Pepsin

对池子脱口秀不感兴趣，主要是对出国了还沉浸在对彭丽媛老公的批判叙事不感兴趣，老中味儿太浓了。我当然知道政治性压抑太久了需要释放，但这不是我最在乎的。 太白，太老中，都很让人窒息。我目前为止唯一会看的中国人脱口秀，是一个在 ins 上关注到的女生。 她很高级很精准地描述了一种称作in- between的状态 —— 既不是出国了还沉浸在中国叙事，也不是出国后就精神白人了，而是我，作为一代移民，此时此刻来到此地。 举个例子，我最喜欢她的一个段子，是她说刚来英国时很难交朋友，因为 Racism（台下稀稀拉拉的笑声）。 然后她接下去：because i hate white people. 然后台下马上爆了，关键是她自己也忍不住大笑。她在评论区说 because the poor white audience didn’t know what’s coming. 卧槽，实在太高级了！欧陆和英国就是特别移民不友好国家，但这个段子反客为主，简直是主体性的胜利女神！！ 还有一个段子关于 bbc 的，太神了，怎么能一句话就骂了两个国家（中国和英国）？ 最后一个我也很喜欢的段子，是她说 tiktok 偷数据不是什么问题，tt最大的问题是偷得不够。如果你偷了一个东西，你是个小偷；但你偷了很多东西from all over the world, you are British museum. （台下英国人此时已经土拨鼠尖叫了） 她继续补刀：so technically we are not stealing your data, we are protecting your data. We are afraid you can’t keep it very well, so we save it all in Beijing. （虽然这个段子不是100%正确，tt海外数据是隔绝的）不过还是想说太爱这个段子了，完全踩在我点上了！ 畅想一下！如果未来有一天我能站在欧洲的脱口秀舞台上，我一定不会是在华人组织里，用中文，和国人嘲讽故土的一切。不！此时此刻我在此地，关注的议题已经不是过去式了，我想知道、想探究、想讽刺、想冒犯、想发出声音的，是那些成为「一代移民」时夹在 in- between 状态下的困境。然后用幽默的方式轻轻化解它，四两拨千斤，冒犯全天下，让苦难成为创作大笑的土壤。 期待有这么一天！！！列入心愿单了。 （突然想起来这也是我没有去东京的原因，就是太老中vibe了……） （本人只说自己观点没有批判别人去池子的意思！我觉得出国了，每个人都可以选择自己喜欢的生活去过！喜欢的场域去待！）

完整评价下，先说好听的： 1. 这不是对measureText的简单封装，而是基于这个API写的一个排版引擎 2. 有卓越的质量和出色的性能 3. 成功挑战文字环绕排版 4. 提供了极具创造力的案例 再说难听的： 1. 往多了说，也就做到了10%的css文本排版能力，却碰瓷css搞宣传，这让我觉得非常不真诚

真尼玛恶心

@aethernet_port @stevehou meanwhile Tamiya and Traxxas keeps reissueing those 20 year old product

@stevehou This generation of RC hobbyists don't realize how good they have it

“Let me introduce to everyone a flying ‘mini-motorcycle’ produced by a Chinese manufacturer. Oh no, it's an industrial-grade drone. It can carry some stuff, all civilian use.”

@oran_ge 记得有一说法是少的那个 GPU 核心可能是因为这些芯片本来就是工艺残次品，刚好拿来用了。

Macbook Neo 的槽点： 1. 电池相比 Air 砍了三分之一左右 2. 触控板竟然是物理按键的，不是振动马达 3. 屏幕和 Air 一样，但色域被莫名砍到了 sRGB 4. 两个 USB，其中一个是 USB 2.0 5. 不支持快充，充满一次需要 2.5 小时 6. A18 Pro 芯片相比 iPhone 少了一个 GPU 核心 7. 256 版本还砍掉了指纹解锁 这些刀法...未免太过 不过 3000 以下还是可以入的哈

@cloudwu @using_YueCheng 找到资料打印出来一大摞离线看…

@using_YueCheng 想象力还不够。想想没有互联网的时代，我们都是每周去书店买新书，订阅大量报刊杂志，经常泡图书馆的。

很难想象上代目程序员是如何工作的，没有Git，没有docker，上个线还要手动打包传过去，Java后端还在用jsp，servlet，写个项目要配置一堆文件，前端还在jQuery，最要命的是资料匮乏，没有系统的学习资源，新手遇到一个问题可能卡很久没办法解决，上代目程序员都怎么熬出来的啊？

现在说”AI 替换程序员“的人，有多少是从事过技术架构师的工作，有多少是从事过技术总监的工作，如果你曾经或者是现在正在从事”技术架构师“或者”技术总监“的工作，你还说出”AI替换掉程序员“的话，那么我可以直接给你下定论，你就是一个水货，十足的水货。

