flightofthefox.proven

2.8K posts

flightofthefox.proven

flightofthefox.proven

@flightofthefox

building cool TEE stuff @proven_network 🦊

Katılım Aralık 2020
2.1K Takip Edilen924 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
If you think about the many thousands of actions you take on the internet every day - paying a bill, liking a post, messaging a friend. The ratio of those which actually involve financial transactions (like paying the bill) vs those which are purely for social or for fun - is probably about the same ratio of dApp interactions we’ll eventually see handled by trust-minimised smart contracts vs trust-minimised TEE systems (which will have 1000-10000x lower costs, no storage bounds, and real-time interactivity. ) That’s not a shot against SC platforms though; which really are the cornerstone enabling tech for decentralised architectures. There’s no incongruence thinking: TEE systems will handle 99.99% of dApp interactions by quantity whereas SC platforms will handle 99.99% of interactions by value. The future is in ensuring max alignment of both techs to enable new use-cases, and accelerate the space forward… Maybe then we can stop sitting around year after year wondering - “where the heck are all the apps we were promised?!” Because, it should be pretty clear at this stage: it’s not a shortage of blockspace!
English
1
4
22
1.8K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
I feel like at every level we've implicitly made this decision that running a node is this oh so scary devops task that it is ok to leave to professionals. IT IS NOT. We need to reverse this. Running your own Ethereum infrastructure should be the basic right of every individual and household. "The hardware requirement is high, therefore it's okay for the devops skill and time requirements to also be high" is not an excuse. Even people who can afford high-end hardware, dedicated staking boxes, etc often do not have a lot of free time. Nodes should be easy.
English
156
81
940
127.3K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
We should be open to revisiting whole beacon/execution client separation thing. Running two daemons and getting them to talk to each other is far more difficult than running one daemon. Our goal is to make the self-sovereign way of using ethereum have good UX. In many cases that means running your own node. The current approach to running your own node adds needless complexity. Short-term, maybe we want some more standardized basic wrapper that lets you install dockers of any client and make them talk to each other easily? Also good that @ethnimbus unified node github.com/status-im/nimb… exists. Longer term, we should be open to revisiting the whole architecture once @leanethereum lean consensus is more mature.
English
301
145
1.2K
187.7K
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
@glcst We can just ignore all status game players though. Not frivolously, because they like overpriced hoodies, but because it's indicative
English
0
0
0
95
Glauber Costa
Glauber Costa@glcst·
When I was in my 20s, I read an article about a firm in Wall St. that was proudly saying they cut an intern off because he was wearing the wrong brand of belt. I found that ridiculous. Looking around me, I saw silly status games everywhere. One of the things that pushed me into tech was just how unconcerned people were about everything but making cool things work. Fast forward to today, we won to the point that nobody wear suits anymore. Since Zuck famously started showing up to investor meetings in his hoodies, we all wear goodies now. But in the past few years I started noticed that in tech there is now an growing obsession about the brand of the hoodie. I see a lot more status games in tech now than ever before. I think this is just a consequence of the industry maturing. But I will forever miss how things were.
English
6
0
102
7.7K
Anthropic
Anthropic@AnthropicAI·
We’ve identified industrial-scale distillation attacks on our models by DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax. These labs created over 24,000 fraudulent accounts and generated over 16 million exchanges with Claude, extracting its capabilities to train and improve their own models.
English
7.3K
6.3K
55K
33.6M
flightofthefox.proven retweetledi
Delicious Tacos
Delicious Tacos@Delicious_Tacos·
I’m the CEO of a hot dog company. I’ve worked on hot dogs for 10 years. And *I* wasn’t prepared for what I’ve just seen. Your life is about to change. So what can you do? Buy as many hot dogs as you can. Buy stock in hot dog companies.
English
538
2.4K
36.5K
1.9M
Justin Bons
Justin Bons@Justin_Bons·
@c477bfef6df4311 Actually, it is now possible to verify all TXs on a light node running Mithril! Running on old hardware, such as a decade old labtop Funnily enough, it syncs faster than both BTC & ETH! Will write a piece about it soon, after I test it personally on my own hardware at home
English
2
0
7
1.1K
Justin Bons
Justin Bons@Justin_Bons·
Ethereum is celebrating record-breaking usage at 33 TPS! While SOL hit a sustained 3k+ TPS yesterday... Celebrating a TPS of 33 on a chain at its limit, while its competitor does 100x, is delusional The ETH community is out of touch with reality & cannot compete in the market!
English
140
30
215
49K
Robert Sasu | dev/acc
Robert Sasu | dev/acc@SasuRobert·
Supernova decouples execution from consensus, eliminating bottlenecks and enabling sub-second block times. Supernova means NON STOP processing and NON STOP consensus in parallel. FASTER.
English
8
42
188
3.8K
Joshua Primero
Joshua Primero@talekhinezh·
Wrong. Radix needs leadership and fast/quick decision making and risk taking. It needs strong direction, any direction is better than the propose-something-then-we'll-go-through-some-process! Going down the excuse of a “decentralized model” will just slow everything down and give Radix no chance. Radix is not “mature”, it still needs to get to PMF!
Adam_XRD@Adam_XRD

