Brandon Zicha

10.4K posts

Brandon Zicha banner
Brandon Zicha

Brandon Zicha

@ProfBZZZ

🇺🇸 Philosophy Politics Economics & Liberal Arts College Prof in 🇳🇱 | AngloCath | Likes, Follows & Retweets = curiosity =/=identity | Opinions: My Own

The Hague, The Netherlands Katılım Ekim 2010
976 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Joel Basson
Joel Basson@joelbasson·
@txgermanbre Americans are a massive part of the economy here. The housing shortage is our own fault for not building. We poldered entire provinces into existence, but now suddenly can’t build pretty houses anymore. I don’t accept that excuse. That being said, house prices have plateaued.
English
0
0
2
32
breanna 🇺🇸🇩🇪
breanna 🇺🇸🇩🇪@txgermanbre·
I really really miss Hungary and the Czech Republic. I cannot describe it, it’s like this feeling that I belong there. I love the flowers. I love the designs. Idk
English
5
0
14
421
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
@txgermanbre Or… we aren’t correct. To be fair, many of the fundamentals of the economy have changed from that upon. Which these models are well tested and descriptive. But this doesn’t look good.
English
0
0
0
1
breanna 🇺🇸🇩🇪
breanna 🇺🇸🇩🇪@txgermanbre·
I feel this deeply as someone who analyses data and economics, it’s dire and what’s coming cannot be absorbed
English
3
0
5
346
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
Americans don't think about ally/enemy as Europeans do...both for better and worse. It's quicker to anger and quicker to forgive. Americans generally dont have well formed views of nations. Europeans always ask ones nationality and usually download a heuristic stack. Americans rarely do and if they do have no firm durable content for that stack. Ultimately it's America and 'the kingdom of foreign'. Europe enjoyed a special affect because of its old country status for it's European American supermajority. But as that is attenuated by time, immigration, and decades of mockery by Europeans for it, that's been well amortized On top of that there is an American narrative, that is maybe the steelman for this feeling, and which largely jives with the about face in policy and the politics behind it. If you dm I'll talk about that if you are interested.
English
1
0
0
1
knut evandt
knut evandt@KnutEvandt·
@ProfBZZZ @davidfrum @thomaschattwill I'm surprised the US went from being an ally to an enemy so quickly. The only positive is that we don't have to deal with more completely insane wars, like the madness in Iran.
English
1
0
1
16
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
558
2.1K
9K
580.1K
Brandon Zicha retweetledi
Ralph Schoellhammer
Ralph Schoellhammer@Raphfel·
🚨 Why the EU's energy policy is mad 🚨 Despite expanding capacity, the EU is now generating 3.3% less electricity than it did in 2004. Compare that to the US (+11%) and China (+358%). The energy transition is a failure, and makes a competitive European AI sector impossible.
Ralph Schoellhammer tweet media
English
36
172
603
24K
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
Couldn't tell you exactly. I honestly don't think most Americans do. I obviously don't. But I have no illusions about what happens if the US decides it really wants Greenland. Nor illusions about the ludicrousness and I seriousness of European defense policy and realities. Though there are plenty of causes for a poor relationship.... Though Europeans seem constitutionally unable at admitting error where where America is concerned.
English
1
0
0
15
knut evandt
knut evandt@KnutEvandt·
@ProfBZZZ @davidfrum @thomaschattwill Where does the Americans' completely insane hatred of Europe actually come from? So, they want to deploy military forces in one of the harshest environments in the world, with extreme cold, storms and bad weather, just to get the pleasure of killing Danes.
English
1
0
0
10
Molly Ploofkins
Molly Ploofkins@Mollyploofkins·
Vance says Americans should find comfort in the fact that our allies are "suffering more than we are" from high gas prices
English
2.8K
1.5K
5K
4M
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
@Noahpinion I will not accept it. I am choosing hope ...desperate... Irrational.... Hope. Lol
English
0
0
0
728
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
I know a bit about arctic deployment .. The way it works is that airstrikes can proceed while, c-130's land on sheet with troops and helicopters. Each plane can hold 98 troops (or 60 paratroops), each plane can carry one Huey-like or blackhawk able to carry 10-15 people, or a troop carrier able to transport 40 each (though these are rarer). They could use Raven Camp where my old AirWing still trains I believe. All the parts necessary for doing this are routine in Antarctic and arctic operations currently. Indeed *landing in Nuuk* by ski plane is out. Even a massive adapt is out. Deploying troops en masse from the interior and the sea via Vtol aircraft is not. The entire interior is basically a landing zone, and the US is experienced in creating said temporary airbases on the ice sheet if Raven Camp were destroyed. Then there are the marine assault (landing is out) since we are talking about the cost. Where, the troops just airlift via Chinook from carriers. According to the Canadian Defense Ministry the US could conquer Canada in two days. I'm confident Greenland would be less. None of the actions here would change that even a scintilla. Though, ultimately given that 'capturing Nuuk' is irrelevant to securing Greenland, the cheapest option is to control the rest of the island and just blockade until surrender. Though, in principle, if the US was going to do this, they would have.... Rather than do absolutely nothing other than continue joint op patrols as Danes below imagined themselves to be fighting the very force securing their airspace. LARPy.
