PUNK Alert's

OG twitter account: suspended price: held community: didn't sell if your coin can survive losing its main account on day one and the chart doesn't dump, the holders are real most coins can't survive a bad tweet. $PUNK survived losing an entire account

BAYC launched may 2021. sold out in hours. hit $1B+ mcap within months @cryptopunks existed 4 years before that and inspired all of it $PUNK is what happens when the original community, the one that started everything, finally gets a ticker

punks on their way to buy more $PUNK

Dear CryptoPunks Holders, We've seen the recent commentary circulating around our airdrop and we want to address it directly and transparently. First, let's talk about the so-called "social engineering" narrative. We understand skepticism is healthy in this space, but skepticism without evidence isn't analysis, it's FUD. Every project that gains organic traction gets hit with this accusation. We'd rather let the facts speak. On the technical side: our smart contract was specifically designed with anti-snipe measures from day one. Buy transactions were capped at 0.3% of total supply per wallet at launch, precisely to prevent anyone from dominating early price action and to ensure fair distribution across the community. This is not something a poorly executed or malicious project does. This is what a team that actually cares about its project does. Now, regarding the distribution issues. yes, there was a problem. Approximately 10% of the supply did not reach its intended recipients due to a technical issue. We want to be crystal clear: we did not pocket that allocation. We burnt all of it, accidentally, and then we purchased those tokens with our own funds at market price and manually sent them to the holders that had not received their airdrop We're not here to pump a quarter and ride the wave. We're here to build something that lasts in the CryptoPunks ecosystem. And if we weren’t, we would already be out. We’re holders, just like anyone else that buys on the open market We respect @PunksOTC and the nuance in their analysis, but we'd invite anyone with genuine questions to look at the coin, our on-chain distribution records, and our team's actions when things didn't go perfectly. That's where character shows The holders.

our biggest regret is not manually checking if everyone got the airdrop we’re sorry we didn’t airdrop the 3984 cryptopunks wallet we airdropped ~3333 and the rest were burnt accidentally and this is why some of you don’t like $PUNK we’re sorry how can we fix this?

gm. we good? ok cool. $PUNK

why airdrops to @cryptopunks never worked, and why this one is different let's be honest. every previous airdrop to punk holders failed. @punksOTC was right about that. the pattern is real. but the pattern has a reason, and the reason is what matters every previous airdrop was a random project trying to borrow the punk brand. some DeFi protocol or NFT collection would airdrop to punk wallets as a marketing stunt. "we airdropped to punk holders" was the headline. the punks were the billboard, not the point the punks had no connection to the project. no reason to care. no reason to hold. it was free money from a stranger. of course they sold. anyone would $PUNK is different for one simple reason: there is no separate project there's no DeFi protocol using punks for credibility. no NFT collection borrowing the name. no team building something else and hoping punks will care the token IS the community. the entire thesis is: the oldest, most connected, most convicted community in crypto deserves a liquid ticker and the numbers prove it 2800 punk holders are still holding their $PUNK. 92% diamond hands. only around 200 punks sold previous airdrops to punks? most were majority sold. the sell rate on $PUNK is 6%, after 24 hours of the timeline questioning everything about it

hey punks, $PUNK is trending on X! x.com/i/trending/204…