Operation🅰️TM

9.8K posts

Operation🅰️TM banner
Operation🅰️TM

Operation🅰️TM

@OperationATM

Canada Katılım Eylül 2009
1.5K Takip Edilen479 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Operation🅰️TM
Operation🅰️TM@OperationATM·
$ASTS Impulse Leg 4 Targets 🚀 Base: $49.31 (Nov 21, 2025)​ Impulse legs 1–3: $37 → $42 (+$5) → $62 (+$20) Ratios: 2/1 = 1.14x, 3/2 = 1.48x Accel ratio: (1.48 / 1.14) = 1.30x​ 🎯 Accel 1.92x: $119 gain → $168 🎯 Linear (+$35): $97 gain → $146 🎯 Recent 1.48x: $92 gain → $141 🎯 Avg 1.31x: $81 gain → $130​ ⚖️ Avg: $97 → $146 📈 Range: $130–168 💥 Curiosity triggered by : x.com/tuff_4r/status…
English
4
2
5
1.1K
Orlando
Orlando@thisisorlando·
You guys remember Greenland? I wonder how they’re doing nowadays
English
3
0
15
1.1K
Operation🅰️TM
Operation🅰️TM@OperationATM·
@aleabitoreddit Amazing, i like your style. For the laggards that haven't run, even if nothing fundamentally changed, just because they haven't moved, do you lower your weighting or exit them to add to ones with momentum???
English
2
0
0
12
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
Year to Date return from Jan to March: +564.36%. I’m speed running last year’s 600%+ returns by finding undiscovered AI bottlenecks. And picking the winners. - 500%+ unrealized gains on $AXTI. - $AAOI 3x’d in 3M or $IQE 2x in 1M. - $LITE close to 100%+. And I expect large capital rotation into silicon photonics + CPO names: Like $SOI, $AEHR, or $SIVE this year. (They’re up close to ~70-100%, but have a long way to go) Then, this is compounded by misc longs, such as $CRCL that increased 148% in 1 month. $NBIS that close to doubled from $70 back to $120. $EWY IV trade is up 50-70% and names like $XLU are up 50%+. My biggest loser YTD is $RDDT since my cost average was $148. Some of the misc picks like $INFQ, $VPG, $AVAV, $LPTH are not doing as well. But as I’ve mentioned aside from Reddit (which I had high concentration in), a lot of my other picks I’m not as familiar with, I have less concentration in: But all my higher conviction picks like $TSEM have been strongly compounded recently. And what matters is I get more things right than wrong, especially in my higher concentration names. Majority of my YTD returns are actually unrealized since I don’t exit my longs, unless there’s material changes: But I did realize a lot of gains at the beginning of the year post Venezuela conflict, as I identified some winners like Gold Reserve that doubled in a day. Sadly I did sell some Asian names like Nittobo or Macronix that both went up 100-200%+ to rotate capital around the time of the Iran conflict… those ended up going a lot higher afterwards. I swing trade a lot of misc names like in fintech or write CSP on the side. Hence why I’m able to compound to 500%+. While individual names are only up 100-200% (just keep doubling + rotating). But if you want to ride the next trend: Most obvious one is Photonics Supercycle if you just look at $AAOI earnings call or $LITE Nvidia GTC call for next few years. And the current one is the Memory Supercycle if you just look at $SNDK returns. And as you’ve seen after my original $AXTI thesis or now Soitec: These names keep going in a vertical line up, as everyone suddenly now realizes its importance to the next paradigm shift for AI. My strategy is identifying structural bottlenecks in the AI supply chains before the market discovers them.
Serenity tweet media
English
133
93
1.8K
130.6K
Hartik
Hartik@Hartik__·
Woah anyone see the capacity ramp guide for $AAOI? Kind of insane. Conservative hyperscaler bulk pricing estimates: 100G (~$20) 400G (~$64) AOC ($52) 800G ($320) 1.6T ($640) ELSFP 300/400mW (~$640) AAOI is guiding to make $300M per month by the end of this year? $700M per month at the end of 2027?? Obviously this requires the new facility to be in full swing by the end of year which is a big "if" but the upside they're projecting is crazy. Even if they hit like 70% of this that would be very impressive. $AAOI
Hartik tweet mediaHartik tweet media
English
10
11
66
30.7K
Forced Alpha
Forced Alpha@forced_alpha·
You nailed the thermal qualification point. The "no external dependency" claim is the gap though. $AAOI still depends on $AXTI for InP substrates — 18 month qualification cycle on that input. Only 3 merchant suppliers globally for InP wafers, and China controls the upstream gallium. Vertical integration solves assembly variance, doesn't solve substrate concentration
English
1
0
0
235
KawzInvests 🦑
KawzInvests 🦑@KawzInvests·
