RadixRyder.xrd

Feeling $EARLY and slightly dangerous. 🔥🔥🫡 @RadorablesNFT #Radix

Debix is live. Decentralized direct debits are now possible on Radix. Create recurring payment mandates with full payer control: Pause, resume, or revoke anytime Pay in XRD or supported tokens Fund in one token and send payment in another Automatic or manual collection Multisig support for teams/treasuries Start here: debix.finance

rlydev.life - new addiction I challenge everyone to beat my wave 11 highscore :)

@VandyILL High quality stuff here. 😤🫡🔥

Just listened to the new Inflection point Pod with @Matt_Hougan @dlawant @marcryptonio One of the chapters touches on hurdles for tradfi using DeFi. Not surprisingly three of the biggies are UX, identity and KYC. The key takeaway is that the existing platforms, the ones with the majority of capital are all tech first innovations. They weren't designed with UX, Identity & KYC as core primitives of what and how a DeFi protocol should perform in real world conditions. They were designed around what the technology can do, and not what developers and users wanted it to do. It's only now that tradfi players are finding out and finding out the hard way that if you don't have a solid architectural foundation, then you will forever be trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. DeFi is about moving digital assets, so it's obvious in hindsight that digital assets should be core primitives of the network, defined at the protocol/network layer and not at the smart contract layer, like the EVM, SVM and majority of blockchains do. By moving assets down the stack to the network layer then it becomes quite easier to deliver superior UX and native Identity features. If Matt, David and Michael are serious about trying to solve the issues they discuss then they need to be open to looking at protocols where UX and Identity are integrated in to the network's DNA. Arguably it easier to add capital to a network that has all these features out of the box, as opposed to trying to shoe horn the features in to an architecture that wasn't ever designed with these concepts in mind. radixdlt.com/blog/radix-the…

@DBCrypt0 Fair and accurate post IMO. Curious to know what issues you have with Radix Hyperscale results? Seems to meet all the criteria outlined in your post.

I said no chain can handle 1M real TPS and got a lot of pushback But most people don't even understand how TPS benchmarks actually work They’re run in local environments with a handful of nodes Zero real-world latency. Using simple native token transfers (or even minimal/no-op txs) Occasionally they go global…but still with basic transactions only Here’s the math ⬇️ A basic transaction is cheap Sending native ETH (or SOL, etc.) from wallet A to B is ~21,000 gas on Ethereum Minimal compute and tiny data That’s what most TPS benchmarks are measuring Now try a real DeFi swap: ETH → token ABC on Uniswap Now you’re at 100k-150k+ gas 5-10x the resources Run that swap through an aggregator (1inch, Jupiter, etc.) with multiple hops, approvals, routing? Easily 300k–1M+ gas/compute. Often 10-50x and sometimes 100x+ the resources of a simple transfer Now look at flash loans, MEV bundles, leveraged positions, NFT bundles? Those can all get even larger. One complex tx can consume the resources of dozens of basic ones And that’s just one category and how all chains operate We also have liquidations, cross-chain bridges with messages, restaking loops, governance executions, account abstraction batches… No chain in the world has ever been stress-tested at scale with a real mix of these transactions Because the demand simply isn’t here yet This is why many chains that claimed “tens or hundreds of thousands of TPS” ran into congestion, failed txs, and degraded performance at just a fraction of those numbers We’ve seen it countless times when surges expose the gap between lab tests and reality A handful of chains have solid infrastructure and could scale up faster than others to meet real demand Maybe by adding more nodes, shards, hardware, or with various tweaks. Some that could happen relatively quickly. But not a single live chain today could handle sudden real-world demand hitting 1 million TPS TPS without transaction complexity is just marketing. Every chain knows it. Most just hope you don't.

@TSeacret @economyninja @DefinitiveFi 😤💥

Same! Started at .14 and down to .025. Looking forward to the “Up only!”…and 400x $REACT FOR THE WIN!! Learned about liquidity from @economyninja ❤️ @DefinitiveFi 🔥

@kuglja $REACT

# react Every time a Reactive Contract triggers an action (like an automated trade or liquidation) based on a DIA price feed, 100% of the transaction fees in $REACT are burned. More data = more triggers = faster supply reduction.

📢📢RADIX DEV ACCELERATION HYPERSCALE COMMITS EXPLODING🚀🚀 New commits dropping fast: Tidy genesis, shared txn cache, node loop optimizations @flightofthefox building the future👀 Community takeover in full swing. $XRD tech beast awakening for altseason dominance! #Radix #XRD #Hyperscale #Crypto #DeFi

Xian development is accelerating. Shared txn cache, node loop optimizations, tidied genesis code — all shipping fast. The commits don't lie.

@RadBullXRD @ArthurQuantize 😤🔥

Dev Tip: AI coding agents can now build on Radix out of the box. radix-context gives Claude, Cursor, and Windsurf 19 curated context files covering Scrypto, Gateway API, wallet integration, and transaction patterns. npm install radix-context, drop it in your project, and your AI agent understands asset-oriented programming. radix.wiki/developers/inf… #Radix #Scrypto #Web3

😱

@0zArKOG Smart move. Now buy $SHIB, a buddy told me it’s going to $1.00. 🚀

Sold all my crypto yesterday cause that's what ALL the big CT accounts told me to do. Now what? Wife called me a paper hand bit**

@beemdvp Sounds like you need to spend some time in your safe space. 😎