Profit Pivots

14.3K posts

Profit Pivots banner
Profit Pivots

Profit Pivots

@Profit_Pivots

We Pivot Profits into more profits. Get to Pivotin!

Earth Katılım Şubat 2010
3.2K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Profit Pivots retweetledi
Erin Brantley
Erin Brantley@logiclives·
I’m an American, a Coloradan, that is just trying to step up and right the ship. Just asking for your help to spread the word 🤍. Thank you to all have been so supportive already!
English
88
494
2.2K
44.8K
robyn☦️
robyn☦️@RRR0BYN·
When all the childfree by choice millennials become old they will be a million times worse than the boomers. Imagine a hoard of shitlib, busybody seniors who never had the stress induced maturation of parenthood.
English
244
500
8.8K
217.5K
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸@EthanLevins2·
Erika Kirk makes ANOTHER WWE-style entrance today. She even has a theme song 😭
English
2.3K
2.9K
47.2K
5.4M
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
English
46.5K
22.8K
195.7K
69.2M
Profit Pivots
Profit Pivots@Profit_Pivots·
@Timcast You are cooked bro...you took that Hebrew $$ and are completely compromised and now irrelevant. Your viewership is tanking as a result...within a year no one will remember you.
English
0
0
0
283
Tim Pool
Tim Pool@Timcast·
yall dont get it Trump is SAVING them hes casting them out knowing that democrats will come after anyone who supports him after the midterms This is trump being MAGANANIMOUS
English
1.3K
178
3.6K
637.4K
Profit Pivots
Profit Pivots@Profit_Pivots·
This makes the most sense... Trump got duped into this disaster, shortly realizes he really fucked up and is likely to be impeached and possibly tried for treason once he gets cooked in midterms as this was an illegal war. So scrambles to pull off some ridiculous snatch and grab Uranium opp....has to fire top generls who tell him he's fucking nuts and retarded attempting this. Once they clear the generals they launch this disaster opp and miserably fail....then spin this downed pilot rescue BS to cover for the failed opp.
English
1
6
32
2.4K
Press TV 🔻
Press TV 🔻@PressTV·
"American Special Forces fell directly into a trap set by Iranian forces" ​​​​​​​WATCH: Information obtained by Press TV regarding the recent operation by the American-Israeli coalition in the central Isfahan province reveals a MAJOR STRATEGIC DEFEAT for the enemy.
English
524
7.7K
24.2K
1.1M
Jon Brooks
Jon Brooks@jonbrooks·
Pipelines are drying up. I’m talking to lenders. Brokers. Top agents. Everyone is saying the same thing: It’s slowing fast.
English
76
47
1.3K
164.8K
Profit Pivots
Profit Pivots@Profit_Pivots·
@CigsMake My daughter just got one of these for Christmas.....who can I sue?
English
0
0
0
84
Profit Pivots
Profit Pivots@Profit_Pivots·
@akafaceUS That Vietnamese chicken is absolute fire if you've never had
English
0
0
0
30
aka
aka@akafaceUS·
This restaurant serves "unlimited rice" and this guy found a loophole.
English
1.6K
617
16.2K
10.3M
Dave Smith
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith·
Protect Tucker Carlson at all costs.
English
2.5K
6.4K
62.4K
1M
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
On June 18th, I had a text exchange with Charlie Kirk. He said he was spending two full days at the White House trying to persuade President Trump not to initiate a war with Iran. Given that Charlie was close with the President and that he represented a large constituency essential to Trump, and given that many proponents of the war with Iran saw a U.S. attack as urgently necessary to the survival of Israel, it is reasonable to wonder if his refusal to back down from his steadfast opposition somehow resulted in his murder. A good investigation could have settled the matter. What we got only increases the reason for concern. Asking this question may be unforgivable, but it is in no way unreasonable. Charlie was in a strong position to keep us from doing what we have now done, and the timing of his death removed him from the equation and likely changed the course of history--as Charlie himself worried it might.
Bret Weinstein tweet media
English
2.4K
7.9K
38.5K
3.9M
Dan Bongino
Dan Bongino@dbongino·
I’m elated that my interview with Director Patel pissed off all of the right media people. I thoroughly enjoy watching you all rage out and claw at your own faces, along with your daily burning sessions of me in effigy as I destroy your bullshit narratives. I know schadenfreude is probably wrong, but I gently hope that all of my shows moving forward cause you the same anguish and intestinal distress. Respectfully, Dan
English
4.6K
3.5K
27.8K
929.8K
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.
English
7.1K
45.2K
290.6K
17.5M
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.
Thomas Massie tweet mediaThomas Massie tweet media
English
1.9K
9.4K
62.7K
2.4M
Dan Bongino
Dan Bongino@dbongino·
Don’t give an inch. Ever.
English
7.6K
2.5K
27.8K
3M
Reid Hoffman
Reid Hoffman@reidhoffman·
Give us a break: If you cared about the victims as you say, you’d stop making false accusations to cover your ass and start using your $220m of influence with President Trump to get justice for the victims. Instead, you’re focused on comparing my visit fundraising for MIT to your begging to go to his island (which happened TWO YEARS before the screenshot you shared), and helicoptering over to Epstein looking for the “wildest party.” You lied about this to everyone for over a decade, and now your excuse (it’s disgusting, by the way) is that you could get young girls without Epstein?
Elon Musk@elonmusk

This is how I knew so long ago that Reid Hoffman went to Epstein’s island. Epstein used Reid being there to try to get me to go, not realizing that it would have the opposite effect 😂

English
6.3K
2.8K
19.1K
9.2M
Killa 🌺
Killa 🌺@KillaKreww·
Theo Von and Tim Dillon were in TEARS while talking about how DoorDash is the MOST dangerous job ever 😭💀🔥
English
24
246
4.1K
277.2K
mistersunshinebaby
mistersunshinebaby@mrsunshinebaby·
🚨 BREAKING: Alberta separatist lawyer Jeff Rath CONFIRMS he has been meeting with high level officials in the Trump administration. Donald Trump will recognize Alberta as a sovereign state. Mark Carney is not ready.
English
923
4.4K
25K
833.3K