Building a memory fab takes 4 years. Building a photonics fab takes 9 months. There is a MASSIVE difference between the build out for Photonics vs Memory A memory fab is a precision lithography operation. You are packing billions of transistors at single-digit nanometer nodes. EUV tools alone take 12-18 months to procure and calibrate. The yield ramp after that takes years. The bottleneck is physics and it cannot be compressed. A photonics fab is an INTEGRATION PROBLEM. You are building devices that manipulate light, not electrons. Indium phosphide. Optical waveguides. Alignment tolerances measured in nanometers of coupling efficiency, not transistor density. No EUV required. The practical timeline difference: Samsung Electronics, $MU, SK Hynix 3 to 5 years from groundbreak to meaningful output. The lithography learning curve is non-negotiable. $AAOI with an existing warehouse 9 months. Not because construction is faster. Because they skip the construction problem entirely. Cleanroom retrofit, tool installation, and process bring-up run in parallel. Most companies do these sequentially. AOI does not. $AAOI has a massive automation advantage AOI runs internal testing systems at 20x the throughput of standard industry equipment. Their product platforms are standardized to the point where each new production line is not a new engineering problem it is a deployment. When they enter a new facility, they are not figuring out the process. They are executing a template they have already optimized across years of production in Taiwan. That is exactly what is happening with their new Texas facility. AOI is not building something new. They are replicating the same factory format, tooling layout, automation systems, and process templates that are already running and yielding in Taiwan. The institutional knowledge, the yield data, the calibration baselines all of it transfers. A semiconductor company standing up a new node from scratch has none of that. AOI walks in with the answer key. Vertical integration across lasers, PCBA, and final assembly means there is no external dependency introducing variance into yield. They own the entire feedback loop from wafer to finished transceiver. That matters because of what the real bottleneck actually is. Most people stop the analysis at fab timelines or InP supply. Both are real constraints. Neither is the hardest part. The hardest part is thermal qualification. A transceiver operating inside a hyperscaler switch runs continuously. These switches need to operate at full load 24 hours a day for the unit economics to justify the infrastructure spend. If the switch is down, the compute behind it is idle. At the scale hyperscalers operate, idle compute is not an inconvenience it is a direct hit to the return on billions of dollars of capex. The failure mode that defines vendor selection is thermal. Transceivers generate heat. Heat degrades the laser. A degraded laser causes signal loss. Signal loss in a switch port takes that segment of the switching fabric offline. Hyperscalers do not tolerate partial switch failures they replace the vendor. This is why qualification cycles are the longest stage of the entire ramp, not manufacturing. Hyperscalers test interoperability, sustained thermal performance, and reliability under continuous full load before committing volume. A vendor that cannot demonstrate 24/7 thermal stability does not get the contract regardless of how fast they built the factory. AOI's vertical integration is a direct solution to this problem. Because they control lasers, PCBA, and assembly in-house, they control the thermal envelope of the finished product end to end. Competitors are integrating components from separate vendors and discovering thermal variance late in qualification. AOI is designing the thermal system, not assembling one from parts. Their automated testing infrastructure means thermal issues surface during production, not during the customer's qualification cycle. That compresses the single longest stage in the entire ramp. And because the Texas facility is a copy of Taiwan, that thermal system arrives pre-validated. They are not learning how to build a thermally stable transceiver in Texas. They already know. They are just doing it closer to the customer. Memory Manufacuturing bottleneck = lithography Photonics Manufacuturing bottleneck = thermal qualification The structural thesis is sound. But there is always a layer of entropy no model accounts for. Execution risk does not disappear because the framework is good.
KawzInvests 🦑@KawzInvests

