negative but the iPad people have completely failed to provide evidence that they improve academic performance. Not a shred of evidence.
English
3
1
12
404
The Modest Teacher
The Modest Teacher@ModestTeacher·
Elementary students do NOT need iPads.
English
40
66
681
31.8K
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@jrsowash Are you always asking for it to code in HTML to embed into sites or how are you hosting whatever Gemini creates in Canvas?
English
2
0
0
26
John R. Sowash
John R. Sowash@jrsowash·
Gemini helped me create this Jeopardy-style review game based on my lesson content. I don't know anything about coding, but with Gemini, I can create awesome custom learning resources for my students! #GeminiEDU #GoogleEDU
John R. Sowash tweet media
English
1
1
3
165
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@effortfuleduktr Some base level memorization will still be needed but the amount that's currently taught will most likely decrease. Take for instance the need to memorize "how to cite in APA style". It's not just facts but some processes as well.
English
0
0
0
52
Jason Spencer
Jason Spencer@NoStressTech·
@DanFriedman81 Most Top 10 rankings of IL HSs have the top 10 comprised mostly of CPS HSs.
English
0
0
0
23
Daniel Friedman
Daniel Friedman@DanFriedman81·
Chicago’s schools are so bad, almost nobody will send their kids to them. Despite this, the bankrupt city maintains full staffing for empty schools with lavish benefits. At a school with 27 full-time employees and 28 enrolled students, the principal is paid $171,173 per year. The per-student spending is $93k annually. Despite a 1 to 1 ratio of students to full-time staff, none of the 28 students enrolled at this school are proficient in reading. It is time to shut the Chicago public schools down.
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist@DeAngelisCorey

Chicago has a public school with space for 912 kids, yet only 28 students are enrolled. The school is 97% empty. It spends $93,787 per student. It's staff to student ratio is 1:1. ZERO of the kids are proficient in reading.

English
123
928
4.1K
204.8K