@G8885861897716@worldhockeyrpt Good thing it went to the situation room where they were able to make the right decision. We agree it was a goal, they called it such. No matter how they got there :)
@PuckExpertise69@worldhockeyrpt I forgot that those refs were wearing their laser patent contacts to be able to distinguish your drawing there, and call it a goal on the ice
@O_Jay1105@PuckExpertise69@worldhockeyrpt yup like if they call no goal, then there would a chance it stand, just imagine your team falling in this situation and us as oilers fan have the reason to be ???? with the ref’ing even i think its in, but rule said cant call a goal then smh they call it a goal
@PuckExpertise69@worldhockeyrpt That doesn’t count as conclusive evidence according to the NHL rules btw. You have to actually see it, the call stood because review was inconclusive.
That’s 15 goals against in the first three games. Lacombe plays Mcdavid perfectly as he try’s going 1 on 3. Then Ekholm turns it over another 2 on 1 against. Murphy falls and it’s 6-4. Gross
@RoaringHammy@Canucks@McDonaldsCanada Bro. Just straight up trade Petey for Bedard. Would be a fresh start for both players and teams. Who says no to that
i hope they know that he actually doesn't care about them or their success at all and he's only doing this because he's exploiting their usefulness in his rhetoric about canada. but that's probably too hard for a lot of them to comprehend