
Peter Bone
6.2K posts



This is why Reform MPs walked out during PMQs. What’s the point if Starmer won’t answer the question?

CONFIRMED: New figures show Conservative-run authorities deliver lower council tax rises than any other Party. Vote Conservative on 7 May!

"The Prime Minister is there because of his backbenchers. And they all think they are the next Prime Minister - and the only thing in their path is you." Boris Johnson on the real mechanics of power in Westminster. Hear more on The @SmokelessWord: youtube.com/watch?v=PslDrE…

The PM should make some effort to answer questions put to him, not constantly refer to the Opposition's policies. This is Prime Minister's Questions not Leader of the Opposition's Questions. What is the point of this process?

'If I have to make this my life's work, I will': Daughter of murdered MP David Amess 'massively' inspired by Nottingham families' campaign gbnews.com/politics/sir-d…

I am pleased to have Jacob Rees-Mogg’s support for my legal action against an administrative body related to Parliament - my argument is aimed at empowering elected MPs over unelected officials. On Tuesday 17 March my Barrister, Christopher Newman, and I were in the Administrative Court in London at a hearing in front of High Court Judge Martin Chamberlain. It is a significant case for the power of parliament, and therefore the power of the voters. As the MP for Great Yarmouth, I am seeking to challenge the legality of the processes of the ‘Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme’, also known as the ICGS - importantly, it is entirely legally separate from Parliament. The scheme’s genesis is driven by the ‘Me Too’ movement in 2018. The ICGS are seeking to use the doctrine of ‘Parliamentary Privilege’ to assert that they are, in effect, beyond the scrutiny of the law. Parliamentary privilege exists to allow MPs to do our job away from legal threats, it does not exist to protect bureaucratic bodies. As Jacob Rees-Mogg, former Leader of the House of Commons, points out in his analysis: “As the ICGS is independent, it cannot in its workings be a Commons body, as it would then not be independent. It is really very straightforward and Rupert Lowe seems to be right." This is arguably the most significant constitutional case in years with the ICGS now arguing the polar opposite of the position the state took in the case of R v Chaytor where MPs unsuccessfully tried to use Parliamentary Privilege to avoid prosecution for abuse of expense claims. ICGS staff are not legally qualified, and this administrative body is outside the orbit of the Chamber and has no link to MPs. It has not reported to a Parliamentary Committee of MPs since 2020 when all links were severed and a panel was inserted. It is our argument that this body cannot claim to be above the law - it is not right that a bureaucratic body separate from Parliament is attempting to use parliamentary privilege, designed for elected politicians, to avoid reasonable scrutiny. Rees-Mogg ends his article: “Thus if Lowe wins, he will not have harmed Parliament, but defended it. For through cowardice we – and I was an MP at the time – abdicated our privileged responsibility and gave it to unelected boffins, who are not so much better than elected politicians after all, but much harder to eject.” We expect a Judgment after Easter, around 14 April 2026. For anyone interested, please find below links to the relevant Court documents and media coverage: Our skeleton argument. #wTfvSth2a99a" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">drive.proton.me/urls/C66EX752H…
Jacobs Rees-Mogg article published - ‘Rupert Lowe and Parliamentary Privilege’. letters.jacobreesmogg.com/p/rupert-lowe-…
And here's headline GDP on the same basis (similar points apply)... 🤔



This is compulsory viewing. Sir Geoffrey Cox KC - a barrister with 44 years at the Bar and still practising today - delivered a powerful defence of trial by jury in yesterday's debate on the Courts and Tribunals bill 👇 @TheCriminalBar


After 18 months of job destroying policies, Labour’s record speaks for itself: 📈Unemployment up, almost a million young people not in education, employment or training, and business confidence is flatlining📉. Only @Conservatives have a plan to get Britain working again.



🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump has backtracked on the Chagos Islands deal "DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA!"

Full marks to Nigel Farage & Reform U.K. for forcing Starmer to perform another U-turn & abandon plans to cancel local elections & deprive 4.5m people of their vote. This isn’t because Starmer saw sense at the last minute, but rather he couldn’t face losing to Reform in the High Court this week after they had brought a judicial review. This latest humiliation will pile pressure on Starmer to explain his initial decision - I’m guessing he won’t give a straight answer - because the truth is he was ducking the electorate fearful he was facing a wipe out at the local elections. It must be embarrassing for him, a former Director of Public Prosecutions, to learn that Farage knows more about the law than he does.