@corndogjpn2 你说的这个东西就是 manus

各位技术大牛，有这么个需求：我想给AI一台它专用的电脑，我希望我能以自然语言向AI下指令，它能操作并利用这台电脑上所有的资源来实现我的指令。 在当前这个时间节点上： 1。这个操作电脑的模型选那个比较好？ 2。这台电脑用什么系统给AI用比较好？ 给关键词就好。

@oran_ge 现阶段其实还是先解决有没有，量够不够的问题，其实也还没解决完，得死上一代人估计能好点。

@PepsinY 双向选择了

通过多巴胺劫持的注意力经济 对字节而言是绝佳的商业模式 对人类而言是有毒的商业模式

I SUPPORTED THE so-called pro-democracy politicians in Hong Kong for many years. I knew the main members personally and happily stuffed my hard-earned cash into their collection boxes. But I increasingly felt something wasn’t right. Then I did some digging. And then I backed off as fast as I could. Here’s the story. . A NEW ASSISTANT As a South China Morning Post reporter in 1991, I noted the rise of a new political group called the United Democrats. They had an “executive assistant” who was always seen at the right hand of the leaders. His name was Tom Boasberg. So, not Chinese, but American. He was hyper-political, and his previous employer was the United States government. Many businesses in Hong Kong employed Americans, sure. We all liked Americans. But this wasn’t a business – it was supposedly a "grassroots" political party—and I thought it odd to have a foreigner at the top end of the noisiest political organization in the city. And when Boasberg moved on in 1992, I noticed that he was replaced by another executive assistant, a woman named Minky Worden. She too was American, she too was hyper-political, and she too was previously employed by the United States government: a coincidence. When Ms Worden left that role in 1998, the group took an another person in her place: a woman named Emily Bork. She too was American, she too was hyper-political, and she too previously worked for the United States government. A series of coincidences? (Ms Worden went on to become an enthusiastic player in the Uyghur genocide hoax. Her journalist husband Gordon Crovitz, with whom I worked directly, later went on to sign a contract to work on media monitoring with the Pentagon.) . FACTIONS For some of this period, I was a Legislative Council columnist for the South China Morning Post. I lived next door to Yeung Sam, a leading member of the so-called “pro-democracy” party, and soon learned there were factions within it. Everyone’s favorite (including mine) was a rough diamond called Szeto Wah who was noisily patriotic about China while believing that western democracy would be good for Hong Kong. (Yeung himself was unpopular within the organization.) But many of the other “pro-democracy” politicians, unfortunately, became closely tied in with anti-China groups funded by the US National Endowment for Democracy, which had taken over the CIA's “soft power” covert regime change duties. The NED had quietly started funding political parties in Hong Kong in 1990, but kept under the radar, using multiple other identities. Cash arrived in Hong Kong listed as “donations” from a non-existent body called the American Institute for Free Labor Development (set up by the CIA for money transfers). . EXTREMELY DANGEROUS The NED were and are extremely bad people. Working worldwide, they used the “pro-democracy” label as a cover to poison the public against local candidates who failed to be pro-Washington in any country. The NED successfully manipulated elections in Nicaragua in 1990 and Mongolia in 1996 and helped to overthrow democratically elected governments in Bulgaria in 1990 and Albania in 1991 and 1992, as intelligence historians noted. And they would eventually cause chaos in my peaceful, gentle Hong Kong. The NED did this by using their bottomless funds to blend Hong Kong’s “pro-democracy” politicians with two groups they funded to poison Hong Kong people against mainland China. One was called the Human Rights Monitor and the other was the Confederation of Trade Unions (not to be confused with the HK Federation of Trade Unions, which was a genuine trade union organizing group). . DESTRUCTION OF LEGCO The "pan-democrats" quickly lost the goodwill of the Hong Kong people by automatically vetoing every act the government did, causing massive delays in a city used to efficiency. Legco became dysfunctional, sometimes grinding to a halt. The physical violence seen in the Taiwan parliament was transferred to Hong Kong, with people such as Ted Hui throwing fists and foul matter into the parliamentary chamber (and becoming hated by the building's cleaners). . PROTESTS PREPARED OVERSEAS By 2012, this pro-US movement in Hong Kong was working with the Oslo Freedom Foundation (which, despite the name, is based in the US), in a multi-year operation to organize massive demonstrations in Hong Kong with the aim of destabilizing the city. The US plan was to present this foreign-organised anti-China insurrection as home-grown “pro-democracy” protests, trusting in the western mainstream media to excuse the horrific violence and hide the US funding. (Which they did.) A major aim was fearmongering. By forcing Beijing to send the tanks into Hong Kong, Taiwan would abandon its growing friendship with the mainland, and became once again a dependable part of the Pentagon's First Island Chain. . A FAILED OPERATION The rest is history. The Chinese refused to send in the tanks. The PLA stayed at home. The Hong Kong police managed to quell the riots without killing a single person (unlike in the six other uprisings in the world that same year, all of which led to multiple deaths). The operation failed. . DISGUSTED By 2021, many people in Hong Kong knew about the foreign forces' involvement and were disgusted with the pan-democrats. My friends and I, almost all of whom had been big fans for many years, became totally disillusioned with them, and with western-style democracy as a whole. The western mainstream press rigidly turned their faces away and refused to see any of this. And today, the China-hostile media, from Reuters’ James Pomfret to the BBC’s Danny Vincent, continue to fail to report the real story. Whether they are hiding it or are genuinely unaware of what is going -- that's not for me to say. But I will say that the catastrophic loss of trust in the western mainstream media is well deserved.