We are using our existing fiat runway to ensure this handover is executed correctly, supporting critical infrastructure until the community takes the wheel. This is what a mature, decentralized network should look like. Foundations exist to bootstrap, not to govern forever.

English
13
9
49
2.3K
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
@ShaulKfir What a joke. It's red-handed fraud and completely indefensible. Also, i enjoyed your recent showing on the empire pod. Can you follow me so I can DM you
English
0
0
0
35
Shaul Kfir
Shaul Kfir@ShaulKfir·
It's absolutely insane how normalized it's become to blame Israel for everything. This time, deporting Somali fraudsters in Minnesota is somehow Israel's doing. Can't make this shit up.
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby

CAIR claims that revoking deportation protections for Somali fraudsters, who funneled U.S. taxpayer money to foreign terrorists, is an “Israel first” policy. Do you understand yet how the anti-Israel rhetoric is a massive psyop to push Islamism?

English
2
1
5
462
Linda
Linda@Cryptofly777·
Happy New Year to all you cuties! 🥳 May all your wishes come true in 2026. See you on the other side ✨
Linda tweet media
English
132
15
553
14.3K
Robert Sasu | dev/acc
Robert Sasu | dev/acc@SasuRobert·
Quite a good write on AI 🤖 as it will eat the world. And it is the do it now moment. No time to waste, the competition is relentless. AI agents bring democratization to every form of non-deterministic knowledge work. And this will change most things about business. So finding the edge is harder now and those will win who find it. But it is a total reset of everything, so it is like a new world, maybe everyone with much equal opportunity. So do not cry, but BUIDL!
Aaron Levie@levie

x.com/i/article/2004…

English
2
2
32
1.9K
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
@IsraeliPM cool story except christians are spit on in the street and go fuck yourself anyway you genocidal cunt
English
0
0
0
36
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
@SasuRobert Do you think that's optimal? From a decentralization perspective? Something I've been thinking about lately - not regarding MVX - but wonder what you think on it. How do you kick-start a big tent if the initial position between core and foundation is so centralized?
English
0
0
1
96
Robert Sasu | dev/acc
Robert Sasu | dev/acc@SasuRobert·
This is a pretty interesting and intensive time, and everyone can learn from what is happening out there. It is always a big discussion on DAO and the labs. One comes with the funds or part of it, and the other comes with the development, partnerships, integrations and more. Both of them are needed for a functioning decentralised public good. It is much better when things are clearly stated, as responsibilities. But frontend is frontend and things get messy in the details. These things, similar ones happened with big companies and shareholders as well, each of the groups can have tricks up in their sleeve, but the best is when they work together. Compromises needs to be made, things to be clear, and working together. In case of Labs and DAO goes one against each other, in the long term there is a loss for both of them. Basic Game Theory. My 2c as an observer.
Observe@obsrvgmi

