Powers1217

BREAKING: 93 House Democrats have filed a motion to block Trump’s self-dealing settlement in his sham $10 billion IRS lawsuit, which would create a $1.7 billion slush fund for Jan. 6 rioters and political allies.

BREAKING: Elon Musk's baby mama reveals that he used "space technology" in the 2024 election and implies that he STOLE it for Donald Trump. This deserves a full federal investigation by Democrats... "In October, Elon tells me that he is ready to release his, in his words 'anomaly in the matrix' And I am like, oh, like, who's that? And he says that he has 10,000 lasers in space, referring to his satellites," said Ashley St. Clair, one of the many women whom Musk has impregnated and then promptly began treating like dirt. "I say, because I am like, rather uncomfortable, and I know the gravity of what he's trying to tell me right now. I say, 'Wow, finally, a focus on the Jewish vote. He keeps going," she continued. "And he says, you know, this is not something on, this is not a piece that they'll see on the chessboard." "And I straight up tell him, I say, I would ask more, but I really don't want to be deposed, to which he says, very wise," she added. The implication here is clearly that Musk was doing something illegal and that St. Clair wanted plausible deniability. "Shortly after that, you know, he's involved with AmericaPAC and all of this other stuff, and he's sending me some internal data from AmericaPAC, real time delta vote metrics," recounted St. Clair. "And I am just like, how the f*ck do you have this sort of data? You don't get this from door knocking, because that was my first one of my first jobs in politics was in campaigns and cleaning up this bad data from door knocking, because the vendors that AmericaPAC is using at this point is a vendor that hires Craigslist crackheads for door knocking. And I wish I was exaggerating there, but I'm not." St. Clair said that she now recognizes that she "caused harm" with her "rhetoric" when she was leaning into being a far-right persona, but claimed that she only ever wanted what's "best" for America. Clearly, she feels that she can no longer in good conscience remain silent on 2024. "And one thing is I have always, always hated big tech," she said. "So then to have arguably the most powerful man in the world, who is sending me things about, you know, using his space technology in the election. I should also say that I have all of this backed up with many people with explicit instructions, should anything happen to me, okay." "But this was something that I was internally wrestling with, while publicly not really showing that I was having any of these internal ethical conflicts with myself regarding this information," she went on. "And then on election night itself, Elon, you know, left Mar-a-Lago early. I was at Mar-a-Lago and he told me, he told me over text, he's like, 'Yeah, I knew hours ago that Trump won. My team has the best real-time data anywhere,'" said St. Clair. "First of all, how the f*ck do you have real-time data on elections?" she continued. "How do you have real-time data? I could not understand that. I don't know that I ever will. I just, I saw some shit, guys. Like, I saw some shit and I'm fighting really hard to keep my voice because I saw shit that impacts everyone. And if I was self-interested, I have been offered the self-interested deal to shut up and not talk about anything. But what I can tell you is I've not been offered certain deals just because I know that he's weird." "Okay. I saw some shit," she concluded. This woman must be immediately subpoenaed to testify before Congress under oath about the "shit" she saw. If Elon Musk — who spent $291 million to help Republicans during the 2024 cycle — really used his technology to illegally interfere in our elections, he must be prosecuted and imprisoned. And if any votes were tampered with, the election must be overturned! Please ❤️ and share to demand a full investigation!

BREAKING: After 7 failed attempts, the Senate has officially advanced the Iran War Powers Resolution in a 50–47 vote. The measure would require congressional approval for continued U.S. military strikes on Iran. That means the cracks are finally starting to show. Even members of Trump’s own party are beginning to realize you cannot bypass Congress indefinitely while dragging the country deeper into another Middle East war. The Constitution gave Congress the power to declare war for a reason. Because presidents surrounded by loyalists, television cameras, and wartime adrenaline are historically terrible at knowing where the exit is.

BREAKING🚨 Nearly 800,000 Louisianians just sent Gov. Jeff Landry a message he can’t spin: they voted, they showed up, and they shot down EVERY one of his constitutional amendments. On May 16, voters across Louisiana went to the polls for what was supposed to be a quiet, low-turnout spring election. Instead, nearly 800,000 people cast ballots — an unusually strong showing for an off‑cycle contest — and together they delivered a clean sweep that stunned the state’s political establishment. Every single one of the five constitutional amendments on the ballot lost. All five had been pushed hard by Gov. Jeff Landry and the Republican legislature. The amendments weren’t small tweaks. One would have let lawmakers and the governor carve more positions out of civil service protections, making it easier to turn state jobs into political patronage. Another would have created a new breakaway school district in the Baton Rouge area, widely seen as a move to siphon resources and students out of existing, majority‑Black districts. A third would have reshuffled education trust funds and retirement obligations, tying permanent teacher pay raises to complex changes in how schools are funded. Yet another aimed to give local governments more room to cut inventory taxes for businesses, and one would have raised the mandatory retirement age for judges. Voters looked at all of it and said no. The “no” margins weren’t close either: most amendments went down by 15 to 30 points, with some losing nearly two‑to‑one statewide. Even the teacher pay amendment — the one Landry’s allies thought would be their best shot — couldn’t clear 50%. After pouring close to a million dollars into a campaign to pass these measures, Landry and his political machine watched them all go down in one night. This is also déjà vu. Just last year, Louisiana voters rejected another slate of Landry‑backed constitutional changes dealing with crime, courts, and taxes, also by wide margins. Two years in a row, the same pattern: the governor and his allies try to re‑engineer the state constitution from the top down, and ordinary voters — across parties, parishes, and racial lines — refuse to give them that power. It’s easy to feel like nothing we do matters, especially in deep‑red states where gerrymandering and voter suppression are baked into the system. But this weekend, Louisiana proved that showing up in “small” elections still counts. People read the fine print, talked to their neighbors, ignored the scare ads, and voted to keep their constitution from becoming a playground for politicians.