Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)

52.9K posts

Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)

Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)

@NotCubby

Katılım Eylül 2011
1.3K Takip Edilen545 Takipçiler
Jean F. Queralt
Jean F. Queralt@JFQueralt·
“Lingering shots on bodies, low-angle cameras that capture revealing views, and excessive slow-motion replays that serve no technical or storytelling purpose are among the issues observed in the media coverage of women’s athletics competitions today.” Fuck these people and their never ending censorious aspirations.
Dexerto@Dexerto

New broadcasting guidelines for women's athletics have been released to crack down on camera angles and slow-motion replays that ‘sexualize’ athletes The guidelines highlight shots broadcasters are urged to avoid

English
6
4
65
2.5K
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)
@lenofi You misspelled “smart kids”. I would hazard a guess that there were sizable numbers of richer kids who didn’t score as well on the aptitude test. I might add: IQ causes SES, not vice versa (with the usual caveats about pro athletes, movie stars, and politicians).
English
0
0
9
181
Lozza Lizza
Lozza Lizza@lenofi·
the elite NYC high schools discourse is ridiculous because rich kids DID get into the ones that were supposedly aptitude-based BECAUSE they had advantages from early childhood. there is no such thing as an objective entrance exam that adequately accounts for race or socioecon!
English
54
9
94
22.9K
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)
That might be because every billionaire knows that in between his checkbook and that hungry mouth in Sudan, are 23 NGOs and 43 layers of administration to ensure that every torrent of aid becomes a trickle of food. You want the harsh truth? Every liberal call to arms, from homelessness to daycare, from hunger to climate change, is just a veiled grift of taxpayer funds to progressive pockets.
English
0
0
0
7
Yiatin Chu
Yiatin Chu@ycinnewyork·
@NotCubby @nycexpatmom Even siblings -- same race, same parents, same income have different abilities and talents.
English
1
0
13
463
Yiatin Chu
Yiatin Chu@ycinnewyork·
This parent leader should know better about how funding works in NYC schools but perpetuates the myth that Specialized High Schools get more funding per student, they do not. Stuyvesant gets 30-50% less than other high schools in NYC. Even with a funding formula weight factored into certain types of high schools including CTE programs (career technical education), audition schools like LaGuardia Performing Arts and the Specialized High Schools, the total funding per student at SHS are still below those of most high schools in NYC. Critics of SHS want to attribute the student achievements to “hoarding” resources, that couldn’t be farther from the truth.
Yiatin Chu tweet media
English
21
45
324
16.3K
Jack
Jack@tracewoodgrains·
remember the rules: if I only ever say negative things about a group, but I make sure all of those negative things are rooted in defensible truth claims, you are not allowed to say or imply I am opposed to that group
English
19
4
293
22.7K
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB) retweetledi
Michael Malice
Michael Malice@michaelmalice·
Mitch McConnell is so brain damaged that it's giving Mark Kelly an erection
English
129
89
2.2K
86.4K
John Ocasio-Rodham Nolte
What people need to understand is how things have drastically changed in the corporate media. “Credibility” is no longer a concern to outlets like the NYT. The NYT can only remain in business if it keeps its subscriber base happy, and its subscriber base is the far left. The NYT long ago lost Normal People. And knows we aren’t coming back. If the NYT told the full truth about Platner, the subscribers would revolt. That’s the only damage that can be done to the NYT today, and that’s the only thing the NYT fears. WaPo is a leftist shit stain, but the few times it tried to act like a newspaper, like not endorsing Kamala in ‘24, the leftist subscribers brutalized it. That’s why WaPo is losing $100M per year. The NYT sees that, had the goods on Platner, but knew there was only devastating financial downside in reporting the truth. So it performed a catch and kill. CNN, NYT, NPR, etc. With advertising gone and cable carriage fees evaporating, and decades of corruption chasing away everyone but the far left, the far left is all they got before the bottom falls out (see: WaPo) so they are whoring themselves to keep the only consumers between them and bankruptcy happy.
AG@AGHamilton29

There is just no way the NYT can escape a permanent hit to their credibility without a full investigation into how they managed to blow this story and throw the women involved under the bus. They had a story that should have ended a political campaign and instead spun in into a partisan defense for the candidate that put targets on the backs of the victims. And for what? The truth came out just a month later. They didn’t save Platner.

English
49
185
684
39.2K
Scott G
Scott G@scttfrnks·
Universities and foundations are so very enamored with this scholar archetype that they repeatedly embarrass themselves and damage their reputations over promoting it. And the people whose opinions matter don’t seem to mind, so it continues. I wouldn’t mind either but for the fact that this realm of scholarship is the animating force behind the very worst elements of our current political/cultural landscape.
John Sailer@JohnDSailer

In 2019, the Mellon Foundation gave Tufts $1.5 million to hire faculty in “Race, Colonialism, and Diaspora.” Their first hire: acclaimed author Kerri Greenidge. Last week, NYT reported Greenidge lost her tenured position, apparently over plagiarism and blatant fabrications.

English
10
18
107
8.9K
Homer Pavlos
Homer Pavlos@HomerPavlos·
Lupita has probably around 10 minutes of screen time playing both Helen and Clytemnestra. She is neither particularly beautiful nor a particularly strong actress. Her role is entirely provocative, designed purely to fulfill Hollywood’s diversity quotas.
English
201
354
7.1K
190.3K
Austin Celestin
Austin Celestin@CelestinAustin·
This discourse again? Fine, I'll bite. The SHSAT isn't where the inequities originate, it's where they materialize. Removing it won't rectify the systemic inequities that plague our public education. They'll just find new ways to materialize. Hell, they already do
Lincoln Restler@LincolnRestler

1 in 5 NYC public school students are Black, but at Stuy - our most prestigious high school - 3 of ~800 incoming Freshmen are Black. We urgently need state legislation to modify the admissions process. A single test should never be only factor deciding who gets in & who doesn’t.

English
12
27
254
19.1K
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)
She presents the false dichotomy of “lower standards” or “allocate even more resources” because that keeps the grift going. The possibility that not all students are equally capable, knowledgeable, or motivated is eliminated a priori, as is the possibility that the test may be accurately assessing future success.
English
0
0
0
5
PulcinellaPosts
PulcinellaPosts@pulcinellaposts·
@teachbk Are you saying lower standards to let blacks in? How many decently smart kids did democrats sacrifice in the alter of affirmative action. Take kids that could go to Lehigh and NYU but sent them to Harvard and Yale and get run over because they couldn’t keep up.
English
1
0
3
83
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)
The reasons to assert “privilege” are three-fold: - to guilt taxpayers into anteing up even more money - to pretend that ability is not the dominant variable - to blame output disparities on environment instead of on input variations, because then we just need to give more resources to administrators, unions, and NGOs to fix the environment.
English
0
0
4
103
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)
@LeeKuanYimby Yes. Next question. [the unquestionable premise, essential to the grift, is the blank slatism that believes that all students are equally capable, experienced, and motivated, and that therefore, any differences in results must be systemic and therefore billable.]
English
0
0
1
157
Share and Enjoy! (AWhiteAB)
@DrGaybeMiller I think the new euphemism is “person of unhoused”, though that might have been superseded by “person experiencing unhousedness”.
English
0
0
1
16
Dr Gaybe Miller, PhD (Zi/Xir)🌈🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈✊🏿👸🏿
There was a starving unhoused person outside my campus today. I would have stopped to help. But I was running late to a panel discussion on structural inequality. But I did whisper “I see you.” Sometimes you have to prioritise long-term change over short-term solutions. ✊🏿✊🏿
English
1
0
16
200