
OrangeGroveCapital
2.9K posts

OrangeGroveCapital
@OGCapital25
To God be the glory | Big Law | Early PLTR, TSLA, LMND, GLXY, AMD, HOOD, HIMS, ASTS and PATH investor | Searching for outsized returns




$SIVE is the upstream laser supplier for CPO and Silicon Photonics. They're the likely $COHR / $LITE type future light source for: - $AMZN Trainium Clusters - $MSFT Maia Clusters and possibly other hyperscalers like $META MTAI and $GOOGL TPU clusters. At a ~$200M MC. Relational Mapping (speculative): $SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium. $SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium $SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers _ Ongoing: $SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU) $SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ( $MSFT, $META historically Wiwynn's largest clients). Because of captive models like $MRVL Celestial, they get a free ride. However, they do compete multi-source ELS against Lumentum, Coherent, and $MTSI with Ayar and win anyway in merchant models. But they win either way. For high-volume production ramp up, a large part of it depends on the ongoing Win semi qualification, but this will likely be a large indicator. Again supply chain BOM is extremely confidential. $AMZN will never tell anyone "Hey, we use $SIVE ". But if you put 1+1+1+1+1 together, you can piece together the likely suppliers. Most people see "Poet Starlight" uses $SIVE. Or Ayar uses $SIVE. But don't map all the multi-hop relations to see where they end up. I do think $SIVE is an extremely undiscovered opportunity as the next possible mini $LITE for Silicon Photonics at $200m MC. As they're the likely upstream laser supplier for hyperscaler supply chains for future CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up with cw dfb lasers and scale out with laser arrays.

$SATS EchoStar Updated Analysis Since we now have a tentative timeline on a SpaceX IPO, its a good time as any to update my NAV analysis and areas of interest as we go crescendo in to the next 6 months. Exciting times. The key takeaway from this exercise is that at the current valuation of $129 / share, $SATS is still trading at a discount to what I estimate to be a worst case scenario With a clear catalyst ahead EchoStar represents a high conviction expected value play with a high probability of 40-90% upside within a compressed timeframe Let's dive deeper into some of the swing factors at play: 1) Value ex-Space X: I estimate there to be $42-53B of asset value to the HoldCo (net of any OpCo debt). The main variables to this are (i) value of the remaining AWS-3 (paired) and (ii) Boost Mobile. AWS-3 (paired) remains a highly strategic asset and my base case at $2.5 MHz POP is quite conservative in my view. Boost Mobile is the largest "unknown" and can seriously surprise to the upside if the hybrid MVNO model takes-off and they become a core player in D2C through the SpaceX partnership. If this happens there is probably further upside to my high case. 2) HoldCo liabilities: there is a ~$8B NAV swing between my low and high case which is a function of (i) tower lease litigation and (ii) tax impact from spectrum sales. On the tower lease litigation there is >$4B of remaining lease obligations as at Q3 and we are taking the full hit in my low case. Whilst we are not privy to the contractual details it is highly unlikely in my view that EchoStar would be liable for the full sum with recourse to the HoldCo. Without going into too much detail the key legal elements revolve around the drafting of the Force Majeure clause (since EchoStar was forced by the FCC to sell its spectrum) as well as the counterparty and guarantor group under the contract. From what I gathered from the case it is likely that the EchoStar subsidiary that entered into the agreement is separate to the spectrum selling entities, is of limited substance and did not provide guarantees. Having said this I am still assuming some settlement amounts in both base and high cases. On the tax liability from spectrum sales, as I've highlighted previously there is a chance the Company can avoid this all together due to section 1033 of the tax code on forced sales of property (since the FCC mandated the spectrum sale they should qualify for a deferral so long as they reinvest the proceeds) 3) Based on all the above I get to a NAV ex-SpaceX range of $24-42B. Now if we overlay the value of the SpaceX stake, even at the very low-end of the IPO range ($800B) I get to a total NAV of $133-186/share. If the $1.5T rumoured valuation is true then we are closer to $190-243/share. Note that SpaceX is expected to represent >50% of $SATS NAV in my base case. 4) Thoughts on exit / trimming: as we approach fever pitch on the IPO I believe there is a good chance that $SATS trades, at least temporarily, at a premium to NAV (which is not reflected in my analysis). If this happens I would suggest trimming more aggressively as I would expect that premium to flip to a small discount once SpaceX shares are live. On the balance of probabilities I think the $200-250 range is a good area to take some profits. @transhumanica @BDeveran @ACapitalLP @HighStakesCap



@DBurkland @pbeisel It’s in testing right now. Wide release in a few weeks.


@DBurkland @pbeisel It’s in testing right now. Wide release in a few weeks.




Come on @AndrewDudum release some good news and burn these shorts into oblivion. Just need a spark to spark the bonfire! $HIMS





Peptides will be given the green light any day now …





BREAKING $HIMS 5m+ shares short vol 🚨🚨🚨 Holy shit, the day just getting started 😂 Short sellers have no chill whatsoever. Where do they get all the shares to short at near 50% Short float? Are we back to fake shares era 2020-2021? Source: Off-Exchange Short Volume