Applied Optoelectronics $AAOI released their capacity ramp plan. We are in Q2 2026, which means this timeline has already started. Current monthly revenue: $64 million. By Q4 2026, guidance puts that at $303 million per month. By Q4 2027, $701 million per month. These are monthly figures, not annual. Here is why those numbers are achievable. Transceiver pricing does not compress as speeds scale. It expands. 100G sells at $20 per unit. 400G at $64. 800G at $320. 1.6T at $640. Each speed generation commands a price that far outpaces the throughput increase, because the engineering complexity at each step grows significantly. The revenue mix tells the real story. Today, 800G contributes $44 million per month and 1.6T contributes $6.4 million per month. By Q4 2026, 800G reaches $134 million and 1.6T reaches $147 million per month. The ELSFP module, which is not in the revenue mix today, scales from $3.2 million per month in Q4 2026 to $256 million per month by Q4 2027. This is ASP mix shift, not volume growth. Each product cycle that ships carries materially more revenue per unit than the one before it. The execution risk is the manufacturing facility ramping on schedule. Even at 70% of guidance, the revenue trajectory is not priced into the current valuation $AAOI $COHR $LITE

English
13
25
357
90.2K
Michael Sikand 🦑
Michael Sikand 🦑@michaelsikand·
$1M BABY 👿 My public photonics fund just hit $1M AUM. Just saw someone put in $100K. Even in the face of a choppy macro, you can stay long if you are concentrating into the next infra supercycle. $LITE $COHR $AAOI $CIEN
Michael Sikand 🦑 tweet media
English
15
4
122
11.8K
Say No To Trading
Say No To Trading@SayNoToTrading·
Another day, another free $100,000 bonus from Robinhood, thank you @vladtenev $HOOD. Technically $97,282.88 but that’s only because my $AMD and $ONTO didn’t transfer over for some reason. I’m doing another transfer on them to get a few thousand more.
Say No To Trading tweet media
Say No To Trading@SayNoToTrading

Another $30,000 bonus from Robinhood $HOOD. Thanks @vladtenev @RobinhoodApp and now that you offer: - up to 3% limited-time bonus on transfers - multiple individual accounts I'm going to transfer my entire semiconductor portfolio over for a $100k+ bonus, from faulty Fidelity. Just need to wait for my recent $NVDA and $AMD trades to settle. If you follow me, you know the glitches galore and deplorable service I've experienced with them in recent years. Fidelity brokerage of 2026 is nothing like that of 10+ years ago. On the other hand, Robinhood support has been flawless in the 1.5+ years I've been using them. Too bad I did this latest transfer in February, when it was a lower amount. 3% is the best stock brokerage transfer bonus I've seen. I've never gotten more than 2% with $HOOD before. Opened that 2nd account last night for my chip stocks and it took about 90 seconds from start to finish. I'll pimp my referral link here because it feels right: join.robinhood.com/npyedwx5365

English
18
1
75
21.2K
Endless Capit🅰️l
Endless Capit🅰️l@endless_frank·
$ASTS Pentagon wants 200b more from congress for this war. Beyond expenses for troops, I’d imagine some of that flows to surveillance companies to help protect those troops. Good thing we’re invested in the most advanced defense stock in the world when it comes to that. 😉
English
7
6
73
4.2K
John Muchow, MSCS
John Muchow, MSCS@JohnMuchow·
Don't focus solely on $VIX, look at the bigger picture:
John Muchow, MSCS tweet media
English
3
2
18
1.4K
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
$CRCL is now up 148.15% in 1 month. If people are wondering why my YTD is ~500%? It’s because I look at fundamentals, not scribbles on a chart. The comment section back here aged like 2021 monkey JPEG prices.
Serenity tweet media
Serenity@aleabitoreddit

I really, really like $CRCL at $54. Valuation has been completely reset back to $12B MC. Everyone was rushing to buy it back at $150-200 but at $54, it's a ghost town. USDC supply still $70B+ and I expect stablecoins to continue growing in usage.

