Patrick

1.4K posts

Patrick

Patrick

@Radtadpole

Nah

Scarsdale Katılım Nisan 2022
3 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@JamesCAutumn @dstibbe @BTC_for_Freedom Oh wow, is real estate a hedge against inflation? Are stocks? What about buying a factory that produces product? It's almost like wealth doesn't fucking depreciate, unless your poor little bitch ass thinks money under your mattress is the definition of wealth 😂
English
1
0
0
7
Bitcoin for Freedom
Bitcoin for Freedom@BTC_for_Freedom·
- You: “Is inflation bad?” - Government: “Very bad. We fight it every day.” - You: “So the goal is 0%?” - Government: “No, the goal is 2%.” - You: “So the goal is… inflation?” - Government: “The goal is stable inflation.” - You: “Stable loss of my money?” - Government: “You’re not an economist.”
English
180
581
6.8K
193.6K
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@CultureWarGulag @BTC_for_Freedom My multifamily annual net cash flow income is about 3-5% of the debt that was taken out. annually. That is substantial cash flow. Combined with paying down principal, write offs for repairs/depreciation, appreciation on the market, rents going up every year, it's very nice.
English
1
0
0
4
Spectre
Spectre@CultureWarGulag·
@Radtadpole @BTC_for_Freedom I can tell you don't have any reading comprehension because I already explained it. You're so lazy you have a contractor/real estate company manage your rental properties. And that backfires often when you have shitty tenants. x.com/i/status/20771…
Spectre@CultureWarGulag

@Radtadpole @BTC_for_Freedom Houses do not provide much (if any) passive income, under today's market conditions. You're paying property taxes which have actually increased in many states. Repairs for the house also fall on you. That's not to mention HOA frees, if they apply.

English
1
0
0
14
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@phortuenti No I just have a basic knowledge of economics and how thoroughly debunked LTV has been since about the late 1800s. Marginal utility, combined with subjective value theory, is what everyone with a triple digit IQ, intuitively understands is correct. Fucking take a class
English
1
0
0
6
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@Memerguy511 @StevenTyler8359 @BTC_for_Freedom No it's actual sincere doubt. I've met retards who claim they make 100k a year, and it almost always turns out to be "daddy got me a job" or "my VA disability plus my landscaping job comes out to 100k" So which is it?
English
1
0
0
16
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@CultureWarGulag @BTC_for_Freedom Why because I have to make a call every once in a while to a contractor? I file a schedule E, long term rentals are commonly defined as passive income streams. I can tell you have zero life experience
English
1
0
0
7
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@scottsantens Land lords would just raise rent to match UBI and land tax. Please use your brain.
English
0
0
0
10
Scott Santens
Scott Santens@scottsantens·
I think the best possible new tax to implement alongside universal basic income is a land value tax because it would also solve the landlord problem and make housing more affordable. In the US, this UBI layer should be implemented locally and exist in addition to other layers alongside other taxes. open.substack.com/pub/scottsante…
English
39
31
110
4.3K
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@ZmudaEthan @radicalizedcent @Sparty87654 @BadSocialisms Laborer A works 80 hour a week for 5 years at a big brick yard to amass enough discretionary wages to buy his own small brickyard. Laborer B complains that even though he works 40 hours a week, laborer A has nothing to lose if the brick yard fails. You are a retard.
English
0
0
0
22
Ethan Zmuda
Ethan Zmuda@ZmudaEthan·
@radicalizedcent @Sparty87654 @BadSocialisms >you agree capitalists reap all the reward, you justify it by them taking "risk" >you agree the "risk" is becoming a laborer, which is risky because labor is more difficult so your justification for them reaping all the rewards is that they don't work as hard. excellent.
English
1
0
5
69
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@420GHz You can't pile up rocks in the middle of the south China sea to try to claim the whole strait on a technicality.
English
0
0
0
3
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@BasicIncomeOrg UBI is fucking stupid. Life has never been better for most people, and the recent crunch is caused by unfettered immigration and asylum grants. Get rid of the immigrants and see prices go down and wages go up.
English
0
0
0
7
Basic Income Earth
Basic Income Earth@BasicIncomeOrg·
A new opinion piece suggests long working hours, financial insecurity, and the pressures of modern life leave many people with little time or energy for creativity, community, or critical thinking. A UBI is necessary for people to live more meaningful liveshttps://zurl.co/3cJlP
Basic Income Earth tweet media
English
3
13
19
618
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@iampedrohgn @mr_james_c @JohnHundeslit It very much is. Inequality doesn't lead to unrest, falling below a certain standard of living leads to unrest. You guys need to stop talking about this it makes you look dumb and entitled.
English
0
0
0
0
John Hundeslit
John Hundeslit@JohnHundeslit·
God, his whole argument really is just vibes, isn't it? Absolutely no attempt to seriously engage with the counterarguments put to him here at all. Stevenson wants a wealth tax because 'inequality', and that's as deep as his analysis seems to go.
BBC Newsnight@BBCNewsnight

