Siren 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇪🇺💙

One in five university students in Britain say they wouldn’t share a house with a Jewish student - and yet many voice their support for an Iranian regime whose soldiers gang-raped two nurses so violently they had to have their internal organs removed. How have we arrived at this point?

Indeed!

🚨 250,000 WHITE BRITISH GIRLS RAPED IN THE LAST 25 YEARS, OVER 90% BY MUSLIM MEN, AND THE AUTHORITIES KNEW AND DID NOTHING. Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oxford, Newcastle, grooming gangs operating for DECADES. Police, social services, councils all aware. They were told. They had names, addresses, victims screaming for help. They did not act. They actively blocked whistleblowers. They threatened victims and families with arrest. They classified reports as “racist” and buried them. This wasn’t incompetence. This was DELIBERATE BETRAYAL to protect a narrative. Pure evil. Pure cowardice. Pure two-tier Britain.

If you claim to be an activist but:  - defend Hezbollah   - cheer for Hamas   - support the Houthis   - applaud the regime in Iran You are not standing with the people of the Middle East. You are standing with terrorist organizations whose sole goal is to murder Jews. You are not a human rights activist, you are an antisemite.

My husband, now ex, once lost the entirety of our savings on a crypto scam. I watched him rush around the house grabbing his wallet and laptop. “I have two minutes to submit this form, and I can double our crypto,” he said, excitement and panic in his voice. “Wait!” I said. “Don’t do it. It could be a scam.” Silence. Then click. With one press of the mouse, our savings were gone. What happened next was something I would later recognise as part of a pattern. I watched him transform from a self-entitled, controlling man into someone suddenly fragile and vulnerable. Sniffling and crying, he repeated that he didn’t deserve to live. Anyone would be devastated at losing their savings. But what someone does after a crisis reveals a lot about who they are. He didn’t take responsibility. He didn’t say sorry. He showed no concern for how it affected me. And once the tears dried, the rules were clear: I was never allowed to mention it again. In abusive dynamics, this is often how accountability disappears. The person who caused the harm collapses into distress so that the focus shifts onto their pain, not the damage they created. Meanwhile, any small mistake I made was never forgotten. It would resurface months or years later in a passing comment or a cutting remark, just to remind me that I was always the problem. That moment was just one snapshot in a much larger pattern of coercion, control, and emotional manipulation. Abusive people often shift tactics to maintain power. They know when to rage, when to guilt-trip, when to cry, when to withdraw, and when to play the victim. Whatever works in that moment to keep the balance of power exactly where they want it. #DomesticAbuse #Manipulation

.@rickygervais thank you #MailonSaturday for publishing this. 3million stray dogs will be brutally killed in preparation for @FIFAWorldCup2030 50,000 a week are being killed now. Thank you to @iawpcoalition for bringing the worlds attention to this. The killing must stop now!

Imagine viewing the Jewish community as a bigger threat than the Muslim community. This mindset exists and is active on this app. It should be studied by psychologists. Something is happening to make otherwise intelligent people suicidally stupid.

And this applies to the oppression of women. I still think feminist are too soft and apologetic actually.

A hijab used to hide the abuse of 10-year-old Sara Sharif at the hands of her father. Women forced into cousin marriages while the NHS praised its ‘benefits’. Children groomed by gangs while police and social workers looked the other way. In each of these cases public services turned a blind eye to the harm of women and girls because they were scared of being called Islamophobic. Labour’s Islamophobia definition will make this worse. If we put one group on a pedestal and make it harder for public services to do their jobs, then we will only foster more inequality and resentment.

Imagine going on a protest this weekend in support of a regime that doesn’t allow protest.

'The scale of violence against women shames our society': Sons suspected in nearly one in five cases of women killed by men lbc.co.uk/article/jess-p…

@JournalistJill @ShelaghFogarty Because it’s odd that they had to be forced into solitary confinement and slavery with threats of torture and death, if that’s what they preferred along.

