PureStress

@tedcruz Sir, is that a veiled threat?

I wish he hadn’t said this.

@Polly_T_ @RealCandaceO @808Regi He absolutely called it Louisiana.

@RealCandaceO @808Regi Pretty sure he misquoted the state at one point too during that exchange. Did I hear “Louisiana” when he meant Mississippi? I can definitely see how he could connive his way into positions of manipulation and control of prior victims who are already vulnerable & primed for it.

It sure was something. 😂 Demanding an apology for a clerical error was a strong start.

@CatholicDeacon Honestly, I attended Catholic school and went to Mass regularly but my home growing up was not what I'd call devout. Do use it in my home as an adult? No. It just never occurred to me. Would I? Sure, if I felt the pull to do so.

Do you use Holy Water in your home? If so, how? If not why? Repost to get all our Catholic brothers and sisters to weigh in.

@MuahD23 @ShawnRyan762 x.com/grok/status/20…

No he is backed by Islam money and supporters. and He's voted against conservative needs/wants TOO MANY TIMES. he's not the "evil' that propaganda is displaying. i agree that's exaggerated. but he is not giving the republican party and conservatism what is needed. he's failed to do the will of we the people. HE'S FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED BY ISLAMIC ORGS

$32 million dollars and an entire administration mobilized to destroy one congressman. His crime? Demanding answers about Epstein class abuse networks, and refusing to let child predators hide behind political cover. If that level of firepower doesn't tell you who's being protected, nothing will. Go Massie!

@RealCandaceO @KingOffX_ @candaceoshow Well, @RealCandaceO didn't lie and damn sure isn't afraid to say it to his face. 🤷‍♀️

@KingOffX_ @candaceoshow Oh wow. I had no idea I said this. Thank you for digging this up.

This Thursday. Hunter Biden and me. @candaceoshow

@CITIZEN_FLX @RealCandaceO @BlakeSNeff Then post it

@RealCandaceO @BlakeSNeff I have the real video

Current situation: -A Daily Mail reporter was writing up the "controversy" over who Charlie wanted to succeed him: His wife who knew him best, whom he trusted most, and whom the TPUSA board eagerly supported, or some other person (Hint: Candace obviously thinks it should have been herself). -Of course, no video is actually needed to "prove" Charlie wanted Erika to succeed him if something happened -- everyone who knew Charlie well and spent time around him knew this was the case and there was zero suspense going into the board vote. -Still, while Turning Point would still rather not release private videos in response to insane screaming from lunatics, they did show it to the Daily Mail reporter just to confirm that the video exists. For good measure, the reporter also spoke to three separate donors to confirm that the question and answer did happen. So, the Mail accordingly reported that the video is real. -Candace is now screaming that the video must be made using AI, exactly as I said she would a month ago. -Candace has publicly accused the Mail of lying about contacting her, so he posted a screengrab of his email to her publicist, which was sent two whole days before the article came out.

@Slm1472 @RealCandaceO @BlakeSNeff Daily Mail, but you're 100% correct. Make it make sense.

@RealCandaceO @BlakeSNeff When did video become a “private” video? Thought it was from an event. Also, why would you show it to Daily Wire and not the investors to reinsure them? Make it make sense!

@JohnMappin @RealCandaceO @charliespiering Assuming the video is real, another question arises. Who brought up the possibility of Charlie dying? Would whomever that person is lead to more speculation? Would it implicate someone or some group? I mean, it's a strange question for a 31 year old coming from a donor.

Dear Charlie, @charliespiering I hope you are well. I have spoken to a donor who was at the event in Aspen, and they have no recollection at all of what you have reported. I spoke to them again today in light of your article, and they reiterated this once more. They are quite certain. They also said that afterwards, following the main filmed Aspen meeting that you reported on, there was a smaller private meeting with Charlie where this subject was raised again, and that there was no mention of the version that you present. I knew Charlie Kirk well, and I know Candace well. This point of truth matters. It will affect Turning Point going forward and conservative politics more broadly. It can affect the presidency and future presidencies. The logical and rational thing to do is simply to release the raw video footage publicly, with any donors who do not wish to be seen blacked out and, if truly necessary, their voices altered if they are keen to retain privacy. You have stated that the Turning Point cameras were rolling, as have others. No one would be more pleased to see that what you are saying is true than Candace, ourselves, and all those who love Charlie and his family. It would give thousands of people great relief. No one wanted, or wants, to believe that untruths or half truths could or would be told on such a subject, or that the deceptions that have been suggested may have occurred. Certainly not us. Several people who have been donors, including the individuals with whom I spoke this afternoon, whom we personally introduced to Charlie as TP donors, are now saying that because of this, and other inconsistencies in what has been said, they will no longer participate in political donations across the conservative spectrum. They are that frustrated by it. These are usually calm, reasoned people. This was reiterated again today when we spoke. Such are the consequences of mishandling communications with donors. They do not like it. Of course, I do not know what happened at the event, as I was not present. I am simply reporting what I was told previously and again today by this person, who was there with another donor. I am not implying that what you have written in your article is either true or false. I am not suggesting that anyone is being untruthful. But the idea that the article you wrote will somehow put all of this to bed is naïve beyond expectation. Whoever is making this dog’s dinner of Turning Point’s PR should be fired. Our personal purpose in all this is solely the preservation of Charlie’s legacy and to help, if we can — and I believe we can — to allow those whom Charlie truly loved to find a route through to sanity and peace via truth and transparency. My elderly mother (88) is a great fan of the Daily Mail. I cannot, in all honesty, profess the same, but I do try to help. I can also extrapolate the consequences to journalistic reputation were one to find oneself on the wrong side of an issue engaging such a vast number of truth seeking Americans, and even a few Brits and Europeans. We live in a new media world, after all. I have advised our good friends at TPUSA that honest and open communication works best with Candace, even when she is in full truth seeking mode. I would continue to suggest to all parties concerned that this is the best, and probably the only, workable approach. Frankly, I do not know how we place ourselves in a position where we can be of assistance, but duty and noblesse oblige compel us to try to help resolve this if we can. It is now 43 days since Candace’s first public request for the film to be made available. What on earth does anyone have to lose by airing it? Thank you for taking an interest in the subject, though. The truth is important. And you have helped us all see more. I hope this helps you. Kind regards, John @RealCandaceO @Nero

