𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈

15.9K posts

𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈 banner
𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈

𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈

@Octopusrpl

07/02/1816

Drake passage Katılım Nisan 2018
693 Takip Edilen468 Takipçiler
Diana
Diana@InvestWithD·
Let's always remember the story of @JoelKatz selling his $ETH for $1.05 🤣 If he thought there is 1% chance of $ETH hitting $2368 would he sell it? No
Diana tweet mediaDiana tweet media
Diana@InvestWithD

🚨Ripple’s JoelKatz CONFIRMS He Has NO NDA Forcing Him To Lie — Says If XRP Were To Reach $10,000, Rich Investors Would’ve Pushed It To $20 Already 😳🔥 Ripple ex-CTO @JoelKatz just DENIES claims that he is only saying this because of some NDA after leaving @Ripple. 👀 @JoelKatz CLAIMS he would rather say NOTHING or avoid the question completely than give an answer he DOESN'T BELIEVE is truthful and accurate. ⚠️ If wealthy, rational investors truly believed $XRP had a SMALL chance of reaching $10,000 in the future… They would already be buying aggressively and pushing the price MUCH higher today, at least $20 as of now. 🤯🫣 And right now, @JoelKatz is saying the market is NOT pricing a $XRP $10K outcome. ❌ This is one of the MOST DIRECT reality checks we’ve seen from inside @Ripple itself. 😳

English
28
61
560
126.1K
𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈
It does not show a great faith in the future of this space though, at least for BTC and ETH, does it? Surely you didn’t absolutely need the cash from btc and eth sales? Whereas for XRP it would make more sense for you to sell a good chunk if you were (partly) paid in XRP. I just hopemyou didn’t treat XRP as other crypto. Saying so would be a tactical nuke in this community. Fascinating anyway.
English
1
0
2
732
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
@Vet_X0 I'm going to have to think seriously about that in a few months. A much lower weight is technically better for my health, but do I really want to be a thin person? Also, as you get older, extra weight can help you survive things like a severe flu.
English
76
6
316
15.2K
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
Just weighed myself this morning and for the first time in 35 years, I am not obese.
English
888
148
6.2K
207.5K
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
@InvestWithD If I had thought there was a 1% chance of it hitting $2,368, I would not have sold it for $1.05. I'm still not sure the odds of that happening really were more than 1% at the time. 😉
English
195
179
1.9K
183.7K
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
I'm glad I don't do my own taxes anymore. Just some of the issues with this: 1) Is the FUZZY that I received a gift? Or was it paid to me in the ordinary course of business? 2) What is my tax basis in the FUZZY that I received? 3) When I deposited into the AMM, do I consider the value materialized to be the fair value of the tokens I deposited or the fair value of the LP tokens I got? 4) Must I use FIFO to determine my basis in the XRP tokens I gave up to the AMM? Or can I choose which XRP to consider myself to have disposed of? 5) How do I figure the fair value of the LP tokens I got? Can I use the DEX? The AMM? Before, during, or after my transaction if I moved the market? 6) Can I plausibly argue that some of the values of the tokens involved cannot reasonably be determined to delay capital gains taxes until I eventually move back into more liquid assets? Or do I have to come up with some value by some methodology?
English
81
46
288
39.9K
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
I took some of my FUZZY and some of my XRP to do a two-sided deposit into the XRP/FUZZY AMM. This adds liquidity to FUZZY and could let me profit from both volatility and swaps between FUZZY and XRP. bithomp.com/tx/A526DD40DC3…
English
204
289
1.6K
129.1K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
In a 100 km race, which do you think wins? + Lion + Human + Camel + Horse + Wolf + Cheetah + Ostrich + Bear
English
1K
486
6.7K
3.2M
𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈
@JoelKatz I believe that in a not so distant future most cars will be driving autonomously anyway. This ethical consideration will naturally disappear, as others will arise.
English
0
0
0
6
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
I oppose any laws requiring cars to have technology that shuts them down if the driver is drunk. The reason I oppose them is that I utterly reject the moral logic on which they are based. The moral logic for these laws is that they will kill some innocent people, but they will save more people than they kill. Sure, there will be the person who was drugged by someone trying to harm them and whose car doesn't let them flee, and there will be the person who is trying to rush an injured person to the hospital whose demeanor will cause their car not to work. But there will be lots more people who tried to drive drunk who will be stopped. And innocent people they would have crashed into will be saved. But we don't get to actually kill innocent people to save other people. Suppose there was a doctor would save a dozen of innocent people every year because he's the best doctor there is, but in exchange he demands the right to kill one innocent person every year who would otherwise have lived. We would be moral monsters if we hired such a doctor. We don't get to play god like that. This law will actively kill some innocent people every year. We shouldn't pass laws that actively kill innocent people, even to save a greater number of other innocent people.
English
381
577
4.1K
145.9K
𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈
Interesting view. Both decisions carry active consequences though. One option relies on an active decision to implement new tech, the other ‘requires’ remaining passive. How is one ethically better than the other? Why not judge by the ultimate result of each decision, meaning the expected amount of misery each option entails, then basing a rational decision on that only? Would that not ultimately be more ethical? Should our ultimate goal not be to minimise misery aven if it means taking the blame? Remaining passive if one is to be clearly superior to the other is what strikes me as ultimately more unethical.
English
0
0
0
8
Governor Tim Walz
Governor Tim Walz@GovTimWalz·
History may have its eye on our state - but we are writing our own story.
English
2.1K
102
741
196.8K
𝒪𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓈
In theory I would say blue. It is the rational non selfish answer. In reality though when puah comes to shove, there is a high risk many people will answer red, simply because in the context of their lives actually depending on it their of fear voting blue could well outweigh reason. Morality will go straight out the window for many. Imagine your life is at stake. I think that in reality, the idealists would be punished by death, sadly. In this case, your answer really boils down to what faith you have in humanity. I am happy you seemingly chose blue, @JoelKatz .
English
0
0
0
100
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
You are part of a group of people who are mostly rational who are forced to take a private vote by pressing a red button or pressing a blue button. If more than 50% push the blue button, everyone lives. Otherwise, only people who pushed the red button live. Which button would you press? Be honest.
English
1.4K
212
2K
187.5K