English
1
0
0
12
knut evandt
knut evandt@KnutEvandt·
@ProfBZZZ @davidfrum @thomaschattwill Planes can land without a runway on the ice sheet, but of course not along the coast, e.g. in the capital Nuuk. Anyone who is not an idiot, completely ignorant or American understands that 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
8
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
I refrain from psychologizing too much individuals who I don't know... But there seems less and less of a discriminating posture here.... For sure. Own goals seem increasingly common. Moreover it's seems admin wide. People I know working with American delegations in different intl orhs report radically increased unnecessary and counterproductive in the medium to long term rudeness. It's.... Not good. But also at times absurd to such a degree that it literally feels like a gag... hence 'badda bing'.
English
0
0
0
23
argon
argon@ArgonGruber·
@ProfBZZZ @dmdebruijn Trump clearly hates the inane questions he gets asked, but also trivializes the sincere & legitimate questions.
English
1
0
0
8
argon
argon@ArgonGruber·
@ProfBZZZ @dmdebruijn I have no such urge here. Sometimes, reporters ask inane questions. I’m unfamiliar w/japanese people personally, but this seems sincere. A real question.
English
2
0
0
15
john milbank
john milbank@johnmilbank3·
@AimeTim He really should not be anywhere near power or politics. Total vulgarity.
English
1
0
1
114
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
Like.... It's gonna suck... But it isn't this grim (though nl is drawing down natural gas production... Closing wells as we speak because of the destruction it has caused in Groningen).sooo....sucks likely more than your think ..lo. we merkeled much of the naturgas production in NL.,.just in time.
English
0
0
1
184
breanna 🇺🇸🇩🇪
breanna 🇺🇸🇩🇪@txgermanbre·
@redaction Germany now imports most of its natural gas from Norway, the Netherlands, and Belgium, with additional liquefied natural gas (LNG) coming via terminals in Germany and neighboring EU countries, including volumes sourced from the US and other global suppliers, not Qatar.
English
7
3
157
2.6K
@redaction
@redaction@redaction·
Germany - Shut down all of their nuclear power - Lost all of their Russian gas - Now losing all of their Qatari gas Holy shit it has never been so over for Europe. It is utterly over
English
271
1.8K
16.6K
340K
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
Sure,but what I'm trying to point out here is (1)They were criticized at the time rather soumdly. He was hardly the first Malthusian. (2) The two most vocal groups opposing it -demographers and economists - where the two groups with the most relevant areas of competance, and we're ignored because celebrities et al and the new environmental movement lined out and it captured the zeitgeist. (3) It is an example (one of many) of the type of fads that a responsible and a well functioning academia is meant to suppress, one where where reasoned arguments against an idea are ignored because they fulfill some social need beyond truth seeking. Ehrlich is like Kendi. I can't blame Kendi. He is a mid level academic who got elevated through no justifiable merit of his own to serve the meds of others, because he scratched a politically entrenched classes itch. (4) Moreover, his normative directions were clearly - even by the standards of the 1970s - dark. They could not help but echo (and it was noted at the time) pre-war arguments about eugenics. Indeed, another parallel. Kendi just brought racial essentialism back into vogue. This was obviously a mistake in the same way. Extraordinary evocative and vetting should precede conclusions of the type Ehrlich or Kendi brought to bear. It was academic malpractice to elevate either.... So I'm less aiming at the public (they follow Kanye, amirite?) but the academic establishment.
English
0
1
2
47
Tyrrell McAllister 🔍
@ProfBZZZ Yes, but everyone is also acting just as if either his arguments *were* always bad or it *was* the public that made him more than the crank he should have been. So everyone's behavior isn't Bayesian evidence either way in this case.
English
1
0
1
61
Brandon Zicha
Brandon Zicha@ProfBZZZ·
They finch because they are LARPing military power and their navies are unable to maintain even basic security of the seas, and they put these facts on their websites. They finch because beyond France and the UK they are unable to help, and since saying that is a political loser they are putting principle over their incapacity. The people that couldn't sustain power projection on Libya better than the Iron Age Roman Empire had no choice but to flinch at this. We don't need to get therapeutic with them to explain it. rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/pub…
English
0
0
0
133