🐭Nodeling 🐁🐁🐁🐁🐀🐀🐀🐀🧪💉📈

@RWMaloneMD Yep, psywar, you are the target: youtu.be/VA4e0NqyYMw

Mar 3: "We won the war." Mar 7: "We defeated Iran." Mar 9: "We must attack Iran." "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully." Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet." Mar 13: "We won the war." Mar 14: "Please help us." Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it." Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all." "I was just testing to see who's listening to me." "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad." Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help." "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO." Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip -step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz" Mar 20: "NATO are cowards." Mar 21: "We don't use it, we don't need to open it." Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours." "Iran is Dead" Mar 23: "We are giving them more time." Mar 24: "The war is nearing its end." Mar 25: "We are still negotiating." Mar 26: "Iran is begging for peace. They gave us a gift. We will give them more time." Mar 27: "Talks with Iran are going very well" Mar 28: "War will be over soon" Mar 29: "Maybe we take Kharg island, maybe we dont" Mar 30: "Open the Strait or we will obliterate all energy infrastructure and oil wells" Mar 31: "We dont need the strait, we got plenty of oil. Get it yourself UK."

@Glenn_Diesen Do the maidan colour revolution Stop the German Russian raproachment by starting a war with Ukraine Blow up Nordstream cutting off cheap energy Close the straits of hormuz through sheer dimwittedness wreaking global energy havoc Leave Nato handing Europe a mess Thanks Friends

Marco Rubio: "why are we in NATO?" - Disbanding this Cold War relic would be the silver lining in this horrible war

@thesiriusreport Isn't it a little tricky to attack Turkey if you're in NATO and they are too?

If Trump pulls the US out of NATO, Europe will quickly realise that they never needed the US in the first place. As we have said for years, the US was never going to defend Europe. It was and will always be an utter myth. They just want Europe to buy their useless military hardware and munitions and so they can seek to control Europe and prevent it's rotation to Russia and Eurasia. Europe has a choice, die defending its pointless relationship with the US or embrace Eurasia including Russia

@AcademicAgent_X His main credential is that he grew up in a council house.

His camp and gay manner goes through me, how do Aussies put up with this guy? He's so wooden here that it feels AI.

@NXT4EU Did the British Empire whinge so much? So whiny its embarrasing.

Why are the Americans whining? Can't you defend yourself? We are done helping your endless wars that cause issues for Europe every single time. Go do it alone.

@AcademicAgent_X Imagine when the food price inflation caused by America's failure in the middle east hits.

New Prime flavour just dropped

The only Europeans who benefit from vassalage to the US are European leaders who fear having to lead. Besides that, US post-war hegemony has throttled our empires, spread open borders, and bankrolled senseless wars. The American people have lost out in the process, but that is exactly the point: let us not pretend that any of us has had a blinder of a half-century.

There is a discrepancy with how the post transcribes what his exact Spanish phrasing is with how its framed here. Extremely nuanced. The isolated clip isnt rendering the subject itself any clarity since its assumed he is criticising the funding for individual idiosyncratic modern artists as state dependant. The cultural funding models for South America are more explicit, like Europe's, rather than the fake 'free market' for *arts funding* that exists inside the US. The US model is different with the unregulated but org/museum/collector driven system gently steered by imposter intellectuals (current signs are indicating that this is slowly weakening). Its very clear that most RW people, even leftists outside the loop have never been taught how (post)modern art as a whole has been "succesful" largely through *systemic* rather than "free market" means, which fundamentally have been tasked with subsidising it, since the 1950s. This system also aided the parallel branding (by cold warriors) as the elite self sustaining project that it is. Its perpetual sustainment however was made possible by power over the schools (with a fabricated historical narrative that renders it intellectually self-sustaining with almost religious belief & adherence). This legitimises the current system as justified recipient for state funding AND since the system is actively hostile towards anything rightwing AND "rightwing" culture inside America was largely rebranded as cuckservatism™️ (which practices cultural & social *retreatism*) then the arts system became more insulated from rightwing influence as a whole. The idea that actively funding art as a civic duty is inherently leftist (therefore bad from a RW perspective) is both bullshit + historically illiterate. [Just like the idea that protesting *anything at all* is inherently leftist is a post civil rights era legacy that for this very day is helping self sabotage the right's political & cultural goals.] What this arts system illiteracy tells me is that L&R are both outside the loop differently: the left feels zero shame for taking state funding (unlike the right, towards its detriment) & feels (without any basis within reality) that establishment art has already been historically subjected & tested by freemarket forces. The latter is entirely false & when small tests have happened, it inevitably fails. For example, ticket sales for such & such retard dogshit pile at BIG BOX MUSEUM vs oldmastery beauty at fuddy-duddy old art museum. It isnt even fair: beauty sells, ugliness is a subsidised scheme. There isnt any historical timeline where big & ugly modern art could have been a self-sustained freemarket project without state funding + systemic changes that benefitted private elites through policy changes instituted after WW2. When the funding appears "private" its indirect state support because laws (1954 tax code for example) were changed over decades which gave immense leverage for collectors & museums over & against artists who still cared about beauty, RW artists,etc. Skill based merit & public prestige was replaced by & separated from *private prestige*. The latter is what drives collectors & they fund what drives artists productivity. The laws helped legitimise such prestige through museums & sales figures. Its a perfect system for making & exhbiting art disliked by the public. If you want RW cultural change ASAP, stop letting the establishment cultural left benefit from the legal structures that allowed its dominance ever happening at all. Change the laws. Change the policies - any pretense that they were *ever* neutral is preposterous. Neutrality isnt even desirable, since "placement is power". The left grasps this. Neutrality was always fake but the stakes were never as high than today. If Neutral policies were legally binding (as is assumed by our naive leaders) they would by themselves have destroyed the left's chokehold over the arts decades ago. @MillennialWoes

