Ofinance

194 posts

Ofinance banner
Ofinance

Ofinance

@Ofinance1

Diversification in making money online Trading with Prop Firms Trading Crypto

Katılım Mayıs 2020
812 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
Ofinance retweetledi
SAYLESS 🤫
SAYLESS 🤫@SayLessFX·
Since when did holding a trade during news became a breach @fundingpips Funny thing is i just left 0.01 lots on the account after trading in the night Now i get accused breaching account because i held my trade during news I’m off, 🤦🏽
SAYLESS 🤫 tweet media
SAYLESS 🤫@SayLessFX

🚨FundingPips is pulling a SCAM and i can’t believe I can’t wrap my head They closed my trade during news and told me i breached my account for closing the trade Check quote for full details

English
53
5
133
28.5K
Ofinance retweetledi
PROPWARZ
PROPWARZ@propwarzx·
🚨 Denied, account deleted, broker deposit stolen, ghosted! @RajaBanks As a multimillionaire Raja Banks is doing this with ALL traders wanting to withdraw over a few thousand at @DominionMktsLLC Including stealing their initial broker deposit! 👇 Trust Pilot is full of them
PROPWARZ tweet mediaPROPWARZ tweet media
English
20
6
76
14K
Ofinance retweetledi
Vincent ETW
Vincent ETW@Etw_trades·
$400 payout from a $50k account. This is the only way in which these prop firms will love you. Someone somewhere is trying to make $2k payout from a $5k account😭
Abhilaksh Mahajan@Abhilaksh_fx

Just smashed another win with @GoatFunded 🚀💰 Made $250 profit on my 50K funded account – keeping it simple with consistent base hits ⚾🔥 Just need 0.5% profit for one more day → that’s 3 profitable days locked in, and I can request my 3rd payout 🎯 Already withdrawn $1,000 total! 😎🤑 One more green day and we’re cashing out again 💸 Don’t sleep on this 🔥 BOGO + 40% OFF limited-time offer! Use code BOGO40 and grab your account now 👇 checkout.goatfundedtrader.com/aff/Abhilaksh1…

English
19
4
131
14.1K
Ofinance retweetledi
AstuceFx
AstuceFx@astucefx·
I get payouts, I make free content for you guys, free promotion for FTMO, and you were happy about it. But the only time I post something negative, FTMO denies my payout. Now it’s suddenly “you breached clause 10 – confidentiality.” Bullshit. Where were you when I was posting all the good things about you? Did you complain then? I know countless people got payout denied from FTMO or got banned without making post about it because of your confidentiality clause, just silencing traders from talking
AstuceFx tweet mediaAstuceFx tweet media
FTMO.com@FTMO_com

Hi everyone, let’s clear this up. The issue here isn't about hiding negative feedback; it’s a straightforward breach of contract. Clause 10 exists to protect the privacy of all parties involved, which is standard practice in almost any industry, not just prop trading. We don't hide negative comments – you can easily see that we reply to them directly and constructively across all platforms. However, sharing confidential correspondence or resorting to vulgarity, even out of frustration, has no place in the FTMO community. We want to thank the responsible traders here who understand that an agreement is an agreement. You don't build a 10-year track record by banning skilled traders. Our foundation is built on long-term fairness and supporting trader development. Just last month (February), we processed over 10,000 FTMO Rewards totalling more than $31,500,000. Stay disciplined, focus on your edge, and keep growing.

English
16
13
167
21.8K
Ofinance retweetledi
AstuceFx
AstuceFx@astucefx·
Isn’t this considered confidential information, or does it only become confidential when it’s a payout denial email and suddenly you pull out clause 10, @FTMO_com 🙂
English
10
8
99
12.3K
Ofinance retweetledi
Prop Firm Eye
Prop Firm Eye@propfirmeye·
If you see any PropFirm doing this, It's a major Red Flag 🚩 After months of disciplined trading, this trader finally passed his @Pipstonecapital account. But suddenly, he received an email saying his account was breached due to a Violation from January – during Phase 1. Now the Question is: If he Violated any rule in Phase 1, how was he given a Funded Account?
AmeerFx@iameerhamxa

🚨🚨🚨I’m beyond frustrated and honestly stunned by the timing from @Pipstonecapital . After months of disciplined trading, I passed the challenge, reached the funded stage, and even started trading on funded account. Now, out of nowhere, I get an email saying my account is breached because of a supposed violation from January—two months ago on my Phase 1 Account. If this was a serious breach, why wasn’t it addressed immediately? This late-stage revelation is completely unfair after all the effort I put in. I demand a full, immediate explanation and a thorough review of this decision. Pipstone, it’s time to stay accountable. @propfirmeye @PropJournalist @trustedprophub @TheTrustedProp @Propfirmedge @SaadShahzad20 @PropFirmMedia

