I AM

@dsconsole @DrShayPhD Oh I do. Because Ignatius used the term the current blasphemous fake religion of Roman Catholicism believes they own Christianity. You falsely claim the name of your religion, you falsely claim creation of the Bible and you proudly claim a satanic driven papacy. Repent.

@NowUlta27434 @DrShayPhD You not know of what you are speaking about. 107 AD was the when the term Catholic was used, but the Church was Catholic from the beginning!

What I keep seeing with Catholics, especially, is disturbing. I have to call it out, because it needs to be said. Their loyalty is not first to the Bible. It is first to Rome. Catholics, and I do not care who it is or where they came from, can read a verse with their own eyes, see it says one thing, then turn around and defend the institution when it says something else. Then they twist, bend, stretch, and explain away the Bible until it sounds like Rome was right all along. Not only is this faithlessness to God, but this is raw religious conditioning. When a person is trained to believe the church cannot be wrong, the Bible no longer corrects them. Scripture can scream, and they still run back to the institution for permission to believe it. That is a dangerous place to be. In Catholicism, this is not even hidden. Rome openly places tradition and the teaching authority of the Church alongside Scripture. That is why so many Catholics do not ask, “What does the Bible say?” They ask, “What does the Church say the Bible means?” That is exactly how people end up defending error with a Bible in their hand. Get a grip! Come down of your rebellious horse. No church gets to outrank God’s Word. No pope gets to sit above Scripture. No priest, council, catechism, tradition, or religious system has the authority to correct what God has already spoken. If you think so, you are braindead! When Scripture and your church collide, and you choose the church, you are not defending truth. You are defending a throne. One day, every throne that exalted itself above the Word of God will fall. God will destroy every system and every tradition that does not come from His word and when He does, Rome, including its supporters, will be first in line.

@realmikolson The biggest mistake I see in Christianity is humans believing they have any ability to interpret God. Who are you? Stop worrying about how a baptism occurs and focus on a Christ centered life!

I hear this argument all the time in regards to infant baptism: “The Bible does not forbid the water to infants.” In other words, “It doesn’t explicitly say ‘don’t do it,’ so this means we should do it.” Do you know why the Bible never explicitly says not to baptize infants? Because it wasn’t happening then. It wasn’t even on the radar. There was no need to document a prohibition because every already understood the obvious protocol. It’s the same reason Jesus never explicitly mentions homosexuality being a sin in the Bible: the Jewish community already understood this, and Jesus taught a consistent pattern of biblical marriage [one man, one woman] clearly, thereby automatically rejecting homosexuality. No need to explicitly name it when the normative doctrine is already established. And this is where an argument from silence not only fails—it actually works against the position. The claim is essentially: “Sure, the Bible never shows infant baptism. It consistently shows baptism following a profession of faith, and even explains why—but since it never explicitly says NOT to baptize infants, we should go ahead and do it anyway.” That logic doesn’t hold. Think of it this way: imagine you run a construction company. Every contract in your business is signed by informed, consenting adults who understand the terms. Then someone argues, “Well, there’s no rule explicitly forbidding infants from signing contracts—so we should start having them sign every contract too.” The absence of a ban doesn’t override a clear, consistent pattern—it reinforces it. The biblical model is straightforward: baptism follows a profession of faith. Every single time. Reaching a different conclusion requires forcing the text to say something it never demonstrates.

@biscuittreat What a horrible post by a Catholic bot!

@WendyWatson222 When you get old my like me you praise Jesus for being alive! And then praise him again in the morning when you wake up on the right side of the grass!!

one day soon the door will shut ,you dont want to be standing outside that door knocking and pleading. the invitation is still open for you to come to Christ!

@realmikolson @conservmillen As Mormons and Catholics both worship a false doctrine. Now, there are also many great people who have found Jesus Christ somehow via these “religions”

Mormons, like Roman Catholics, are so close to the gospel—using much of the same biblical language—yet so so so far away. Jesus + NOTHING = the gospel. Well done here by @conservmillen

@Truth_matters20 Why did Adam live for over 900 years? The 120 years you are referencing is ambiguous. Do you speak for God?

Won't ever happen. The expiration date of human beings is 120 years, according to God. "Then the Lord said, 'My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.'" —Genesis 6:3

@IHJWAMH @churchtalkative No. Read Job.

@churchtalkative God doesn't test anyone. Satan does.

Why does God test people if He already knows the outcome?

@realBrandonGill Unfortunately Satan is real and among us. And he controls people like this

Which abortion is your favorite? The one where the unborn baby's body is crush and sucked out with a hose or the one where the baby is cut apart with a knife? Please enlighten us.