@AaronBastani No it didn't. It was suicided. Traitors need to be held accountable and treated accordingly.

World Wars 1 & 2 ravaged a civilisation, in whose ruins we live. There’s no getting around it: Europe essentially committed suicide, for no reason.

Today is both Tuesday and the end of Q1 2026 - this is the size of the Taco that is going to be delivered to Wall Street before markets reopen to make sure everyone can get their windows dressed smoothly without too much volatility

They are just relentlessly looting America under Trump. It is Yeltsin era Russia style

@JoshFerme Keep switching, it gives Peter Hitchens 2 weeks of content per year.

Should the UK keep switching between GMT and BST, or stay on one time all year?

🤣 مضيق ترامب!!

@roddreher Slight correction for Don, we send billions of dollars to* Northrop Grunman, Lockheed Martin & General Dynamics, NATO also requires interoperability meaning those dumb nato rubes also buy from US defence contractors. Now we're abandoning them after destroying their energy

Um, because NATO is a defensive alliance, not the U.S. military’s auxiliary.

@WhiteRabbitIA "In the three years to 2024-25 Australia exported 71% of agriculture's production, by volume. The export orientation of each industry can vary by commodity type. Wheat and beef, which are large sectors, are more export-focused..." The ROW will miss out: #around-70-of-agricultural-production-is-exported" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">agriculture.gov.au/abares/product…

Australia is about to discover just how reliant our food supply is on fertiliser.

@Glenn_Diesen They already attacked one NATO member by blowing up Nordstream. Turkey could be next on the chopping block. So NATO needs to go.

Trump announces that the US will not have to be there for NATO in the future, as he seemingly blames Europe for the difficulties in the war against Iran

@Matt_Bracken48 @WeTheBrandon This is kind of depressing. Hopefully not in port, preferably not at all.

@WeTheBrandon Wait until LNG liquification and gasification plants are sabotaged, and LNG tankers are attacked at sea or in port. That will be the nail in the coffin of the old energy order.

"Iran just shut the Strait of Hormuz. Houthis now threaten to slam Bab el-Mandeb and Red Sea shut, too. Result? 25-30% of global oil + critical shipping paralyzed. Oil to $150–$200. Skyrocketing gas, groceries, and supply chains. Europe & China get crushed. America's shale buys us time—but this shadow war attrition is bleeding us dry while we dither. Wake up: Secure energy dominance or watch the world burn.

UK GDP Per Capita in CONSTANT 1980 USD 1980 - $10,032 1990 - $10,119 2000 - $11,144 2010 - $11,893 2020 - $9,300 2026 - $9,030

@RightMagaParty @WallStreetMav It wasn't, remember it was open not so long ago 🤦‍♂️

@WallStreetMav Huh, the same Australia stating protecting the Straight of Hormuz wasn’t in their “immediate national interest”.

Australia used to have 8 refineries. Now they have 2. They import diesel and gasoline from South Korea and Singapore. With oil blocked in the Middle East, South Korea and Singapore are limiting exports of diesel and gasoline. Australia gets crushed