English
6
4
15
2.7K
Ofinance retweetledi
Turbo Trades
Turbo Trades@TurboTrades1·
I GOT BANNED ON @TradingLucid story: I made a promise to my Discord we’d run a 0 → $10K challenge with a prop firm the community chose. They voted @TradingLucid So we ran it. From eval → funded → $10K payout request in just 10 days. Over $20K in total profits. All done LIVE teaching entries, stop losses, and full execution while people followed along and learned. Then… I got banned. All the accounts get closed Reason? “Fraudulent activity” because people were copying my trades. Let that sink in. If I was losing money, they’d have no issue. They’d gladly collect from me and everyone using their platform. But the moment we win? The moment we hit payout? Now it’s a problem. There are thousands of traders streaming, teaching, and having others follow along across YouTube, TikTok, Discord but somehow it’s only an issue when you’re actually profitable. Instead of honoring the payout, they labeled it fraud and shut it down. 0/10 experience. I was genuinely excited to work with them… but this showed me everything I needed to see. If you’re thinking about using them think twice.
Turbo Trades tweet mediaTurbo Trades tweet media
English
131
31
487
122.3K
Ofinance retweetledi
Prop Firm Media
Prop Firm Media@PropFirmMedia·
🚨 So this is how it works with @FTMO_com 🚨 If your payout gets denied and you speak about it on social media, you get banned. That’s why you rarely see anything bad about @FTMO_com online. Not because everything is perfect but because traders get silenced. “Best prop firm” they say. Lol. #propfirmmedia📈
Prop Firm Brigade@PropFirmBrigade

Now we can understand why you never see negative posts about @FTMO_com If your payout gets denied and you talk about it publicly on social media they just ban you. Problem solved, right? Silence the trader, protect the reputation. Best prop firm indeed.💀 #propfirmmedia📈

English
8
12
73
7.8K
Ofinance retweetledi
Dan Cheung
Dan Cheung@wannabechamp·
I'm getting so fed up with FTMO who has been banned from them ?
English
44
8
241
60K
Ofinance retweetledi
AmeerFx
AmeerFx@iameerhamxa·
🚨🚨🚨I’m beyond frustrated and honestly stunned by the timing from @Pipstonecapital . After months of disciplined trading, I passed the challenge, reached the funded stage, and even started trading on funded account. Now, out of nowhere, I get an email saying my account is breached because of a supposed violation from January—two months ago on my Phase 1 Account. If this was a serious breach, why wasn’t it addressed immediately? This late-stage revelation is completely unfair after all the effort I put in. I demand a full, immediate explanation and a thorough review of this decision. Pipstone, it’s time to stay accountable. @propfirmeye @PropJournalist @trustedprophub @TheTrustedProp @Propfirmedge @SaadShahzad20 @PropFirmMedia
AmeerFx tweet mediaAmeerFx tweet media
English
14
3
9
5.6K
Ofinance retweetledi
Armaan
Armaan@Armaan_M9·
I’ve had my master account closed by FundedPips for the third time, even though I didn’t incur any losses at all. Honestly, lately I’ve been seeing very unfair practices. If a solution isn’t found, everyone will eventually leave. As for me, today is my last day 🙏💔😭@fundingpips @Khldfx @SealFunded
Armaan tweet mediaArmaan tweet media
English
60
10
323
46.5K
Ofinance retweetledi
TradeX_Nayan
TradeX_Nayan@GautamG5555·
Withdrawal accepted, trading disabled… yet my account (36562) magically failed for a “3% risk trade.” Interesting, since I didn’t even trade. Dashboard PnL $9,625 matches my withdrawal, but the DD numbers don’t. Amazing s @thefundedroom @thetraderoom_
TradeX_Nayan tweet mediaTradeX_Nayan tweet media
English
14
14
21
11K
Ofinance retweetledi
Forexblog9ja
Forexblog9ja@forexblog9ja·
FTMO denied my payout - Bobo FX
Forexblog9ja tweet mediaForexblog9ja tweet media
14
2
62
8.1K
Ofinance retweetledi
Prop Firm Media
Prop Firm Media@PropFirmMedia·
🚨 Payout Rejection Has Started within a month @thefundedroom ? Another trader is reporting serious issues with @thefundedroom after their $100K instant funded account was flagged for an alleged HFT violation. According to the firm, 8 trades were placed within 3 minutes. But here’s where it gets interesting • The trader claims he did NOT place any trades during that time • The reported trades do not appear in his trading history • The trades supposedly used 10–25 lots on GOLD, which is technically impossible on a 100K instant account due to margin limits So the question is simple: If the trader didn’t place those trades, and the account couldn’t even support those lot sizes where did the trades come from? This is exactly why beginners need to stop chasing shiny offers and “50–60% discounts” from random new firms. Getting a 100K or 200K account from a new prop firm means nothing if the moment you make money, the account suddenly gets flagged for some mysterious rule violation. Stop worshipping your trading guru like they’re your father. Your capital matters. Your time matters. Before buying accounts, do your own research. If this is a system error, the firm should investigate server logs and resolve it immediately. If not, the community deserves a clear explanation. Transparency is the minimum expectation when traders are risking their time and money. Let’s see how this gets handled. @thetraderoom_ #propfirmmedia📈
Ankur Kathiriya@ankurkathiriya_