"Why aren't you persuaded by the fact that they've been reversed in some jurisdictions?" Economist and campaigner Gary Stevenson, host of Gary's Economics on Youtube, is challenged on whether wealth taxes work in practice. #Newsnight

English
20
10
181
10.6K
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@NoodleHouseAlex @JohnHundeslit @pgboyce You have wealth and I have an equal amount of wealth. I build/create something, whether that's build a brickyard, a house, a factory, etc. and you do nothing. Did our wealth inequality increase? Did that mean I stole something from you?
English
0
0
0
0
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@EAA_Insight @1990Cuppers @JohnHundeslit @pgboyce You have wealth and I have an equal amount of wealth. I build/create something, whether that's build a brickyard, a house, a factory, etc. and you do nothing. Did our wealth inequality increase? Did that mean I stole something from you?
English
0
0
0
2
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@1990Cuppers @JohnHundeslit @pgboyce You have wealth and I have an equal amount of wealth. I build/create something, whether that's build a brickyard, a house, a factory, etc. and you do nothing. Did our wealth inequality increase? Did that mean I stole something from you?
English
0
0
0
1
Cuppers_199
Cuppers_199@1990Cuppers·
@JohnHundeslit @pgboyce No I am asking you - you disagree that inequality is increasing right? So cost of living, the fact ordinary families are increasingly in poverty in the UK... you dont think thats happening?
English
2
0
1
25
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@JohnHundeslit @pgboyce If you create nothing, and I create something, does our wealth inequality increase? Does that mean I took your wealth?
English
0
0
0
1
John Hundeslit
John Hundeslit@JohnHundeslit·
@pgboyce All of them? What about the one that says inequality is up, which is arguably his most core of core claims?
English
5
0
1
203
Patrick
Patrick@Radtadpole·
@haugejostein "Let's bankrupt our citizens and essentially make them slaves for economic improvement while we, the bourgeois, and our children, enjoy every western luxury from education to medicine" -High ranking CCP party members.
English
0
0
0
7
Jostein Hauge
Jostein Hauge@haugejostein·
I don't think people are saying: "hey, just do like China, become a socialist market economy and everything will work." There are, of course, limits to replicating the Chinese model. Ultimately, all economic models are unique and historically contingent. But China still offers useful lessons as an economic model. Other countries *should* look to China when thinking about how to raise investment rates in productive sectors, how to attract foreign capital without ceding control over strategic industries, which sectors to privatise versus keep in state hands, etc.
Policy Tensor@policytensor

Before people copy random things the Chinese have done, they need to sit back and think more carefully. China did a lot of things. Some of them were important to their success; others hurt; others still are such that they may have worked there but won’t work in your country. All the clever folks in DC selling you simple stories — “socialist market economy” and whatnot — do not understand the challenges faced by situated modernizers the world over. In particular, they are ignorant of the social rigidities of your anthropology. Development is hard work bc you are pushing against the grain of your society which mobilizes to defend itself with its plentiful ‘weapons of the weak’. You need to break some eggs. Killing your landlords may just do it — or not. It depends! Killing your landlords is not going to make Ali to show up on time. Anyone who thinks there is a simple formula is a moron. Had there been one, most countries would’ve made it by following the formula. It does not work like this. Some things we know for sure. Others we don’t. Investment in human capital is a no-brainer. So are fair and impartial rules-based governance. Tariff protection and industrial policy come with a substantial risk of rent-seeking, corruption and incompetence. Anticorruption drives rarely work; removing the fat of the land does. Incentive structures matter a great deal, etc. Beyond this, very little can be said. And what is being peddled are idea balloons, not a solution to your developmental challenge.

English
26
35
177
9.7K