MusicAndTruth

But Eric I think half the time you think you're being lied to because you hear things that don't align with your logic & common sense... For typical life scenarios that'd be a good indicator, but here that doesn't always work because here you may miscalculate variables by assuming agendas/motives are simpler than they are, allowing you to more easily misconstrue some things.... But then in other cases, sure, you could be getting full on lied to, who knows.. But you're not being lied to constantly. @EricRWeinstein

I am being lied to about this UFO thing. Constantly.

@GTP_Podcast @TheUfoJoe So it's all just the usual suspects then? In a weird way that's actually reassuring, lol. If it's someone new coming in hot & heavy but acting like they have full lay of the land, it goes from just pain in the ass annoyance to almost suspicious.

@TheUfoJoe They all hang out in spaces. It’s been ongoing for about two and half years and I’ve tried to warn most of these influencers about the behavior but they just don’t listen. I’ve distanced myself from all of them.

I noticed that a lot of the folks who are attacking the various whistleblowers and witnesses, and replying to my posts about them, are people who don't follow me. I'm blocking those folks. Probably up to 5 or 6 over the last few days.

@DavidBursteinMD @TheUfoJoe One of the problems, I imagine, would be that without access to anything classified, gathering to identify & discuss best practices for data analysis would leave you at a disadvantage.... due to lack of knowledge about what tools are at the disposal of high-ups doing analysis(?)

Hi Joe. I was there. It was a good meeting. The meeting was organized by Gretchen Stahlman and Tim Spuck with support from AARO. It was conducted as a research meeting to identify best approaches to analyze narrative data from UAP reports. Because of the way the data was collected (a handful of focus groups, for example), research ethics were used with respect to protecting participant participation, hence the reason for privacy. When the final report was released, a decision was made to keep all of the participants confidential. We didn’t have access to any classified data, and AARO didn’t present any new cases, nor did we review individual prior cases per se. As I recall, we gathered to simply identify and discuss best practices for data analysis in general. There were a handful of popular, well-respected, and knowledgeable folks within the UAP/UFO science community who were there. I don’t think they are active on Twitter, so I doubt they’ll come out of the woodwork here. And of course, because of the research-participant privacy piece, it would be inappropriate for others to identify them. The 6-7 month timeline to get the summary out was fairly efficient in my view. The organizers drafted the summary initially, which takes time, and then it was subsequently reviewed by AARO prior to its release. I’m proud of the final report, and my honest frustration is that because of the “AARO stamp” it’s been widely distrusted. But it really was a good science meeting, and the contents in that report accurately reflect state of science at that time based on what we covered. Last, I believe Gough is telling the truth (gasp! 😉) about no current follow-up plans from AARO. I haven’t heard otherwise so far, though of course I can’t say for sure. DB 🩺

They tell us a year after the workshop, and won't tell us who attended. "Aproximately 40 government, academic, and independent researchers met at a private workshop last year to standardize processes for capturing, sharing and studying narrative data on...(UAP). "(AARO) set up and sponsored the invite-only event. It was officially hosted by Associated Universities, Inc. (AUI) in the Washington, D.C. area in early August. "Participant privacy was a prime consideration and DOD did not publish a full list of those who went or information about the meet-up ahead of time. Attendees had to cover their own travel costs to get to the workshop, but lodging expenses and most meals were paid for by the office." (@BrandiVincent_, do you know if everybody who attended had the proper clearance to look at the best UAP data?) "Gough told DefenseScoop on Monday that AARO did not have additional workshops or plans to announce."

@TheUfoJoe That is what they imagine. (The ones that aren't just being pseudos & dicks I mean.) They envision a Hollywood level scenario where a guy can sneak out with the hard proof, and that they all have it & have the ability to "show it." So when they don't, it boosts their skepticism.

We've been told by multiple witnesses (Dylan, Matt, Grusch, etc.) that various people in various agencies are totally fucking over UAP whistleblowers who have come forward publicly, and behind the scenes. And crimes have allegedly been committed against said whistleblowers. And yet, Astral chooses to go after Dylan, who's the only one who came forward w/o going through DOPSR first. Think about that. Whatever evidence these guys do or don't release, classified or not, is up to them. But if you're thinking any of them have a piece of a craft or amazing video they snuck out, you should lower your expectations.

@Kidneyqueen89 @TheUfoJoe I don't think that's how he meant it. Definitely haven't noticed a trend twd "white supremacy," but yeah ya sometimes hear the casual American exceptionalism stuff from service members that probably comes off in ways unintended. This however, I don't think was either.

@TheUfoJoe I haven’t watched the full thing yet. But I’ve noticed a trend in recent years moving the ufo community and its theories closer to nationalism and white supremacy. So that one quote out of context perked my ears. I was hoping for more details in the comments…

@Kidneyqueen89 Because he said America instead of Planet Earth? That's scary to you?