@thetraderoom_ @thefundedroom I am reaching out here because it appears that live support is currently unavailable. Therefore, I kindly request that you look into this issue and assist me in resolving it at your earliest convenience. Account ID: 21446 Email: kathiriya.ankur@gmail.com I recently received an email stating that my 100K Instant Funded account was flagged for a High-Frequency Trading (HFT) rule violation, specifically for placing more than 3 trades within a 3-minute interval. However, I would like to clarify that this allegation appears to be incorrect formally, and I believe there may have been a system or platform-related error. First, this type of trading behavior is not part of my strategy. While I do scalp the market, my approach involves entering a single trade and waiting for it to reach either TP or SL. I do not place multiple trades or layer positions within a short time window. According to the email, the violation allegedly occurred between 02:48 PM and 02:51 PM IST, during which 8 trades were recorded under my account. After carefully reviewing my records, I found the following: I did not place any trades during that time window. In fact, I did not trade at all between 02:13 PM and 04:14 PM IST. I was not even in front of my trading terminal during this period. The 8 trades listed in your report do not appear in my trading history, which clearly indicates that these trades were not executed by me. Additionally, there is another important technical inconsistency in the trade history you shared. The 8 trades shown in your report were executed with lot sizes ranging between 10 lots and 25 lots on GOLD. This is not possible to execute on a 100K instant-funded account. Even if I attempted to use 100% of the available margin, the platform only allows a maximum position size of approximately 2 lots on GOLD. Therefore, placing trades with 10–25 lots is technically impossible under the margin constraints of this account. This further confirms that the trades you referenced could not have originated from my account under normal trading conditions. Based on these points, it strongly suggests that there may have been a technical issue, platform error, or incorrect trade attribution. I have already reviewed my logs and records and can provide supporting evidence confirming that no trades were executed by me during the mentioned timeframe. I am happy to share screenshots or any additional proof if required for your investigation. Therefore, I kindly request your team to: Conduct a detailed investigation into the flagged trades. Verify the server-side trade logs to determine how these trades were generated. Remove the HFT violation associated with my account if it is confirmed that these trades were not placed by me. I have always made sure to strictly follow all trading rules and risk parameters, and I take compliance with your firm’s policies very seriously. I would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue as soon as possible. For your reference, I have attached screenshots of the trade logs that were shared by your team and also the trade history from my own trading account. After carefully reviewing my account logs, I could not find any of the trades that were mentioned in your email. This clearly indicates that those trades were not executed from my account. I request you to please review the attached evidence and verify the logs from your side. I believe there may have been a technical issue or system error that caused these trades to appear incorrectly.

