
Andre McLaurin
1.8K posts





















What should be the statute of limitation on discussing woke censorship? I think it should be 10 years after the Dr Seuss books that were pulled from publication and from library shelves are finally re-printed.




@asymmetricinfo In some elite spaces there is this idea "We on the inside all know that some aspects of what we say and do are performative; therefore, it's unfair for you to take them seriously and hold them against us!" and that's just not going to fly.


Lets keep in mind Caitlin didnt ask for this She’s never said she was the face of the league. She’s always showed respect for those who came before her. She could squash this league like a bug if she started her own league. When she was asked to do NBA 3pt contest she said she wanted to do WNBA one 1st. She has fought for players salaries. But she is by far the most popular player in the league by every metric possible. Was it disrespectful to past tennis players when Serena and Venus instantly became faces of women’s tennis or Tiger with golf? The market dictates who the face of the league is and it’s clearly Caitlin. This argument makes zero sense and is just steeped in jealousy and stupidity






Some of you will be too young to remember, but there used to be a cadre of conservative pundits and politicians who pretended to be deeply, sincerely concerned about “crony capitalism”



@jessesingal Should there be any statute of limitations on re-surfacing a 2020 article in which a C-list celebrity advocates an act of censorship that was never actually implemented? Can we stop doing that in 2030 or 2035, or do you agree with Kat that we should "never" stop?






