Pro

@NACHOS2D_ This isn’t worth anything let alone $1,000,000. If we’re just mass creating slop then it’s all worthless because it didn’t take any effort to create.

Hollywood got cooked. AI Seedance 2.0 just dropped a Hancock vs Homelander in a matter of days $1,000,000-level quality.

@barneybush21 @CattardSlim Just say you aren’t capable of any nuanced opinion

@CattardSlim just say you support the regime

Out: I'm liberating the Iranian people. In: I'm plunging the Iranian people into darkness.

@jessew22 @Krealic @jonfavs No one cares about being a saint, it’s about having decorum in public office. Everyone here has said something fucked up privately. There isn’t a single president who has said something as fucked up publicly.

@jessew22 @Krealic @jonfavs Lol even if I thought Trump’s grievances weren’t cope, I don’t want any American president tweeting like this ever. Who gives a fuck if he says it privately, why post it on the internet? It denigrates the office of the president.

One day, Donald Trump will die, and his supporters will try to punish the people who say things like this.

@Muronelkaz @atrupar But also calling people fascist is bad, unless the president does it

@atrupar Democrats are Antifa, but also Fascist?

Trump: “If the Democrats do not allow for Just and Proper Security at our Airports, and elsewhere throughout our Country, ICE will do the job far better than ever done before! The Fascist Democrats will never protect America, but the Republicans will … I look forward to moving ICE in on Monday, and have already told them to, ‘GET READY.’ NO MORE WAITING, NO MORE GAMES!”

@MettesStemme @acnewsitics He’s the president of the United States. Who cares of randoms on twitter talk shit about Trump.

@acnewsitics I wonder how many people will celebrate the day Trump dies🤔

Robert Mueller was a lifelong Republican, decorated Marine, and public servant. Donald Trump is a draft-dodging, convicted felon celebrating death. MAGA chose the felon.

@ianbremmer @DaleDykes5 Do they agree on military action?

turned out the iranian government was lying about not developing any ballistic missiles with range beyond 2000km. hardly surprising, but justification for removing their ballistic missile capability militarily.

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave Are you trolling?

@PrometheanLogix @petergietl @BlueBoxDave If they are "structured to survive" why is their next Ayatollah in a coma? Doesn't look like he was structured to survive, but we'll see, I guess.

To ensure Iran doesn’t get nukes To debilitate its long range missiles To destroy its navy To disable it from supporting terrorism This has been answered for weeks, for whatever reason, you just don’t like the answer.

@petergietl @TBerlaga @BlueBoxDave Thanks. I assume I’ll just be called anti America for being critical of how we wage war.

@PrometheanLogix @TBerlaga @BlueBoxDave A reasonable, nuanced take that will go over the heads of these people

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave It’s not dead. Iran has a decentralized regime. For example: who is currently ordering Iranian strikes on other countries? Who is ordering the Basij to silence pro Western sentiment in the country? They are structured to survive decapitation strikes. Think hydra.

No, my point was "Iranian leadership is dead." Go back and read it. Your point was that "Iranian leadership is more radical" but my point is "It doesn't matter if it's more radical as long as it's dead." I am glad you agree with my point that it's dead. Or nearly dead. Or will be dead soon. I really don't care if it's more radical if it's dead. Kapish?

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave I’m not happy about this. I wish the people of Iran could be free. But our actions thus far may have made their lives even harder than they were before, which is also saying a lot. Not to mention the 500+ dead Iranian civilians as a result of US/Israeli operations.

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave He’s probably in a coma. Seems you’re missing the point which is that Khamenei was more moderate than his replacement. Which is saying a lot. Why do you think the US has given up the regime change goal of this operation? The regime was built to survive this exact scenario.

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave Is this supposed to be some kind of gotcha? Any evidence based organization will hedge their claims bc absolutely proving a negative is faulty logic. Conversely, you could prove that they absolutely are building nuclear weapons, but of course we don’t have that evidence.

@PrometheanLogix @petergietl @BlueBoxDave Tis you? Either Iran was not getting nukes, or you don't know. Which one? Because you definitively stated they were NOT, and IAEA said they weren't sure.

@txJCTtx @BlueBoxDave That is painfully ironic coming from someone that can’t seem to accept the possibility of Trump or his messaging ever being imperfect.

@PrometheanLogix @BlueBoxDave I don't "act" like anything. I see clearly without the fog of TDS in my brain. You do not.

@txJCTtx @BlueBoxDave Whether I like the answer is irrelevant. I have eyes & ears. The messaging has been inconsistent. We have all seen & heard it. Why do you need to act like everything the admin does is perfect? You could say “yeah it was ambiguous but they’ve become more consistent” and move on.

@PrometheanLogix @BlueBoxDave Just like he said, you don't like the answer. So there you go.

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave In your own image, the IAEA says they don’t believe Iran was building nuclear weapons, but that they can’t verify. That’s what I said originally and it’s consistent with my last message. Don’t waste my time trying to play games with me if you can’t even read your own source.

So, was Iran developing nukes or not? You said that IAEA said they weren't - and I just showed you that's not what they said. After which, you replied with "they aren't sure, and it goes both ways." That's not what you said, originally. Do you stand by your claim that Iran was NOT developing nukes, or are you not sure yet? Because Iran themselves said they WERE developing nukes. They said it, in so many words. So, do you want to restate your original statement, before we move on to the next one that's not related?

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave The son of the last ayatollah, now his successor, is far more hardline than his father. I’m certain the people of Iran aren’t happy with the regime, but they don’t have much power, that’s the whole point. The power mostly rests in the IRGC who absolutely see him as a martyr.

Have you talked to people in Iran to find out they now like the Ayatollah? Or are you assuming we have turned him "into a marthur?" Because the people of Iran may just be afraid the new Ayatollah is still sitting out there ready to murder another 30,000 people like they just did the other month. Or perhaps, the people of Iran still have bombs raining down on them. We don't know, really - we have no intelligence regarding that. But just because they haven't risen up within 2 weeks isn't really a tell-tale sign they suddenly have great love for the regime. I can tell you after Stalin died people of Soviet Union haven't risen up, either. They still had no love for the regime - and it reflected in the new leader who was a lot milder than Stalin. Still not great - but a lot better. Kapish?

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave We wanted a decapitation strike against the regime. We hoped the populace would rise up, building off early 2026 unrest. Since it’s been weeks and that hasn’t happened, we’ve effectively turned the ayatollah into a martyr rather than an oppressive ruler in the eyes of the people.

@PrometheanLogix @petergietl @BlueBoxDave I am sorry I didn't understand the word "martyring." You want to restate that?

@TBerlaga @petergietl @BlueBoxDave This isn’t news. And it goes both ways. If the IAEA isn’t 100% sure, am I to believe that the US or Israel is? Again the director of the IAEA said these attacks only worsen the nuclear threat, & given the bloodthirst on all sides of the conflict, the IAEA is the only real source

@PrometheanLogix @petergietl @BlueBoxDave