@iFightForKids The fuck you do.

I speak for every single American when I say we stand with chudthebuilder

@DustysBDE @griftersdeport @RealAlexJones This. People in town have been pleading publically for months for something to be done. Chud has been clear from the beginning, he 100% wanting something like this to happen.

@griftersdeport @RealAlexJones Wrong. Chud went to incite reactions like usual. Was approached by someone who actually stood on shit. Chud pussed out & pulled his gun before a physical altercation even occurred. Little pussy pulls bear spray on women but pulls guns on able body veterans cuz he’s a bitch. FAFO

THIS JUST IN- Chud the Builder has successfully raised enough donations to pay 10% of his $1.25 million bond to be released from jail.

@RealAlexJones @RealAlexJones sit this one out man. Child has purposefully been trying to incite someone to get physical for years so he’d have an excuse to shoot someone. Also, he pulled the gun in advance of the man moving towards him. This wasn't self-defense. It was pre-meditated.

Oh would you look at that. Posted on 9/12 “Was arrested in Washington County LAST NIGHT” Gasp. You mean 9/11??? @baroncoleman @RealCandaceO

@QueenMarkmyword @JustTheTweets17 Tell that to one of the witnesses, @BlakeSNeff. He seems to have forgotten that.

@JustTheTweets17 You do realize there's a gag order. No one can say anything about this case until the trial is over.

It breaks my heart to think about what was going through Charlie's mind the night before he was killed. He knew "they" were going to kill him, he said it to at least two people, neither of them were Erika. Yet, he doesn't sleep with his wife, he doesn't even tell her goodbye.

mol.im/a/15821203 Bullshit. Show the video publically or I'll never believe it. It's pretty sus that Erika went to the WHCD to ‘confront The Daily Mail’ and suddenly they have two Kirk related exclusives within a day. We aren't this gullible fed-sloppers.

@TLHb6bh @NPolitic23 Baron did not have his podcast shut down. Prior to gaining traction due to Ian and GoogleTrends coverage, most followers were friends and family. Occasionally his children popped up on video. After growing, he CHOSE to set old videos to private to protect his family’s privacy.

Baron had shut his podcast down!!! He had placed everything on private. He saw an opportunity to capitalize on Charlie’s death so he came back on September 14th. If it was about politics why was his first show back about googling Tyler Robinsons name before Charlies assassination? He saw dollar signs. Baron is a reprobate!

What do you mean that you had shut down your podcast and gone private shortly before Charlie’s assassination? What do you mean that you never watched one episode of Charlie’s podcast? What do you mean that if someone had asked you a week prior to Charlie’s death how you felt about him, you would have said, “eh, you could take him or leave him… he wasn’t a saint, he wasn’t god”? You’ve spent the last 7 months making money off a man you openly admit you didn’t really care about. You had shut down your podcast and gone private, but then Charlie is assassinated and suddenly you care? Suddenly you become one of the loudest voices in the room? The truth is you saw an opportunity to capitalize on a man’s death and you took it. Then you pushed wild conspiracies and attacked his widow for a man that, by your own words, you could “take or leave.” You piled on and encouraged attacks against Erika. You demanded alibis for accusations you created out of thin air, while at the same time saying Tyler Robinson doesn’t have to prove anything and that the burden is on the prosecution to prove the case against him. So which is it? Because according to you, Tyler deserves the presumption of innocence, but Erika has to prove hers to the internet mob you helped create. You weaponized speculation, outrage, and social media for clicks and money. You turned a tragedy into entertainment. You helped spread harassment and suspicion toward a grieving widow while pretending to stand for truth and justice. But “eh’ you could take him or leave him”, right? You’re a reprobate, Baron Coleman.

