@PhilipQuane@Dukie1988@SkySportsNews lol by you lots logic it doesn’t matter if it looks like it wasn’t much of anything… rules are rules no?
No room for nuance or common sense… 🙃
@amit_mavar@SkySportsNews As a red I'd like to see the Jones incident again. There didn't look much in it at all.
Don't think United fans can talk about spending and shitting the bed given your recent history though.
@SkySportsNews Hey ScouseSports I know you have set the narrative now that centres fully around “The Handball”
Any chance of showing 20 seconds before when Curtis Jones pulled Sesko back when he could have scored??
Also anything on Liverpool spending Half a Billion and shitting the bed 🤷🏻♂️
@Dukie1988@SkySportsNews You say taken out, but it didn't look like Jones did much of anything to sesko. Do we have a replay of it?
Also the Jones one would be subjective. This handball is objectively the wrong call.
@SkySportsNews Liverpool fans moaning about this literally 5 seconds earlyer jones takes out sesko for a penalty and red card so which way you want it goal ruled out and pen an red card or keep goal ?
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD I thought you were referring to the first attack earlier in the day. I don't know if he had a custodial sentence. I think he was in a mental facility.
@PhilipQuane@dibster56@BBCMOTD Pretty sure he received a custodial sentence so must have been arrested. Maybe he didn’t try to attack the police last time.
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD No, but they didn't taser him and arrest him last time either, so I'd say they should have done that. Saves 2 lives instead of costing 3 or potentially more.
@PhilipQuane@dibster56@BBCMOTD Well they didn’t shoot him last time either and you could argue they needed to after he was free to go on another stabbing spree. Hopefully that’s his lot now
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD I wouldn't want those officers to be armed having seen that footage. It would kill far more than it would save. They'd have shot him here when evidently they didn't need to.
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD He was incapacitated.. they have no justification for stamping on his head. They could have kicked the arm he had the weapon in but no.. they stamped on his head. Questions should be being asked about the whole thing.
@PhilipQuane@Stumitchell87@dibster56@BBCMOTD But VAR didn’t have clear footage of a handball. It took sky 22 minutes with all their cameras to find what appears to be obvious deviation of the ball. So how was it the wrong call by VAR exactly?
@Sargesbackheel@Stumitchell87@dibster56@BBCMOTD You can see the handball on every replay. You can see the change of direction and spin on the ball. Gary neville said it hit his hand as soon as he saw the first replay.
If the refs can't see it with the benefit of a replay, then they shouldn't be refereeing.
@Stumitchell87@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD It's an objectively incorrect call by VAR. Like an offside by centimetres is still offside. It's the same principle. Slight handball is still handball.
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD He was on the floor being tasered and pinned down by those who were disarming him. There's zero justification for literally stamping on his head in that situation.
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD This isn't America. It's not a bullet to the head for having a knife. He'd have been tasered and arrested like he was.
He wasn't "coming at them with a knife" when they stamped on his head. You're being disingenuous coz you know you're wrong.
@PhilipQuane@dibster56@BBCMOTD He was coming at them with a knife ffs. Had they been armed then it’s a bullet to the head. Which I’m sure you’ll have complained about cos ‘mental health!’
@jonaymufc@BBCMOTD I don't need to ask United fans. I watch enough of neville myself. The fact he was willing to go back on his initial "it hits his hand" to "its not conclusive" shows he desperately didn't want it chalking off despite knowing it should be.
@jonaymufc@BBCMOTD Former man United player and lifelong man United fan couldn't possibly have a bias towards man United or against Liverpool. OK mate.
@PhilipQuane@BBCMOTD Serious you are clueless just listen to united fans and your see out opinion, if you was talking about Rio I would agree as he is so biased for us but Neville is so biased against us, you won’t change my mind so maybe find someone else’s opinion to defend yours
@jonaymufc@BBCMOTD Watch him and listen to him enough to know he's clearly biased towards united. Same way carra is towards Liverpool. Bizarre to suggest he's not.
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD He was tasered and incapacitated on the floor as well as pinned down. Stamping on his head was completely unnecessary and sets a horrible precedent.
If they'd thought he had a bomb they wouldn't have gone near him.
Mad that you've been wrong about both the footy and this.
@PhilipQuane@dibster56@BBCMOTD He was trying to kill people and had a heavy jacket. Glad you know when it’s clear and obvious someone doesn’t have a bomb 🙄
@jonaymufc@BBCMOTD Gary neville lives and breathes man United 😅 he's often very biased towards them and even he thought it was handball until VAR started pretending it might not be.
@DannyTarr@footyinsider247@HACKETTREF Of course, it's a VAR issue. You can see the handball in every single replay.
Also, why aren't they watching the game?
@footyinsider247@HACKETTREF Don’t k ow what everyone is arguing about. Yes it hit his finger nail but that angle wasn’t available to VAR at the time, it was an angle later revealed from the broadcasters so not really a VAR issue here.
@Sargesbackheel@dibster56@BBCMOTD If you think there's a bomb, you don't go anywhere near them, and you certainly don't taser them cos that's likely to trigger it.
There was obviously no reason to think he had a bomb and no reason to kick him in the head whilst incapacitated.