Owly
6.1K posts

Owly
@Owly_Rate
Honestly - Brain injury. Accident. Disabled. Receptive Aphasia. Never Give Up. Brisbane Australia. Fav Word Biclique.
Planet Earth Katılım Ekim 2014
86 Takip Edilen107 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

circle of life
frozen tundra@newmoneyBTCETH
@NeelMacro @EleanorTerrett If Circle holds US treasuries 1:1 to back their stablecoin, they can still corporately earn the coupon on those treasuries. This states they just can't share that with holders of the stablecoin. It acts like cash, which is the intention, anyways.
English

@jk_rowling @LudicrousMonica only because i follow @elonmusk on x , do i now know there's a NEW harry potter series to watch.
English

@LudicrousMonica It's going to be incredible. I'm so happy with it.
English

Hey @jk_rowling The trailer for the new Harry Potter looks bloody marvellous. I cannot wait, and as it seems to me, neither can the rest of the world❤️🪄
English

🚨 BREAKING: CIRCLE $CRCL CRASHES 15% AS CLARITY ACT SEEKS TO BAN YIELD ON STABLECOINS
The bill that was supposed to be Circle's biggest catalyst just became its biggest threat.
Language in the advancing CLARITY Act would prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying yield to holders, a direct hit to Circle's core business model. Nearly 95% of CRCL's revenue comes from interest earned on USDC reserves.
The stock that IPO'd at $31 and hit $299 is now paying the price for Washington's compromise with the banks.
English

🚨JUST IN: CLARITY ACT DRAFT BARS STABLECOIN YIELD ON BALANCES
A revised draft of the Clarity Act has been revealed. The proposal bans yield for simply holding stablecoins, according to @CoinDesk.
Rewards tied to balances would not be allowed. Lawmakers aim to avoid similarities with bank deposits.
The move reflects pressure from the banking sector. Debate around stablecoin utility is intensifying.
Activity-based rewards may still be permitted. However, the framework remains unclear on implementation.
English

BREAKING: $CRCL is down 16% intraday, wiping out $5.6 billion in market value after Congress proposed banning stablecoin yield.
The sell-off is tied to leaked stablecoin legislation that would ban platforms from offering yield on stablecoins "directly or indirectly", blocking anything "economically or functionally equivalent to interest."
Circle generates 96% of its revenue from interest on USDC reserves. If platforms cannot offer yield to users, USDC demand weakens and Circle's revenue base contracts directly.
But here's the wild part.
Cathie Wood's ARK Invest sold $5.9 million worth of CRCL on March 20, four days before the legislation leaked.
Did she already know this would happen?


English

$CRCL : Nobody connected these dots today.
Circle dropped 15% this morning. Everyone blamed ARK selling. Everyone blamed rate cut fears.
Both are wrong.
Eleanor Terrett broke the real story. The new CLARITY Act text just leaked. And it bans platforms from offering yield on stablecoin holdings "directly or indirectly."
Read that again.
Circle makes 96% of its revenue from one thing. Interest on USDC reserves. That is literally yield on a stablecoin.
The bill also targets anything "economically or functionally equivalent" to interest. That language is broad enough to hit Circle's entire reserve income model.
Crypto insiders who reviewed the text on Monday called it "overly narrow and unclear." That is Washington for "we are not happy."
This is not an ARK sell. This is not a Fed rate cut fear. This is a direct legislative threat to how Circle makes money.
The CLARITY Act markup is targeted for late April. If this yield ban language holds it reprices CRCL overnight.
Watch the Senate Banking Committee.
Follow @neelMacro to connecting dots which move market.
Rest. #DYOR

English

🚨NEW: New details are emerging about the latest legislative text outlining a compromise on stablecoin yield and rewards, along with early reactions from crypto industry leaders who reviewed it today.
According to an internal stakeholder email shared with me, the proposal would prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” for holding a stablecoin or in a manner that resembles a bank deposit. The restriction would apply broadly to digital asset service providers (exchanges, brokers, etc.) and their affiliates to limit workarounds, and would bar anything “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest.
The proposal would also permit activity-based rewards tied to user activity, including loyalty, promotional, or subscription programs, provided they are not deemed economically or functionally equivalent to interest. It would also direct the @SECGov, @CFTC, and @USTreasury to jointly define permissible rewards and establish anti-evasion rules within one year.
One industry leader who reviewed the text today tells me the draft is a “departure” from what had been previously discussed with the White House, warning the “economic equivalence” standard is vague and could be interpreted more restrictively by future regulators. They also point to limits on tying rewards to balances or transaction amounts, which could make incentives difficult to structure.
“Overall, this is a more narrow and restrictive approach toward crypto,” they said.
Another says the text is “largely in line with expectations” and reflects a balanced outcome, preserving transaction-based incentives while making clear stablecoins cannot function like interest-bearing deposit accounts.
“This is the best possible result,” they said, noting that the text is broader than the initial Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which would have been more restrictive on crypto.
Up next: Bank reps are set to review the text tomorrow.
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett
🚨🗞️NEW: Crypto and Bank Reps Head to Capitol Hill to Review Stablecoin Deal as Details Remain Under Wraps Some crypto industry leaders will meet with @BankingGOP today, with banks set for tomorrow, to review the product of a long-awaited compromise. cryptoinamerica.com/p/crypto-and-b…
English
Owly retweetledi

@BestForexMethod look for something you can pay for as a reward , kids school stuff is often useful?
English

@SKDTIME @jonbernardk i know , its worrying because the focus is on the fraud but not the disabled person who needs the help. For example the government is corrupt, you can find lots of examples on the internet but they want you to focus on NDIS not their own fraud. I believe.
English

@Owly_Rate @jonbernardk Not true. There’s a few YouTube clips of people exposing these companies
English