@baroncoleman I can say this,since I've returned to the Catholic Church I'm now bombarded with anti-Catholic posts from evangelical accounts. No doubt we are being geofenced too.

Serious question: Do Catholics launch dozens of these multi-million-dollar campaigns yearly to combat Anti-Catholicism? Do Buddhists launch Anti-Buddhist initiatives? Baptists? Muslims? Anyone else? Just Anti-Semitism? And constantly everywhere all the time? Weird.

@LeftRight4029 @paramounttactcl @baroncoleman He doesn't e en qualify for Crayola. Ol’ boy is chowing down on RoseArt.

@paramounttactcl @baroncoleman You’re really bad at this, aren’t you, Gary? You’re the “crayon eater” I’ve heard so much about 😂

Proving once again @baroncoleman is a grifting clown peddling conspiracies that don't exist. Isn't it convenient you didn't show the below arrest report, which shows Tyler Robinson in custody on 9/12 (TWELVE, not 11) at 0400hrs? This is what the Motion to Exclude Cameras document is referencing. The interrogation occurred at 6:25pm on the TWELFTH! You also FALSELY stated "the Sheriff's Brooksby's timeline is the ONLY thing that supports that he was Mirandized on the 12th and not the 11th." Wrong again, asshat. You really do suck at lawyering. This must be why you lost the Gavin McInnes defamation case. I will direct your attention below to the screenshot from the Affidavit for Search Warrant for Apple Inc. It's page 5 of 9 of Search Warrant No. 3217131 (you seem to have problems finding information). It's not just supported by Sheriff Nate Brooksby's timeline — THE TIMELINE IS IN THE SEARCH WARRANT, YOU LOW IQ CLOWN! Good thing you have become a full-time lying, conspiracy-inventing, horseshit peddling propagandist. You have a gift for it, unlike your incompetence at practicing law. 😂

@Mandy1398991 @Dog85French @JustTheTweets17 Yes, and righteousness is in the eye of the beholder. There are many of us who believe our God-given gift of discernment tells us to question and be skeptical of Erika Kirk. We have that right. We're also on Earth and can judge who to listen to and who to rebuke.

Awe. You are such a sweet person! LOL God gave us brains to use and told us to discern who is true and who is deceitful. We have to use judgement to do that. Only God can ultimately judge where your spirit goes, but while on Earth, we can judge who to listen to and who to rebuke.

Good morning Blake, just catching up on this now. According to reporting from The Washington Post and other outlets, White House Correspondents' Dinner invitations extended through news organizations do typically include a plus-one (or additional guests) for invitees. As a quick illustration, here’s a small sample of spouses who attended the 2026 event: Melania Trump Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio Jennifer Rauchet/Hegseth Cheryl Hines Katie Miller Rachel Campos-Duffy Liz Wright Sharon Landry Christie Mullin Karoline Leavitt (with husband Nicholas Riccio; she was very pregnant) Amy Baier Caroline Decker Brianna Keilar From what’s publicly documented, the only Turning Point USA affiliates in attendance were @AndrewKolvet and @MrsErikaKirk. It’s also worth noting that Charlie Kirk himself never attended the WHCD. Interestingly, Erika’s invitation appears to have come from Fox News despite the network’s well-known boycott of Charlie following the 2020 election. One might have expected reciprocity on her part, yet she accepted their invitation. As for Andrew’s wife staying home with their three children, I commend that choice. Raising a family often means prioritizing responsibilities over cross-country travel for an event like this. One might think Erika would feel similarly, especially so soon after her loss. Instead, she chose to attend, apparently to speak her mind directly to those she feels have attacked her. What stands out most is the striking contrast: just 11 days after Charlie’s assassination, she publicly forgave the man charged with his murder. Yet she has shown no such forgiveness toward the journalists and outlets she believes targeted her. She can forgive the alleged killer but not those who merely spoke a cross word against her. There’s a word for that kind of selective grace. I have to say, you guys have destroyed TPUSA in record time. Charlie deserved so much better.

@AuburnJPJ @RealCandaceO @JohnMappin @ImMappin @BlakeSNeff I think they're suggesting donors hold the CEO accountable

@RealCandaceO @JohnMappin @ImMappin @BlakeSNeff Are you suggesting that donors should use their influence as donors to bully the CEO of TPUSA??? 🤔 🤔 🤔

Dear Blake, The donors to which Candace referred also called me completely in shock. As these were donors that we personally introduced to Charlie and to Turning Point directly I do feel that you owe it to them and to other donors to back up your statement @BlakeSNeff People who have backed Charlie with a considerable amount of money do deserve to be shown the video that you say you have. I am not suggesting that you are being untruthful about having it. My interest is simply in the truth being clearly and cleanly and ethically presented. Kind regards, John

@baroncoleman 😂😂

33 👀 Does this mean Kash is going to send me to Valhalla???