Patrick.om retweetledi
The Nuances of Iranian Asymmetric Warfare on Land, Sea, and Air
Its biggest challenge remains detecting these operations in time without relying on medium- and long-range radars. That is the real limitation of Iran’s current asymmetric air warfare tactic.
We often struggle to understand asymmetric warfare. The common idea of war is simple: you hit the enemy with everything you have, as efficiently as possible, aiming for a quick victory.
That is the concept of conventional war, which gives superpowers and large, modern armies a massive advantage, because a direct, short-term clash tends to devastate a smaller force.
Asymmetric warfare works differently. It is based on lure, lure, and lure again, and only then ambush. The goal is not a quick victory, but to wear down the adversary through attrition, targeting economic, political, and psychological pressure much more than pure military destruction.
In Iran’s case, its resilience and missile-based attrition strategy clearly aim to erode domestic support for the U.S. government, increase pressure on Gulf and Asian allies, and generate political and economic stress in Europe, including through inflation.
All of this is executed through tactical means that serve multiple strategic axes, all converging to create an environment of stress and chaos for Trump.
This entire approach operates under well-defined doctrines of asymmetric warfare at sea, on land, and in the air.
When we see the U.S. Navy stationed 700 km off the Iranian coast, many people ask: “Where are Iran’s anti-ship missiles?”
Anxious American politicians even claim that “everything is under control” and that the ships can safely advance.
Can Iran attack those ships? Yes, it can. But it chooses not to, at least not yet.
Those ships, operating at 700 km, are already at the limit of the F-18’s combat radius, the main aircraft on American carriers. And they are obviously well within Iranian missile range.
During the conflict with the Houthis, the Yemenis launched Sayyad/Quds-Z0 missiles with an 800 km range. Today, they already speak of Palestine-2 and Quds-4 versions that easily exceed 1,000 km.
If the Houthi arsenal is essentially Iranian technology, what is the real range of Iran’s anti-ship missiles today? It certainly goes well beyond 700 km.
But asymmetric warfare is not a 50-meter sprint. It is a carefully planned marathon. The Iranians know that the critical point is maintaining control over the Strait of Hormuz. That’s why they try to lure the ships closer, a bait the U.S. Navy has so far refused to take.
Join my Substack to read full article:
open.substack.com/pub/global21/p…
English