@qhfls @STANLEES4 因为不治理就一堆人要死要流离失所，有那么难理解么，中国一直以来就是人口密度最高一档的国家。

@STANLEES4 中国好像是一个天天喊叫顺天却又跟天斗个没完的群体。 从神话里的补天、精卫填湖、愚公移山…… 到大运河、各种渠、修河堤、都江堰…… 现在南水北调、各种大坝、三北防护林、治沙…… 对这种浩大工程特别热衷😂 这点好像和西方不太一样，项目上马的时候估计就没想过收益，一家之言。

这样的人很多，属于完全不理解西方宗教史，政治史和哲学史，把各种思想炖成一锅粥，还在那洋洋自得说着狗屁不通的话。首先，我们讨论美国这个例外之国时，需要澄清一个最根本的误解：美国政治并不是以法国式“普世人权”为核心建立的。把“人之为人”的抽象价值当作政治起点，是法国大革命—启蒙理性主义的产物，是卢梭、康德、自然法传统的问题意识；而美国的立国伦理，源头却是新教，尤其是加尔文主义。美国政治所承认的“人”，从来不是一个脱离道德、信仰与秩序的抽象主体，而是一个被要求自律、能承担责任、被假定具有道德召唤的个体。正因为如此，美国的自由始终与财产权、契约精神、宗教伦理和共同体责任捆绑在一起，而不是一种对一切国家、文化、历史条件都同样有效的价值宣言。换言之，美国并不相信普世价值天然普世，而是长期相信：美国的文明形态有义务被推广为世界模板。美国所推广的普世价值是一种使命论，而不是人权哲学。 其次，把“历史终结”理解为“人终于摆脱一切束缚”，本身就是对这一概念的二次误读。无论是黑格尔意义上的承认结构，还是福山意义上的制度合法性收敛，在苏联解体后所有有关于历史终结的讨论，讨论的从来不是个体解放是否完成，而是关于何种制度最具正当性的根本争论是否已经结束，否则为什么会把中国拉入WTO中，都无视中国产业兴起时的低人权优势？因为当时所有的政治家和核心圈里都从心底认为中国在融入以美国为中心的世界经济体系下，必然会迎来以美国为目标的政治体制改革。 第三，将“西方重过程，中国重状态”的判断，实际上是把现实权力行为误当成文明时间观。在思想史层面，恰恰是西方，尤其是基督教新教文明，极端重视结果：是否得救，是否完成使命，是否推动历史向前，否则为什么会有《信新教伦理和资本主义》？正是不确定自己是否得救，才极端依靠现世的成功来证明自己已经被拣选，而新教徒的道德观又恰恰符合资本主义兴起的必然条件。自律、勤俭、奉献之所以被合理化，正是因为它被安置在一个通向终局的线性时间中。而中国传统政治所追求的，从来不是一次性抵达某个不可动摇的终极状态，而是在承认冲突永恒存在的前提下，尽可能延长秩序的可维持时间。修复、调适、循环、再平衡，远比最后胜利重要。 至于所谓“西方历史是人与神的战争，中国历史是人与人的战争”，就完全是在放屁。真正的差异从不在于战争对象，而在于冲突是否被赋予终极意义。在西方传统中，无论是十字军东征，还是七年战争，还是一次、二次世界大战，都被不断包装为“终结战争的战争”；而在中国历史经验中，战争始终被视为治理失败的表现，而非正义完成的标志。这正是为何中国对意识形态输出保持结构性谨慎，对战争保持长期厌恶。 最后，西方从来不是一个统一的西方，把美国、法国、德国、英国乃至南欧、北欧、东欧国家统统打包为“西方价值”，本身就透露出一种不学无术，智障般的愚蠢。就既无视了宗教史上的断裂，也抹平了政治哲学内部的根本分歧。法国有共和主义、德国有国家理性、英国有经验主义，美国有新教使命论，它们本就诞生于完全不同的历史问题意识之中，而所谓的西方价值只是在冷战结构下被暂时编织进同一套意识形态话语，通过简单的意林、读者来灌进当时根本没什么见识的中国知识学者嘴里。美国从建国时关心的，就从不是抽象的人，也不是精致的制度，而是始终的一个问题：谁被上帝拣选，谁就有资格领导世界。正因如此，美国在价值语言上经常借用法国的人权话语，在制度设计上吸收英国的普通法传统，在哲学修辞上偶尔引用德国的自由概念，但在行动逻辑上，却始终遵循一套自己独特的，例外的，普世帝国行为规范。冷战时期，这种内在分裂被共同的外部敌人暂时遮蔽；苏联解体后，它反而开始显露裂痕。我们可以清晰的看到，欧盟正越来越倾向于把价值理性视为内部治理原则，而美国却不断试图将自己被上帝拣选的认可外化为全球责任。所以当美国制度输出遭遇失败时，当中国，俄罗斯、欧盟拒绝被同构时，美国的焦虑便不可避免地爆发出来，并以各种形式回流为战略预言、道德恐慌和战争时间表。 因此，理解当下世界秩序的紊乱，不能简单地诉诸西方衰落或者东方崛起。而是真正的开始正视原本被想象为统一整体的西方，正在回到它本来支离破碎的状态。而美国正越来越被困在其必须证明自身使命正当性的历史压力之中，而这才是美国失败感的真正来源。

