@InterstellarUAP @TheUfoJoe @galb_71 @bennyjohnson @mattgaetz yes he did. he said specifically "unclassified."
English
Raven Rubottom
5.6K posts
@TheUfoJoe @galb_71 @bennyjohnson @mattgaetz He does not specify in this clip whether it’s classified or unclassified setting.
English
🚨 Matt Gaetz : “There is an ALIEN Hybrid Breeding Program”
Rep. Matt Gaetz on what he was told in a classified congressional briefing by a uniformed U.S. Army officer:
“I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army, that was briefing me on the locations of hybrid breeding programs where captured aliens were breeding with humans to create some hybrid race that could engage in intergalactic communication. An actual uniformed member of the United States Army briefed me on that.”
Gaetz added that recovered craft crashes examined by the CIA contained “non-human biologics” with no identifiable human source.
This is straight from a sitting Congressman under oath-level clearance. No speculation — just what he says he was officially briefed.
What do you make of it? 👇
---
English
@InterstellarUAP @mattgaetz It was NOT "classified congressional briefing." Sheesh. It was someone in Army uniform (not clear it was even an officer) who came to Matt's FLORIDA OFFICE to essentially "whistleblow." Matt says he did NOT verify the claims.
English
@GeneralMCNews He actually said he "did not verify" the claims made by uniformed Army who came to his office in Florida.
English
BREAKING: Matt Gaetz confirms the U.S. military is currently in possession of alien technology and has reverse-engineered their weapons, which are now available for use.
English
@Mappy6984 I guarantee you that bill already had 18%-22% figured in before the ADDTIONAL gratuity of $60.
English
@AndrewKolvet @FenixAmmunition Andrew should start by explaining the hug.
English
A lot of noise was made yesterday about the Daily Mail headline said the ATF could not match the gun to the bullet in the Tyler Robinson trial.
@FenixAmmunition joined us today to explain the actual facts.
English
@BlakeSNeff Or they want the Truth and to find ALL those involved rather than accept fed slop that this was a "lone gunman."
English
It's very obvious that a lot of people are not "brave truth-seekers." They just want Tyler Robinson to get off while smearing the people close to Charlie as much as possible.
We can only speculate as to their motives.
Colin Wright@SwipeWright
All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.
English
@itslinklauren seriously... have we already forgotten the Biden admin?
English
The liberals making fun of Kristi Noem’s husband right now have spent the last ten years telling us men can be women, men should be in women’s sports, and that trans people are the pinnacle of beauty. Now they’re upset with someone cross dressing? That’s their party platform! Just saying. It’s not my cup of tea at all, but the hypocrisy stands out to me. 🧐🤔
English
@bennyjohnson David Grousch was not believable. Maybe this is true.. maybe not. But, I'd need more than that.
English
I asked Matt Gaetz What Is the Most Disturbing Alien Finding He Learned In Congress:
Alien 'Breeding Programs' and 'Non-Human Biologics'
"I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army, that was briefing me on the locations of hybrid breeding programs where captured aliens were breeding with humans to create some hybrid race that could engage in intergalactic communication. An actual uniformed member of the United States Army briefed me on that."
"In crashes of craft that had been recovered by the CIA... it wasn't just the hard materials, it was also biologics, but that they couldn't identify a human source of those biologics."
English
@megbasham @DailyMail and how does it make a difference? the result is the same. no evidence linking bullet fragment to the alleged gun.
English
This is clickbait trash and completely discrediting to the @DailyMail.
Spoke to a LEO who told me fragmentation that makes it impossible to get a match to ANY weapon happens all the time. Yet the Daily Mail is echoing Tyler Robinson’s defense team nearly verbatim. They did NOT quote a single law-enforcement officer not connected to Robinson’s defense who would’ve given their readers a better understanding of what’s happening here.
They’re purely leaning into this because they know there are a bunch of rabid conspiracy theorists who will not take the time to understand this.
Which makes the Daily Mail and its reporter scum in my book.