@Paul72753398 Stay safe

Me and Gia are getting to get ready for the storms. We going to lay down and watch the weather. Love you all

@jakobe291 You met Jesus once and Crucified him for the reason you present. You felt you deserved better than the Son of God that arrived and you wrestled with it and failed. Time to learn and for all Jewish people to recognize that Jesus is your Lord and Savior!

In Jewish tradition, we don’t just read the Word; we wrestle with it. When people pick one verse out of context to justify hate, it’s like stealing a single line from a private love letter and using it to get the author fired. Even if the words are technically 'there,' using them to destroy someone is a form of theft. You are kidnapping the Author’s voice to do work He never intended. When we meet Yeshua, we will have to explain why we weaponized His words to fuel our own anger. Scripture was always meant to be a mirror to show us our own flaws, not a magnifying glass to hunt for the flaws of others. True 'faith' isn't just reciting facts; it’s faithfulness to the person of Jesus. If we use His words to act unlike Him, we aren't showing faith - we’re showing a total lack of it. When you enter a house, you follow the rules of the owner. If you claim to be in Jesus’ house but ignore His foundational rule to 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' you are essentially an intruder. It doesn’t matter how many verses you can quote from the hallway; if you’re being hateful in the kitchen, you’ve missed the point of the whole home.

Loving Jesus Christ is as simple as falling on your knees a couple of times a day and professing your never ending love. And giving thanks that he somehow loves you. And let HIS WILL be done. It IS NOT in the interpretation of his words for your benefit.

@iam__Jezreel I get your intention. But expecting to become “perfect” is not possible. How about growing day by day to become better servants and not expecting to be perfect day one?

You can't be God’s example and at the same time the devil's sample. There's no joy in joints. There's no joy in pills. Calling out every lukewarm Christian that tries to find fulfilment in the world. The drugs, the alcohol, the cheap sex. Stop trying to find yourself or discover yourself. Open up the Bible and find God!

@churchtalkative It’s by GRACE! Because Jesus Christ knew he was God and was still tempted when he inhabited a human form. That’s why he understands our trials and difficulties!! If God himself was tempted? It’s OK for us to be flawed. Despite every temptation just cling to Jesus Christ!

If salvation is by grace, why does obedience still matter?

@Damon_Gang @BrysonGray You do know 170 AD and 1,700 AD are enormously different?

@NowUlta27434 @BrysonGray 170 AD is the 2nd century. Do you even know what the Muratorian Fragment is?

The “church” didn’t write any scripture nor give us any scripture. All of the scriptures were already being taught in churches well before any councils.

@Damon_Gang @BrysonGray Yes. He was a dude in the 1700’s who found a bit of potential New Testament. Woohhoo! Allegedly. Meanwhile, 1,500 plus years ago an ACTUAL New Testament was being circulated. Ridiculous

@DrShayPhD @loki3729 @Pontifex Hey, hey. Tone it down. There are and have been millions of people who have somehow found a relationship with Jesus Christ through the Catholic Church. How I don’t know, but they have and did. Save the outrage for those who “lead” the Catholic Church and not the everyday person

If you think Christ built His church on a system that molest children and covered it up, that blasphemes His name, that sold indulgences, that slaughtered over 15 million people, that kept the Bible out of the hands of ordinary people, that the Bible says Satan gave it power to, you are a special kind of brainwashed.

The #GospelOfTheDay (Jn 10:1-10) invites us to trust in the Lord. He does not come to take anything from us. Rather, He is the Good Shepherd, who multiplies life and offers it to us in abundance.

@TheSwampyTimes @oliverburdick The Romans and their new Catholic Church. You can say it.

@NowUlta27434 @oliverburdick No, just empire, using jesus as a tool of power.

They killed Jesus because he claimed to be the Messiah. He rose from the dead because he is.

@Damon_Gang @BrysonGray The New Testament was being compiled within the lifetime of the Apostles themselves. People today have zero concept of 1st century people. Early forms of the New Testament were put together and distributed to be read aloud and became oral tradition.

@NowUlta27434 @BrysonGray Hundreds of years was individual books and letters for the New Testament. The Muratorian Fragment shows the beginnings of that in about 180 AD. About 395 AD for the canon places "hundreds of years" before to when it was individual Gospels and letters/epistles.

@jakobe291 Eventually EVERY knee will bow down before Jesus Christ. All in shame and begging for forgiveness. ALL!

Jesus frequently emphasized that he didn't come to abolish the Law or the Prophets, but to fulfill them. Because of this, he would likely want people today to see the New Covenant not as a 'deletion' of Jewish heritage, but as its expansion. He would remind the people that we are part of a single, unfolding story - one where the 'root' of Israel supports the 'branches' of the nations. A path forward requires people to repent for the harms caused by 'replacement' ideologies and embrace the humility of a Kingdom defined by love, not just institutional identity.