Ruslan Dmitriev 

1.2K posts

Ruslan Dmitriev  banner
Ruslan Dmitriev 

Ruslan Dmitriev 

@PhotoBioLab

Associate Professor @ResearchUGent @UGent_HSR @microscopyUGent 'FLIM gypsy' and developer of #FLIM #PLIM bio-/nanosensors for #organoids #3D PI @FlImagin3_DN

Ghent University, Belgium Katılım Ocak 2010
582 Takip Edilen612 Takipçiler
Ruslan Dmitriev  retweetledi
John Gallagher
John Gallagher@MereSophistry·
The arXiv one-year ban reveals that a lot of people who submit papers don't like...doing research. Reading papers is fun. Talking about papers in a group is interesting. Synthesizing the literature is rewarding. There are lot of careers don't involve those things & pay better.
English
13
80
872
16.1K
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
@briandavidearp to me, being able to write a research paper without any help from LLM is a basic skill for a PhD student. If this is not being developed, it is simply lowering the standards and 'cognitive surrender'.
English
1
0
7
314
Brian D. Earp, Ph.D.
Brian D. Earp, Ph.D.@briandavidearp·
"Writing is thinking." This phrase went viral recently (from lnkd.in/gYj2c9uE), often quoted in the context of objections to use of AI in drafting academic prose. In Nature Reviews Bioengineering we respond: "Thinking is not only writing." Preview below. Shareable full access link: rdcu.be/fiuYi
Brian D. Earp, Ph.D. tweet media
English
21
156
724
114.7K
Brandon Stewart
Brandon Stewart@b_m_stewart·
1/ New @Nature! We study how powerful institutions shape the information environment for LLMs. Commercial LLM training is opaque, so we trace a path from state-coordinated media -> training data -> model responses.
Brandon Stewart tweet media
English
4
68
167
25.1K
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
@ey_985 Excellent, happy to see this published! Hope it promotes a more responsible use of it
English
0
0
1
59
Eddie Yang
Eddie Yang@ey_985·
New paper in Nature. The more a government controls its domestic media, the more it dominates AI training data, the more pro-regime outputs we get from AI. By scraping the open web, LLMs are unwittingly laundering state-coordinated narratives into seemingly objective answers.
Eddie Yang tweet media
English
43
673
1.6K
104.4K
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
@hausfath ironically it is being applied for studies of climate change, right? What is a cost/benefit? Worth it?
English
0
0
1
69
Zeke Hausfather
Zeke Hausfather@hausfath·
Using AI for science! Neat new Nature piece on how tools like Claude Code can speed up data analysis and visualization. (link below)
Zeke Hausfather tweet media
English
7
25
121
9.2K
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
@QueenMab87 agree, regarding the academics / PhD I have serious doubts that it helps in writing. Being able to write a PhD thesis and organise it logically, cite literature etc. is a skill that has to be mastered without AI. Cheating/skipping it will only result in lower quality learning
English
0
0
3
130
Dr. Mia Brett
Dr. Mia Brett@QueenMab87·
I’ve never quite understood how I’ll get “left behind” if I don’t use AI. I’m perfectly capable of writing, researching, and thinking all on my own. What does it do that will leave me behind?
English
998
9.3K
75.1K
1.4M
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
I just learnt from ERC info session that they allow using AI in preparing applications - so the problem is not in decreasing funding landscape but in AI. Just ban it and you will get less applications.
English
0
0
0
16
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
The main reason in rising grant applications is in decreasing overall funding landscape to the researchers due to the global conflicts, politics and other challenges. ERC was always a 'lottery' so why not make it real lottery, > this would save money, time and limt bureaucracy
European Research Council (ERC)@ERC_Research

The number of grant applications is rising sharply. Our capacity for their evaluation isn’t. ERC President Maria Leptin explains why stricter resubmission limits are being introduced for 2027 calls and what this mean for applicants. link.europa.eu/xF7kjc