Daily Mail@DailyMail
Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims trib.al/sWEJfeN
English
@jason_howerton It actually doesn't matter. The end result is the same. They have no evidence that gun shot that bullet. In fact, the evidence points to the opposite. Multiple prints on the gun. The gun had not been recently fired which is why the dogs didn't locate it.
English
She didn't even read the article, which is exactly what Daily Mail knew would happen with that ridiculously misleading headline.
For anyone who doesn't read past the headline, like Candace, here's what the story actually says:
The defense is desperate and is arguing that because the bullet that killed Charlie was badly fragmented, it can't be proven that it came from his rifle. Don't be a low IQ person.
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO
Where are all my neocons who have been “overwhelmed” by the non existent evidence against Tyler Robinson? You should all be ashamed of yourselves. Hope the money was worth your soul.
English
@robbystarbuck @DailyMail Have we already forgotten the Biden admin?
English
Wow. This is disturbing. Kristi Noem’s husband has been caught by @DailyMail sending pics where he crossdresses with giant fake breasts.
They also say he’s been paying fetish accounts to trade pornographic "busty bimbo" content.
Can insane people stay out of politics please?
Full story: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
English
@QuantumAlteredX I just switched from organic baby carrots to organic carrots with the tops still on for this very reason.
English
@KanekoaTheGreat Legally, it means they cannot prove that gun shot that bullet. No match.. inconclusive... either way, there is no ballistic evidence to support the claim that Charlie was killed by a bullet from that gun.
English
What a misleading headline from The Daily Mail.
The ATF ran a tool mark analysis on a bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy.
The result was "inconclusive" — not "no match."
The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound.
The bullet shattered on impact.
"Inconclusive" means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion.
It doesn't mean the bullet "did NOT match" the rifle like the headline says.
The defense wants to use "inconclusive" as exculpatory evidence — but the prosecution wants to run chemical or molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy to ammunition recovered with the gun.
Unlike tool mark analysis, it doesn't require an intact bullet.
The defense is trying to block that testing from happening.
That's the nuance of the real story.
Daily Mail@DailyMail
Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims trib.al/sWEJfeN
English
Raven Rubottom retweetledi
Today on the show:
-The Freemason Murder Plot in France which proves, I was telling the truth about the maroon berets.
-Sherriff Brooksby suddenly resigns. Could it be because he lied about Tyler Robinson?
-The “33” club is having a bad week.
youtube.com/live/7ERqbYElO…
YouTube
English
It is not human how spot-on @candaceowens has been with her wildest, craziest theories...
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO
Where are all my neocons who have been “overwhelmed” by the non existent evidence against Tyler Robinson? You should all be ashamed of yourselves. Hope the money was worth your soul.
English
Raven Rubottom retweetledi
Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims trib.al/sWEJfeN
English
Raven Rubottom retweetledi
And OFC the sheriff who “arranged” for Tyler to turn himself in, Nate Brooksby, resigned today.
Total coincidence I’m sure.
Daily Mail@DailyMail
Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims trib.al/sWEJfeN
English
Raven Rubottom retweetledi
Great. If all our essential services are funded purely by property taxes.
Then why in gods name is there vehicle registration taxes, gas taxes, excise taxes, lottery taxes, income taxes, estate taxes, tariffs, capital gains taxes, estate taxes, gift taxes, luxury taxes, corporate taxes, etc etc
And property taxes only pay for local services. Which means I pay not only for services I need / or might need. But also every tourist, traveler, neighbor, etc and what i pay is determined by the government at random based on the assigned value of my home and not the actual cost of those goods or services.
Oh and if I dont pay for the hobo to use the ambulance or for another persons child to go to school. The state seizes my assets and auctions them off.
English
@forestfrank Depends on the church. Some people go to church every week but never "grow" spiritually. Some rarely go, but have a deep spiritual life and grow in understanding (revelation) by other means (books, podcasts, classes, seminars etc).
English
Do you believe church attendance is essential for spiritual growth?
English