@Condorman6 Congtats!!!

Got promoted today. Sr. Director, Advanced Design. Now I oversee lots more than hypersonics. 🍾🍾

@DecipheringTV @TheUfoJoe @Producer_Meagan Hey, if u wanna call people full of shit, don't get mad if someone calls u full of shit.

@TheUfoJoe @Producer_Meagan I am not afraid to call things how I see them. Why are you afraid of folks engaging me? Why is my whistleblower voice considered less than others in your book? Because I do not support the disclosure circus?

Another great post by Eric. See a pattern here? Again, why give this person a platform, @Producer_Meagan?

@TheUfoJoe TLDR : Jeremy don't hype some shit, add a time, make it sound bigger than even ur typical hype, than pull the rug with no explanation & use ur Wonka joke lol, like at least be like "Guys & Gals, I apologize that tonight's weaponized needs to be pushed back due to xxxyy" etc etc.

I'm just gon say the unpopular thing out loud. (Notice I didn't say I'm just gonna say the quiet part out loud. Which would mean im claiming to speak for everyone. I'm not. I'm just speaking for me but there's probably one or 2 who agree.) My interest in this is lost. MB doesn't have any first-hand knowledge, nothing that's gonna move the ball fwd, Jeremy hyped somethin when he did so well like a month ago with that one vid he didn't hype at all & it actually got due attn. Here he hyped, then, backtracked, likely cuz MB wanted something edited out(?) & if not, don't let me come to that logical conclusion & only use oompa loompas as the excuse... I'm all for jokes, no prob, & if explained in the updated vid, at least that's sorted. I like Matthew Brown. It's not personal. It's the hyping. If u bust out with McCasland who was hiding out waiting to spill the beans or something illl eat a big fat crow, a turd, & thank God he's safe, & bow tf down, but what can Matthew say that's gonna lead us anywhere worth hyping up only to delay it with no reason. Is he gonna say something that'll be mildly interesting to us or will it make headlines. Im sorry. Partially. Shouldn't knock the hustle. But I'm still awake cuz of that shit, u goin all in on some big promise, then pulling back just to make a joke about it with no comment.. and if it really is cuz he wanted stuff edited, (just wild guessing, & still nothing against him, it's the hype/promise stuff), then well, BLEHH!!! Is he gon blow my mind with some evidence or just talk more about stuff that's not actionable. If that's it, cool on him, but don't hype it. Still hope it's cool don't get it twisted. I just don't really care as much now. At least at the moment.

You get everything! You win! Good day, sir!"

@TheUfoJoe People keep connecting these 2, some even describing them as "colleagues." Meanwhile, McCasland command of progs that had over 3,000 people in them, unless I missed something there's nothing indicating they ever even met.

7 months apart. I read about the funding detail but I don't see anything connected or nefarious. Remember when the Boeing whistleblower committed suicide and people were mad at me bc I said they should wait to hear the evidence instead of proclaiming "murder"? It was a suicide. How many people came back and admitted they had jumped the gun and were wrong? Zero.

@draken1721 @TheUfoJoe Mainstream media? What are u talking about, mainstream media couldn't care less about this.

@TheUfoJoe mainstream media's playbook never changes

No, they'll say the meteors took McCasland and those posts will go viral.

@RedPandaKoala Lolll

A lot of you owe Ryan Bledsoe an apology

@Mr_BenPrime Well no shit. It won't even take a wk.

Here's a prediction for you. I predict that a week from now everybody losing their shit over a few meteors will have forgotten all about it.

Boy he really wrote a book for the diehards & not the avg reader it looks like.... nothing gets soccer moms who are into spooky podcasts wanting to pick up a book like a chapter called Comprehensive Integrated Threat Assessment Addendum Report, lol. But its all good, the prior chapter title makes up for it. Ya could literally just call a whole book by that name & those podcast chicks would buy it. So I guess it evens out. Curious about Buckeye Arizona Grey's, (sports team name anyone??😁) and Armament section.

Someone asked for a Chapter list for "Future Visions" by Lacatski. Here ya go. ⬇️⬇️⬇️

U worded some of this funny, perhaps to make it sound more reductive. I agree likely no connection between the 2 disappearances. But ur statements on McCasland as far DeLonge seem to show a limited understanding of those events. Also the wife did have some strange wording by leaving out the term "allegedly" where it shoulda went when talking about knowledge of roswell at WPAFB. Especially if trying to distance from that being a reality. Tom ABSOLUTELY didn't seek him out for "military realism." Listen to him describe on multiple podcasts how he came about "meeting the general," & what ",the general" told him. The wife's statements echo Tom',s when he said at the time that the wikileaks screwed everything up & that they were setting them up with new advisors. Tom's goal that he pitched to Lockheed & USAF was that he wanted to make them look like the good guys when it came to the cover-up, they were protecting us. This appealed to them. this got him in the door. What was conveyed to him & Levenda for use in both the fiction (& non fiction but couldn't have any names on it,) was clearly delineated. Telling him about a lifeform found during the cold war wasn't about military procedure to something Tom pitched, this was told to Tom under the promise that he couldn't use names etc. He never did, & only said ",the general." Til wikileaks. Which is when they stopped talking & set him up with the next set of advisors.

