Paul Gutenberg™

It might be worth noting what Hitler's Plan for Humanity was post-war: *Partial Germanization; mass expulsions; 80–85% of Poles deported or killed. *Agricultural colony; cities destroyed; 65% population reduction via starvation. * Dismantled; remnant Slavs in Siberia; 50–60% exterminated, rest enslaved. * Genocide and Starvation: Deliberate famine (Hunger Plan) to kill millions, as seen in early war policies. * Enslavement: Surviving Slavs reduced to uneducated labourers. * Extension of Final Solution: A book in Hitler's library on Jewish populations in North America suggests interest in applying extermination policies there. * Puppet or Isolation: If defeated, install a fascist regime or force neutrality; no mass resettlement planned, unlike Europe. * Partial Germanization; mass expulsions. Agricultural colony; cities destroyed. Dismantled; remnant Slavs in Siberia. In summary, a Nazi victory would have meant a dystopian world of perpetual racial war, with Europe as a fortified German empire and outliers like Russia decimated, America isolated or subjugated indirectly. These plans underscore the ideological drive for global Aryan dominance, though practical limitations (e.g., resources) might have altered outcomes. Is anyone making the connections here? Is it the same Plan?

Many people have solved the energy issue. Then they get murdered.

Welcome to a new 21st Century Physics and Philosophy! While most physics "news" simply rehashes or mildly updates the 100 year old theories of quantum mechanics and relativity, on my X profile you will find new theories of fundamental philosophy and physics. Scientific topics include a replacement for relativity, a new way to produce clean and cheap energy through fusion, a new quantum mechanical formulation and a new theory for elementary particles. Unfortunately, alternatives to the scientific status quo are often produced by authors who do not have a scientific background, and so it is necessary to present some of my credentials. I have a Ph.D. in physics and decades of experience as an author and reviewer of peer-reviewed scientific works. Among my many efforts are three sole-author publications in the highly prestigious journal Physical Review Letters[1,2,3]. I’ve held positions at well-known institutions such as the Superconducting Super Collider, where I had a leading role on longitudinal physics design, and UCLA, where I was an adjunct assistant professor of physics. I have designed and led the construction of two working accelerators[4,5], one of which[4], a 2.5 MeV electron accelerator, employed “relativistic” particle velocities. More recent important works include those on the aether[6] and quantum mechanics[7]. I'm presently working on electron cooling for a future muon collider. I'd like to emphasize that the works to be discussed are not a Theory of Everything. Instead, they are a New Foundation. Much work remains to do. The strong force is not yet fully treated. The interior of supermassive stellar objects is only speculated about. The Lamb shift needs a detailed calculation. While an explanation is given for WHAT quantum collapse is and HOW it is possible, the mechanism underlying it is not yet specified. ECOFusion must be built and likely improved upon before useful fusion power is achieved. Aetherial engineering is an entirely new possible field of exploration. Those are but a few of the many tasks remaining. The present physics status quo was built by 1000's of physicists over 100 years while being based upon relativity and a math-based quantum theory. What will be presented here are the new basic building blocks for a realist and physical approach: reaching the coverage of the present status quo will of course need the efforts of many others, over many years. I am a Christian Physicist, which may be considered by many to be an oxymoron. However, I assert that one can indeed be both a Christian and approach life with scientific rigor. The great Christian philosopher Rene Descartes taught that we can be certain of nothing other than our own existence. Since that time, other philosophers (especially Hume) have put forth philosophical axioms that have led to present scientific thinking, leading to the now dominant theories of relativity and quantum mechanics. Since modern scientific theories are based upon modern philosophy, and everything (mostly) agrees with experimental tests, the present status quo is accepted by the vast majority of the intelligentsia. The present theories are also supportive of atheism, as represented by Einstein’s support of Spinoza’s God, an idea that God and nature are one in the same. So how can one be both scientific and Christian? By starting with different fundamental axioms! The philosophy of Hume and Mach is embraced in Einstein’s relativity, which, when confronted with quantum mechanical results, leads to a questioning of whether reality even exists. But rather than starting with modern philosophy, I propose we go all the way back to Descartes’ realization that we can be certain of nothing at all other than our own existence. From there, I propose a fundamental axiom that a partially observable reality exists. And from that point we can define further hypotheses of the asserted underlying physical reality. In my works, I show that this simple philosophical realignment returns us to an absolute theory that is an even better fit to experimental tests than is the present theory. By also embracing the indeterminate nature that is fundamental to quantum mechanics, we then have room for free will, the existence of a soul, and the existence of God. In this way, I argue that we reach a point where Christianity can be compatible with science. Some of the works presented here will involve a fair amount of detail, and these details will appear in a series of posts. I plan to cover one topic at a time, and then return to each topic again in turn. Each time the topics are presented I plan to add more detail as well as to make improvements. I plan to respond to sincere questions and sound critical comments. Indeed, I hope to learn from you to improve the next iteration of my posts! However, the web being the web, I don't plan to respond to everything. There is no need to repeatedly argue about the same point over and over again. (Trolling is an art form I wish to avoid interacting with.) I look forward to your serious comments and questions! Together I hope we can work toward an advance in mankind’s thinking in a way that brings us back to a world of physical modeling, objective reality, and the moral teachings of Jesus Christ. Five Relevant References Extracted from my CV. 1. “A Method for Free Electron Acceleration of Particle Beams”, D.J. Larson, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 71, 851-854, (1993). 2. “Comment on 'Electron-Beam Cooling by Stimulated Synchrotron Emission and Absorption' “, D.J. Larson, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 68, 133 (1992). 3. “Electron Cooling for Positron Sources”, D.J. Larson, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 60, No. 13, pp. 1274-1277, March 1988. 4. “Successful DC Recirculation of a 2 MeV Electron Beam at Currents More than 0.1 Ampere”, J.R. Adney, et al., IEEE Proceedings of the 1989 Particle Accelerator Conference, 348-350, (1989). 5. “Ion Optical Design of the BRF-FNAL-SAIC-UW PET Accelerator”, D.J. Larson et al., 1997 PAC Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2, 1403-1405.

A photon never experiences time from its perspective. T=0 as per Special Relativity and to the photon, the Big Bang, just took place. The photon may be a product of the new theory of—the Quantum Platform? If it is proven accurate, reality is not unfolding… It is deploying.

🚨🚨 Los investigadores escanearon los cerebros de 60 niños en edad preescolar y lo que descubrieron sobre las pantallas fue realmente asombroso... "El tiempo frente a una pantalla provoca una PÉRDIDA de materia blanca en el cerebro".... En términos simples, el profesor Mike Nagel lo llama una medida de "DAÑO CEREBRAL"... ¿Qué es la sustancia blanca? Es la parte del cerebro formada por fibras nerviosas aisladas que ayudan a diferentes áreas del cerebro a comunicarse de manera rápida y eficiente. Actúa como el sistema de cableado del cerebro, transportando señales de una región a otra para que el pensamiento, el movimiento, la emoción y el aprendizaje puedan funcionar sin problemas... "Por lo tanto, si observamos déficits en la producción de mielina en etapas tempranas de la vida, probablemente estemos viendo déficits en la conectividad neuronal"... "El estudio muestra que cuanto más tiempo pasa un niño expuesto a la pantalla, mayor es la pérdida de materia blanca"... Profesor Mike Nagel.