Pigdowndog

@hammyj5 "Lame cop out" Says someone who blocked Barney for confronting your bullshit! Irony at its finest.

@MaxAlva08132546 @dailybritainonx You certainly live up to your nom-de-plume.

@dailybritainonx The daily shit. All these whores trying to take him down now that the left hates him

🚨 NEW: Piers Morgan asked suspected rapist Russell Brand which Bible passages were relevant to him after he brought scripture into court. What followed may be one of the most painfully awkward exchanges you’ll see this week.

@ArmandJville You proved Barney right. You're the usual loud-mothed theist that makes claims but when confronted instead of defending your beliefs you run away behind the block button. Just when will one of you have the guts to actually argue your side? Pathetic.

@SavedByGrace300 Typical cowardly shit theist. Barney made you look like the uneducated idiot that you are and instead of engaging in the debate because you knew he was right you blocked him. Just another pathetic, indoctrinated moron. The baby Jesus will be proud of you!!

@millie141414 @Matt_VickersMP @BBCNewsnight Your delusions know no bounds!!

@Pigdowndog @Matt_VickersMP @BBCNewsnight Civil servants who are still in post now. Good morning

📺 Catch me on @BBCNewsnight shortly 👍

@millie141414 @Matt_VickersMP @BBCNewsnight "Covid loans had nothing to do with Tories ministers" Who was it then? Mickey Mouse?

@Matt_VickersMP @BBCNewsnight You did a great job but don’t let them attack you all the time as they think they’re the only ones who can make mistakes and move on. Covid loans had nothing to do with Tories ministers

@Matt_VickersMP @BBCNewsnight What a loudmouth wanker you turned out! Forgot about Thatcher and Saville did you?

@titpto Could re-post that in English please as my skills in gobbledegook are a little rusty?

@Pigdowndog You see, you get it straight off. Good on you, God Bless

@titpto Thanks for the explanation but I think I'm probably leaning toward the last part of my initial tweet.

@titpto What point do I "et"?

@Pigdowndog No, I know you et the point. Ha Ha

@titpto Not sure why it's not a proper forum but you've done your best but they all fall short of refuting my "baseless" arguments. Wanna try again?

@Pigdowndog It is not the proper forum to make my case, but I will do my best to refute your baseless arguments.

@titpto Can you provide an example where a geologist has deliberately ignored evidence that points to a young Earth?

@Pigdowndog Take geology, for example. Geologists fit observable rock features into an unobservable rock history. Naturalist geologists strongly favor rock histories that include millions of years, even if they must disregard evidence for recent rock origins

@titpto Just because a scientist is a believer doesn't make his scientific findings creationism if it's genuine science that can be tested.

@Pigdowndog Mainstream journals will sometimes publish a creation scientist’s results that deal more with straightforward observations than origins, like modelling the sun’s effect on global temperature or crafting algorithms to improve pacemakers. These Godfearing authors generally keep low

@titpto You're right PLOS ONE did publish a Creationist paper......................by mistake! PLOS ONE immediately retracted the paper, citing that the rationale and findings were not appropriately reviewed, and apologizing for the oversight.

@Pigdowndog The mainstream journal PLOS ONE published a paper describing the precise coordination between nerves, muscles, and finger motions in the human hand. Its Chinese authors wrote that this anatomy reflects “proper design by the Creator the evolutionary community revolted. Stopped it?

@titpto Can you point out where science confirms scripture?

@Pigdowndog Mainstream gatekeepers generally maintain a bias against God, His work, and His Word. They, therefore, can close the publication gate to science that confirms Scripture, regardless of the quality of that science. The problem peaks in historical disciplines

@titpto When we die our bodies rot down to the stardust everything is made of. No heavenly Disney World overseen by a celestial Kim Jong Un just oblivion.

@Pigdowndog Where do you think you will go after you die, or what happens to you?

@titpto You're quite right, god doesn't send anyone to hell as much like him it doesn't exist. Happily that's just bullshit for the gullible.

@Pigdowndog Sadly, one day you will give a sh*t, but it will be too late for you to turn. God never sends anyone to hell; they send themselves. Sadly. God Bless.

@titpto Of course they support the Creationist position as they're not proper scientists Can you post one peer reviewed Creationist paper that has been published in mainstream scientific literature? You can't because none have Couldn't give a shit what Jesus or Paul said as it's nonsense

@Pigdowndog Wrong they support the creationist position. I don't think what you believe bothers me one way or the other. As Jesus said, " Work out your salvation with fear and trembling", or maybe it was Paul, no matter who said it, it is in the Bible, and it is true. God Bless, over and out

@CreationMuseum Creation Museum confirmed the bible is nonsense.

Jesus confirmed the Genesis definition of marriage as between one man and one woman for life.

@titpto Your ignorance and lack of education have sadly closed your eyes to the truth.

@Pigdowndog Look at the end of each article; you will see all the references laid out for everyone to see. Your ignorance and lack of education have sadly closed your eyes to the truth.

@titpto There certainly are published papers from recognised scientists but sadly for you not one of them are Creationists. So you are showing your ignorance.

@Pigdowndog They are all fully recognised scientists who have published papers and are fully accepted. If you looked, you would see that every doc has references. So you are showing your ignorance, i.e., you have not even looked.