RSLSTG

@heyrimsha FREE

Everyone is super hyped about Claude… but barely anyone knows how to actually use it to replace real work. I collected 2000+ mega prompts that turn Claude into a full-blown productivity engine. Comment "FREE" and I’ll DM you everything.

@cdikici71 @abnormalit5gni Thank you 🙏🏼

cd_bias_profile_test users, hi. I have updated the usage period for all users to 31.07.2026. @abnormalit5gni , please share it too bro, so your followers can be informed as well. :) (scam profile)

@Crak_Trading Ahh nice. Do let us know once the pricing is out or you have some awesome discount codes for us OGs 😉 And it would be awesome if we could get professor crak do run a quick lecture on how we could effective use it to take good trades 😊

@RSLSTG Pre-release is the full version. You have what I have. Now that you’re saying it, sectioning off the internals isn’t out of the question. Like dom only, risk, management etc. I’m also fine with a payment plan or demoing. Just haven’t figured out the logistics yet 🤪

That didn't quite work 😂 Lifetime is easier to manage. I wasn't going to announce it really, but It's now available on whop- but there's only 10 licenses. If you have to have it, you can have the pre-release at a significant discount. That's my thank you to you for the support in development. Only up from here!

@Crak_Trading @jay555b Can’t wait!

@RSLSTG It’s possible! lol just wait til I show the rest of you what I showed @jay555b the other day. 🤪

Single prints cleared. Liking the S1/VAH overlap up in the 300s, Looking short if TDI holds below 50. Watch S2 level for long pullback, re-accumulation and an expected push to S1. If no sign of reload at S2, we will push lower from there.

@Crak_Trading You’re brilliant as always. Thanks Crak

@RSLSTG Always! lol yes it’s more for bias and probabilities for what might happen in the coming days.

Has anyone been using the scanner? Those HMM predictions slap.

@Crak_Trading Man.. I can feel that it’s such a powerful tool, but I need a manual for it 😂😂😂

@RSLSTG Yes. But particularly with OFS, multiple confluences and things happening at the same time. It has a combo setting for that specifically.

I am the algo 🤪 Dom ain't too fast- if that was an excuse, institutions would have abandoned it long ago. And ATM overrides work wonderfully.

@Crak_Trading What would you be looking at? Exhaustion/ accumulation before taking a trade?

@RSLSTG All the same concepts as OFS. The footprint is just built directly into the columns of the dom so you can see what’s happening right next to the resting orders.

@jay555b @Crak_Trading Thanks Jay 😂

@Crak_Trading full support😁😁😁

He keeps liking my posts, but everyone thank @jay555b for the 'build your own platform' challenge 🤣 basically why puzzledom exists. Close enough lmfao

@cdikici71 So sorry to hear about your lose. My condolences and love to you and your family

Babam Mustafa Dikici Hakk'a yürümüştür. Namazı Pazartesi Öğlen Ünye Merkez Camiinde, Defni köyümüz Tekkiraz-Saraçlı aile mezarlığımıza olacaktır. Rabbim rahmet eylesin.🙏

@cdikici71 Sorry to hear about this. Praying that your dad’s health will be restored. May he be strengthen and healed. 🙏🏼

Hi cd_bias_profile_test users, I have updated your usage period to 30.04. I kindly ask for your prayers for my father, whose old illness has returned and is getting worse day by day. 😾🙏😾

@ItsTraderLuke Journal

Your trading journal should tell you THIS instantly: → If you overtrade → When you break your rules → Where you actually lose money → When you perform best Because what gets measured gets fixed. Comment “Journal” and I’ll send the template.

Here's why your veer form your plan, it's not just a discipline problem: You think they’re trading the market. But in reality, something else is happening... You're trading your own Inner Market. And when you don’t understand that… you ignore your plan. Ignoring your plan is actually an emotional regulation strategy. Bored > take a trade Anxious > avoid or exit early Frustrated > revenge trade Missed a move > chase You’re not trading opportunity. You’re trading for emotional relief. Here’s the part most traders miss: Your Inner Market has structure. It has its own supply & demand: • Demand for certainty • Supply of patience Its own support & resistance: • Support = self-trust • Resistance = fear, doubt, shame Its own volatility: • Calm, clear, intentional • Or reactive, urgent, impulsive When pressure rises, your Inner Market moves fast. And if you can’t read it in real time… you’ll use the buy/sell button to manage how you feel. Your interaction with the market is an attempt to feel better.... instead following your plan, which often feels too uncomfortable. The edge isn’t just reading price. It’s reading yourself. In real-time. Which is difficult to do under pressure The moment you feel the urge to trade for relief… you’ve already stepped away from your edge. And this is why skilled 1:1 coaching works. The best traders don’t eliminate emotion. They understand it. They track it. They stay present with it. And because of that… they realize they don't have to act on it. You’re not just trading the market. You’re trading your Inner Market. Learn its structure. Or it will trade you. If this post resonates, follow, like, r/t, BOOKMARK this post. #tradingmindset #traderperformance #tradingpsychology $ES_F $NQ_F $QQQ $SPY

