Joshua M Goldberg

1.8K posts

Joshua M Goldberg

Joshua M Goldberg

@OriginalJMG

Co-founder @SunstoneCredit, formerly co-founder Astrum Solar, Sunlight Financial, Legends of Learning, likes telling jokes and spouting random historical facts

Baltimore, MD Katılım Haziran 2015
543 Takip Edilen250 Takipçiler
evin
evin@EvinKnowsBall·
THE GIANTS JUST GOT A WR2 WHO COULD BE WR1 ON SOME TEAMS WHO THE FUCK IS STOPPING MOONEY AND MALIK?
English
166
55
1.4K
487.2K
Joshua M Goldberg retweetledi
Kevin Oestreicher
Kevin Oestreicher@koestreicher34·
What are your true feelings on John Harbaugh?
Kevin Oestreicher tweet media
English
580
15
286
73.7K
CNN
CNN@CNN·
The University of Michigan has fired head football coach Sherrone Moore after an investigation into an alleged "inappropriate relationship" with staffer cnn.it/4aaQjd0
English
68
54
177
186.7K
Joshua M Goldberg
Joshua M Goldberg@OriginalJMG·
@sgellison Why are you surprised? John Harbaugh and Todd Monken refuse to run the ball.
English
0
0
2
542
Sarah Ellison
Sarah Ellison@sgellison·
Tony Romo practically BEGGING for Derrick Henry to be on the field on that third-and-1. Instead, Justice Hill was out there with no threat, and Lamar Jackson dropped back and was SACKED. You have The King and need 1 yard, and he's off the field.
English
140
144
1.8K
62.3K
Jesse D. Jenkins
Jesse D. Jenkins@JesseJenkins·
So here's the deal on the Senate-passed One Big Bad Bill, now heading back to the House for further debate: 1. Wind & solar projects that commence construction before the end of 2025 can claim the investment or production tax cuts under current law & have up to four years to complete construction. 2. Those beginning construction between 1/1/25 and 12 months after enactment also retain tax cuts but only if they meet new Foreign Entity of Concern (FEOC) supply chain rules (which may be practically un-administrable). 3. Projects after that have to both meet FEOC rules and complete construction before 12/31/27. 4. Other resources like batteries, nuclear, geothermal can claim credits if they commence construction before the end of 2033 (with 75% in 2034 and 50% in 2035), providing some long-term certainty, but they are only eligible IF they satisfy new FEOC rules. That's the lowdown for PTC/ITC. It's still bad. But mostly less bad than it was a few hours before passage. Importantly, the new surprise excise tax on wind and solar after 2027 that I & others (thanks @elonmusk!) sounded the alarm about was removed before passage.
English
39
86
485
53.8K
Joshua M Goldberg
Joshua M Goldberg@OriginalJMG·
@SenJohnCurtis @senjohncurtis please explain how this bill ensures predictability for the Utah companies in residential solar industry which mainly the Section 25D tax credit you let be killed. They are screwed. Many jobs will be lost. You didn't listen to your own people. You own that.
English
3
0
7
208
Senator John Curtis
Senator John Curtis@SenJohnCurtis·
Our energy policy should be forward-looking, not punitive. We need a soft landing for renewable energy tax credits—not retroactive changes that pull the rug out from under current projects. The Senate has already passed a bill that ensures predictability for businesses. My message to the House: finish the job. Send this to the President and give American energy the certainty it needs to grow.
English
29
14
83
10.5K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
People are asking me who the Senator is who extended the Green New Scam…it’s obvious from public reporting. One of these 2 people’s votes hadn’t been secured, and they traded it for a paragraph that undid the termination. Many/most Rs didn’t understand what they voted for here.
Alex Epstein tweet media
English
6
10
35
5.2K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
With this one simple fix, the House can truly terminate solar and wind subsidies. The fix just restores the Senate bill to the text that every Republican who voted for the bill agreed to—except for the one Senator who did a sneaky last-second deal to extend solar/wind.
Alex Epstein tweet media
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein

Senate fails to terminate Green New Scam The Senate bill *looks like* it has a 2027 "placed in service" cutoff for new solar/wind subsidies. But one last-minute paragraph makes it worthless—because projects making a recoverable 5% investment in the next 12 months are exempt! The idea of a 2027 "placed in service" cutoff was that new subsidies would actually end during the Trump administration. But under the last-minute carveout, Big Green has 12 months to initiate as many subsidized projects as it wants using the insanely-easy-to-meet "construction" threshold. (All you need to do is commit 5% of expected project cost to buying re-sellable assets like solar panels.) Once they declare "construction"—e.g., in July 2026—they'll have 4 years (e.g., July 2030) to "place in service." And then some of those projects, e.g., most wind projects, will get 10 years of subsidies. So we'll still have wind subsidies on Donald Trump's 94th birthday! Here's how much worse the Senate bill just got: * Two days ago: "Placed in service" by 12-31-27—with new subsidized solar/wind projects stopping very quickly, and Trump being able to let subsidies truly end. * Today: "Placed in service" by JULY 2030—with new subsidized solar/wind projects absolutely spamming the rid and ripping off taxpayers like never before, and Trump having no control over whether the subsidies end. The current Senate bill is arguably worse than the original Senate Finance one. At least that bill decreased solar/wind subsidies starting in 2026 to 60%. The current bill just increased them to 100%. The current bill is a solar/wind lobbyist's dream. It does not terminate the Green New Scam in any way, shape or form. It absolutely perpetuates it. And offensively so, I might add, by keeping the "placed in service" cutoff language so many people courageously fought for, then totally undoing it with a single last-minute paragraph that makes it worthless. If the Senate wanted to extend the Green New Scam it should have said so, not insulted our intelligence by trying to bury the extension in one sneaky little paragraph. PS Several Senators have already told me they didn't know about or understand this last-minute paragraph. If that's the case they should do whatever they can to fix the situation.

English
65
176
531
46.2K
Joshua M Goldberg
Joshua M Goldberg@OriginalJMG·
Sharing my thoughts on solar incentives, specifically a fair compromise for Congress to adopt on Section 25D below and thoughts on Section 48E. This is the critical week where it all happens. The game is on the line. Here is what I believe: @SunstoneCredit
Joshua M Goldberg tweet media
English
0
1
10
476