English
49
84
1.2K
221.1K
sig
sig@SerSigma·
Peek a boo! $KTOS leader in A&D/drone/robotics. Eyes up!
sig tweet media
English
2
1
6
146
IU C🅰️T
IU C🅰️T@shihchiehlee·
After seeing $CRCL and a bunch of other crypto stocks pump for a while on the CLARITY Act news, I couldn’t help but share my thoughts. Everyone wants a piece of the pie in this stablecoin world! The big breakthrough is Section 404 of the CLARITY Act: it finally bans passive yields — no more “just hold USDC and earn interest while you sleep.” But it smartly allows activity-based rewards like cashback, loyalty points, merchant rebates, and incentives tied to real transactions, payments, transfers, wallet use, or liquidity provision. That’s exactly the compromise Senators Alsobrooks and Tillis have been negotiating, and it’s why the bill feels closer to markup than ever. Compared to pure banks (who are still screaming about deposit outflows), Visa and Mastercard are playing offense — launching cards with stablecoin cashback and pulling billions in USDC settlements into their rails. Their moves actually undercut the banks’ arguments, but I still think banks will feel some real pain. Even if cashback requires actual activity, everyday users will still move part of their cash into USDC/USDT for faster transfers, cheaper cross-border sends, or DeFi convenience. Traditional ACH/wire fees will take a hit. It’s not a total disaster for banks like full passive yields would be, but the impact is definitely there — legacy finance is losing ground. Overall, this is huge progress for crypto clarity, yet politics could still kill it. The temporary stock pop on CRCL shows the market is betting on passage, but we’ll see what this week’s DC Blockchain Summit brings. Yahoo Finance link for the full story: finance.yahoo.com/news/clarity-a…
English
2
0
1
140
Frank Curzio
Frank Curzio@FrankCurzio·
Just finished taping my exclusive interview with $DGXX CEO @michelamar3. It's in production and we'll post it right here in about 60 min. A few highlights: - Creating USDC is brilliant - USDC results in ZERO dilution for DGXX shareholders - It locks in superstar talent (former CEO of Verizon / board member of Blackrock) long-term without having to pay them tens of millions in compensation every year - Updates on Alabama, NY and North Carolina assets - Michel has not sold one share in over 10 years - Huge short-term catalysts in the pipeline... Overall, it was a great interview! He addressed many of the questions you asked on X. You'll see why creating USDC is a game-changer. Thanks to the $DGXX community for the outreach... and looking forward to your feedback.
English
32
19
135
12K
Operation🅰️TM
Operation🅰️TM@OperationATM·
@endless_frank like clockwork. great pattern recognition. I am wondering if there's anything like a deadline /due date that drives that
English
0
0
1
98
Operation🅰️TM
Operation🅰️TM@OperationATM·
@YoYInvestor What about the recent INDO acquisition, would that be net new revenue projections for next quarter?
English
0
0
0
54
Sleuth 🔎
Sleuth 🔎@YoYInvestor·
$ONDS A 387% move from $10.55 is $51.38. Earnings are next Wednesday before the bell. The $170M-$180M guidance for 2026 does NOT include revenues from Rotron Aero, BIRD Aerosystems, Mistral, or any other acquisitions that take place this year. Some analysts see the Mistral acquisition alone doubling the $170M-$180M revenue number. Will Ondas shock the street with a massive guidance raise? Time will tell… It’s getting tight.
Chow@JoelWitcombe2

$ONDS 👀 Last time we seen a TTM Squeeze remotely similar size to this one (current one is longer) we seen a 387% price increase 🤔🤷‍♂️ I wonder I wonder…