@Crak_Trading All good. I understand it’s not as straight forward and mechanical. I will keep it on an observe a little longer. 🙂

That depends on the size you’re trading and what the ATR value is on the current timeframe. That’s kind of a whole other thing I need to talk about. What timeframes I choose, when and why. That’s a cross system approach and more-so focuses on risk management. One mini on the 5m with a single candle drawdown will cook your account vs 1 mini on the 15-30s action. It really depends on the volatility.

@Crak_Trading I’ll go revisit the video. Was curious whether you would take into consideration indication from M1 or S30, since it fire every other seconds. Or you trust higher time frame better?

@Crak_Trading Hey Man, been exploring the new indicator lately but don’t know how to use it effectively. Do you think it’s possible to show us some of your set ups for different scenarios? Eg. Trending, reversal etc. just some examples would be good! Need some guideline. Appreciate your help!

@ekyamdrakon @StevenBartlett You have good week ahead Ekyam, know that you’re loved and deeply cared for by someone you’ve yet to know. I think you’re cool too 😊

Hello! Thank you for your words. Just a clarification, I don't hold any "belief tightly". I think based on what it's known, for instance historically. It's not a belief; it's operating with the parameters of scientific methodology. Because, otherwise, all you have is operating on what you are told, for instance in the Bible. Here's an example: I believe Jesus might have existed historically. However, I don't know; nobody knows. If anyone says to you, "Jesus existed", they are lying to you. If anyone says to you, "Jesus didn't exist", they are lying to you. Historically, we don't know. We can believe anything we want - and as I said, I believe he very likely existed - but it doesn't change the reality of not knowing. Historically. Anyone can believe anything they want. One issue I have is people lying to our faces: "Jesus did...", "Jesus said...", "Jesus wants...". A common religious person doesn't know any of the nuances of what makes something historical or not. They just believe what they are told and they are told Jesus existed. And then repeat it. This is, in somewhat simple terms, the difference. I don't believe in God because, despite of what people claim, he has already been proven a fiction. Scholars and theologians - I like to focus on these facts because people tend to think atheists did; nope, believers did - while trying to prove the Bible and God real, applying the scientific methology, proved the contrary. You can see everything I'm saying as a "belief", it's your right. Unfortunately, it isn't. If there was the possibility of God - the particular one; not a being like - being real, I'd present it the same way I preesent Jesus: "He might exist" or "He might not exist". I'd have no problem with that. Then I'd believe or not believe. I have no problems changing my mind but simply saying things "exist", "are real", "said", "done"... is not enough. >>> For me <<< If it's enough for you. Go ahead. It makes your life better? It makes you happier? It makes the hardships more tolerable? Yes. Then good! I particularly don't like all the deceit, manipulation and lies of religion. Not your faith; religion. Because they know. Everything I said here - and elsewhere - nothing comes from my mind. Some of these are around 500 years old. They know, but they don't tell us. I learned because I was going to become one of them. And my moment of realization came when I still believed in God. I realized I could manipuliate, deceive and lie to people just like they've been doing. To wrap up, most people here - if not all of them that commented - did not disagree with the fact that "sin is disobedience". Their problem is where it leads, tyranny. I posted on X about it, it's a matter of perspective. I'll stop now; I always talk too much😅 I hope what you believe makes your life the best it can be😁

What if everyone is actually destined for hell? When Christian Apologist Wesley Huff joined me on The Diary Of A CEO, he explained a central idea in Christianity that many people misunderstand. According to scripture, the standard for being “good” isn’t simply being better than other people. The standard is God himself. Which means, by definition, no human being meets it. That’s what Christianity calls the bad news. Humanity can’t save itself through good actions or intentions. Here's him breaking it down