@grok McCasland's main ufology tie: Post-2013 retirement, brief unpaid consultant to Tom DeLonge/To The Stars (per 2016 WikiLeaks Podesta emails). DeLonge sought him for UFO briefings & military realism on fiction projects. Wife Susan confirmed this publicly but stated he had "no special knowledge" of ET/Roswell material at Wright-Patt (his AFRL command 2011-13, site of Blue Book & lore). Reza/Mondaloy: AFRL-funded under McCasland era, but patents & records show conventional nickel superalloy R&D from 1990s Rockwell (no UAP/exotic claims). Substack notes severed "chain" (Hardwick dead 2014, Reza missing 2025, McCasland missing 2026) but offers no verified ufology link for the alloy. Cases active; no resolutions or confirmed foul play.

Aerospace engineer Monica Jacinto Reza, co-inventor of a key U.S. rocket alloy, vanished while hiking in 2025, and months later Maj. Gen. William Neil McCasland, who oversaw the program that funded it, has also vanished without a trace. thesentinelnetwork.substack.com/p/the-green-bu…

@disclosureorg It's all strange. But let's be careful before connecting. He oversaw over 3,200 employees.

@BubStine @planethunter56 So like I said, it wasn't a colleague. Unless u have info I don't. Which im open to. But one of over 3,000 people.

@BubStine @planethunter56 The lady is getting thrown in unnecessarily imo. I'm not sure about that, but he had 3,200 people "technically" working under him. This wasn't an associate. Unless there's other connecting details, I'm not sure that's not throwing people's attn somewhere unrelated. not sure tho.

If I exit my front door and walk down to my neighbors homes - front and side neighbors - it’s guaranteed that I’ll pop up on multiple cameras of all sorts and sizes. Yeah, maybe the ABQ is not like Los Angeles. But the point is made. Truths are being hidden, imo.

@planethunter56 Idk about multiple cams of all sorts & sizes. Someone post a Google earth satellite shot of his neighborhood & then use streetview to look at the homes. See if they're the type to have ring cams.

@PostDisclosure But I digress, its a trend?? (When I originally asked that at beginning of above, I was wondering if we were talking legit folks, or the silly sounding guy in my lower example. That's what prompted me adding it. Cuz I hadn't noticed that it was a trend like that for access types.

It's a trend? Even scrolling thru his replies, the ratio of support to jokes is over 20 to 1. Either way, I agree about not blaming him/shaming him. Or most anybody who says that, especially if they come from the inside or have any military/govt connection. Admittedly most are saying it out of an extreme abundance of caution, in some cases probably bordering on paranoia, but better safe than sorry. Different backgrounds have different levels of knowledge about what may or may not be plausible, & some backgrounds, it just literally comes from the training to be over-suspicious. (Like the time Lue in a early podcast was getting seemingly paranoid about someone listening when it turned out to just be a problem with the microphone... - my takeaway from that was just "geezus, what kinda training & action do these guys encounter on ops where that was the line of thinking!!?" (iirc he covered it up with a joke afterward like "never can be too careful haha!!" but it was clear it crossed his mind) When military & govt/congressional type people feel the need to state they're not suicidal, I get how it can sound silly to most of us. But u used the right word, due dilligence. I think alot of us (if in that position) would feel more comfortable putting that on the record too, even if realistically we don't expect anything to happen. Better to sound silly & have that peace of mind. Having said all this, I'll admit to not being perfect & probably having laughed if I saw someone **UNCONNECTED** to military/intel/govt/aerospace in any way whatsoever, & just some farmer who thinks he saw a ufo, or some experiencer/abductee who tweets they met a pleadian representative from the Galactic federation named Talla who communicates to him cuz he's a special starseed but saw Talla get caught in a shootout with a reptilian named Lagaroth & starts talkin how they're afraid the men in black are comin again, with zero self awareness of how they sound & talkin bout how they're not suicidal, I mean, ima probably either laugh or get annoyed that they're kinda giving those out there with legit fears for their safety a bad name... So I mean its a case by case basis, but we shouldn't be shaming any connected individual who may have legitimate fears.

Nothing cringe about due diligence. I don’t like this trend of getting shamed for saying you’re not suicidal. There is a long verified history of UFO witnesses getting harassed or threatened. I don’t blame Rep. Burlison.