Peter Sikuda

@HHorsley So we wanted freedom to transact just to hand it over to ai agents?

Agents are coming to crypto. Like everything in AI — It will happen faster than you think, and will look different than you expect.

@Icebergy They use it only for themselves. Don't you know that?

where's all the apps people are building non stop since the ai tools dropped?

Just tried @autonomint. I can deposit any ETH or LRT to mint USDA+ stablecoin and always remain hedged, it doesn't matter how much the ETH price drops...curious how it works! Also, highest stablecoin yields on their CDS

@VittoStack AI

Creating a PRIVATE Telegram group for people to learn about AI and vibe coding. We’ll talk about what we’re building, revenue, favorite AI tools, plugins, Claude Code, new releases, marketing, content, X, etc. Comment ‘AI’ if you want to join. I'll DM you the link.

@PancakeSwap @safepal #breakpoint #hardwarewalletsoftcake

@otnoderunner No

Still fading $TRAC? It has been completely dominating the AI sector since the mass liquidation event.

@mert Looking forward to it. In that regard I buy 1 extra sol now, to cover my tx costs for it for eternity

as a solana user, I want to be able to buy regular assets without feeling like I just did meth gold, stocks, bitcoin, zcash, sol, hype, uranium, DePIN and even barrels of whiskey all with just an internet connection coming soon

The Binance Trojan Horse: More recently, Binance has been heavily diversifying in hopes of maintaining control and expanding its web of influence Communities often put too much pressure on projects to force listings on certain venues. Every project knows that visibility is key and one of those venues is CoinMarketCap, which used to be an independent company but is now owned by Binance. In order to maintain control over the space, you must own consumer-facing apps. Binance knows this - which is why it has invested heavily in consumer-facing businesses and implemented its “Binance Business Model” across them. They frame the costs as “Priority Fees” or “Marketing Fees” and proceed to charge fortunes for basic services. Since its acquisition, CoinMarketCap has been operating under the same business model as Binance - charging exchanges $50,000 for what they call a “Priority Fee” due to “backlog.” Because... well, CoinMarketCap is Binance. Decentralized exchanges that want visibility on CoinMarketCap are forced to absorb the cost. Pay $50,000 and you get listed. It didn’t use to be like this - but this is Binance’s way of maintaining control. Personally, I recommend boycotting CMC altogether and switching to better alternatives such as CoinGecko. What about Binance themselves? Well Their exchange takes approximately 9% to 11% in the form of tokens that comes back as sell pressure on retail and is framed as "Marketing Fee". This is the very same business model they run through and through. The conversation usually goes as follows: "We will list you for free - just fill in the form". Once the project fills the form where they give out general information about themselves, the team, the project... they are then told that the free listing looks as follows: 1) 2% total supply 2) 3% total supply reserved for future airdrops to be distributed to Binance web3wallet users 3) 1% total supply for web3wallet marketing 4) Hundreds of thousands in USDC/USDT 5) 3% total supply reserved for BNB HODLer programme 6) $200K worth of your tokens based on your last valuation reserved for Binance affiliate marketing 7) $2M worth of BNB for security deposit They also force you to list on PancakeSwap as part of their "Binance Alpha". Why Pancake Swap? Because this venue - is also owned by them. Whats more interesting is the fact that they frame this ask as "an assurance of interest". If you do large volumes and prove to be an interesting token - they will consider you to be listed. But why do they do that? To make preparations for their final "Max extract". You see - Pancake swap charges 33% of everything that liquidity providers make. The idea is that they put immense pressure on projects to perform , forcing projects to throw money and generate volumes.. Subsequently Binance extracts 33% of fees on this volume, It gets listed on Binance SPOT - they proceed to dump the tokens framed as "Marketing Cost" and on top of all of that they tell projects that if they fall beneath a certain price point - all of their security deposits will be confiscated. And all of this is just a small taste of how they run business. A large chunck of the industry is being mislead into one big max extraction machine that is Binance and its cartel. To be honest I have big respect for a lot of the venues that exist on Solana. Kamino, Jupiter, Meteora, DefiTuna, Raydium , Orca... They are far better venues to support and build on top of. It is the responsibility of projects and communities alike to put their funds and support venues that uphold to the highest standard and grow the this ecosystem to the right direction. TLDR : don't put pressure on projects to get listed on venues that max extract. We are responsible for driving this thing. Do your due diligence. Support the right people for the right reasons! Solana!

@SynthLuvr Maybe there is a solution already? @origin_trail

if this tweet reaches 100 likes i will share a long-read alpha thread on @autonomint ongoin' point system with spicy secrets, APY farmin' pre-launch actions 2 start & all z relevant info Autonomint TGE: dec '25 / jan '26 protocol category: #DeFi like & retweet 4 visibility 🤰🏻

@0mllwntrmt3 @autonomint @0x_Aks I think I need to farm more now

@MrkvakEth @sportfun Trust the process. "This season will their season"

I read this. I buy more Gyokeres at @sportfun Odegaard, Saka, Rice, Gabriel, Gyokeres are going to cook in the next tournament. Mark my words.