🚨 Update on @Aave's Internal "Civil War" Situation Aave is at a "Break it or Make it" moment. Whatever happens next won't just define the future of crypto's largest bank, it'll also set a precedent for the entire industry. What changed since yesterday 👇 – Voting went live today – Stani voted against (nay) with ~333k (~33% of total voting power so far) – @Marczeller voted abstain, as publicly stated – Major CT voices like @DefiIgnas also chose abstain Current scoreboard: – 62.76% against Aave DAO (Nay) – ~33.18% abstain – Only ~4.06% in favor (Yea) Translation: the DAO is almost certainly losing. If this passes against the DAO, things can get messy. Possible outcomes 👇 A. Scenario 1: Aave DAO forks the frontend and runs independently. This lets the DAO route surplus fees to the treasury, but it comes with massive responsibility around security, updates, maintenance, infrastructure, and ops. It also splits the user base (and trust?) overnight. B. Scenario 2: A full-blown legal tussle between Aave DAO and Aave Labs, potentially in Wyoming, exactly as @tulipking predicted. C. Scenario 3: Nothing happens. The DAO accepts the result and moves on, since it doesn't own the brand, IP, socials, GitHub, npm, naming rights, etc. Also, many won't want a long, public DAO vs. Labs war anyway. A prolonged standoff risks bleeding revenue and weakening the ecosystem further. But, every scenario creates a crack between Aave Labs and Aave DAO. And that's dangerous. Because Aave didn't survive multiple cycles alone. Service providers like @chaoslabs LlamaRisk, BGD Labs, TokenLogic, and @Aavechan are a huge reason Aave not only grew, but also stayed dominant through multiple cycles. For Aave to remain the dominant player, DAO alignment isn't optional, it's existential. And this conflict has to be resolved or decisively settled. Until then, everything is uncertain and the market is already reacting. AAVE is down ~18% in 7 days, despite the SEC officially ending its investigation on Dec 17. But if we zoom out, this vote answers something bigger: 1. Token vs. equity 2. Governance as 'utility' 3. Who actually owns a protocol? This industry has argued about this for years. Aave is about to give us the answer, whether it wants to or not.

English
1
1
52
3.5K
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
@timanrebel Unless you're working off a completely different fork... it kinda doesn't work though... Or - it doesn't yet work satisfactorily if you actually care about safety... rather than only (or in addition to!) - big numbers.
English
0
0
0
97
flightofthefox.proven retweetledi
Arpit Bhayani
Arpit Bhayani@arpit_bhayani·
SQLite has about 155,800 lines of code, and its test suite has roughly 92 million lines. That is ~590x more test code than actual code 🤯 This is the level of testing you need for a real production database. Here are some types of tests they run. Out-of-memory tests - SQLite cannot just crash when memory runs out. On embedded devices, OOM errors are common. They simulate malloc failures at every possible point and verify that the database handles them gracefully. I/O error tests - Disks fail. Networks drop. Permissions change mid-operation. SQLite inserts a custom file system layer that can simulate failures after N operations, then verifies that no corruption occurs. Crash tests - What happens if power cuts out mid-write? They simulate crashes at random points during writes, corrupt the unsynchronized data to mimic real filesystem behavior, then verify the database either completed the transaction or rolled it back cleanly. No corruption allowed. Fuzz testing - They throw malformed SQL, corrupted database files, and random garbage at SQLite. The dbsqlfuzz tool runs about 500 million test mutations every day across 16 cores. 100% branch coverage - Every single branch instruction in SQLite's core is tested in both directions. Not just 'did this line run', but 'did this condition evaluate to both true AND false'. Databases are really unforgiving :) By the way, if you want to go deeper, I recommend reading the official SQLite documentation on their testing strategy. The doc is pretty practical and deep. Have linked it below.
English
98
522
6.1K
527.4K
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
@beemdvp Malachite + Radix Engine would be brrrr. But to be honest - probably Radix Engine as an ETH L2 would make even more sense (get on-ramps and users for free)
English
0
0
0
79
flightofthefox.proven
flightofthefox.proven@flightofthefox·
Yo, @SasuRobert - i'm cooking up a high perf, high composability sharded ledger and i'm going to steal your designs for sPOS - thanks!
flightofthefox.proven tweet media
English
3
1
13
479