@saltmoon2008 @CgtnJapanese 5 yen don’t compensate this stupidity

@CgtnJapanese 南京虐殺の責任は、今の世代の日本人にはないよ。 プロパガンダ教育世代だろうけど、ジャーナリストを名乗るなら自国でグレートファイアウォールで情報統制を何故やっているか？取材したほうがいい。物事は何が事実で正しいかも分からない。

【観察眼】「何とか虐殺？」22年間忘れられないその一言 2003年、私は日本の地方テレビ局でアナウンス研修を受けるため、初めて日本に長期滞在しました。 japanese.cgtn.com/2025/12/11/ART…

近代化改修前のF-15Jが採用する旧式RWRであるJ/APR-4(A)は受信信号強度とPRFパターンのライブラリー・マッチングで脅威を識別するだけで、複雑なAESA信号（周波数ホッピングや低出力ビーム）への対応が弱く、TWS＋STTのインターリーブ信号をSTT（火器管制照射）シグネチャーとして誤検知しやすいことが昔から知られており。、これが事件のRWR警報（1回目短時間、2回目長時間）の違いを説明する一因となり得る。 日本側が「火器管制」と断定したのはF-15JのRWRの警報に基づいているが、詳細な信号解析（周波数・パルス解析）なしでは「誤検知」の排除が不十分である。 申し訳ないけど、この話も「台湾問題における戦略的曖昧性」と同様、新聞記者やテレビ局関係者にとっての「バカの壁」があるテーマである。場合によっては、🇯🇵の主力戦闘機(F-15J)の電子戦能力（ESM）が🇨🇳の最新鋭機(J-15T)の前では時代遅れという防衛省にとって最も知られたくない事実を自ら宣伝して回ってしまったというとんでもない皮肉なオチになる。 参照リンク： x.com/weiwei882288/s… x.com/weiwei882288/s…

@oran_ge 看个英文病历再看个中文病历就挺明显的，一个你识字就能看懂，一个全是生词组合

前几天听到一个灵魂提问： 为什么美国的 AI 应用大多是有毛利的，而中国的很少有 也许 AI 应用本质是一个橘生淮南的故事。 橘树生长在淮河以南就结甜橘，而移植到淮河以北就长成苦涩的枳。 大模型就像橘树。 生长在美国应用里就是有毛利的，而生长在中国应用里就没有。 很神奇，为什么会这样呢？

@notianblolo @levelsio It’s regulated pretty restrictive maybe more than most of countries.

@notianblolo @levelsio If you know Chinese cops and divisions are lining up hard in front of Tencent daily to access specific evidence with all the papers, because it’s the top secret data that only proper papers and procedures and long waiting can access. Not that much people know that, even locals.

I want to classify replies like these as "extreme naivety with good intentions" You know that every train ticket you buy in the West is directly tied to your payment and with that you? The Visa/MasterCard system is essentially a co-op with gov and they know exactly where you are, where you go, what you buy and what you do at all times if they want Not that I think that's good at all btw, I think the gov shouldn't know much at all, but you can't act all superior about China when we pretty much do the exact same

@oran_ge 免费的用户大概率不是目标客户，一点点试用就足够了

最近的事情让我下定决心 把所有的免费用户福利都停了 做这种慈善毫无意义 只会被坏人利用

@levelsio pho is made of rice powder，noodle is made with flour，that maybe the main difference

Is Vietnamese Pho just Chinese beef noodles or are Chinese beef noodles just Vietnamese Pho???