Dom Gamiello

@inminivanhell @dial_stacy69461 Your previous statement is also super toxic, problematic and sexist.

@dial_stacy69461 Um, I am absolutely not a Republican. Fuck Trump. What the actual fuck? I am a very left California resident who doesn’t vote for predators. Either party.

He took his dick out in a car, looked over to his employee who was 17 years younger than him, and asked her to suck it. What the absolute fuck is wrong with you people trying to excuse this bullshit? PS drunk women cannot consent. Gfy.

@NomikiKonst @evanwch @Ally_Sammarco

@evanwch @Ally_Sammarco Let me be clear: I’m sharing this because this man was out in the open at dnc events acting this way. Nothing happened, thank goodness. But it was an indicator - and hopefully the more women who share the more actual victims feel power

Ok just to show how insane this is I was aggressively hit on two separate times by Eric Swalwell (one after a DNC meeting at the hotel in front of a ton of notable folks) and one in my DMs. I don’t think he remembered me from the first time when he hit me up in DMs. (1/2)

@ClankoMedia @don_sinatra7 …which is exactly how life should work.

@don_sinatra7 No point to a burner account. Won’t go anywhere

Interesting considering the questionable practices while the Director of CJR.

@BrainlessThe2nd Syracuse…tanked again

Talk about earners? How about "Fat Dom" Gamiello?

@AjMachalaa Unpopular opinion: wouldn’t have killed Jamie Dimon to give him 15 mins. I get that he can’t personally meet every $150m private wealth client but show the guy some respect. He’s a big deal in the entertainment space.

“I moved a $140M to JP Morgan & I said I want to talk to Jamie Dimon thinking he let me in on some deal flow he refused. When I complain online they debanked me. I tried to buy my own bank & when I asked adidas to give me the marketing funds we agreed on they said NO” -Kanye

@helloparalegal People like you have ruined a once outstanding and useful platform.