English
2
2
36
3.5K
David Madden
David Madden@davidjmadden·
Universities don't need to "teach students to use AI well." The whole point of AI is that it doesn't require any skill. Universities *should* teach students how to write and research on their own, and foster an ethic of shaming people who outsource their basic ability to think.
English
156
3.2K
15.3K
225.9K
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
@MrEwanMorrison @prunskunas well it is not only about the exams (we still have exams without the gadgets) but about e.g. using it in writing, which they still have to learn and I feel that this cognitive capacity is really getting affected. 'Cognitive surrender' I would say
English
0
0
0
0
Ewan Morrison
Ewan Morrison@MrEwanMorrison·
This is true. My take: Unless chatbots are banned from universities, then universities will cease to serve any function at all. They will just become clearing houses where you pay money and get a certificate - AI writes the essays and dissertation papers, grades them and awards the 'pass'. No need for 100s of staff, for buildings upkeep, for libraries and study areas and lecture halls. Lazy academics and university bureaucrats haven't woken up to the destruction of their jobs and institutions that is already half complete.
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky

🚨 University professors have been saying AI is completely destroying learning and that we'll soon have an AI-powered, semi-illiterate workforce. Here's a glimpse into the educational apocalypse: "Sarah, a freshman at Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, said she first used ChatGPT to cheat during the spring semester of her final year of high school. (...) After getting acquainted with the chatbot, Sarah used it for all her classes: Indigenous studies, law, English, and a “hippie farming class” called Green Industries. “My grades were amazing,” she said. “It changed my life.” Sarah continued to use AI when she started college this past fall. Why wouldn’t she? Rarely did she sit in class and not see other students’ laptops open to ChatGPT. Toward the end of the semester, she began to think she might be dependent on the website. She already considered herself addicted to TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and Reddit, where she writes under the username maybeimnotsmart. “I spend so much time on TikTok,” she said. “Hours and hours, until my eyes start hurting, which makes it hard to plan and do my schoolwork. With ChatGPT, I can write an essay in two hours that normally takes 12.” - "By November, Williams estimated that at least half of his students were using AI to write their papers. Attempts at accountability were pointless. Williams had no faith in AI detectors, and the professor teaching the class instructed him not to fail individual papers, even the clearly AI-smoothed ones. “Every time I brought it up with the professor, I got the sense he was underestimating the power of ChatGPT, and the departmental stance was, ‘Well, it’s a slippery slope, and we can’t really prove they’re using AI,’” Williams said. “I was told to grade based on what the essay would’ve gotten if it were a ‘true attempt at a paper.’ So I was grading people on their ability to use ChatGPT.” - AI in education is a serious topic, and many schools and universities are blindly jumping into the "AI-first" wave without considering short and long-term consequences. It would be great to hear more from teachers and educators to understand potential solutions. This might be a great opportunity for rethinking the education system and how students are assessed. - 👉 Link to the full article below. 👉 To learn more about AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 94,700+ subscribers (link below).