Incredible when this caller says ‘They prefer to live the way they live’ that he genuinely hasn’t given a moment’s thought to the women in Afghanistan being tortured and oppressed and whether THEY prefer it. Well handled @ShelaghFogarty

They Broke It. Now They're Policing the Rubble. A government document, leaked last week, contains a sentence that should stop every British citizen in their tracks. "For many living in the UK, the changes brought about by mass migration have been too much, too quickly, leaving people feeling as though they are losing their local and national identity." That's not a critic of this government speaking. That's this government, in its own words, in its own strategy document, admitting that millions of people who were branded racist for saying it were right all along. Read that sentence again. Too much. Too quickly. Identity lost. The government knows. It has always known. And then turn the page, because the same document brands the Union Jack a potential tool of hate, creates an Islamophobia tsar, proposes a new definition of anti-Muslim hostility, and earmarks £800 million to manage the consequences of the policy it has just admitted was too much too quickly. The diagnosis and the prescription are in the same document. They point in opposite directions. This is the two-stage operation the British public has been subjected to, and it's worth stating plainly. Stage one: pursue mass migration at a scale and speed that overwhelms housing, public services, school places and community infrastructure. Do this knowingly. Prof Alan Manning, former head of the government's own Migration Advisory Committee, has now confirmed publicly that migration was used to paper over economic failure; a conscious substitution of imported labour for genuine reform. The trade-off was understood. The warnings were issued. The decision was taken anyway. Stage two: when the costs arrive: fractured communities, collapsed trust, sectarian bloc voting, parallel societies, antisemitism normalised in schools and hospitals, foreign conflicts fought out on British streets, reframe the native population's discomfort as the problem. Tell them their flag is a tool of hate. Tell them their concern about integration is extremism. Build a Prevent training course that classifies the belief that Western culture is under threat from mass migration as a subcategory of terrorist ideology, sitting alongside white supremacism and neo-Nazism. Not the policy that caused the fracture. The people who noticed it. The British majority did not vote for this. They were not consulted. No manifesto proposed the transformation of their communities at this speed and scale. When they objected they were branded racist. When they persisted they were branded far-right. When they voted for parties that reflected their concern they were told they had been manipulated. And now, having absorbed all of that, they are presented with a social cohesion strategy that creates protected categories for the communities whose arrival caused the disruption, while treating the host population's identity as a sensitivity to be managed. Religious leaders from Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Sikh communities have already written to the Communities Secretary Steve Reed warning that the Islamophobia definition is so vague it could chill legitimate debate on grooming gangs, halal slaughter, gender segregation and face coverings. The Free Speech Union has warned that the Prevent definition of cultural nationalism is broad enough to capture the Prime Minister's own words. Starmer said without fair immigration rules we risk becoming an island of strangers. Under his government's own training materials, that sentiment is ideologically adjacent to extremism. That is not irony. It's the logic of a political class that has run out of answers and reached for control instead. They made the choices. They deferred the costs. And now that the bill has arrived, they are telling the British people that the problem is not what was done to their country. It's their reaction to it. That is not a cohesion strategy. It's an insult dressed as one.

If a country was overtaken by a violent female militia who brutally banned all men from public spaces or work, shot little boys for trying to attend school, forbade them medical care, and traded them as young as nine as sex slaves and husbands, how many hours would it be before the world intervened

This International Women’s Day, stand with little girls who spent decades being brutalised by Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs and silenced by powerful men. Stand with the women and girls of Iran who are fighting for freedom from a violent Islamic regime. Stand with the women and girls of Afghanistan, who are treated like chattel and have had all their most basic rights stripped away by the Taliban. Stand with the women and girls of Nigeria, who are being slaughtered and raped and tortured for their Christian faith by the Boko Haram insurgency. Stand with the women and girls of Sudan, who are being forced from their homes, denied basic freedoms and rights, and brutally slaughtered in the Darfur genocide. Stand with the women and girls of Pakistan, where they are ranked amongst the lowest in the world for gender equality and economic participation. Stand with every woman and girl who is fighting for justice, freedom, or equality against their oppressors. And stand for every woman and girl who lost their life trying. Stand with them. Happy International Women’s Day.

@elicalebon UK has fallen under the traitor @Keir_Starmer 🥷🥷🥷🥷🥷🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🥷🥷🥷🥷🥷🥷

The guy who killed Huntley likely did it for kudos or to make a name for himself. I find it very hard to believe a guy who raped a pregnant woman and killed three other women has suddenly developed a moral compass of some kind