A friend of mine from Harvard Law set up his own firm last year. Solo practice. No associates. No paralegals. Working out of a co-working space with a laptop and a coffee habit. Last month a mid-size business owner reached out looking for outside counsel. Three firms were being considered. Two of them were 15-attorney shops. The kind with pitch decks, associate teams, and glass-walled conference rooms that smell like fresh carpet and overbilling. My friend was a one-person firm with a WeWork membership. He almost canceled. He thought there was no way he could compete with that. I told him to try one thing before he walked away. Open Claude Code. Give it the owner's name, the company name, and 45 minutes. Ask it to build a complete intelligence report using only publicly available data. He did not think it would work. He tried it anyway. Claude came back with a 13-page report. He read it over coffee. Took 28 minutes. By the time the Zoom started, this solo attorney knew things about the prospect's company that the owner's own in-house team probably had not assembled in one place. The company was incorporated in Delaware but registered as a foreign entity in Texas 14 months later. That is expansion. A second member was added to the LLC in 2024. Claude pulled the operating agreement implications from the state filing and flagged what a new member meant for governance, profit distribution, and decision-making authority. Three active trademark applications filed in the last six months. Two were in a product category the company had never publicly announced. Nobody on the website knew about it. The trademark filings did. PACER hit. The company had been named as a defendant in a vendor dispute 18 months ago. It settled. But the complaint was public and Claude read every page of it. The core issue was a supply agreement with no termination clause. My friend now knew this company had been burned by a bad contract. They would care deeply about airtight vendor agreements going forward. He did not have to guess. It was in the filing. State court records. The owner had a dissolved LLC from 2019 with a different partner. A business divorce. Which meant this owner would value clear partnership terms and buy-sell provisions this time around. People who have been through a bad breakup want a prenup for the next one. Same principle. Hiring activity. Four job listings posted in 60 days. Head of compliance. Operations manager. Two warehouse roles. They were scaling fast and hiring operational infrastructure. That is exactly when companies need outside counsel the most and know it the least. They think they need a lawyer when they get sued. They actually need a lawyer when they start hiring a Head of Compliance. Glassdoor. 11 reviews. Every positive one mentioned culture. Every negative one mentioned the same thing. "No HR. No handbook. No process." A company growing faster than its internal policies. An employment claim waiting to happen. And a business owner who probably had no idea what his own employees were writing about him. Google reviews. 4.3 stars. But Claude flagged a pattern in the 1-stars. Three different customers mentioned the same issue. Product delivered late with no communication. The biggest operational liability was not product quality. It was fulfillment. That is a breach of warranty problem, a customer retention problem, and a potential class issue if the pattern scales with the company. Then there was a section Claude titled "Founder Mindset." It pulled a transcript from a podcast the owner appeared on and analyzed his communication patterns. One quote stood out. He said "I have spent more on lawyers fixing problems than I ever spent on lawyers preventing them." That one sentence told my friend exactly how to position his entire practice. Not as a litigator. Not as a fixer. As the lawyer who prevents the problems in the first place. The pitch wrote itself. Claude also analyzed the owner's communication style across LinkedIn posts, podcast answers, and X replies. Based on patterns it flagged what mattered for the meeting: this person values substance over rapport. He distrusts anything that feels like a pitch. Lead with what you know. Skip the small talk. Show your work before you ask for the engagement. My friend adjusted his entire approach based on that analysis. The Zoom started. No pleasantries. No "let me tell you about my firm" warmup. The owner gave his overview. What the company does. Where they are heading. What they need. Then my friend said "I noticed you filed two trademarks in a new product category last quarter. Is that the line you are launching in Q3?" Silence. "How do you know about that?" A solo lawyer working from a coworking space just earned more credibility in one sentence than the 15-attorney firm earned in their entire pitch deck. He walked the owner through everything. The vendor dispute and what it meant for future contracts. The hiring pattern and the compliance risk it signaled. The Glassdoor reviews pointing to an HR exposure. The fulfillment complaints that were one bad quarter away from becoming a warranty liability. He did not pitch his services. He showed the owner his own blind spots using the owner's own public data. Then he said which ones he would fix first and why. The owner said "the other firms sent me a brochure. You just showed me you already understand my business better than they do." He hired my friend that week. A solo practitioner over two 15-attorney firms. No associate team. No paralegal pulling research. No marketing department. One Harvard Law grad with Claude Code, a 13-page report, and 28 minutes of preparation that the other firms did not think to do. This is what I keep telling solo lawyers and most of them do not believe me until they see it. The advantage is not firm size. It is not headcount. It is not a fancy office or a partner track or a receptionist who offers sparkling water. The advantage is showing up knowing things the prospect did not expect you to know. That is what wins the engagement. Every time. And right now it is easier than it has ever been. Because almost everything about a business is public. It is just scattered across 15 different sources that no lawyer checks before a pitch meeting. Claude checks all of them in one run and hands you a report you can read before your coffee gets cold. Secretary of State filings. Incorporation, officers, registered agents, foreign qualifications. PACER and state court dockets. Every lawsuit, motion, and settlement. USPTO. Trademark filings tell you where a company is going before they announce it. LinkedIn job postings. What a company is hiring for reveals what is broken inside. Glassdoor. What employees say when nobody from management is reading. Google reviews. The 1-star reviews are where the legal risks hide. Podcast transcripts. The founder's own words analyzed for how they think and decide. UCC filings. Who they owe money to. What assets are pledged. Property records. Leases, liens, ownership structures. Communication pattern analysis. How this specific person talks, processes information, and makes decisions. So you know exactly how to show up. All public. All free. One report. Under 30 minutes to read. The solo lawyer who builds this into their pre-meeting workflow will win clients over firms 10 times their size. Not once. Every time. Because nobody expects a solo to show up that prepared. And that gap between what they expect and what you deliver is the most valuable asset in your practice. My friend is a Harvard Law grad. He has no team. He works from a coworking space. He is winning over 15-attorney firms because he spends 45 minutes doing what they never bother to do. The playing field was never about resources. It was about preparation. And preparation just got automated.

@CHN_AdamWodon @pitp23_kim @Slatesloveshoc2 @chnews It will absolutely go away in the US w/o this unnecessary dynamic of college hockey players needing to be 2-3 years older than every other college athlete.

@NovaMichigan @pitp23_kim @Slatesloveshoc2 @chnews Junior hockey is not going away. So why does it upset people that college hockey adjusts accordingly?

This is not great for college sports if it takes away opportunities by giving players 5 years of eligibility. But may be a little mitigated in hockey by a 24 year old age limit, and the fact that many 19 year olds won't use the 5th year. But still, not great.

@pitp23_kim @CHN_AdamWodon @Slatesloveshoc2 @chnews I think it will only destroy the USHL and NAHL type leagues. Leagues that I’m not sure need to exist. 20 year old kids who have been managing to current rules shouldn’t be abruptly cut off. But after they are done the change would end this stupid dynamic in college hockey.

@NovaMichigan @CHN_AdamWodon @Slatesloveshoc2 @chnews In US as well. This will destroy many levels of hockey. If it goes through & there is not grandfather clause, I will be the first in line with a lawsuit as it directly affects one of my college hockey playing children & a number of his teammates. My spouse is a lawyer so let’s go

@doshmanhere You are an ineffective communicator, lacking usage of proper grammar and sentence structure needed to demonstrate a point without creating confusion.

Dear family oriented men, there’s absolutely nothing near okay about being 40yrs old and having a 5yrs old as your first child.

