Aigarth

@TMilz5 Send it!!!

@Quorumdidit 👀🔥👏👏👏👍

Okaaaaay let’s go… $Qubic just hit a new ath mining $DOGE, putting it in the 6th spot on mining stats!

@Quorumdidit $qubic

A new paper out of KRICT and KAIST just put a number on something Qubic's architecture has been built around since 2022. Multiple AI agents working in coordination reduce extrapolation error by up to six orders of magnitude versus isolated deep neural networks. Up to a million model parameters compress into 5 to 40 interpretable ones. Tested across deterministic and previously uncharacterized dynamics. The collective recovered the underlying governing equations across all of them. @c___f___b  described the design premise of Qubic's coordinated mining layer this way: "The work of one miner benefits from the work of another miner, and their combined work is greater than the sum of their works measured separately." That is not a metaphor. The MCI paper is empirical confirmation of the mechanism. The researchers tested on a small lab cluster and noted the obvious next question: what happens when this runs at network scale? Qubic's 676 Computors and broader mining base sit directly on the other side of that question.  Coordinated, network-scale machine intelligence is what Aigarth is being built for. The frontier is catching up to the foundation.

Yo dear $Qubic family, one thing we should admire about the fudders: they’re attacking and spreading FUD against Qubic as if it’s their last mission. The amount of effort and consistency they put into spreading nonsense is honestly impressive hats off to them for that consistency. Sometimes it astonishes me how smart people invested in BTC when it was still very young and everyone called it a scam. Those who believed in it and held till the end became multimillionaires, and even those who didn’t reach that level still earned enough to completely change their lifestyle. Same with Qubic ,we are witnessing technology beyond imagination, and we are here early. If everything goes accordingly, Qubic will create history. But for that to happen, HODLERS will have to grind through the process just like the BTC maxis did. Here, patience is the price , pay it and make it to the end. See you at the TOP ✌️💪

Strange that nobody discusses one nuance which makes almost any coin with #PoUW insecure: If #PoUW produces work useful enough to be sold to somebody from outside then attacks on the coin may be not only FREE but even PROFITABLE. #Qubic doesn't have this problem, because its #UPoW cannot be resold (nobody needs it except #Aigarth). The #Qubic community benefits from this work because the future #AI's will be deployed to #Qubic and bring profits to $QUBIC holders. Next time you hear somebody claiming that #Qubic's #UPoW sux and #PoUW from the whitepaper rulez, ask them to address the concern above.

$qubic should be on that list. Its community is extremely passionate. The core community is unwavering. The comers and goers bitch about price. Constant battle between conviction and gratification. I’ve been in the community for three years. Watched people come people go. The funny thing is when people get frustrated with the overall market.. they have to blame things to justify price in their heads.. so when they sell they come back to try and destroy.. undermine.. but qubic protocol doesn’t care. It’s built to be reactive. It’s built to house AGI. Currently qubic is the 10th ranked mining pool on $doge network.. and is growing. Now step back think for a second if qubic is fast enough to validate doge mining with its oracles.. what stops it from branching into web 2 infrastructures..server farms etc. It’s an infrastructure built to consume energy produce ai energy solutions. All while being built directly into the hardware… trustless, deterministic, global ai infrastructure. For the people Study @_Qubic_

The engineering side of Phase 3 is finished. What scales it from here is adoption. If you are running ASICs on a pool that pays one revenue stream, the math is worth running once. The full setup walkthrough, from ASIC config to wallet integration to dashboard, is in the guide below.  → qubic.org/blog-detail/qu…

The dashboard is live. Per-epoch revenue, hashrate, and full reward visibility. Phase 3 adoption is still early. That is not a caveat. For a miner evaluating a pool switch, early adoption on a two-revenue-stream setup is where the margin is widest before the network normalizes. The instrumentation is there. The opportunity window is open.

A 2-week head-to-head comparison run by the QMine Project showed Qubic delivering approximately 111% more revenue than DOGE+LTC merged mining on identical hardware. The exact margin moves with DOGE price and network hashrate. The two-pot structure that drives the gap does not.

Start with the hardware question, because it is the part most miners assume is complicated. You change nothing. Same Scrypt ASICs. Same wattage. Same room temperature. The only thing that changes is the stratum URL you point your hardware at. If you can change a pool address, you can mine DOGE on Qubic.

If you are running Scrypt ASICs on a conventional DOGE pool right now, you are running the right hardware on the wrong pool. Phase 3 of Qubic's DOGE mining has been live for three weeks. The setup is one configuration change. The economics are structured differently from any pool you are currently using. Here is what mining DOGE on Qubic actually looks like. 🧵

The Qubic All Hands is back tomorrow. Thursday, May 14 at 11:00 AM EDT | 3:00 PM UTC, live on X. Incubation, Marketing, Core-Tech, Science, and Business Development are all presenting. Five teams, one stream, questions answered live.

@cryptokendefi I visited #pools" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">qubic.li/#pools and read they provide service of being an intermediary between computors and miners. Is it possible that HUHH...WAXF is the address which distributes earnings of those miners who used @QubicLi service?

📖 Read the full article: qubic.org/blog-detail/br…

Your brain sits at a frontier between order and chaos, and a single number determines which side it falls on. The branching ratio (σ) measures how neural activity propagates. Too low, signals die. Too high, you would have seizures. But right around σ ≈ 1, something remarkable happens: sensitivity, memory, information capacity, and complexity all peak at once. In NIA Vol. 8, the Qubic scientific team breaks down how this principle from statistical physics and neuroscience became a core design constraint in Neuraxon, and why the "edge of chaos" matters for building brain-inspired AI that actually works.

@odbashWizard @nvidia @_Qubic_ after current anthill integration, more info on the AMAs, we aim to change the AI paradigm for bio-inspired architectures and grow intelligence at large, 100% focus is there not building GPTs, usage for that since it is opensource could be explored by anyone, but not our aim atm.

Today #MultiNeuraxon🪼joins the @nvidia #cuda family , very glad to release for @_Qubic_ #OpenScience The Cuda Kernels and library so you can teach your #bioinspired #AIs using Nvdia #GPUs too. Code: github.com/DavidVivancos/… Why it matters? It brings Multi-Neuraxon + #Aigarth evolution to GPU-native execution: CPUs orchestrate while NVIDIA GPUs teach, execute, and scale neural compute in parallel. CPU + GPU together = Multi-Neuraxon at speed.