English
67
170
575
32.5K
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
@MrEwanMorrison I agree that they should be explicitly banned a priori, unless the teacher believes that it is important for his/her topic
English
0
0
0
13
Wee AGI
Wee AGI@helloWeeAGI·
AI can absolutely make people weaker if they use it to avoid thinking. But used properly, it may be one of the strongest learning tools we’ve ever had. A Harvard randomized study found that students using a structured AI tutor learned more than twice as much as students in an active-learning classroom, and did it in 49 minutes instead of 60 minutes. That’s not small. That is personalised learning at scale. But there’s a catch. In a high-school maths experiment, GPT-4 improved practice performance by 48%, and a guided tutor version improved it by 127%. Yet when the AI was removed, students using the basic version performed 17% worse than students who never had access. So the difference is not “AI good” or “AI bad”. The difference is how it is used. If you ask AI to do the work, you may become dependent. If you ask it to explain, quiz you, challenge you, simplify difficult ideas and test your understanding, it becomes a personal tutor.
Wee AGI tweet media
English
16
15
77
10.1K
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky·
🚨 University professors have been saying AI is completely destroying learning and that we'll soon have an AI-powered, semi-illiterate workforce. Here's a glimpse into the educational apocalypse: "Sarah, a freshman at Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, said she first used ChatGPT to cheat during the spring semester of her final year of high school. (...) After getting acquainted with the chatbot, Sarah used it for all her classes: Indigenous studies, law, English, and a “hippie farming class” called Green Industries. “My grades were amazing,” she said. “It changed my life.” Sarah continued to use AI when she started college this past fall. Why wouldn’t she? Rarely did she sit in class and not see other students’ laptops open to ChatGPT. Toward the end of the semester, she began to think she might be dependent on the website. She already considered herself addicted to TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and Reddit, where she writes under the username maybeimnotsmart. “I spend so much time on TikTok,” she said. “Hours and hours, until my eyes start hurting, which makes it hard to plan and do my schoolwork. With ChatGPT, I can write an essay in two hours that normally takes 12.” - "By November, Williams estimated that at least half of his students were using AI to write their papers. Attempts at accountability were pointless. Williams had no faith in AI detectors, and the professor teaching the class instructed him not to fail individual papers, even the clearly AI-smoothed ones. “Every time I brought it up with the professor, I got the sense he was underestimating the power of ChatGPT, and the departmental stance was, ‘Well, it’s a slippery slope, and we can’t really prove they’re using AI,’” Williams said. “I was told to grade based on what the essay would’ve gotten if it were a ‘true attempt at a paper.’ So I was grading people on their ability to use ChatGPT.” - AI in education is a serious topic, and many schools and universities are blindly jumping into the "AI-first" wave without considering short and long-term consequences. It would be great to hear more from teachers and educators to understand potential solutions. This might be a great opportunity for rethinking the education system and how students are assessed. - 👉 Link to the full article below. 👉 To learn more about AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 94,700+ subscribers (link below).
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD tweet media
English
665
1.7K
5.3K
2.9M
Ruslan Dmitriev 
Ruslan Dmitriev @PhotoBioLab·
Sad news, Craig Venter was a great scientist and visionary. Back in the days I was lucky to attend his talk at @ASCBiology meeting, which I still value as one of the most inspirational talks that I ever attended to.
Elisabeth Bik@MicrobiomDigest

J. Craig Venter, Scientist Who Decoded the Human Genome, Dies at 79 A risk-taking outsider, he brought speed, competition and controversy to one of science’s biggest races. #GiftLink Nicholas Wade writes @nytimes nytimes.com/2026/04/30/sci…

English
0
0
0
94
Ewan Morrison
Ewan Morrison@MrEwanMorrison·
False quotations are being caused by LLM AIs conflating & confabulating. AI Conflation is the blending of separate concepts. AI Confabulation is when an AI produces fabricated or inaccurate info, filling in knowledge gaps with plausible-sounding but completely false details.
Ewan Morrison tweet media
English
7
27
92
2.4K
Martin Vinck
Martin Vinck@martin_a_vinck·
@OdedRechavi I find it not credible there is a supposed lack of reviewers. There are plenty of experienced (human!) researchers that would want to sit in panels and do reviews, but they are simply never asked and found.
English
1
0
9
1.5K
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
Announced by the ERC today (really bad news for science!!! It starts in Europe but will affect everybody) Because the REVIEWING LOAD is so bad, if your application fails you may need to wait mulitple years (>3?!?) until you can submit again! The ERC is the lifeline of the leading labs in Europe, so many research programs will be terminated (just no other sources to compensate). The letter from the ERC says “the only way is to reduce applications” (highlighted in the picture below) No!!! It's the wrong direction. Use AI to assist review. It’s not perfect (yet), but it allows more proposals to be evaluated, and it could support, not replace, human reviewers.
Oded Rechavi tweet media
English
55
134
462
121K