@nodp53 @AlexReibman I confirm M4 Max 128GB RAM and even gpt-oss:120b run fast

@AlexReibman In my M4 Max it running like a beast;)

Just installed gpt-oss:20b on my M1 Macbook Pro and it took 21 minutes to produce a response

I just bought 10,000 USD of HDX! I'm no longer neutral & only hold DOT. Why? I have been saying this more and more in interviews recently: @hydration_net is THE DeFi killer app of Polkadot. So I put my money where my mouth is. 3 reasons: - product - founders - vision 👇🧵

@jesseblessed3 @Polkadot @EnterTheMythos @thatMediaWag @D0tSama @dotinsights_xyz why should players know about polkadot? only to buy the token? the adoption comes with usage no speculation. btw, the things you mentioned already failed in web3 gaming. only in-game items should have a marketplace (ideally using stablecoins)

Just tried out FIFA Rivals, a game that was supposed to be part of the Web3 future, built on @Polkadot. But if I didn’t already know that, I’d have never guessed. Here’s why it was a huge letdown

@0x_Abdul @hydration_net for sure

non-exhaustive list of og defi teams that continue to impress me everyday: - aave - euler - fluid (fka instadapp) - uniswap - pendle - jupiter who else?

@TheDotsTalks When techies meet the market

Polkadot Coretime Renewal Mechanism Needs an Urgent Rework ASAP!!! Renewing a core is 1200x cheaper than buying from the market: 0.753 DOT vs. 922 DOT Total disaster. 🤯 How the current mechanism works: you just pay +3% over what you paid last month. That puts early Polkadot core buyers in god mode. Some paid <1 DOT and now renew forever for peanuts. It breaks the entire economic system. FYI: the Coretime Baron bussiness is built on this flaw. Jonas from W3F is pushing to fix it with RFC17 🙏 It replaces fixed renewal prices with a market-driven model – demand sets the price. If you own a core, you have two options: • Participate in the auction and pay the market-based price like everyone else, or • Use your renewal right by skipping the auction, but pay 30% over the market price. ___________ @GehrleinJonas do we have any ETA on RFC17? The problem has gone too far.

@GregusJakub Seems like some big Polkadot voters do not like/want success and are probably the weakest point of the whole ecosystem.

Btw audit of Hollar Stabilisation Mechanism didn’t find any critical bug & issue (1 of the big concern about our proposal comparing it to Acala, ehm). Also today, I made 1st step to bring perps which will allow orders of magnitude more possibilities for users (eg hedging, long short pair trades), more organic yield, more demand for Hollar and other our unique assets (e.g. GigaDOT) useable as a currency,collateral or both. Perps are also 1 of the biggest consumers of blockspace so in combination with other our products we are aiming for utilising as much (currently free) cores as possible. With all of these coming, slowing us down isn’t beneficial to anything and certainly not to Polkadot. Let us grow and we will rehydrate whole ecosystem.

@alice_und_bob More important than sentiment is that we use the products

Has Solana sentiment shifted? I see far less Solana discussions on Twitter recently. Charts also look like bags are being unloaded. What do you hear about Solana, chat?

Releases of Hub & JAM are exciting, but they will attract easier way more builders, users and capital if they can lean on powerful vertically integrated Hydrated DeFi stack and tap into its quickly accelerating hundreds of millions and eventually billions of $ onchain liquidity from the day 1. Builders, their users and investors prefer buzzing place full of energy and resources everytime. Blockchain world as 1 of the purest represantation of (hyper) capitalism (with everything good and bad coming with it) is all about network effects and race for resources. You might heard that not the best technology always win, unfortunately. Our proposal is explosive catalyst highly improving chances for success of Hub, JAM and broader ecosystem benefiting from more liquidity, revenues and wealth effect which never came, unfortunately, but was essential for success of Ethereum and Solana. After such boosts their ecosystems are only snowballing more integrations, builders, users, liquidity and overall momentum with which will be increasingly higher to catch up. Or you can keep status quo and hope for luck. Win of Hub and JAM is not given or guaranteed however amazing, innovative and cool they are. If I knew about better solution we would propose something different. Proposal of similar size was on table already in late 2022 / early 2023 and we recognized as bigger need to improve and secure necessary integrations for ecosystem first, bc w/o them such proposal couldn’t even work. Thats why Velocity Labs was created. Thanks to this incredibly useful company and other table stakes delivered in meantime, liquidity can finally flow, but there are still other chalenges. As you could see (or maybe didn’t realize) we didn’t run away, didn’t exit scam, didn’t give up but double or even triple down, punching way above our weight and did way better than anyone, even ourselves, would expected. All despite pretty small team and very modest resources available for the last 2y, while saving tens of millions in cash for Treasury and hundreds of millions from DOT market cap thx to DCA only possible with @hydration_net. But, Time is running.