@CHN_AdamWodon @Slatesloveshoc2 @chnews I understand that junior is engrained in Canadian hockey culture. I appreciate and respect it. But why is it relevant in the US where NCAA sports define the national sports culture? If college hockey rosters started from 0 tomorrow, why couldn’t HS seniors just go directly to D1?

@Slatesloveshoc2 @chnews No. Junior hockey is engrained in hockey culture and is never going away. No other sport has that. That's why college hockey is rightfully different.

@FariaDM86 @daggerdonred Is your assumption that your adversary will always have a less lethal gun and less skilled at using it? Why not look 2 acquire a microwave device or train a Bengal tiger? I think ppl often over estimate the effectiveness of a hand gun in solving an unknown problem in the backyard

@daggerdonred I never said I defended. I was thankful for the ability to defend if there had been something.

I'm sleeping at my parent's house tonight with my 9-year-old daughter. My 70-year-old mother comes into the guest room and says the camera out back just detected a person in the backyard. My daughter starts crying and hiding under the desk in the guest room, scared out of her mind. I immediately retrieve by 40 cal and go out in the backyard to ensure no one is there. After walking the whole property with my 40 cal, I verify that no one is outside the outside at the time. I come back in and my daughter is hiding under the desk in the guest room and crying still. This is the first time I have been in this scenario. I thank God for the United States of America and the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution and being able to adequately defend 3 generations of my family.

@The_Rad_Dawg @the_P_God This is exactly what’s happenning to a majority of college graduates complaining about the employment situation. The stories that cite how many jobs a given applicant has unsuccessfully applied for are maddening. Social habits are catching up to the Fortnite/tiktok generation.

@the_P_God they are probably spamming resumes to linkedin easyapply jobs instead of networking with friends of friends & school alumni & family friends etc getting real meetings with real hiring managers / adjacent teams

Small sample size but if your children go 0 for 3 on employment you likely failed as a parent.

@johnnny63 @AlexMicheletti @cwillaert He’s arguing that there is no need for juniors (at least as a pipeline to college hockey). And re: D1 coaches saying 18 year olds aren’t physically mature enough, why aren’t coaches ever forced to respond to the very basic and obvious rebuttal? “If *all* freshman are 18…”

@AlexMicheletti @cwillaert If everyone was the same age there would be no issue. College hockey should be like the rest of the sports

This would not work with college hockey

@AlexMicheletti @svenson_sv22199 No I think he’s saying it would fix college hockey! And I agree. This would be amazing (although the USHL would prob have to fold).

@svenson_sv22199 That’s not true, especially with the new rule allowing CHL players to play college hockey, a lot of them are coming in as 21 year old freshmen, as they age out of CHL

@PaulieWahlnutz @bostonradio He was at SopranosCon in New Jersey in 2019 and was really cool, fun to talk to.

@bostonradio Met this dude at Detroit Metro Airport during covid, walked past him, did a double take. Yelled "Agent Harris!" He turned around and laughed. We chatted for a couple minutes, great guy.

Character actor Matt Servitto, who played FBI Special Agent Dwight Harris on The Sopranos, is turning 6️⃣1️⃣ today. A fringe character for five seasons, Harris became unexpectedly essential in Season 6, slipping Tony intel as the war with Phil Leotardo heated up. In this scene at Satriale’s, he delivers the warning: an informant in Phil’s crew says Tony’s been marked.

@TBU12345678 How THE FU#% do you know what level of wine people are drinking or how they are traveling? Is this a joke?

the one thing I like about the OG Tiger Cub guys is that they really live/lived "the life". PJs, Augusta memberships, the best wine, epic houses in the Hamptons. for whatever reason the pod guys never picked up high class tastes, even with the big share shift of $

@Johnubacon I liked it better than Dawn’s apology for this… (Actually no we’re still waiting) cnn.com/2022/09/03/us/…

This is how you apologize. No excuses, no “if I offended,” Etc. One day story.

@CCHockeyNews What specifically is the “tone deaf” part? Also, I’d love to place some real wagers in front of you to see how strongly you actually believe that someone from the ACA will win a national championship in the next 20 years.

I appreciate Bucci’s passion for the game, but he’s just way off the mark here. And crapping on Atlantic Hockey as a bunch of teams that are “not gonna ever win the national championship” is a super tone deaf soundbite. All this from a guy who claims to love college hockey.

@BobEUnlimited This has to be a shtick or sociological experiment. There is no way you are really like this.

When allocators finally learn that "idio" is just a fancy way to say "short vol"

@PorscheDaddy23 @roflfights You good wit dem hands?

@roflfights Can I get a good deal on a house in this area?

At least they throwing hands and not shooting