English
16
21
304
64.3K
InvestWithRian
InvestWithRian@InvestWithRian·
@SJCapitalInvest Up 82% on my OSS call and up 250% on my AMPX call. Loading up on calls during pullback is definitely the way to go 🤝 thank you sir
English
3
1
18
4.7K
S&J Investments
S&J Investments@SJCapitalInvest·
Holy cow Can’t emphasize how important being in the right sector is. Like poker but I only get face cards…. Stacked deck. $AMPX $IBRX $OSS $BE $OUST $LPTH $TE
S&J Investments tweet media
S&J Investments@SJCapitalInvest

🔹S&J Portfolio Update 3/14/26🔹 Total: $1.41M * Excludes $700k cash I banked 1. $AMPX 2. $TE 3. $OSS 4. $IBRX 5. $BE 6. $OUST $. $LPTH 7. $Cash 🔹Key Takeaways🔹 🔹+ $200k this week 🎉 🔹+ New ATH hit this week 🎉🎉 🔹 Officially took $700k off table 🎉🎉🎉 This was a big week personally as I took action on a decision that has been on my mind since October. When is enough… enough? I am proud i made the move, I essentially just wiped out one of my accounts to rip the band-aid off and not punt it, so I spent a lot of yesterday re-shuffling my portfolio to balance back out. It’s not perfect yet but not bad. 🔹Position by Position Breakdown🔹 $AMPX: 28% What’s not to like here? Earnings were perfect, the broader macro situation continues to lean heavily in their favor, CEO is out in front on linkedin promoting NDAA compliance. Valuation is not quite as compelling as it was when I first entered but they put up a huge quarter and we know guidance was exceptionally conservative. I have unloaded a lot of calls (only holding Jan 2027 now) here and it’s actually much LESS of my portfolio than before, but I am actually quite comfortable at 28%. You know how I feel about momentum, I am not fighting the ocean. I very much see this ending the year over $30. $TE: 15% I guess at some point they do have to report earnings…. Right? I am going to be honest, this delay is starting to bother me. Of course they are still within their timing per SEC so nothing is wrong but if I have a CAO issue and concern about my filings I want to get it out of the way and clear the deck fast, not wait until the last possible second. I reduced my options exposure here and ate a bad loss on some July calls, which is on me obviously. All of my calls are January and assuming any issues are re: previous revenue recognition I feel good about them rebounding by January (my calls are not aggressive strike prices, $7s and 10s). But I am going to be examining this very very closely. I need full clarify on revenue recognition, forward guidance and deals. If they put up +$400m as previously stated, I’ll shut up. $OSS: 13% I believe I originally recommended this around $8 in Jan. We just closed over $10 I’ve added here into strength as this chart is flipping bullish as earnings approaches. This is going to be a very interesting report as we finally get to see the business metrics of the pure play USA defense company without the Bressner business they sold. I have a feeling the street is going to be very excited about this once the smoke clears. Reminds me of $oust recent earnings. $IBRX 12%: Some good news Friday around their tech capabilities. Allows faster and more efficient scale of production. FDA approval is still the white whale here. I am staying here all year. New tech development raises the floor. Revenue still aggressively ramping. I can afford to take this moonshot. $BE: 9% Not an asymmetric investment. I just think this is the best AI energy company by a lot. I will add on weakness. My options here are Jan 2028. Just giving myself some leverage but no time pressure. Might reduce leverage here. $OUST: 8% My new position. I made a long post about it. Sector, revenue, valuation are all perfect. We are likely close to floor valuation here when you comp to peers. I’ll likely write a report on this in the coming days but for my own learning. $LPTH: 8% Been a bit slow here, still unsure why. They are coming off a massive year so probably still digesting the move. Earnings was great. Environment tells me that won’t slow down given their domestic need and military increased spending. 🔹Final Thoughts🔹 I still have too much leverage. Right now I am 2:1 options to commons across my portfolio. That should really be reversed. I loved my play swapping commons to cheap options on pullback. I want to be able to do that again, but I need to continue unwinding these positions. Let’s keep winning. 🔹

English
18
12
207
29.6K