English
7
5
21
3.9K
Ofinance retweetledi
Ankur Kathiriya
Ankur Kathiriya@ankurkathiriya_·
@thetraderoom_ @thefundedroom I am reaching out here because it appears that live support is currently unavailable. Therefore, I kindly request that you look into this issue and assist me in resolving it at your earliest convenience. Account ID: 21446 Email: kathiriya.ankur@gmail.com I recently received an email stating that my 100K Instant Funded account was flagged for a High-Frequency Trading (HFT) rule violation, specifically for placing more than 3 trades within a 3-minute interval. However, I would like to clarify that this allegation appears to be incorrect formally, and I believe there may have been a system or platform-related error. First, this type of trading behavior is not part of my strategy. While I do scalp the market, my approach involves entering a single trade and waiting for it to reach either TP or SL. I do not place multiple trades or layer positions within a short time window. According to the email, the violation allegedly occurred between 02:48 PM and 02:51 PM IST, during which 8 trades were recorded under my account. After carefully reviewing my records, I found the following: I did not place any trades during that time window. In fact, I did not trade at all between 02:13 PM and 04:14 PM IST. I was not even in front of my trading terminal during this period. The 8 trades listed in your report do not appear in my trading history, which clearly indicates that these trades were not executed by me. Additionally, there is another important technical inconsistency in the trade history you shared. The 8 trades shown in your report were executed with lot sizes ranging between 10 lots and 25 lots on GOLD. This is not possible to execute on a 100K instant-funded account. Even if I attempted to use 100% of the available margin, the platform only allows a maximum position size of approximately 2 lots on GOLD. Therefore, placing trades with 10–25 lots is technically impossible under the margin constraints of this account. This further confirms that the trades you referenced could not have originated from my account under normal trading conditions. Based on these points, it strongly suggests that there may have been a technical issue, platform error, or incorrect trade attribution. I have already reviewed my logs and records and can provide supporting evidence confirming that no trades were executed by me during the mentioned timeframe. I am happy to share screenshots or any additional proof if required for your investigation. Therefore, I kindly request your team to: Conduct a detailed investigation into the flagged trades. Verify the server-side trade logs to determine how these trades were generated. Remove the HFT violation associated with my account if it is confirmed that these trades were not placed by me. I have always made sure to strictly follow all trading rules and risk parameters, and I take compliance with your firm’s policies very seriously. I would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue as soon as possible. For your reference, I have attached screenshots of the trade logs that were shared by your team and also the trade history from my own trading account. After carefully reviewing my account logs, I could not find any of the trades that were mentioned in your email. This clearly indicates that those trades were not executed from my account. I request you to please review the attached evidence and verify the logs from your side. I believe there may have been a technical issue or system error that caused these trades to appear incorrectly.
Ankur Kathiriya tweet mediaAnkur Kathiriya tweet media
English
23
7
36
22.5K
Ofinance retweetledi
Chay Bowes
Chay Bowes@BowesChay·
So @Revolut just closed my account. No reason, no discussion. I owed them nothing, never did, and had money in the account. I'm an EU citizen This is the "Free Europe" they are telling us we live in? This is coming for anyone daring to stand up and speak out @NStoronsky?
English
637
1.1K
4.8K
496.4K
Ofinance
Ofinance@Ofinance1·
@andrew_nfx "Sitting there. Untouched for weeks at a time." is there no inactivity breach if he doesn't trade for a long time?
English
0
0
1
150
Andrew NFX
Andrew NFX@andrew_nfx·
Met a trader last year who was doing $15-25k per month in prop firm payouts. Seemed like he had it figured out. Then I noticed something strange. He had $2.8M in funding. But he was only trading 4 of his accounts actively. The other 8 accounts? Sitting there. Untouched for weeks at a time. I asked him why. He said: 'I don't take the same trades on all my accounts. If I did and hit a losing streak, I'd breach everything at once.' Smart. He explained his system: He'd rotate through his accounts. Some days he'd trade accounts 1-4. Other days accounts 5-8. Never all at once. This way: If he had a bad trading day, only 3-4 accounts took the hit. The others stayed untouched. Safe from drawdown. Meaning even if he went through a rough week… He still had $1M+ in funding sitting clean. Ready to trade once he regrouped. I asked: 'Why don't more people do this?' He laughed. 'Because they're greedy. They see $2M in funding and think they need to trade all of it every single day to maximize profits. Then one bad week wipes everything.' He was right. Most traders with multiple funded accounts treat them like one giant account. Same trades. Same risk. Same exposure. Then they wonder why they lose everything at once. If you have multiple prop firm accounts… Don't trade them all the same way. Diversify your risk. Rotate your trading. Keep some accounts as a safety net. It's not about trading more. It's about trading smarter.
English
69
144
1.8K
145.7K
Ofinance retweetledi
Prop Firm Media
Prop Firm Media@PropFirmMedia·
🚨 @FundedNext finding “rule violations” right when payouts are due is becoming a pattern. Prop firms love transparency until it’s time to pay traders. $1,048 deducted for a “rule violation” when my only profitable trade was $11,318. No clear explanation. No proof. Just silence and “contact ethics”. Traders deserve better than this. #propfirmmedia📈
AstuceFx@astucefx

Second payout denied by @fundednext this year. This time my dashboard shows $1,048 deducted for “rule violation”, but during this payout cycle I never made any trade with $1,048 profit. My only winning trade was $11,318, so where did the $1,048 deduction come from? And as usual, no clear explanation about the rule I supposedly violated… I have to contact ethics just to find out. 😑

English
3
5
21
2.7K
Ofinance retweetledi
AstuceFx
AstuceFx@astucefx·
Craziest payout denial from FundedNext. People even think I’m making this up, but my payout got denied because of an issue that supposedly happened 3 months ago… yes, 3 months ago. You can pause the video and read everything yourself.
Camila Juárez@callmecamila07

@maleekberry12az @FundedNext and you all are even believing his words? thats sad cause the way he is portraying it clearly seems fake

English
18
5
113
26.4K